Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I bought one of the Baldwin filters and after having it on my '90 Integra for a while, I hacked it apart and was impressed with its build quality ... comparable to a WIX. I think Baldwin got their name making filters and parts for trucks and other heavy-duty applications but it's been a while since I've heard or seen anything about them.
--- Bror Jace
Toyota will only void the warranty for sludge if they believe is was caused by neglect/lack of maintenance.
Spend the couple extra bucks to have your service done by Toyota and your potential problems are solved! As soon as you start doing your own maintenance and/or involving outside comapnies (i.e. Jiffy Lube, local mechanic, etc.) you're opening the door for the "finger pointing" to begin.
If Toyota has been the exclusive maintenance source, then all of your documentation is in one spot and you're good-to-go!
Common thread between all the sludge stories heard here (and elsewhere), maintenance has been done by owner or outside company.
My free advice, and worth every penny!
Scott
The card (part number M/N 00404-02000-CARD), "About the Maintenance of Your Toyota," reminds the new vehicle owner that "Regular maintenance -- including replacement and replenishment of vehicle fluids -- is essential to obtaining the highest level of performance, safety and reliabiity from your Toyota." The card cites the 5000-mile severe-service interval and the normal 7500-mile interval.
It then warns in bold type, "It is especially important to regularly replace the engine oil and oil filter. Failure to do so can cause oil sludge build-up, which can result in severe damage to your vehicle and require costly repairs that are not covered by the New Vehicle Limited Warranty."
From my experience and the posts I have read; Toyota's stance is sludge only happens from lack of maintenance, it is the owners fault. I know this would be an up hill battle because lack of maintnenance is the primary cause of sludge. Even here in this forum, it has been said many times by many different people. So, Toyota and many other people take it that, if you have sludge, you did not maintain your car.
Legally, I wonder whether they have been questioned in a court of law if they have elected to void a warranty and refuse to pay for repairs in a vehicle that was found to have sludge IF the owner can verify oil changes at the proper intervals with receipts (from someone other than the dealer).
Do I remember once hearing that the only way Toyota can legally do this is if they offered free lifetime oil changes and the owner elected to bring the vehicle elsewhere?
FYI-I know someone who recently purchased a new Sienna and the dealer threw in free oil changes. An added perk or an ounce of prevention?????.
Why not Buick, Honda, Ford and all of the other makes?
Guess we'll never know the real facts?
Please reply.
QS is okay.
I've never seen light color engine sludge. The goo I've seen has always been almost black.
Also, just because the oil on the dipstick or the oil that is drained comes out clean isn't necessarily a sign that all is well. It could mean the detergents/dispersants in your oil that are supposed to be removing sludge/varnish from inside the motor and holding it in suspension are not doing their job.
--- Bror Jace
1. All receipts in one spot
2. Dealer knows entire history of car
3. One party is responsible if something goes wrong.
Will you spend more? Maybe a little...
The place I go has a quick lube built into the Toyota dealer. My work is always done in under 25 minutes and I am fairly confident that it's been done correctly and I know it's been done with genuine Toyota parts.
It's not just Toyota, I take my Suburban to the Chevy dealer for the same reasons.
If something ever would go wrong, there is no "middle-man" or outside company that they can point their finger at and claim that it's their fault.
Of course, if you actually *do* the scheduled maintenance I don't think you'll have much to worry about.
Scott
Suppose you get the oil changed in accordance with the "NORMAL" maintenance schedule and you get sludge and the dealer has never recommended to you that you do otherwise, do you still think they will cover sludge under warranty???? Or, will they still claim a lack of maintenance?
Sorry, I just don't trust dealers on this one!
If you don't change your oil often enough you get a tar like (looks like tar put is softer and not sticky) black residue that coats all of the parts under the valve cover(s). I bought a used vehicle that fit in this category. I looked under the valve cover and everything was coated with a dark black sludge. This vehicle may not have had its oil changed in 42,000 miles according to my mechanic.
