-September 2024 Special Lease Deals-
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
Break-in period
I am in the process of buying my first new car and would like to know what I need to do (or not to do) during the first few thousand miles of the car's life. Any help would be appreciated.
Tagged:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Limit the maximum rpm to say 2/3 of full rpm. If no tachometer limit speed to some value as specified in manual,
No full throttle for at least 1000 miles - no fast starts.
Change engine speeds frequently- no cruise control.
Totally get off the gas when on the highway (if safe) for a few seconde every now and then (5-10 minutes) This sucks oil into the rings.
Try to avoid long trips for first 1000 miles.
In general-baby the car-it's worth the wait.
no cruise control either
no towing (trucks) first 500 miles
Brand A
- Don't drive at any one speed - fast or slow - for the first 500 miles. Don't make full throttle starts.
- Avoid making hard stops for the first 200 miles or so. During this time your new brake linings aren't broken in yet. Hard stops with new linings can mean premature wear and earlier replacement. Follow this guideline every time you get new brake linings.
- Don't tow a trailer during break-in.
Brand B
- Change your speed often as you drive. Do not drive at one speed for a long time.
- Avoid sudden stops. Begin braking well in advance. Apply the brakes gradually. The break-in period for new brake linings lasts for 100 miles of city driving or 1,000 miles of highway driving.
- Use only the type of engine oil that XXXXX recommends. Do not use oil additives.
Opinions are like belly buttons, everybody has one. However, owners manuals are written after consultation with the engineers who designed your vehicle. Read yours and proceed accordingly.
Later there , alcan
However their are opinons and their are true to life experts with many many years of experience that often have more insight than the average "joe" who does not.
Engineers tend to be a bit arrogant. There are times when the guys "in the trenches" understand the situation better than the generals.
Every day above ground is a wonderful one.
Okay, so if I have a engine blow at 30,000 and the dealer claims that I did nto change the oil as recommended but used synthetic and went 15,000 between changes, in theory, the manufacturer must prove it was the oil that caused the failure not the failure of the owner to change it in accordance with recommended schedule.
Is this where the Forensic Mechanic would come in, we could hire you to inspect the engine and testify in court that it was an engine manufacturing defect and not the oil (or it could be the oil) that caused the failure?????
Is this correct?
Anyway, I'm sure I can hear Mr Shifright clearing his throat.... :-)
You've mistaken my point, clearly those who invest the needed energy and time to develope for r&d purposes know the limitations of the products they develope and test, more particularly those who manufacture race motors or in the racing industry have an intimate knowledge and understanding of tolerances and given limitations of motors.
My point was, one could go by the conservative guidelines yet there is an option that can be employed to prepare the motor to utilize it's full potential. I've just expressed another viewpoint with the intention to apprise, It's too bad you've taken such data as a personal offense followed by a curt remark, far be it from me to step on the sensitivity level of another for being informational
I would strongly recommend that you establish your facts prior to launching unprovoked personal attacks. As you assumed, I am a member of the Faculty of Engineering Technology of an Ontario community college. As to misleading the public re the improper use of a title, if there is any misrepresentation here it would be borne by the Council of Regents of the province's Ministry of Education. It was the Council which, in 1988 (9?) re-designated college faculty from Teaching Master to Professor. The workload profile for professors includes, but is not limited to, developing curriculum, preparing and delivering lessons, and evaluating student performance. Consequently, use of the title Professor is factual, accurate, and justified. Incidentally, there are Instructors in the college system. They deliver prepared curriculum only.
As to credentials, am I a licensed technician? Yes. Did I complete a 4 year mechanical engineering degree program? No. Did the Council of Regents confer the title of Professor? Yes. Do I feel as though I am misleading the public? Absolutely not. Do I feel like wasting any more of my time responding to your inane drivel? Not particularly.
Clearly, you have a personal agenda which you insist in pursuing, for reasons which are of no consequence to me. Please find someone else to annoy with your ill-conceived and assinine witch hunt. This is becoming tedious and wearisome, my good man.
Alcan
Alcan, you are most welcome and appreciated here.
Shiftright the Host
thank you
Shiftright the Host