Are you a current Michigan-based car shopper? A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/2 for details.

Best Hot Hatch - SVT, Civic Si, GTI, RSX, Mini, Beetle...

191012141518

Comments

  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    The author explained it as a linkage issue...now it is true that the Mini Cooper originally had linkage issues as well. There may be some correlation to that....
  • csurams85csurams85 Member Posts: 6
    I know it doesn't count as stock but check out this web site: http://www.ford-v8-focus.com/


    I talked to the owner and you can drop in a factory fresh 302/5.0l 325 hp stock, with this kit for about $10K. Even though it is a highly modified car, it can, by the owners words pull low 13's to high 12's in the 1/4 mile. Wouldn't you love to pull up next to a Mustang, Camaro or even a Vette and smoke them?

  • 8u6hfd8u6hfd Member Posts: 1,391
    why do you see Mazda Protege5 threads in the Hatchback discussions?

    I thought it's a station wagon.....
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,717
    Well, if you ask Mazda, they will tell you it is "5-door". They seemingly refuse to be placed in a "hatch" or "wagon" category.

    I, however, definitely call the Protege5 a wagon (or "sportwagon" if you're really picky).

    OH, by the way, someone back there mentioned the Saab as not being considered a hatchback. Ya know they do make hatchback (3-door) 9-3 Saabs, right? Unfortunately, that is all changing. They've decided that the new design will be available in sedan form only. They feel the availability of the hatchback is killing sales because it makes them seem low-class. (this is according to an article in the recent Car and Driver)

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • automotionalautomotional Member Posts: 14
    If the Protege5 is so named for its 5 doors, then what does that make the Mazda6? Very odd naming convention. The only people who have the numerics down pat are the Germans and Lexus.

    Infiniti discredited themselves when the last Q45 had a 4.2 liter engine. That's called .. cheating.
  • 8u6hfd8u6hfd Member Posts: 1,391
    The hood and sunroof each counts as a door

    But my guess, for the US market, to somewhat differeniate it from the 626, yet still tying into a replacement for the 626...by just leaving out the 26
  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    If you think about it this class of cars now includes cars like the Protoge5 wagon, WRX (4 door/ wagon), the new turbo Protoge (4 door, can't remember the exact name) and all the other one's comming down the pike. That turbo Protoge 4 door looks sweet - it's featured in this month's Sport Compact Car magazine. I'll take a look at the article and post some results - they said things like it has the best factory suspension of any small car they've ever tested. If I remember correctly the slalom speed on it was 72 MPH.
  • revdrluvrevdrluv Member Posts: 417
    I think the WRX Wagon could be included in this group. The Protege5 is a little less targeted at the performance market but it is still sporting enough as well.

    I know performance gets us talking, but one major aspect of the Hot Hatch is real world usability. It is a balance between being fun and practical that makes them special. Sure the RSX may have an edge on the GTI in the performance realm, but can it haul 4 people or large boxes as easily and comfortibly.

    IMO the car that offers the best balance is the WRX wagon. So it may be more of a wagon than a hatch, but it is (just) under 25k, offers blistering performance and can carry a whole lot of stuff. Of course for this comparison the price is very high. If price is a factor I think the car with the best balance is either the Civic Si or the SVT Focus. (I haven't driven the Si yet so I am not sure which I would choose yet)
  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    I consider my GTI a mini minivan - half the time I have the rear seat bottoms removed (really easy) and fold the rear seat back down for a totally flat load floor. With the seat in I have a roomy back seat and a lot of usable space behind the seat - an amazing amount of usable room in a small package.

    WRX wagon is the bomb - lots of power and all wheel drive with a lot of aftermarket tunability in a totally usable package.

