Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Pontiac GTO
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I own a 02 bonneville, and sales numbers have been reported in that forum several times. The info always seemed of interest to all the members. I would never think to look somewhere else for this information.
I looked at the Holden site, and noticed they offer the electric sunroof option for the Monaro. There are two options I wished the GTO had for the U.S.: Sunroof and heated seats!!! It gets cold in the midwest and my bonny's heated seats are sure nice.
http://www.webastoshowroom.com/pontiac_gto_710.htm
They have a link where you can find the installers in your area. I'm told $1000-$1200. Don't know what the warranty is, but those who have it say it's a very high-quality unit. I'm interested in one too, but the $$$ isn't there right now and I want to sit in a car that has one (make sure headroom/et. al. isn't compromised much).
--Robert
. "3" is from 1, to 2 to 3....... with a down shift from full throttle to 2 nd gear with tire -chipping wow..."D" IS FOR DRIVING IN THE CITY....FOR ANY DESIRED GAS gas mileage which is a oxymoron with GTO.... have you people noticed this????
SO.... spotlight accleration..............FORGET ABOUT PUT IT in "2"..GOES STRAIGHT TO "2".............therefore have to launch in !st... shift out at 5500 rpm for best times........
what are your experiences...thanks
Wow!
I'm still smiling.
What an awesome, incredible car.
100 felt like 50.
Still shopping around, but hope to purchase within a month.
The test drive convinced me - I must have a GTO!
Gets no respect, though. If the GTO had Toyota badging on it, what would the reviewers say?
It is a REAL GTO whether the critics want to believe it or not. The 1964 was the same thing, a Lemans Rebadged with GTO and more powerfull engine that resembled the other Pontiacs in the line up. Yet knowone criticizes the '64? hmm..
Car and driver said it was one of GM's best interiors/seats, better then the new C6 Vette. You are right, if it was called something else, esp Toyota badging the Critics would be in love with it.
I usually do mostly city-in town driving so I leave my GTO in 3. I only use D if highway, etc.
I am averaging about 13 to 14 mpg in town.
Knew I wanted a GTO from the start but decided I should look at everything in the same price range.
After looking at cars not only in the same price range, but also higher priced ones -I'd have to say - I think you get more car for the money with a GTO.
Nothing else compares, in my opinion.
And if you compare it to the corvette & caddy - well, the GTO gives me the same engine, but at a price I can afford.
http://www.danpalka.com/cateraperformance/images/cateragto.jpg
---
Just thought you all may like a brief history of the Holden Commodore which is not on the Opel Omega/Cadillac Catera, even though many of you have been told that the GTO is based on an Opel Omega chassis. I live in Australia and I know the full history of the adaptation of the Opel
Senator into the Holden Commodore.
Here’s the true story. Opel had a model called ‘Senator’ which Holden decided to base their new car on in the late 70’s to replace their ‘Kingswood’ (and eventually it’s LWB ‘Statesman’) large car range in response to the oil crisis. It also had to replace the smaller Holden Torana. But they had to use Holden’s own designed old cast iron pushrod V8’s and sixes in the new car. But Opel’s Senator was too expensive with independent rear suspension. However Opel had a shorter lighter model
called the ‘Record’ which shared most of the passenger cell with the Senator. So Opel and Holden decided to resurrect an old Opel name and created the 1978 'Commodore’ VB model by using the longer front from the Senator (which could take Holden’s 6-cylinder engine) and the rear doors, quarter panels and suspension of the Record which used a cheap live rear axle. And so the first large Holden to be based on an Opel used the Senator’s frame. You can see how the Holden Commodore uses the front of the Senator and the rear of the Record.
