Subaru Impreza WRX

1145146148150151224

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Pay attention to all car ads - 9 out of 10 would qualify as completely irresponsible.

    GM touts quadrasteer and has this guy doing a dangerous parking manuever that could kill the cows around him. Animal cruelty?

    Nissan has Frontier ads where it's tossing mud every where. Tread lightly? Hello? Not to mention it's hilarious to see that live rear axle bouncing around uncontrollably.

    The RSX ad is almost a carbon copy of the WRX.

    What about Nissan's ads where the Maxima runs near the speed of light to keep up with the sun and even shed its paint? And Altimas spin out and do a 180 on a public road?

    IMO the Subaru ad doesn't stand out nearly as much as most other ads. It's pretty tame in comparison.

    -juice
  • sonya4sonya4 Member Posts: 92
    ...which wasn't clear from juice's post (#7328) unless I missed something.

    bamawrx--Like your new ad concept. We could all work on it together!

    juice--If you're 34 and considering yourself a "geezer," what the heck am I at 44?

    Whatever, I don't think I was responsible enough to drive something like the WRX when I was in my 20s. You get a whole different perspective as you age. And I enjoy it even more now that I'm older. :)

    --sonya4
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I won't touch that question! ;-)

    When I wanted something fast, all I could afford was fuel efficient cars. Now that I can afford something fast, I want a practical and fuel efficient car.

    -juice
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    "Whatever, I don't think I was responsible enough to drive something like the WRX when I was in my 20s. You get a whole different perspective as you age. And I enjoy it even more now that I'm older. :)"

    sonya4-
    Boys will be boys no matter how old. I don't think we ever grow wiser as we age. We just accumulate "battle" scars enough to remind us to not go there. ;-)

    -Dave [geezing @ 43]
  • sonya4sonya4 Member Posts: 92
    Just curious...I never had fog lights on my other cars, and I thought drivers were supposed to use them only when there's actual fog. But I've seen many others use them on clear nights. Is this for show? Or is it to make other drivers more aware of you?

    So when do you all use fog lights?

    --sonya4
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Sonya

    Yes, you are only supposed to use them when weather conditions dictate.

    The only other reason people use them is because they think it looks cool.

    I think I used them three times total in 11 months.
  • merrycynicmerrycynic Member Posts: 340
    I'm 44 years old and own a silver Subaru Impreza WRX Sport Wagon.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    I'm trailing not too far behind.
    43 and soon to be behind the wheel of my silver WRX Sport Wagon too. :)

    -Dave [patiently waiting]
  • ppekppek Member Posts: 58
    I have also wondered about when you are "supposed" to use fog lights. I use mine most nights because I like how they fill in the space immediately in front of the car (I know I should be looking further ahead when I drive, but I still like the extra light in front). However, I sometimes get brighted by oncoming cars (possibly because my fogs are on?).

    We only have heavy fog a few times a year, and I don't find any value in the fog lights in actual fog, because the main headlights remain on, causing glare. I would think real fog lights would allow you to have only them on and the main headlights off.

    Just my $.02

    Paul
  • jmgregory5jmgregory5 Member Posts: 48
    Driving back from Chicago a couple of nights ago, it was raining - although there was no fog - the fog lights definitely helped light my way. They did something else as well.

    Several people had this strange need to race me as I passed them in the fast lane. One Chrysler, with some young punk driving, decided to move back into the passing lane in front of me and proceed to slow down, of course delaying my forward progress. Repeated flashes and left turn signal signs did not get him to move over. I decided to fall back in traffic where I then turned off my fogs and began to slowly move back up the line. I am sure he didn't realize it was me coming again this time as he moved over to let me pass. I could only shake my head in wonder.

    I am all of 35 years old myself and I agree that I enjoy my wrx wagon more now than I would have in my 20's. Having three kids gives you a new perspective on life and how beating the guy next to you at a stop light is not the most important thing you can do (although it still is fun giving a bmw a view of my taillights now and then).
    John
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
    Are Priceless!

    They do help a lot in the fog, mostly for seeing the edge of the road, (low, wide, beam).
    Often, we can't drive around with our high beams on because of oncoming traffic. So fog lights light up the sides of the road better without blinding the oncoming drivers. Note: Fog lights go out when you turn on your high beams.

