By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I made the trip averaging 75mph with the cruse on and the car never struggled going over the mountain passes. I only remember one instance when the car downshifted to maintain its speed, while maintaining 31mpg.
The P5 tends to breath quite well at the higher speeds, so I don't think keeping up with the maniacs shouldn't be much of a problem.
On the other hand, if racing around is your bag...
As a guideline, if the engine seems somewhat responsive in 5th (in its power range), downshifting to 4th should be more than enough. If on the other hand, you get no response from 5th, because your RPMs too low, downshifting to 3rd will put the engine back into its proper power range.
Automatics will even shift from 4th to 2nd, if the RPMs are too low when the accelerator is stomped on!
unclebud: You'll have an interesting choice and the info I can offer is both good and bad. First, the Pro5 has pretty much the same engine as that 4 cylinder automatic 626. Having said that, I've spent quite a bit of time driving both a 4 cylinder automatic 626 (not really as bad as you make it out, just not at all sporty) and an automatic Pro5. The P5 is a whole lot faster with that same engine simply because it's a much smaller and lighter car. I've had the opportunity to drive the P5 through heavy rush hour traffic (in Chicago as well as through El Paso, Oklahoma City) and it performs pretty well depending on the speed of traffic. If traffic is moving about 50-65 you'll have tons of power to spare and the car is great for zipping and zooming between cars. If traffic is going 75-80 (and you still need to pass people for whatever reason) you'll have the power to do it but you may have to downshift (or turn off overdrive). The revs are pretty high in top gear and I found mine to stay around 3500-4000RPMs at 80mph. That leaves you with not a whole lot of headroom to speed up though someone on this board claimed to top out his ES 2.0 sedan at 119 so I guess you CAN go faster. I had no trouble maintaining speed up hills through New Mexico, especially with cruise on but it DOES feel like the car is straining because it'll downshift and you're going 80 at 5000+rpms. Still the cruise is ruthless and will maintain speed no matter what, even with the a/c on. Keep in mind this was also with two full sized adults and about 1000 pounds of stuff in the hatch, back seat, and in a soft carrier on the roof. Generally power is good but not overwhelming. I'd recommend a stick if you're really concerned about high speed driving in traffic though you should be able to get by with an automatic. Getting to 80 is not real hard, accelerating to pass from 80 is a bit tougher.
Also just for kicks today I made a left turn from a stoplight behind a pretty nice Camaro and we both punched it. I wasn't even close
They say that the car "feels quicker then its 17.2-second, 81-mph quarter-mile suggests."
More quotes...
"... the Protegé5 pilot was enjoying the full potential of his mount and grinning ear to ear."
"The helm points the 5's standard 16-inch wheels and V-rated Dunlop SP Sport rubber with Germanic accuracy."
"To the scintillating driving dynamics, add supportive seats ..."
Not bad.
1200 miles on mine and it's really humming. The engine is starting to sound sweeter as it breaks in and my mileage is pretty close to the EPA estimates. I easily fit all my camping gear in teh back this weekend, dog too.
I haven't had one single time where I have felt a real lack of power, and it handles like a dream. Since I don't street race, I guess the lackluster 0-60 and 1/4 mile times won't bother me too much. :-)
zoom zoom!
(All quotes from Frank Markus, Car & Driver Magazine, 10/01 issue, page 145)[/i]
"I personally load/unload my trunk. I am super careful doing so and don't trust anybody else to! Maybe it's just anal, but it's my car.
Me too, me too, but accidents happen, even to the most anal of people. I'd rather take a small precaution now, then be kicking myself later when my hand slips or something.
Nevertheless, I change the oil in both my 2000 PRO-ES's EVERY 3,5000 miles! I use four quarts of Castrol engine oil, replace the oil filter with a Mazda OME replacement filter. Drew, by investing a little time and a modest amount of money, you can help your PRO-5 outlive the Mazda Factory Warranty.
I believe clean oil, every 3,500 miles prevents sediment and old contaminated oil from turning into engine sludge build-up. I guess engine oil works fine lubricating automobile engines up to 7,500 miles or so. However, I don't want that old black contaminated engine oil in either of my Pro-ES's.
Respectfully,
Larry
Well I went for a second test drive and well,
I think I am going to buy that car.
When accelerating from a stop, I have found
that if I am not so heavy on the gas, the motor
doesn't make such a loud "Vrooom" noise when
upshifting.
The car I would like is Auto, with ABS,
moonroof and side airbags. The sticker
price is $19115. The Edmunds price is $18621.
I am going to bring in all my info from the
internet and I am hoping they will be fair
and sell it to me for $18621.
My allergies are really bad, so I do not
for see opening the moonroof very much. Is the
Moonroof Deflector really worth getting?
Does it reduce the fuel economy any?
