By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
And to answer a previous comment - yes, buybacks over TIRES...if the suspension and steering systems won't maintain alignment specs, and the owner goes through tires because of it, that's a defect. Since it's public knowledge, you have a significant loss of value, and impairment of use. Those factors meet lemon law statutes in most of the states out there.
This class action suit will be in addition to anyone filing separately. I'll update this topic with new information as I have it.
I wish I was getting a piece of the action...
I can see smoking the tires or driving aggressively in any sporty vehicle, where the tires would wear quickly, but evenly, but this is single-sided alignment wear.
On the 911 I run, I get 9000 miles ... but I earn it, and the wear (as you say) is even.
Driftracer, have you heard as I have that the Nismo suspension (already available to Nissan dealers obviously) cures the issue as discovered by track drivers of the Z?
If that is correct, the failure to repair with an (expensive but) available upgrade is really aggravating.
Good luck.
JW
They had the cure all along, they just didn't use it - I've seen situations like that plenty of times in my line of work with many manufacturers.
Also where are some websites that talk about the success of the upgrade in fixing the problem.
Thanks
It ran about $3000 (parts) when Nismo released the parts (fairly cheap for such an upgrade), but be aware (since you confess to lacking background) that it will lower your car a bit and stiffen the ride to what most people will find pretty uncomfortable in a daily driver.
If you will find that acceptable, then it's probably a decent idea so long as you don't have to go over speed bumps or in/out of parking lots with any regularity. I manage just fine with a similar setup in my Porsche (but my wife hates to ride with me!)
Hope this helps. JW
JW
Dealer looked at it again but couldn't find any evidence of other damage, rechecked alignment which came into specs. His theory is the tires I got with the rims are slightly feathered, but my originals(3000 miles) were more feathered. So he blames the noise on that, however I had no noise until I hit the curb. The only thing that is suspect is the right rear wheel toe came in at -1.1 but the specs say 0.1 - 0.9. This setting is not adjustable, and I don't think it got messed up from the hit since it was the wheel to bear the least of the impact.
Could that cause the droning noise, and does that setting mean the front end of the wheel points out or in?
Sorry for the long post. I would gladly pay 3000 for a suspension upgrade if it fixed the problem, but I am wondering if my problem is accident related or just another case of the tire feathering issue.
Another funny point is the mechanic told me Nissan has fixed the tire feathering issue on the 04's just after he explained to me that my 3000 mile tires on my 04 were feathered.
I wouldn't bother with a dealer at this point -- don't know where you live but I'd ask around, at tuner shops, good independent mechanics, call folk who are active in the local Porsche club, etc. -- and find a really good suspension shop in your area (after all, this damage isn't a warranty issue really and the Nissan dealers have shown themselves incompetent to deal with the car's suspension in any meaningful way).
And yes, .1 or .2 out of spec on the rear camber setting could exagerrate some of the car's problems -- either it got bent in the hit or was out of tolerance in the manufacturing -- you need someone who has a clue to take this seriously.
Since you're interested in suspension remedies, perhaps this person will also have some suggestions for you in this area.
Oh, You may need new tires.
Good luck. JW
Yeah I am sure all the damage took place when I hit the curb. They did look at the car for free and acknowledged the out of tolerance specs on the right rear wheel and brought everything back in beautifully(I got a copy of the read out from the machine).
It handles great(still has a little pull to the right, but it did that before the accident (all part of that compression arm issue nissan knows about). Unfortunately I didn't get around to getting it replaced under warranty before the accident. Amazingly the guy who did the alignment admitted that the compression arm issue isn't a result of the accident, and will see what they can do to get it replaced under warranty.
He seemed very knowledgable and has worked on a pit crew for some racing teams doing the alignment work for them. He said he was absolutely amazed at the condition of the car after hitting the curb. The only thing he could find was the two bent rims and the alignment obviously needing to be readjusted.
I am hoping the droning noise I hear(which shows up even less frequently now after the final adjustment) is only becuase of the feathering on the tires I got with the new rims on ebay. When I get enough money together to buy some winter tires, I will put them on. If I still get the droning noise then I will have to take it to a premium suspension shop and have them look at it.
Last question for you. If everything falls into tolerance beautifully like it did on my car, and there was no damage to control arms is there a possibility that the body itself or the subframes got tweeked from the curb hit even though nothing else got damaged?
Thanks
If this concerns you, again you'll need a highline shop, this time for bodywork (We have one north of Boston people ship cars to from all over the East, as an example) -- they will have the machinery and experience to tell you exactly.
But I think that would be a waste of money, given that there is really nothing wrong that you don't know the cause for ... it's just getting Nissan to fix it.
JW
Total Bill is less than $1400/year. This includes the premium plus package which gets you a new car if it's totaled the first 3 years, has gap protection and most importantly gets you one get out of jail free card. If my car had cost $13,000 to fix like another Z that hit a curb a few weeks before mine, not only would my rate not have gone up, but I would have kept my good driver discount. That was a huge relief to find out.
JW:
Thanks again,
I agree, I think it is pretty unlikely any other damage took place, it must just be the tires that came with the rims. If new tires don't fix the problem I may ask for the contact info for that shop in Boston.
I am seriously considering obtaining the 2005 Z sometime later this year (Ultra Yellow I'm hoping)...But am really curious as to whether the suspension problems have been addressed for once and for all.
It's such a beautiful car it's sad to see its reputation marred by something that does seem to have an obvious fix. I've been salivating over the Z car since its debut in 03 (and really all of the other Z car most of my life)...but don't want to plunk down the cash and get a stomach ache later.
Thanks for any info anyone can share with the msg board.