However, Holden did a lot of engineering changes for Australia’s harsh conditions but mainly to use as many parts from the old Kingswood to keeps costs down and limit reengineering for it’s local car parts suppliers here in OZ. Australia is a small market and low costs are critical. And this single fact dictates the entire rest of this story, because Holden and especially it’s suppliers could never afford to use a whole Opel design. They took the basic new Opel design and crammed it as full of carryover tough, rugged and proven components from previous Holden models. And they still do. Holden eventually upgraded it’s first Commodore by adding the rear doors, third rear window and rear quarters from the Senator making the 1984 Holden Commodore VK virtually an Opel Senator body fitted over a modified Holden Kingswood components and drivetrain.
Then in 1987 Opel brought out the new Senator B and Holden followed with the 1988 Commodore VN except that while it looks like the Opel Senator B with different grill and rear lights - only the doors are shared with the Opel’s body. Because Holden couldn’t afford to wind tunnel test and develop a new body on it’s own, it used just the shape of the new Opel. But because it had lost sales to Ford’s much larger ‘Falcon’ for ten years it knew it couldn’t use a shape as narrow as the Opel body. Holden also couldn’t afford to use new Opel frame and suspension, which it would have to reengineer to tougher standards and to suit local parts suppliers anyway. Therefore Holden simply welded sill extensions to its previous ten year old Commodore’s floorpan/frame and mounted over that a copy of the new Opel’s body, which had been widened by a few inches. Only the door skins were shared.
Unfortunately people complained that the old track width of the wheels looked too skinny under the new wider body and so eventually Holden developed a new Holden designed wider tracked suspension which was fitted to later models of that body style. In 1990 Holden also reintroduced the Statesman model name with a stretched LWB version of the VN Commodore. And this LWB VQ Statesman was fitted with a wider and tougher version of Opel’s independent rear suspension, which Holden had developed. This IRS was later offered as an option on some Commodore models in this body style series from 1991 onwards.
Then in 1994 Opel brought out the brand new Omega B that replaced both the Record and Senator models and ended the inline 6 engines for Opel, using a new V6 and I4 engines (It was also sold in the US as the Cadillac Catera). Again Holden decided to save money by using the wind tunnel tested and developed ‘shape’ of the new Opel. But it again had to widen it. This resulted in the new 1997 VT Commodore using a stylized copy of the now 3 year old Opel Omega. But again locally designed suspension and other locally sourced parts had to carry over into the new design. Again, only the doors were to be shared with the Opel, as well as a strengthened and modified copy of it’s independent rear suspension (which had been reengineered into a unique Holden version during the previous body) was used. However, as the body team worked on the style of the new VT Commodore (from which the Monaro/GTO was later engineered), even the rear door skins and glass were reshaped and so only the front doors were common with the Opel Omega B/Cadillac Catera. And of course the Holden Commodore now used the Buick 3.8 pushrod motor (with and without supercharger) and the Chevy Corvette LS1 engines matched to locally designed and sourced drivetrains and brakes etc. This also required a totally unique floorpan and framework than the narrower and lighter Opel/Catera.
To reaffirm that the Commodore and Omega are two different engineering products you can visually see that the Commodore is a much wider and bigger vehicle than the Omega. And look at things like the roof of each car. Note that the Omega’s roof is a single pressing while the Commodore has a three-piece pressing. Given that the passenger cell is a major frame component in a monocoque design - this is a significant difference on it’s own. But also follow the carriage line under the side windows forward to where they intersect the front. Note how this virtually straight line sweeps over the top of the Omega headlights yet intersects the side blinkers on the Commodore. And the bonnet shut lines on the Commodore are more inboard than the Omega’s. This is because the entire shape of the front and even the substructure in the Commodore are different And underneath is even more different. A car needing to carry a heavy 5.7 LS1 has to have a different frame from a vehicle whose heaviest engine is a 3.0 V6.
And that is the story of how and why the Australian Commodore, from which the Monaro/GTO was derived, may have a similar ‘look’ to Opels, from whom the styling was sourced. However, underneath the skin, which they don’t even share, they are completely different animals.
V6?
And it's $34k?
Looks like a fun car & all but I'd take the GTO over that anyday.