    I have to get out and test an SVT and Si just for grins. I've never been up against an RSX but I'd think a stock GTI turbo would give it a good run since the GTI has so much low end torque, same with the VR6 GTI. Of course my 240 HP turbo GTI would blow an RSX's doors right off.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Rickrover - lets be honest. Your car would probably blow away any of these cars, including a WRX wagon (unless the guy in the WRX is really good at starts, and does clutch drops, but that is another story).
  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    The WRX has a huge advantage over my GTI - all wheel drive - I really have to be careful when I launch not to just sit there and roast my tires. From a standing start (10 MPH or so) I'd have an advantage over the WRX. That is until the WRX guy hits the aftermarket, does a little tweaking and blows my doors right off :-)

    Wait until the next level of performance for our cars hits in a couple of years. That's when we'll be talking 300 HP and all wheel drive in our little cars, - can't wait.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,717
    Of course, you may then be competing with a WRX STi. ;)

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Next Gen. V6 GI - 220 or 240 hp? Also the new EVO is supposed to come to America in either 2004 or 2005 according to some magazine called - Car Review (or is it Automobile Review).
  • revdrluvrevdrluv Member Posts: 417
    I have heard from many sources that Alfa Romeo is coming back across the pond. Does anybody know if they will bring the beautiful 147 hatch with them? That car would be great competition for the GTI.
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    The 147 is nice and seems to have gotten good reviews in the Euro press.

    I heard Alfa will be back for 2004. I wonder how they will define success and how much effort they will expend to get back in over here.

    Will they bail in a year or two?

    With whom do they partner to get a bunch of dealers set up quickly? I can't see them being as big a deal as the Mini was/is.
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    I'm looking forward to lots of cars getting exhaust handed to them by the little itty, bitty, tiny, winny MINI COOPER S (mod).
  • revdrluvrevdrluv Member Posts: 417
    I heard they would partner up with caddilac or saab.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,717
    The latest news is that the return was bumped to 2005 (way back when the rumours started, it was supposed to be 2003). The new Spider at that time is supposed to be the debut model. BUT, I wouldn't count on anything with GM subsidiaries floundering as they are (Isuzu and Fiat to name a couple). I think they would be much wiser to bring the more economical and practical 147 here first. Don't know what's going to happen.

    Yes, the rumours also state that they will be sold from Saab or Cadillac showrooms. HOWEVER, if from Saab, I think the 147 is even less likely. Nothing like direct competition for the Saab wagon sitting right across the showroom floor. The Spider on the other hand....

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    GM? FIAT is in trouble, but GM hasn't bought them out yet.

    I don't think the 147 would infringe on SAAB. The 147 competes against the VW Golf. The 156 sportwagon could dent the SAAB wagon sales though. I can't recall seeing a SAAB wagon lately. There might not be a lot of sales to dent.

    The 166 is bigger than the SAABs and would attract a different customer.

    I dunno, I took a real liking to Alfa while I was in Italy, but I cringe thinking about CR will have to say about their reliability.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Alfa Romeo Spyder was a fun car when it was out here back in the 80s, but suffered from all sorts of reliability problems, including rust. Sort of like what happened to Peugeot. The Peugeots in Europe are really nice!
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    Alfa has made some strides in reliability in the last decade. I think they built a new plant or two and have caught up with the other manufacturers.


    I really liked the 156 and might pick up a used one next time I go to Europe. The German TUeV has given the 156 good marks. Of course it has some weaknesses. Autobild, a german weekly, says the 156 has been reliable, with the following caveats:


    The weatherstripping around the doors comes loose

    The undercoating at the lift points is easily abraded.

    The headlights fall out of adjustment for the lowbeams.

    ABS sensors are prone to getting wet and causing the warning light to indicate.

    If 2nd gear gets scratchy, then the tranny is about to fail.

    Brakes are strong but aggressive, sporty driving causes excessive wear.

    Paint problems are not unknown, the top layer can flake.


    The TUeV summary states "From our examinations, the Alfa has more problems with the headlight adjustment than the average. In other areas the 156 shows its best side and is better than average. The test results for CV boots, brakes and rust on the frame and weight bearing components are exemplary. Here we can give the best grade possible: A+" - Rainer Fass, TUeV Rheinland/Berlin-Brandenburg.


    Seems they got the rust thing licked.


    Here's a shot of the 147

    image

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,717
    They own a good portion of them right now (was it 20%?) but have the option of buying more or buying them out or something like that. I can't remember all the details at the moment.