    In this part of the country, there are nearly as many deer as there are humans, and when they are on the move, they don't look both ways before crossing the road. There are litterally hundreds of deer hit each year around here. Most the time, it's just the deer that is killed, but sometimes the results are worse. But there is generally always a lot of damage to the vehicle that struck it. Not counting, big trucks. They just need to get washed.

    You can't drive 10 miles around here and not see a deer carcass laying on the road, or a huge blood stain splattered all over. And that's even considering, most of the carcasses are picked up and butchered.

    Foglights have saved my butt many times. You see, fog lights, light up the sides of the road just enough, that usually you can see the deers' eyes first, (they are excellent reflectors) before he jumps out in front of you. It gives you just a little more time to react. They also help you see other animals and people thay may be walking or riding bicycles along the edge of the road at night. (this happens a LOT around here).

    I ALWAYS have my fog lights on at night, and it's not because they look cool.

    The idea behind fog lights is, they are supposed to cast a beam of light under the fog to allow you to see the road better, they are not (and they can't) designed to allow light to penetrate the fog to make it go away. Fog, naturally, reflects light, which is why you can't see past it.

    Fog lights are GREAT!

    Happy driving,

    Ken
  • nschulman3nschulman3 Member Posts: 125
    For those of you interested in giving oyur wrx a little more power without spending a lot of money, check out vishnu's latest. I was about to get stage 0, which brings the rex to about 275 hp for $1100 plus install. I looked on their website last night and saw they have introduced stage subzero. It adds a 321 uppipe kit, ngk spark plugs, and a underdrive power pulley. It supposedly brings the car up to 260 hp and costs only $635, plus installation and $109 for the wiring harness. $750 plus about $400 for install seems like a great deal for 30 plus hp.
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    I agree with your logic: if fog lights are for fog, they should be able to be used with the headlights off and be hooked to the parking lights. But, outside of having a need for them because of deer in the road, I've had it explained to me (not sure if this is true), that mfgrs are required to tie them to the headlamps because of liability. 1) kids were driving without headlights to look cool 2) on-coming traffic can see headlamps, even through fog, long before they can see fog lights 3) most states (all?) have a requirement that light extend a certain distance in front of the car (no, I don't know how far) for the safety of pedestrians.

    Long-winded, I know, but I'd still like to have them hooked to the parking lights.

    JW
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Not for others to see you. Fog lights help you see the road better when there is fog, not neccessarily let others see you better in the fog.

    Ken brought up a really good point.

    I have used fog lights occasion when there are a great deal of cars on the road at night, so that I am seen better. Sort of like with the third brake-light above the trunk, 4 lights tend to get noticed much more easily than 2. I tend to notice I get cut-off less at night with the fog lights on. Of course, once the road clears a little, I turn my fog lights off.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I use my fogs whenever I need extra illumination. That could be rainy nights, driving in rual areas without much road lighting and of course, real fog.

    What I wish Subaru would offer in the US are rear fogs. I'm not a fan of two (looks too much like brake lights), but one single rear fog is very visible in poor weather.

    And finally, as John mentioned, fogs do come in handy when you need to establish a stronger road presence at night. A set of four lights coming up behind one definetly says more than just two.

    Ken
  • lilbluewgn02lilbluewgn02 Member Posts: 1,089
    I use mine in the heavier rain storms we get here in South Florida...the drivers here are pretty bad, and I figure the more visible I am, the safer...I also use them in areas without street lighting instead of hi-beams..the extra ligth down low helps quite a bit.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    OEM fogs are worthless except as eye-candy!

    Now if you want some REAL fogs you need to look at Cibie, Hella, IPF in the aftermarket to get some actual usable fogs/driving lights.

    -mike
  • nine51nine51 Member Posts: 77
    I use my fogs in rain, fog, and snow. Seems like the reflective white line along the edge of the road wears out in late fall just when you need it, and the fogs help light up what is left, helping me to see the edged of the road better. If the fogs are good quality and aimed properly, they shouldn't cause oncoming drivers any problem. The real problem with fogs is the poor quality lights that produce more glare than beam, or the ones that are aimed at the moon :)

    I also like rear fogs. They really help the drivers behind you see where you are in heavy snow and rain. I don't like being rear-ended :(