Apparently the fix is NOT simple or they would have done it. There are mixed reports if even the $3000 NISMO suspension upgrade fixes the problem. My theory is it won't be fixed until they do a body redesign which might not be til 07 or later.
If you don't want to wait for the redesign you need to consider that if you buy the 05 and it still isn't fixed you may have to replace your front tires 1 to 3 times per year at a cost of about $400. So figure an extra $30 to $100/mos for tire replacements. If you love the Z that much that basically adding that to your monthly payment doesn't bother you then go for it.
Most people would have an issue with that, in which case I suggest waiting until the late spring or early summer to see how prevalent the complaints are on the 05's.
I love my z and think it's worth every dime I paid for it. However I haven't had it long enough to have to start replacing tires. So I guess you will have to ask me in a year and see how much I have had to pay to replace the tires to let you know if it's ultimately worth it.
Buy the way I think the Ultra Yellow is hot, I have the Daytona Blue, but that would be my second choice!
i own a silver 2004 350Z with the NISMO exhaust package. Yesterday i was driving down the road when a black volvo S60 R pulled up next to me. The driver started giving me the "wanna race look?" I had a fairly open straight stretch of road in front of me so i floored it. Even though the volvo pressed the accelerator after me he just flew past me like i wasn't even touch the gas, and he went so far ahead of me that i was in shock the entire drive home. Is the volvo really THAT much faster than the Z? Don't the volvo and the Z have roughly the same amount of hp and torque? Just interested in everyone's thoughts. Thanks
to quote ralph earnhardt..."the winner isnt the one with the fastest car...just the one that refuses to lose."
By the way, the Volvo is 300hp/300ft.lbs. with the 6-speed (automatic is MUCH slower and has quite a bit less power in the first 2 gears), but the Volvo's extra weight is why the Z is a close match for it.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
but, yeah, his stick vs. your auto would account for quite a bit.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I drove a Z with a after market sunrook in it...not sure if Nissan will or not. Tho I do find myself looking for the sunroof button now and then. I had one in my Integra.
You wont be disappointed in the Z's cornering. It has great handling. The materials inside are fine. Ive only had mine for a few weeks so I cant say if they are faulty or not. Looks good so far. Overall im happy with the car. If the tires do start to feather, then Nissan should replace them for free as they have been with the 03's and the 04's.
Who told you Nissan is replacing the tires on Z's that experience tire feathering? if you read this board, you will see there are many dealers that will NOT replace the tires.
I hope you have great luck with your Z and maybe Nissan has fixed the tire wear problems.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Your Quote:
"they are aware of the problem and they should in turn replace the tires"
I am afraid to say this is complete WISHFUL thinking. There are high costs involved in replacing worn tires on affected Z's. Dealer's (Nissan) will not willing replace ALL affected tires without a huge fight. If Nissan did have this policy, would they not put it in a TSB of some sort? From reading numerous websites and my Dad's experience with his Z, dealers are NOT replacing tires on all affected cars. I am sure there are some dealers that are providing this service to their customers. But, I would venture to guess, the dealers and Nissan are not willingly doing this.
It sounds as though you may have convinced yourself that if your Z has these problems the dealer will just replace them. I hope your correct, but that has not been the case as far as I know.
On the other hand: The car is a very nice ride.
Enjoy it....your car may NOT be affected....so all of this may be mute.
The issue sounds like the dealer and not Nissan in your father's case. If your father continues to experience problems, I suggest either a different dealer or just call Nissan corporate direct.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
They've been using just Z for quite some time, as far as I know. I could be wrong, though.
As far as timeframe, most folks seem to think 2007 is the updated interior.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I've taken an '03 Z for a test drive and absolutely fell in love with the car. However, I've been reading about this feathering issue (I'm sure it's been beaten into the ground on this board). Here's the situation: if I buy a used Z from a dealership or private owner, is there any way to protect myself? Is it really so bad that I'll have to replace tires every year?
Would it better for me to lease a new 05 or 06 than risk an 03? I'm someone that would drive this car only about 3000-4500 miles a year.
Thanks!
OR, find an '03 at a Nissan dealer and get the extended warranty. At least then, if you find a problem in 2 years (6k miles seems to be the most common number i've seen for noticing tire issues on these), you will be covered.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
The other problem is the excess treble when ANY CD is played. Every recently released disc has to be played with the treble no higher then (minus) 3 or the system is completely overwhelmed on the high end. How ridiculous! And, needless to say, THE POWER OUTPUT IS WAY TO WEAK (YOU CAN'T CRANK IT!!!!).
Finally, I need some recommendations from other owner for aftermarket components for this Bose system. I am trying to find a graphic equalizer and a power amp that can be integrated and also be non-obtrusive (i.e. fit in the empty front compartment that would house the non-existent GPS system). Or in one of the rear glove boxes. I have been unable to find compatible products online so far. Please post your thoughts. Thank you.
first of all, im sure glad you dont live in my neighborhood. i get enough people blasting away at stop lights, driving down the road at 2 in the morning with your "you should be able to shake the entire car and the ones on either side and in front/back of you with the volume and bass at their highest" attitude.
yeah, I guess I'm getting to be an old fart, but anybody else I ever give a ride to holds their ears when the stereo is at a volume I find entirely acceptable, so I know its not just me.
I will say that the Z's Bose system is not as clean and clear as my stock Volvo system, but I can't complain one bit about its power.
I agree with one thing ... the excess treble. I have it set, I believe, to +3 Bass and -1 or maybe -2 treble.
OH, by the way, the original sticker on my Volvo was about $7K more than the Z ... and that has no midrange control, either.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S