Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Toyota will have to come out with a "fix" first, then in time, independent shops will also be able to correct the problem.
wwest, since all of the functions on the new HL's are computer controlled, installing a cable won't work. The fuel mixture is determined by the angle or amount of pressure put on the accelerator pedal and that info is processed by the PCM. There are also many other factors but it happens to be one of them. Also there is nothing to hook a cable up to.
Interesting fact here. I went to the dealer (again) that I bought my '04 HL from just to drive another '04 to do some comparison. I was given a '05 to drive and the transmission shift points are so much smoother/quicker than my HL and the brake pedal is much firmer. I drove a new '04 and the trans on that is smoother than mine but it still had a "soft" brake pedal.
After test driving, I went to the service desk and explained my findings. They still said that "Toyota doesn't have a fix for the transmission problem." I said "then why is the problem not there in the '05 I drove?" No answer to that.
They asked me if I wanted to schedule another appointment and I said "why?"
Toyota will feel much pressure to do anything.
I don't want to loose this thread. There are too many of us having this problem to let it go and we are getting new members everyday that might not be aware. Hey, maybe this will get it resolved!!!
So file a complaint if you are experiencing the hesitation problem with the '04 Highlander here;
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ivoq/
Click on "secure submissions" and fill out the simple form. When you get towards the end of filling out the form, you'll be asked the component. Click/highlight "POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION." Some have posted under "VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL" so file where you want. There are (11) complaints under PT: Auto Trans and (3) under VSC:Accel Pedal at present posting. As of 10/11/04 that is.
Thanks!
Whether the vast majority are fine or not, that's not the issue. The issue is that these vehicles have a problem and the problem needs to be fixed.
It's pretty sad when the dealer knows there is a problem but can't do anything about it.
Toyota...you listening???
04 lmtd awd...bought 6/04.
Picked up car on Saturday (10/02). Didn't use it till Tuesday 10/05. Upon startup, engine light, ABS light and BRAKE lights came on. Shut off engine, restarted, no change! Checked gas cap, was tight. Drove anyway for a short distance. ABS and BRAKE lights turned off, but engine light remained lit.
Called the dealer who said to bring it in again that afternoon. Got rental car. The next day, they called and said it was the computer or a computer module. Another special order part.
Part came in Thursday. Friday, car not ready. Picked up on Saturday. I noticed on invoice, it was the ECU module and the "Brake actuator assembly" whatever that is...cost was about $1500!! Dealership covered everything despite being 1 month out of warranty.
Honda looking better and better every day!!
I can understand your logic, though. After I had so many problems with my brand-new Accord, I went straight to Toyota.
The grass is always greener...
Point well taken.
I have a 98 Accord V6 that's had a spotless repair record. Nothing but oil changes and tire rotations. I think they didn't change the tranny design till after 98. And the brakes on my Accord lasted till 75K miles!
My family has had been pro-toyota...from a 1968 Corona to a 1983 (trouble prone) Celica. Then we switched to Honda in 1988 till today (Accord, Prelude). NO problems whatsoever.
Definitely a luck of the draw!
I can eliminate some of it by lightly bumping the window control down from the normal tight position.
In the full up position the window pulls the insulation away from the door.
Ask a number of people who had serious transmission and brake problems with their Accords about Honda's "integrity" and you'll get a different impression.
Toyota may drop the ball, but that doesn't mean that Honda doesn't do the same on occasion.
I got fed up with Honda's "integrity" back in the early 1980s due to my experience with owning two Honda vehicles. I agree with the point of view that the grass is always greener.
So file a complaint if you are experiencing the hesitation problem with the '04 Highlander here;
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ivoq/
Click on "secure submissions" and fill out the simple form. When you get towards the end of filling out the form, you'll be asked the component. Click/highlight "POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION." Some have posted under "VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL" so file where you want.
Thanks
The 3rd row seat is a waste. Even my 6 year old son does not want to sit at back. If I realy want the 3rd row seat, I would buy a Pilot.
then back to hardly warm. Unless its broken totally, expect Toyota to say its normal. For a great vehicle like the HL there are many "normal" things like this that take away from the total experience.
arbitration set for next week but don't get my
hopes up after all I'm dealing with a company
who says this is 'the way the vehicle is designed,' and they 'can't remodel cars because of a customer's inconvenience'. No kidding!! It is rather inconvenient to fear driving a car that
could get me hit or killed anytime. I filed the complaint with the DOT and will pursue any means
I must, but if it comes to trading it away and losing lots of money on a 4 month old suv I'll do that. Not worth getting killed over. Anyone considering the Highlander...think twice..you can't always tell what's in the package by the way it looks. Everyone else should file a complaint with Toyota and DOT otherwise they will
continue to market this car without customer knowledge of these problems.
So file a complaint if you are experiencing the hesitation problem with the '04 Highlander here;
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ivoq/
Click on "secure submissions" and fill out the simple form. When you get towards the end of filling out the form, you'll be asked the component. Click/highlight "POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION." Some have posted under "VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL" so file where you want.