*****You know that the skyline is coming here in 08*****
I think i might get that now. THey say it's going to have up to 450 horse power
http://www.freshalloy.com/site/cars/nissan/skyline/r35/concept/home.shtml
That picture is not what it is expose to look like
Try putting it in OD and see how your mileage is. With a 3.46 rear, the LS2 can use 4th just fine, even at slower around-town speeds.
Only 3 minor changes and 2 new colors for 2006 GTO. They are getting rid of Yellow and Midnight Blue and replacing that with Spice Red and Brazen Orange.
p.s. yes saw the new "2006",,,,,,,,how do i get "darkened tailghts"" or should i just put black tint on my 2005....yeah...that will make it a 2006...................boy Pontiac is really making big changes and investments in the GTO.....it is only matter of time before it is "by by american pie"...
hope they don't do to GM WORKERS what they did to AIRLINE COMPANY employees.....pay cuts/health benefit cuts/ and PENSION cuts
soon parts will start falling of planes....hope i don't need service on my PONTIAC....NOBODY WILL AROUND...
http://www.pontiac.com/vehiclelocator/pontiac/locatevehicle.jsp?year=2005&modelId=192&subm- odelId=192&makeId=002&pvc=250&style=base&brand=gto&originatingBrand=gto
Had exactly 4 miles on it.
Pick it up tomorrow - they need to clean it up (the union guy's don't work weekends).
Declined on the clear coat finish (another $700) - would like to hear what others do in terms of maintaining the finish. Mine will be in the garage except on weekends - not going to use it for commuting.
So what's the best wax & other info/tips on keeping it looking good?
www.autopia.org, great bunch of guys.
Dave
Here are some tips:
1) double-check the tire pressure. They get put on the boat with 60 psi in the tires, to keep them from flat-spotting. Most dealers don't do the Pre-Delivery Inspection (PDI) and thus you think the thing rides like a truck. Reduce the tire pressure to 35 psi and you'll be fine.
2) Conversely, check the tire pressure of the spare. I believe it should be 60 psi and is often quite less.
3) There are "spring spacers" in the front suspension. Have them put it up on a hoist and make sure these either bright red/orange, or even black, devices are out of your front struts. #1 and #3 were not done when I picked up my first GTO and I drove it around for a couple of weeks like that - contributed to the problems my first car had which led to it getting exchanged.
4) It's your car, but I wouldn't let the dealership prep boys touch either of my GTOs (would put in some free swirls for you). I do my own detailing, thank you. Seen too many dealer-caused problems to ever let their entry-level detail person touch the finish of my car (won't even let them wash it when I take it in for service). The paint is a little thin/easy to chip on these cars as it is, so why start off with problems?
As for what to use to take care of your paint, I've had great experiences with Zaino products (http://www.zainostore.com). There is a Zaino discussion area on this site, so I won't say too much here. There's another GTO-specific site that I visit frequently and a very large percentage of those folks have either tried Zaino and become addicted, or are already Zaino users. I've been using Zaino for 4+ years on multiple vehicles and am very happy with the results...
--Robert
http://www.jhp.com.au/
http://www.burgdesign.com.au/
As to the '06's, I've seen a Monaro in the orange color and it's quite stunning, IMHO.
I also believe the '06 will have a door lock switch somewhere in the center console, rather than just the lock assemblies on the doors (and on the keyfob)...
--Robert
I should have thought of the whole 'I wouldn't let the dealership prep boys touch either of my GTOs (would put in some free swirls for you).' myself. Especially since they were really pushing the clear coat finish to avoid those dreaded swirls....
I'll follow up on the items you mentioned when I pick it up this afternoon - I really appreciate that valuable feedback and the Zaino recommendation.
I also checked out the autopia website - some good info there. I'm sure I'll be going back often. Thanks for that Dave.
I'm about 9 hours away from being an official GTO owner, i.e. actually having the car in my possession.
Excited?
Oh no, not at all ;~}
As for your questions about maintaining your car's finish, there are several discussions going on right now in the Maintenance & Repair Forum, where you can ask our resident experts for their opinions.