    I made my own rear fogs. I tucked 2 red LED clearance lights under the rear bumper next to the license plate. They are brighter than the tail lights. I switch them on when it's snowing hard to give me a little better visibility from the rear.
  • inlin4wrxinlin4wrx Member Posts: 1
    Hi I am New to this site so Hi everyone. I am hoping to buy a WRX but I think I will wait until the Evo hits U.S. shores early next year to benefit from the price game that will be played. Anyway I know its a long time to wait but I wanted one all summer so a few more months wont kill me ... Or will it???
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Maybe you should change your name to inlin4wrxsti-or-EVO

    By the time the EVO comes out, the WRX Sti should be announced also. Then the real decisions begin.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    The less WRX owners, the cheaper insurance rates are. ;-)

    -Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Actually he shouldn't use in-line at all, it's a boxer. ;-)

    Now's a good time to buy, I don't think you'll gain much by waiting. I've seen WRXs for as little as $22.1k new.

    Try fitzmall.com. Sure enough, they have one in stock for that price. And that includes freight by the way.

    -juice
  • qualityguyqualityguy Member Posts: 101
    Anybody heard anything particular re. stronger clutch/tranny/differential coming for WRX from Subaru?
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    I think he meant "In line for a WRX"
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I know, I was just teasing. ;-)

    I heard that the 2003 has a valve on its clutch that limits the clamping force, so that even with a clutch drop or speed shifting it won't fry the trans.

    I also heard the 2004 would get an entirely new design, more robust.

    -juice
  • qualityguyqualityguy Member Posts: 101
    Hopefully coming STI isn't the styling inspiration & they don't change the appearance of 04 like it - I'll be obviously one of the few who like the "bug eyes".
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    some comments made by Paul Hansen. He's driven both the new WRX and STi over in Japan at Fuji Speedway. He was saying the new WRX powerband is now from 2000 - 5500 rpm, whereas the outgoing WRX's power was from 3000 - 6500 rpm.

    He said there really wasn't a whole lot of difference between the new WRX and the new STi, until you get above 5500 rpm. The WRX sort of gives up at that point, were as the STi continues to build power. In either case, it sounds like both models should have excellent power characteristics for "daily driving" (unlike the S2000).

    Bob
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    For Automatics, that is a godsend - the 2000 rpm start of power band

    For Manuals, there will be less of a turbo lag, but you will have less of an RPM range to work with. Also, MPG will probably suffer with the lower level power band (more use of the turbo when cruising.).
  • vonbondsvonbonds Member Posts: 12
    I saw someone before mentioned the Vishnu subzero upgrade to the engine. Has anyone here done any mods like this for your WRX? A lot of these sites say it won't affect your warranty but is that true out there in real life?

    I find that subzero upgrade pretty interesting. Figure 1K installed for 30-50 more HP. Seems like a neat add-on if it doesn't affect the reliability of the car or cause it to die an untimely death!

    What are your opinions of upgrades like the Vishnu subzero?
  • wannawrxwannawrx Member Posts: 22
    There is a early 2002 wrx wagon with skid plates, mirror, stereo, security, and an Turbo XS MBC with 5K miles and asking $20k for it. Dont know the condition but he says it is in great shape. Should I opt for the MY03 or go with the 02? any suggestions are helpful.
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    depends what you're looking for. There are new ones available at a couple hundred over invoice, if you aren't 100% sold on those exact options.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    2003s go for $22.1k. 10% drop in a year is only worth it if you want those mods. Usually cars lose 15-20% of their value the first year.

    Definitely sounds like the new engine is tuned for better power with an automatic. But I'd prefer it even with a manual, 'cause you'll use the 2000-4000rpm range even in casual driving.

    -juice
  • merrycynicmerrycynic Member Posts: 340
    I would welcome this change. I drive a stick WRX wagon. Currently with the AC on full low rpm's are a drag. I only hope that Subaru rewards all the station wagon buyers that kept Subaru going all these years and offers a STi Sport Wagon. A front dif on all WRX's would be way cool!
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    It all depends on your dealer. Some dealers even sell mods.
    They can't void your entire warranty if you do something to a certain part. But if that part causes any problems, or they suspect it does, you would have to replace the stock parts.

    Vishnu is highly respected for reliability and service. Shiv, the owner, really stresses tuning and testing (i.e. - not just throwing on 300 hp and not worrying about it :) ).