Thanks
I am thinking of buying a SUV and have found a used Sequoaia SR5 in the same range as a new highlander. So I am torn between these 2.
How many of you have real problems with acceleration on a HL and how do I verify it during he test drive? Which one is safer (even without side airbags)?
I am planning to keep it for 10 years.
Which one may have the overall lowest maintenance cost over 10 years, considering that I coudl get both at the same price?
Thanks
Regarding all the engine/trams hesitation for newer DBW models...my brother in law is a master tech for a local lexus dealer...Lexus has a new software program for their RX330 (lexus's version of the highlander with the same 3.3 moter/5 spd trans) which addresses the hesitation issue. I check with him on this issue because we are so impressed with our highlander...we are purchasing a 2005 rx 330 with the mark levenson/nav package.
regards.
I havent talked to the dealer and haven't bought a car in over 5 years .. So I wanted to consult all the knowledgeable souls here befre I contact the dealer. Also does Non-toyota dealers offer any kind of warranty or certified programs?
and ask your BIL please what the name/service bulletin number is on the reprograming
thanks
It's difficult to compare the two vehicles, because they're really not in the same class. The HL is a smaller, car-based SUV, while the Sequoia is a large, truck-based SUV.
That said, Consumer Reports rates the 02 Sequoia as "recommended" in terms of reliability. The Sequoia has a few more potential problem areas than the new HL though (according to Consumer Reports).
The IIHS doesn't have crash ratings for an 02 Sequoia. The NHTSA ratings for a front crash are 4 stars driver/5 stars passenger. It wasn't tested for a side crash. The rollover rating is 3 stars. I would check to see if the Sequoia you're looking at has side/side-curtain airbags. If not, I'd go for the new HL. They're just too important.
The NHTSA gives the 05 HL has five stars all around for frontal and side crashes (but no rating for rollover yet). It doesn't say whether that's with or without side airbags, but I would consider them a "must" on a new car.
It's difficult to compare safety ratings between the two, though, since they're in different weight classes.
Unless you have a huge family or do serious off-roading, I would go with the HL. Better fuel economy, fewer potential mechanical problems, better safety ratings, etc. Just test drive it carefully and don't buy one you haven't driven.
My 01 AWD RX300's transmission fluid has a burned look and odor at just 38k miles. This on a vehicle that has no tow hitch but with the tow package (extra transmission fluid cooler in front of right front wheelwell) and no designated fluid/replenish maintainance schedule.
I have sent at least three missives to customer_satisfaction_inquiries@lexus.com and what I get back each time is that I should check with the dealer about why my RX has burned fluid. Apparently something they do not wish to put in writing.
Up until just this week I have been assuming that the designers underestimated the heating contributed by the VC.
But then I keep hearing/reading about these hesitation problems and that got me to thinking on another thread.
I am absolutely sure that my 01's transmission shifts into another gear, or maybe even neutral, during coastdown.
Some have described it as a "slingshot" effect or as if being bumped from behind just before coming to a full stop. I have attributed this effect to a desire to increase fuel economy and/or reduce the instances of loss of control on a slippery surface as the result of engine braking to the front, drive, wheels.
But suppose for a moment that I'm correct and the vehicle is being shifted into neutral in these instances.
My 01 DOES NOT have an e-throttle so the instant I depress the footfeed the engine will react and apply high output......while the transmission is still in neutral or an inappropreately higher gear??
Now THAT would result in premature BURNING of the transmission fluid!
But now with e-throttle the later models might have a firmware fix that delays the onset of engine torque until the transmission can be shifted into the correct gear and allow time for the clutches or bands to be full seated before excessive torque is applied.
Obviously just guessing, but....
Being in the automotive/truck industry for over 25 years, I've learned a little. :-)
At 38K miles, your trans fluid WILL look burnt and have a somewhat burnt smell. That's normal with that many miles. Regardless of a cooler or not, that won't matter. Cooler is just for hauling, mountain driving and extreme conditions.
A discoloration to the fluid is fine, it will function properly... but when the oil has an excessive "burnt" smell, thats a different story.
The odor you sense is the clutch plates and the stronger the odor, the more wear that has occurred on those clutch plates.
In our fleet of vehicles, 300+, we service (by removing the trans pan, draining the fluid and replacing the filter) the trans at every 12K miles. But again, thats a fleet.
On my own vehicles, I change the trans fluid (just the fluid) at every 12K miles. It only takes a few quarts and the drain plug is as easy to get to as the engine oil plug.
Is your driving habits mostly city, stop and go? If thats the case then yes, the fluid will be discolored and burnt smelling. It's just the nature of the beast so to speak. I suggest you have your trans serviced more often.
OK, I'm off the devils advocate thing.
If your trans is going into neutral, that of course is not normal and will result in excessive wear on the trans. Does your RPM gauge reflect this as you step on the accelerator pedal?
Wrote by wwest; "But now with e-throttle the later models might have a firmware fix that delays the onset of engine torque until the transmission can be shifted into the correct gear and allow time for the clutches or bands to be full seated before excessive torque is applied.
Obviously just guessing, but...."
Interesting point, very possible but still isn't right, the vehicle that is.