ClaireS
MODERATOR
Need help getting around? claires@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Tell everyone about your buying experience: Write a Dealer Review
I know hammen from the Oldsmobile Aurora board. I'm considering replacing my girl with a GTO. Love everything about the GTO, understated looks, massive power, excellent handling, classy interior... I own an Oldsmobile Aurora so I don't care about resale. Just had a couple questions to ask.
1.) How's the GTO's interior room? I'm a big guy, 6'4" 210lbs. Will I be comfortable?
2.) I know its a 2-door, but is the back seat usable for 2 adults?
3.) I heard that the 4-speed auto was faster then the 6-speed stick, is this true? I wouldn't mind using a stick, but if the 4's faster, why bother?
Any help would be greatly appreaciated!
Thanks
Shawn
1- I am 6'4" 200 lbs. and have no problem getting comfortable. I do have to duck my head getting in/out.
2- I would not want to sit back there. My two kids have no problems though.
3- If I remember correctly, the auto and manual are very close for 05. I highly doubt that any of us could tell a difference.
For what it is worth, I have had my 6-spd since Sept. and love it. Drove it all winter without any problems. One thing is that gas mileage is pretty bad - I have averaged 12.5mpg over 6000 miles. Although all of it is city driving and I drive it fairly hard.
You could have just asked me :-)
1) Interior space is great for both tall people (b4z has a GTO, he's 6'8" and bigger people (there are some folks on another GTO discussion board pushing 350+ pounds). You have to adjust the seat, and duck your head getting in (painful clunk if you don't). Don't forget that the steering wheel not only tilts, but also telescopes! The seats are awesome! Feels like they are holding you snugly.
2) Back seat IS usable for 2 adults. It's a bit of a PITA to get back there (must flip the little lever over to move the seatback forward, then push in the little button and wait for the SSSSSLLLLLLLOOOOOOWWWWW seat motor to casually glide the seat forward. Those crazy Aussies have more time on their hands than us Type-A Americans, I guess). Getting out is a bigger PITA, but do-able. I believe there's more usable back seat room/comfort than any recent Mustang, Camaro/Firebird, 350z, et. al.
3) Yep, the A4 is pretty fast. It's the choice of dragstrip vets due to its consistancy. The stock computer tune on the GTO limits the performance due to "torque management" on the A4. Fortunately, you can use something like a Diablosport Predator to tune it, or take it somewhere to get a dyno tune. Would strongly suggest you drive both cars. I have to go to/through Chicago frequently and the thought of having to shift frequently/have a bigger left calf and thigh due to working the clutch, didn't appeal to me. Lots of folks don't like the long throws and rubbery feel of the stock manual shifter - many like the RipShift from GM Motorsport, so there's no panacea here...
Hope this helps,
--Robert
12,000 GTO's or 200,000 Mustangs.
Congratulations on your new GTO...
It really is an awesome car.
Now I'm gonna become a polishing fanatic but I'm having fun!
I had been looking at every site I could and once I found that locater I was able to track down exactly what car each dealer in No. Ca. had on hand. It also has a clickable window sticker for each car that I thought was a handy tool.
I thought I found a cyclone grey 6-speed which is what I am looking for at Stevens Creek GM so I went there and it wasn't there. So maybe it's in transit. Interestingly, when I pulled up in front in my Quicksilver '04, there was a Quicksilver '04 across the street in front of the Toyota dealer. I think I've seen maybe four other GTOs on the road. What are the chances I'd see one just like mine parked on the other side of the street? Freaked out the saleman too.
I have yet to see a GTO on the road and I have been actively looking for a couple of months. My whole family has been on the lookout and no one has seen anything.
I'm in the Bay Area too.
Got mine at Capitol in San Jose.
They have a silver, 6-speed, 2005 and a red automatic.
Or at least they did on Monday.
Did you check Colma?
They had a cyclone grey - but it may be gone.
--Robert