    Anyway, much of this has been talked about over on the Alfa's Return to the US discussion board.

    I guess where we're trying to fit it in here is with that 147 and the possibility of adding another Hot Hatch to this category sometime in the future. But its all speculation and really irrelevant at the moment. (I know, I know, we can dream, right?)

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • ranaldranald Member Posts: 147
    Maybe it's just me, but that 147 is awful. Hideous. That's a fairly generic Euro hatch body with an Alfa nose grafted on, and I've never like Alfa noses. For some reason the grill on that car in particular makes me thing of a skull.

    But hey, these days that design *must* be sexy, just look at all those creases in the sheetmetal.
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    That grill looks like a lot of things but skull is not coming to mind.
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    I had a Fix It Again Tony. I use to have to carry spare distributor caps/rotors as they would get loose and get destroyed inside. Also, first thing in the morning, you have to "hand" dry the inside of the cap off because condensation would prevent it from starting.

    The car was an "electrical" nightmare. Its like someone created it without the tinyest bit of an understanding of electricity.
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    is the name of the shield device seen on all Alfas. It has varied over the years. The one on the 147 is more retro than on some of the other cars. It is supposed to evoke the Giuliettas of the 50's. First time I ever heard it being compared to a skull.

    FIAT has improved its game too. Most European manufacturers seem to have had trouble getting the electronics right. Audi is still having some trouble in the A6, or so I hear.

    FIAT and Alfa underwent a kind of revitalization in the early to mid 90's kind of like Nissan and Mazda are trying to do now.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    The upside down triangle between the bumper looks like the cavety for the nose in a skull.

    The bottom cut-outs of the bumper looks like where the opening for the mouth would good (assuming the bottom jaw-bone is still hinged) with a big tooth in the middle.

    Behind the fascia, it sort of looks like a sexy Golf. The fascia is ugly though.
  • revdrluvrevdrluv Member Posts: 417
    Ugly or not it is definately unique. I personally think it is very attractive, but I can see how it would take some getting used to. It would be a great alternative to a Golf though.


    Speaking of Golfs, this is the special edition GTI we should have got.


    http://www.carbc.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index&req=showcontent&id=15


    This is more of a hyper hatch than a hot hatch. It is really hard to read that article though with no paragraphs... ughhh gave me a headache.

  • ranaldranald Member Posts: 147
    Yup, you pretty much have it right there. It's not entirely just me. :)
  • ranaldranald Member Posts: 147
    The rumors I've heard of increased power and available AWD sound appealing, but personally whenever I look at a Golf or a GTI I think "Rabbit". And I've known people who had Rabbits. Nossir, no way, I just couldn't do it.

    But if VW could demonstrate for a while that it can design electrical systems, and maybe, for the American audience (HINT) revive the Corrado... I might very well be there.
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    Unbelieveable how slow that car is what an engine that big...bot 0-60 and top speed.
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    Nice Hot Hatch...

    I saw two today. They look sweet. Kinda look like a Mini cooper with the scoop higher in the hood and more square in the front.

    I think I may have to test drive...
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    I had a friend that had a Rabbit and he had to gut the engine.....no matter what he did...he could not get it to pass a simple emissions inspection.

    Rabbit, Golf, GTI, even Jetta...the cars all look basically the same....I can't tell the difference until I see the name on the back.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    the difference between hatches like GTI and a sedan like Jetta??? Well, lessee, one has a trunk with a lid, one doesn't...guess which is which?

    :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    can be forced by legal agreement to buy Fiat Auto in 2004 - but of course, seeing the trouble that Fiat is in now financially, the GM lawyers are already working overtime to weasel out of the deal.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • revdrluvrevdrluv Member Posts: 417
    Yeah well lots of cars during the 80's (and early 90's) were an embarrassment. If we didn't buy cars from companies that produced crap in the past our domestic marks would be going down the tube... oh wait, that is whats happening. Well nevermind.

    "Rabbit, Golf, GTI, even Jetta...the cars all look basically the same....I can't tell the difference until I see the name on the back."