The other type of sludge is a cream color, and has the consistency of yogurt. This is caused by condensation. A co worker has a Durango that had this problem. He only had 5,000 miles on his vehicle - so it could hardly have been abused by inadequate oil changes. The oil filler tube on this vehicle is in front of the engine-away from the engine, and is plastic. This keeps it from getting very warm - as a result it had a thick coat of this cream colored sludge. This was recalled by Dodge to get better circulation of warm gasses to prevent the condensation - thus preventing the sludge.
Do the Toyotas have the cream colored sludge? If so, this is not from abusive lack of oil changes - although more frequent changes may help prevent it. This is from the engine not getting hot enough to burn off any condensation. Toyota makes a very efficient and powerful engine that turns at a relatively low rpm (due to 4 speed auto and taller gearing). This engine may need more time to get to operating temp than engines of the past. I had an old rabbit that would turn water to steam if it touched the valve cover. On my newer (1990) Integra I can touch the valve cover even when the engine is warm (it is hot, but touchable).
So in a way Toyota may be causing the sludge with their own excellent engineering. If you make an engine that is very efficient and never has to work very hard it won't get as warm - this problem would be exaggerated in colder climates. If the engine does not get as warm, it will not burn off all of the condensation and hence sludge will form.
Why only Toyota - why not Honda. Maybe Honda engines run slightly hotter, maybe they warm up faster (I do think Hondas are geared slightly shorter - and rev a little higher at the same speeds - that may help them warm up faster). Maybe a part of the Honda design keeps the valve area warmer (less area under valve cover to heat up - less surface area of valve cover to help it lose heat etc.) Or maybe Honda owners do have the problem, but don't know it. 4 Cyl Hondas use rigid valves that may hold up to sludging better than the hydraulic valves Toyota uses.
Is the sludge thickest in the corners of the valve cover, and near the filler cap? These would be the coolest areas under the valve cover.
What kind of climate do the people with sludge live in? I am in SD and I can let my car idle for 20 minutes in the morning and the temp gauge is still pegged on Cold. I don't have a problem because I use Synthetic Oil, and I try to get the engine warm every chance I get.
If you live in Detroit or Chicago VS Miami or Los Angeles. I would say your chances of getting the cream colored sludge are much higher. Worst case would be a very cold climate combined with very short trips (1-2 miles or less).
No they can't void your waranty, but they can certainly make it tedious for you get them to support it.
By having the work done at the dealership, you rob them of that out. "What do you mean improper oil changes are what caused the sludge. YOU did the oil change!"
Myself, I don't trust the dealers either so I do all my own maintenance regardless.
An old timer mechanic, who was one of the very best HATED parrafin based oils like Pennzoil and QS. His favorite at the time was Havoline. Even though this was a Mobil station, he used nothing but Havoline in his own cars.
Now...this was a long time ago, and these issues may no longer apply.
Still, to this day, I won't use either of these oils in my lawnmower.
I remember using a putty knife to scrape three inches of gunk out of an oil pan once.
The elderly lady insisted on Pennzoil!
It has been correctly noted that the PCV valve should be cleaned or replaced to assure crankcase ventilation. If the PCV valve is dirty, it's also important to check cleanliness of the PCV tubing fittings to assure flow from the crankcase to the intake manifold. Further, the line which allows the make-up air to flow into the crankcase also must be checked. On most cars this line takes filtered air from upstream of the throttle valve and feeds it into the valve cover.
Note that a short section of the air line which supplies the crankcase is heated by contact with a hot-water bypass on some (perhaps all) Hondas. I presume this small "line-heater" is to prevent condensation and freezing of any moisture during cold moist weather. Indeed, if moisture froze and plugged this line, the crankcase would have no ventilation and the problem would be difficult to detect because the ice would likely melt by the time an inspection could be made. I have worked very little on Toyotas; is it possible that the crankcase air feed line could be freezing on some of them?
