Jaguar To Trademark "XQ" for New Crossover Due in 2015

Edmunds.com

Jaguar To Trademark "XQ" for New Crossover Due in 2015

Jaguar trademarks XQ name for upcoming crossover.

Read the full story here

agentorange

I don't care about the market, kill it with fire.

skw0123

Completely news free news. The "artist's rendering" is a farce...some photochop based on a front-wheel drive something...looks like a cross between a Saturn and a Mini...and maybe a goldfish.

This is deplorable click-bait crap.

fortstring

What was the artist going for? A London cab replacement? "Stodgy" is putting it nicely >_>

tnooch1

When I first saw the picture without reading anything, I thought it looked like a Mazda.

cuselancer17

Pretty harsh comments... I think it looks good. Its a RR sport with a jag XFR face. I actualy really like it. Bring it jag!

throwback

A Ranage Rover with a Jaguar grille? kind of like a Tahoe with a Caddy grille. I don't understand why Jag thinks they need a crossover when they share a showroom floor with Land Rovers.

wdrauch

This pretty much sums up what I think of a Jaguar crossover:
http://www.autoextremist.com/

99sablewagon

It looks like one of those cats with a squashed nose.

garrym

Whatever this crossover is going to look like, its not really necessary. I suppose now that they have some cash in the bank someone with a suit believes Jaguar too must get into the SUV game.

Focus on your core product people.

themandarin

Needs larger rear to match XJ even as hatchback. Face is facetious.

openeyes1

First, it's NOT a Crossover, it's an SUV, since it's elevated vs a car, and offers SUV high seating. Second. it will most likely suck down gas like only a Jaguar can, emptying even more of the owners wallet.

andys120

I don't know if I'd call a Range Rover body with a Jaguar nose "distinctive Jaguar styling" but I'm sure their PR department would... and did.