    Well the Golf and GTI are the same car and the Jetta is just a golf with a trunk so it makes sense.
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    In europe that car has always been the Golf and has defined a class of car since its introduction. Like the 3series in the sport sedan segment, the Golf has been the benchmark of its class. Where we talk about hot hatches the Europeans talk about the Golf class.

    I'd hate to see FIAT lose its brand identity and become another cog in the faceless GM machine. I hate seeing the same product badged differently in different markets. Opel = Vauxhall = Pontiac/chevy. The Isuzu Rodeo was at one time available as the Rodeo, Honda Passport and Opel Frontera all at once. Bleh.
  • npaladin2000npaladin2000 Member Posts: 593
    "I'd hate to see FIAT lose its brand identity and become another cog in the faceless GM machine. I hate seeing the same product badged differently in different markets. Opel = Vauxhall = Pontiac/chevy. The Isuzu Rodeo was at one time available as the Rodeo, Honda Passport and Opel Frontera all at once. Bleh."

    You forgot Saturn and Saab too. What ever happened to companies making their OWN cars?

    Saab COULD have been a "hot hatch" until GM got their sedan-loving hands on it. If they buy Fiat, watch that body style disappear. VW and BMW will be the only ones making hatches...oh, and Ford (Focus..ugh!)

    I wonder if the BMW 1-series will be considered as a "Hot Hatch?" Hopefully there'll be an M1 version.
  • gotenks243gotenks243 Member Posts: 116
    "Unbelieveable how slow that car is what an engine that big...bot 0-60 and top speed."

    VW's estimates are typically very conservative. They claim the 1.8t GTI has a 7.5 second 0-60, whereas magazines typically pull off 6.8.

    So a "6.4 second" R32 could easily be 5.7 or better in a magazine test. About equal with a WRX in acceleration, I'd bet, only without you having to burn up your clutch (as much) to do that well.

    Mike
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    "Unbelieveable how slow that car is what an engine that big...bot 0-60 and top speed."

    VW's estimates are typically very conservative. They claim the 1.8t GTI has a 7.5 second 0-60, whereas magazines typically pull off 6.8.

    Hmm, I thought normally, you can't get even close to what the manufacturer says...
  • minimike2minimike2 Member Posts: 50
    So a "6.4 second" R32 could easily be 5.7 or better in a magazine test. About equal with a WRX in acceleration, I'd bet, only without you having to burn up your clutch (as much) to do that well.

    Hmm, car and driver has this WRX zipping along with a quite a bit smaller gas hog...

    "The clutch drop breaks the tires loose for only an instant, and then the WRX leaps off the line, scooting to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds and through the quarter in 14.1 seconds at 96 mph — both the best of the bunch. Turbo lag, however, rears its head in the top-gear tests where the Subaru trails from 30 to 50 mph."
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    stand for the $32,000 pricetag?


    Saturn at least looks different. Whatever happened to them beating the imports?


    Saab still has its funkiness, but I question how long it will last.


    GM has a special place on my scorn list. It's not just the whole muddled brand thing, which seems ever more common, it's the models that they have produced over the years. Things like the Fiero and Aztek. Seriously, how can a design team agree on these things? To me GM's product development has always been very short-sighted.


    Speaking of hot hatches, anyone here familiar with the opel Tigra? First time I saw one, I thought it was cool. That was when I thought Opel was a real German company. Then I find out that it was a slick looking version of the Corsa (think Ford Fiesta) but was actually slower. People bought them for the looks and got beat at the light by the ugly econobox.


    Corsa:

    image


    Tigra:

    image

  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    "Nice Hot Hatch...

    I saw two today. They look sweet. Kinda look like a Mini cooper with the scoop higher in the hood and more square in the front.

    I think I may have to test drive... "

    Is the MINI the only car on this forum you've tested???