    Back to the warranty issue. If you do any mods and your car starts running funny, you should contact the vendor to sort it out. Some dealers will at least look into the problem and charge you accordingly, some won't even look at the car if it's been modified.

    -Dennis
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    This also bodes well, if this "new" 2.0 engine goes in the Forester turbo next year.

    Bob
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    In 2003s?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Prolly 2004. Aren't the 2003s already for sale here?

    -juice
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    I've decided to get rid of both of the Soobs. The wifes 99 Forester has 42k on it and the 02 WRX is just shy of 21k. It's a tough decission with winter coming but if we get a reasonable price for the 2 cars and get a couple of used low mileage Yugo's, we can invest the rest in the revitalized stock market and .... NAH .......

    How's everybody doing ? Haven't been around for some time.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    D'oh!

    You almost had me, I was starting to get the chills!

    I was gonna ask you to check out a '99 Miata for me in Joppa, but lost interest when I found out the mileage was really high. How are things? You get any show yet? We might on Friday.

    -juice
  • wrxsoon1wrxsoon1 Member Posts: 158
    Juice,
    I think you're right on that. 2003's are already for sale.

    I recall reading somewhere that the MYO4 should arrive as early as March. I sure hope so, and with more options too (like a winter package).

    -Ian
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Heated seats? :-)

    -juice
  • djasonwdjasonw Member Posts: 624
    I just read a review on the new Neon (with the turbo 2.4 liter engine). Great price for the equipment (19.9k). 0-60 in 5.4 seconds. Is this going to be a formidable oponent to the WRX? Great performance for a BARGAIN price!!
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    The new Neon SRT4 is spitting out some incredible numbers. There is no doubt that WRX's should watch their backs if they think that their WRX is unbeatable.

    However, I bought the WRX not just because it can run fast in a straight line, but because of the total package. Subaru Impreza's are known to be very solid dependable cars, with racing heritage and an AWD, all of which makes it a unique car in the market. The Neon is still a FWD car which automatically compromises its driving feel. FWD cars inherently have limitations that are beyond the numbers and specs. My brother owned a Neon and the quality of that thing was pitiful. The new ones aren't that much better.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    The two reviews differed drastically on the Neon. Road and Track loved it (go figure)

    Car and Driver said it was fast and handled well, but seemed crude, stiff riding, loud, very rough around the edges with gobs of turbo lag and some torque steer. They made it sound like a boosted and stiffened Neon (go figure!).

    - One final thing, because of being FWD with no LSDs, it is easy to spin the wheels when putting the pedal down and turning.
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    Juice - glad you enjoyed my gag. Are you in need of Mazda parts or did you want the car?

    If the late 60's early 70's didn't teach us anything else, simply putting a bunch of HP in a car doesn't create anything but 0-60 #'s. The "N" may have potential but the couple I've been in were tinny & noisy and sure didn't handle well.
    - Hutch
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    I hadn't considered the racial implications of my previous message. For anyone offended ..... that sure wasn't my intention.
    - Hutch
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    road and track thought the interior was nicer than the wrx, whatever that's worth to you. I think we'll see some seriously high horsepower srt4's out there in a short amount of time, since the tuners will have the extra .4 L of displacement to work with. They should get more wheelspin, too, so they might not have the tranny problems at the drag strip.

    I wouldn't buy it, but I'm glad it's out there as a competitor :)
  • djasonwdjasonw Member Posts: 624
    I think it was Automobile. I had picked up one of the rags at the airport last weekend and read it on the plane. Regardless, its still a Neon and I'd take a Subie ANY day over it. I have to agree that you must look at the entire package. Even though I traded my WRX Wagon for the Audi allroad, I still LOVED my little rex and I miss it terribly. I am just a spoiled guy and missed the luxury touches I gave up when I got the Subaru.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    The great thing about the Neon is it's numbers. That's why I fell for one in 1994. Fun car at a great price. The bad thing about the Neon is, it's a Chrysler product.
    I traded the Neon for an Outback Sport in 1997. The Dodge service depts. were lousy and so was the car. Automobile magazine even regretted naming it as car of the year a few years later.

    -Dennis
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'm actually looking for a used one ~$700 to use for auto-x. Mostly cause in a racing situation you are gonna break parts. Neon parts are CHEAP and plentiful. I wouldn't use it on the track or on the street though.

    -mike
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.