Off subject but this is for Armtdm:
IDIOT SIGHTING #5: When my husband and I arrived at an automobile dealership to pick up our car, we were told the keys had been locked in it. We went to the service department and found a mechanic working feverishly to unlock the driver's side door. As I watched from the passenger side, I instinctively tried the door handle and discovered that it was unlocked. "Hey," I announced to the technician, "It's open!" To which he replied, "I
know - I already got that side."
I'm embarrassed to say I have not taken action on the "shudder" problem. Since the condition is not too bad, I have delayed. Your suggestions regarding the TCC engagement point and the probable need for a new PROM in the ECM make excellent sense and will guide me when I do take action. Thanks again.
- What's a short trip? I go 4.5 miles stop & go in 15-20 minutes each morning commute. By the time I arrive the temp gauge moved well off "C."
- Should I idle a couple of minutes or so when below freezing to be sure?
- Play it totally safe and drive my other car on the morning commute (that seems extreme)
- I'm resolved to changing my oil at the Toyota dealer every 3000 miles. Doesn't appear synthetic oil helps.
Okay, at next trip to dealer for your oil change specifically state to the rep that you are concerned with sludge. Ask him that if sludge develops and you have your oil changed there every 3,000 miles will the warranty cover it? Get it in writing or write it out and have the manager sign it!
Also, always have a Toyota dealer do the service; if you have to do it on the road, seek out a Toyota dealer as well.
Keep all receipts, even though the dealer will have a copy.
I also have a post on this board describing my sludge experience dated approximately 2/21/01.
Here is the post from the other board:
********** ************* ************** ************** ************* ************* *************
Synthetic Oil in a Camry
I pulled this from elsewhere. I am sure the nay sayers will find fault. It is a good thing the oil company did not.
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 09:41:03 GMT From: Mike V Newsgroups: alt.autos.toyota
Subject: Synthetic oil warning for Camry 4-cyl engine (long)
The long-time users of synthetic oils (i.e., myself) are going to be surprised; the I-told-you-so crowd will want to do just that
-- Please try to stay on topic!
The story:
We have a 99 Camry in which I changed the oil to the Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30 (drain interval is 35k or one year, which
ever comes first) at the first oil change at 3k. It now has 27k miles on it and the engine is destroyed--blew up this past
Tuesday evening, 11/7. The car was due for its annual oil change when this occurred. I had the car towed home so that I
could inspect it the next day.
What little oil was on the dipstick was extremely thick and there was no firm indication of an oil *level* on the stick. A
visual inspection of the engine & drive train appeared normal--full coolant, oil drain plug in place, etc. The Camry was
towed to an independent mechanic I've used for fourteen years because I wanted him to put the car on the rack to locate the
oil leak I suspected. I also wanted his expertise on record in the event there was conflict with Toyota and/or Amsoil. His
findings were no leaks, but extreme sludge build up in the engine--found by using a bore scope through the oil filler opening.
This mechanic told me that If he had not known me as long as he has (and how I take care of my vehicles) his conclusion
would be that I had not changed the oil, resulting in combustion burn up of the oil. His recommendation is to replace the
entire engine with a new unit.
While waiting for the above inspection results I contacted Amsoil Technical Services and relayed the breakdown to them,
and asked what kind of info they required in the event the oil was suspected as the cause of this failure.
After my mechanics evaluation, my next call was to the service manager at the dealer where I bought the car. I relayed
everything to him, including the fact that I had an independent evaluation. When I described the findings to him, along with
the brand of oil used, he told me that he personally had seen the same problem in a customer's Sienna. The customer went
through the entire arbitration process trying to have his problem covered under warranty. The end result was Amsoil paid for
an engine overhaul (new short block and related components) and ancillary expenses.