Someone else asked about the auto dimming
mirror. It is mentioned in the P5 brouche,
None of the sales people know anything about
it. I would love to get one in
my car. Is it hard for some car mechanic
to install it after market?
Thanks,
Alana
Did anyone get an extended warranty with
their P5? Is it worth it?
Thanks,
Alana
That's a lot MORE money in the future if you get an oil change there. Just my .02 cents.
Also what is the average MPG (city and highway) that you guy and girls get out of your Protege5.
I knew the PR5 is not a V8 but after reading that it only goes 0-60mph in 9.5 i was, very and really disappointed. Doesn't the sedan go much faster? What about the MP3?
If you insist on being a sheep for OPEC, and changing your oil every 3000 miles, then at least do it yourself or have a good independent garage do it.
You're not doing your Pro any favors by bringing it to Jiffy Lube.
The manual for my Pro5 lists oil changes at 7500 miles. I'll go with 5000 just to be safe because I drive my car pretty hard.
3000 mile oil change intervals is a waste of money and resources... this has been proven time and time again with scientific research. It is pure OPEC-bunk in modern cars.
-Finn
Silver Protege5, 4500 mi
Peace of mind, and $1,100 seamed reasonable.
Bruno
I have always had my '99 ES sedan's oil changed at the dealership. It's a bit more expensive ($25), but they have it done in less than 30 minutes (or the next one is free) plus they wash the car. This also gaurantees that Mazda oil filters are being used, and everything is being installed by a mechanic that has been certified and trained by the factory for that specific car.
I generally change my oil every 3,000-3,500 miles. I don't consider myself a sheep for OPEC. I drive my car hard. I generally shift between 5,000rpm and redline for acceleration, and about 4,000rpm around town. I do about 85% city driving and 15% highway driving. I feel much better changing it sooner than 5,000 miles. If you don't drive it hard, 5,000 miles is certainly ok. Just look at it this way... a $20 oil change is the cheapest and most worthwhile maintenance you can do to keep your car running trouble-free.
BTW, in terms of highway power, the Protege has lots of it. I am the one who has taken my '99 ES sedan to the 119mph speed limiter. I find acceleration on the highway is quickest in 5th gear between 70mph and 90mph. This may not be true for the 2.0L engine, which I find isn't nearly as rev-happy as the 1.8L.
+ Left oil cap off resulting in HUGE mess (luckily it was on a beater)
+ Reinstall belly pan improperly with only 2 of the 8 screws so pan drags and catches after a big bump. (dangerous)
I had a friend who's car was rolled out without oil! Can you imagine? Yikes!
Also, they never seemed to have the correct oil filter, and would want to either substitute "an equivilent size" or say... "We'll just leave the old one on there." Um... no thank you.
I do it myself in the warm months or go to my trusted independent mechanic in the cold months. If you've had good luck then that's great, but I sure haven't.
"Think about it...do you want high-school drop-out's performing vital maintenance on your brand-new car?", in some cases yes I do. Some of those high school dropouts did so because they worked on their car too much, and they know and care about cars.
On the idea of how often, I'm not convinced that it needs to be done any more than every 5000 miles. I had a crx that I changed every 7500 miles. I drove it hard for 125,000 miles then sold it to a contractor who drove it 125,000 more. Not one bit of trouble. Yeah, it's not that expensive, but over the life of the car the time and money does add up, and I'm not willing to pay it.
Zoom, zoom,
Bruno
BTW Jerry, sorry to hear about your unfortunate ticket. Two years ago, on the way back to Houston from Big Bend SP, I get caught at 97mph with the Civic EX. So far, my P5 still has a clean file.
0-60mph times... From what I have read since the 3rd Gen Protege ('99+) has been introduced, here are the acceleration numbers:
'01 MP3 sedan: 8.2 seconds (2.0L 5-spd)
'99 ES sedan: 8.4 seconds (1.8L 5-spd)
'02 P5 5-door: 9.3 seconds (2.0L 5-spd)
I imagine the 2.0L sedans will hit 60mph in the high 8's (8.8, 8.9 seconds).
For the wind deflector, I don't know exactly what is the effect on the mileage (I have mine installed with the car), but my guess is it will not hurt, since when the noise go down, that means there is less wind turbulence, i.e., more efficient penetration in the air.
Bruno
I am surprised, I guess, that an mp3 is a full second faster than the pr5.
I was looking to buy a mustang gt, gotta love that v8, but since i put about 500-600 miles a week on car, mostly highway on i-95, i didn't think the ford would hold up for the next 5-6 years. And it was a good 6 grand more. I am very happy with my yellow auto pr5 and i am glad i didn't get something like a civic.