    You need to get out and test these cars for yourself - even the one's you don't think you'd ever be interested in - I did - they all have their points. It seems like you do your test drives through magazine articles. Forget what other people think - form you own opinion after driving these cars. The WRX is a sweet car - it's performance and personality trancends it's weird styling. The night I tested the WRX I (Audi/Subaru dealer) I tested Audi A4's, all engine choices with/ without Quattro/ CVT/ etc. etc.. I drove everything at the VW dealer including a TDI (diesel) Golf which I was very impressed with by the way. I even hit a Hyundai dealer and came away with a completly different attitude. I've actually sold 2 Hyundai's because I recommended people include them in their search for a compact sedan.

    I'm taking a Civic SI and SVT Focus for a spin in the near future - two cars I have no interest in at all - I won't form an opinion until I drive something for myself.

    Last year when I got my GTI I was on the waiting list for an E46 M3 - after test driving everything on the BMW lot - even stuff I never thought I'd be interested in (M5, 740, 530 wagon) I ended up with an X5 3.0 (my 4th Bimmer), then got the GTI about a month later after a ton of test drives and aftermarket research. I was on the MINI waiting list for over a year and a half when the doors finally opened on the MINI dealer. After a couple of test drives in an S I was just not that impressed - just my opinion. I could have had one of the first S' on the lot, I passed, got my deposit back and got the GTI.

    Try to form your own opinion - the MINI ain't the only game in town. I am so glad I didn't get one or an M3 for that matter. But that's just my opinion, formed by a lot of test drives and research and analyzing what I will use the car for.

    Get out there and test drive everything in this forum - you could end up with something you never thought you'd own and be really happy with it.
  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    Stands for the 3.2 liter 240 HP VR6 under the hood. I think the R is VW's Racing division, kind of like what M is to BMW or S is to Audi.
    When I see that R32 I think Hmmmm:
    240 HP + supercharger ($4k)= 320 HP R32 + $32k + $4k = $36k + other inevitable tweaks = $38k = no way

    That R32 includes every conceivable option as standard equip. including rain sensing wipers, navigation, auto climate control etc, etc. stuff I would not want in my hot hatch
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Maybe in Europe it would sell, but it would never sell here for that price! Not when you can get a loaded 350Z, Mustang SVT, Audi TT, CL Type-S, a new G35 coupe, base 330i.....
  • 8u6hfd8u6hfd Member Posts: 1,391
    VW also tends to underrate their horsepower ratings also. for the 1.8T, to avoid up-staging the VR6, many people have measured (dyno tests) 180 at the wheels.
  • revdrluvrevdrluv Member Posts: 417
    I still think Hyundai should jump on the "rally inspired" bandwagon and create an AWD turbo Accent modeled after their WRC car. Regardless of what you think of Hyundai now this could do wonders for their brand image. And if it was priced just at 20k, sold in small numbers and was a good effort on Hyundai's part we would all be tempted.

    Car companies are so afraid to stick their necks out, but often when the do they are rewarded greatly. (just look a Subaru selling 3 times the number of WRXs than they had anticipated... it only took them how long to get it over here?)
  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    I agree - I can't imagine the R32 selling over here for that kind of money. If VW decontented it by removing the navigation, auto climate etc, etc and brought the price down to $25 - $26k maybe they'd have a shot. I wouldn't be interested on one since the Golf V will be here in about a year. I'll be replacing my GTI in late 2004 which will be excellent timing with everything that's comming out - Lancer Evo VII, BMW 1 Series, Golf V, WRX STI and who know what else. Times are good for us hot hatch enthusiasts :-)
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    This is not to mention the 350Z and possible engine upgrades they might do, and other vehicles.

    BTW, how has the GTI been? Any problems or issues?
  • rickroverrickrover Member Posts: 601
    I've had it almost a year without any issues to speak of. I can't think of anything that's gone wrong with it - no unscheduled visits to the dealer. They fixed a couple of minor things when I took it in for the 5k service but I don't remember what they were - nothing I complained about- I'd have to look at the service order to see what they did outside of the 5k service. I have to get it in for the 10k service in the next couple of weeks. Nothing is wrong with it now - runs perfect and uses no oil, not a drop in the last 5k miles.
This discussion has been closed.