The Camry was towed to the dealer for inspection. The valve cover was removed and I saw ~1/2-inch of sludge build up on
the cam/valve train components--something that occurs over a long period of time. According to this service manager, this
particular model of the four-cylinder engine runs very hot to comply with emission standards and the oil in it must be
changed at the Toyota-recommended drain interval, regardless of the type/brand of oil used.
Toyota denies warranty service for this failure and recommends replacing the short block. I have enough mechanical
knowledge to recognize that the oil is at fault in this failure and am not bother by Toyota's decision.
After the above inspections I again contacted Amsoil tech services department. I talked to a different individual, again
explained everything, and asked questions regarding my experience and what could I expect from Amsoil in getting this
situation resolved. According to this individual, this type failure of this engine model is a known problem at Amsoil and they
will stand behind their product warranty (a sigh of relief for me--hopefully not having to fight a corporate giant). He also
added that Amsoil is investigating/evaluating this engine model and is finding the same problem when petroleum-based oil is
used. His recommendation is to replace the engine, not overhaul.
Apparently the design of this engine is extremely hard on oil. The bottom line is: change the oil at the Toyota-recommended
intervals, or more often (preferably with documentation), in the event there are any warranty concerns related to engine oil
failure.
I have been an Amsoil dealer for six years and have used their products in all of our vehicles during that time (92 Camry,
190k; 95 T100, 84k; 88 Ford F150, 88k; 88 Buick LeSabre, 147k; as well as lawn/garden equipment and emergency
generator). I have always followed the Amsoil-recommended drain intervals and have never had an oil related problem.
Any thoughts on this situation?
*********** *************** ************** ************* ********** ****************
So, consider that before you lend any credibility to anything "pulled" from there such as the post above from
"Carl Bevan".
Scott
Thanks for posting
I think anyone who that goes to long, extended oil change intervals (>5k with synthetic) is conducting an experiment, and should get their oil analyzed evry 5k miles. I say this because different engines and drivers are different so you have to determine an appropriate change interval for your conditions.
/end rant.
HiC
There were a couple of recent posts by a Carl Bevan, and several responses to those posts. The responses alluded to relationships to other posts by Charlene Blake--the consumer advocate who got this thing about sludge started. These other posts commented to the effect that C. Blake's and Carl Bevan's posts were being done by the same person.
My question is simply this; Is there any truth to these comments? If this is what's happening, then the quoted story must be considered suspect.
Probably I should just copy & paste all those
"wonderfull" discussion that took place on the old sludge board. Then again, it'll probably add oil to the fire...
Stealth1969 -- How much were you charged for the work on your engine? Was it about $1000? At least the engine was fixable, and really, not too many parts had to be replaced. Again, your sludge was light-colored?
"the end justifies the means!" ... kinda make them similar to other "interesting" individuals don't you think?
If its really necessary, we could just trace all the IP that these poster are logged on. Compare it to the one in the e-mail account being registered in Edmund....and you can get your own conclusion.
No one is completely invisible/anonymous in the internet. Well, maybe if you works for Microsoft
210delray:
I have to agree. The discussion taking place is much more civilized and tend to move toward finding the cause/solution, instead of just direct confrotation in the old topics.
The work cost $991, the dealer reduced the cost by $50. The engine has been running fine since. Yes, the sludge in my engine was light colored and felt like wax.
Pilot13:
I admitted my theory was wrong (the one I believe you previous said was a myth, hey, you were right). I have not brought up any other theories. Could we please stick to sludge and not try to find a conspiricy by every post that it is cblake (you know it could be or just might not be). To get back on topic: what do you think would cause light colored sludge with the consistancy of wax? Thank you.