The car turns heads everywhere, including local hotspots in ft.lauderdale and miami and even from drivers in boca raton, fl where all you see really is benzes, bmw, caddillac, lincolns, and acuras. More power however would never get in the way, i.e. is useful.. Maybe I should go pock around an mp3 and see what its made out of. My zoom car can sure use some of those tweaks. BTW, the best mpg in my auto is about 26 so far. This is mostly at highway speeds although i do spend at least 20 minutes idling in traffic everyday. I keep 90% of my shifts under 3500, and very rarely go over 4500-5000 range. Is this good? Should it be better, or will it improve? And sorry if this rant is too long.
ZOOM ZOOM
Black P5, Auto, 5400 fantastic miles.
zoom-zoom
Anyway...
I don't know all what goes into making a car faster or slower than another. I'm not a serious "car guy" or "gearhead" (oops, are those sexist/gearist slurs?).
Will somebody try to look beyond my obvious lack of grasp of acceptable speech and tell me how it is possible that a Honda Civic LX Sedan is nearly a full second quicker zero to 60 than a Pro5?
Civic LX Sedan
2465 lbs
115 hp @ 6100 rpm
110 lb/ft @ 4500
Pro5
2716 lbs
130 hp @ 6000 rpm
135 lb/ft @ 4000
I really don't think a couple hundred pounds difference can explain a 0.9 difference in zero to 60. And the gearing seems to favor the Pro5 as well. What am I missing? Is it the roof rack? ;-)
twist (unless that screen name offends somebody)
The Pro5 is about a second slower to 60 then my Passat was... frankly, I don't feel the difference.
In my opinion, the ratings are highly inflated. There are several postings on the Honda news groups with people questioning the horsepower ratings of the different Honda vehicles... among other things.
As much as I loved my CRX and enjoyed driving the 96 Civic LX from time-to-time, the 2001 seamed like a real piece of work.
In a lot of ways, my Pro5 reminds me of my old, beloved '93 Civic Hatchback. Just at 12/10th scale. It's got that same light, zippy feeling.
I fully appreciate your perception of the Civic...I think you have a lot of company in your view. Of course, Honda also makes lawnmower engines. Maybe one got switched accidentally? ;-)
But C & D cooking the books? idonthinkso
And a Mazda fan should be particularly careful about casting that type of stone. See, e.g., Miata hp error http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/roadtests/spin/45557/article.html (which Mazda did an admirable job of fessing up to and making amends for - I hope they teach Ford how to handle that kind of thing).
twist
I wouldn't put it passed any one selling any product to inflate their claims (including Mazda).
As far as I'm concerned, there is no C&D controversy.
Remember that C&D felt that the modest 255lb. weight gain of the Pro5 over the ES 1.8 previously tested was accountable for the .9 sec. increase in 0-60. So just a few hundred pounds can make a big difference.
The wind-drag coefficient of the P5 is 0.32, similar to that of the sedan I think. I'm also a little bit disappointed by the measured numbers. I don't feel the car is that slow. To put in persperctive, I drove the 97 Civic ES for 4 years, and test drove the 2001 Civic not long time ago.
I have 2 graphic plots of speed/distance vs time of an P5 in full acceleration, jpeg format. I don't know if there is any way to post it here.
Bruno
But of course I have no idea what magazine I saw that in.
Pro_fan
note - if you attempt to contact me via email - I will not be providing responses until the beginning of Oct.
The site:
www.astolfo.com/p5
Cheers,
Dave
Will anybody make them? That would be a great colectors item as well as centerpiece
zoom-zoom and boom-boom
The second-annual Mid-Atlantic Protege Picnic (MAPP II) will be held on Saturday, October 6, 2001, at a park about 25 miles south of Washington, D.C. We have reserved a large picnic shelter for the entire day. We're going to bring our Proteges, pictures, car-care stuff to show off, and generally have a great day meeting our fellow Town Hall members and talking about our No. 1 love -- our cars!
For the sake of security, we're not publicizing the exact location of MAPP II here. If you're truly interested in coming, drop me an e-mail (mdaffron@the-rma.org) and I'll e-mail you all the details. Attendees will be expected to bring something (food, beverage, etc.) and contribute toward the shelter rental (no more than $10 per person -- of course, much less than that if we get a good crowd).
Last year's MAPP was limited to Protege sedans because the P5s weren't out yet. We'd LOVE to see some P5s at this year's event! It's also really fun seeing others at the park gawk at all the Proteges lined up side-by-side; makes a good pic too! Check out last year's pics at:
http://www.geocities.com/negatize/mapp.htm
(Edmunds can be finicky about geocities links. If you can't link to the page by clicking on the text above, just cut and paste the link into your browser's address window.)
MAPP II = 23 DAYS! We hope to see you there!
Meade
Meade, thanks for the invitation, but Washington DC is too far for me. I live in Houston. Have fun.
Bruno
Meade
btw-- these hedlights are really great. Bright, with a great pattern adn cutoff. Better even then my Passat which I thought was outstanding.
PF