After my experience with sludge in my '98 Camry (see my post of approximately 2/21/01), I quickly discovered 2 things: 1) In sludge cases, Toyota has an iron policy of not honoring their warranty REGARDLESS OF CIRCUMSTANCES, proven or unproved, and 2) Many internet sites are heavily populated with documented cases nearly identical to mine and to each other. I also noticed that no other manufacturer has suffered this phenomena. This is not to say there have not been scattered sludge cases out there, there have been; it IS to say that 95% of the reported cases appear to be concentrated on two of the Toyota engines, their late model 4 cylinder and V-6s. The other 5% appear to be for all other engines combined.
The prospect of taking a Multi-Billion dollar international conglomerate to court was just to daunting and so I have taken the following steps to try to save my engine.
I have paid $942 to have the valve case and oil sump pan cleaned of the mountains of sludge in my low time engine in which the oil was changed (to no avail). Next, I changed the oil filter and replaced the oil with 5-30 Mobil which is the oil Toyota uses in their shops but with the 'Toyota' name on it (a slightly thinner oil than usual). At the advice of an individual in the shop, I have added 1 quart of 'RISLONE' which I understand to be an oil with a transmission fluid like consistency and a heavy concentrate of detergents. I will repeat this process every 1000 miles for about 3000 miles. I figure that if there is a 40% chance this will work and prevent the ultimate self destruction of my engine (which appears to be working fine right now) , it is worth risking the $942 to save the $5000-$6500 for a new engine.
I will post the results of this experiment here as they become known.
Serious inquiries may be made to carlbevan@zworg.com. Others will be ignored.
Oh, I won't be too sure about that. Here in Edmund alone there're multiple references about sludge in reference to the Dodge Dakota and Dodge Durango. Back before the old threads is frozen, I posted several finding in the usenet of sludge problem with the Jeep Cherooke.
If you feel you been cheated by Toyota on repair work, I would recommend seeking legal ways, either through arbitration of attorney (if you feel you have sufficient evidence), or at the very least report them to BBB. I don't think any1 should get away with anything, no matter how big they are. Its just at this point, I'm not sure that its really a defect of Toyota, or the fault of the owner.
Also, it appears that Ms.Blake has a habit of taking on the auto manufacturer.
So far she has:
1)Fight Chrysler on brakes problem on her Dodge (and spreading it to a class-action lawsuit, which I guess she won (?)
2)Fight Honda for a supposedly (?) faulty ABS system in the Oddysey. (possible class-action lawsuit in the making)
3)Fight Toyota in the current sludge issue (possible class-action lawsuit in the making)
It appears that she always seems to have problems with the minivan that she bought/used (92 Voyager, 95 Oddyseey and now 99 Sienna), and it eventually leads to the possibility of class-action lawsuit.
Insofar as "Many Other Internet Sites With Identical Problems" is concerned, there are indeed a lot of sites out there. I find that just about all of them have multiple posts by our friend C. Blake which comprise most of the subject matter in them. For example--Cartrackers. com-- has a total of 7 different topics on Toyota problems--all of them authored by her. Check out any of the others she suggests, and you'll find that it's no different there either. If nothing else, she must spend a huge amount of time maintaining these sites. I often wonder why?
Regarding the color or consistency of sludge-- the only way to relate this to a cause would be to have an analysis done on the engine oil. To suggest any relationship in this context would be sheer speculation. One would also have to take the kind of service the engine was subject to into consideration too.
And pilot13 is right, the newsgroup does have multiple subjects regarding Toyota's engine sludge, but they're mostly either started by Ms.Blake, or have post from her in it, and begin to appears in later half of 2000.
Just consider this, Toyota sold millions of this vehicles during the period of 1992-2000. Yet so far, the problems has arise in....what? 10-15 owners?. Granted not every1 posted on the internet, but if there're a real defect in the engine, there're got to be more than that.
I personally would like to know how many Toyota owner have contacted her regarding this sludge issue.
If the issue is really with the engine, then Toyota MUST take responsibility, if its due to the owner lack of maintenance, then its the owner fault.
But i guess it would always be easier to blame someone else for one's own problem.
" My engine blew up...it MUST be someone's fault"