Volvo XC90 SUV

1454648505198

Comments

  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    I have found a couple of DC area dealers willing to further discount BMW ED prices to $1,200-$1,500 over the ED invoice - Passport BMW has been mentioned by other posters in the 5-series board. Arlingotn says they will negotiate, but I'm not in the market for a BMW now, so I can't confirm.

    You might also want to check the web site: www.eurobuyers.com.
  • aljalj Member Posts: 11
    Are the Bay area dealers or other Western dealers discounting the xc90? I really do not want sign an agreement at MSRP and wait 3 months. I also do not want to buy today and find out they are discounting them in two months, while I wait.

    Any thoughts when these vehicles are going to become more abundant and discounted. I know if I want to buy an xc70, the dealers in Colorado will give you 3% right off bat.

    One other thought, anyone have an opinion or fact on if the new V8 model will replace the T5 or T6. I do not want to buy the T5 and see it discontinued. I would imagine the V8 would replace the T6, if anything?
  • beemergirlbeemergirl Member Posts: 10
    I have read so much about the XC90. Both engines, options, prices, etc. To be fare I have only test driven the T6. This week I will go and test drive both. Its seems to be split between 2.5 and T6ers. I am an aggressive driver, I like the feel of speed but I want the utility of an SUV. I don't like the price of a Porsche and I like what Volvo has to offer. Does anyone have any additional strong opinions about T6vs 2.5?
  • lagastrolagastro Member Posts: 5
    Can anybody give me a clue as to whether the "elegant design kit" noted in the Volvo 2004 XC-90 buying guide is or will be actually available anytime soon. Our dealer said something about "well since Volvo owners keep their cars >10 years that the company is still testing the adhesive and its not quite ready for primetime". Any truth to this?
  • rollierollie Member Posts: 337
    Regarding the 2.5T vs. T6 - try to find a used T6 for an evaluation (some are hitting the lots from executive programs.) I tried one and couldn't believe how much faster the T6 engine was with 15,000 miles on it. It was really about as strong off the line as the Porsche Cayenne and even stronger off the line than the V8 Touareg.

    These engines are very tight and I think once broken in the T6 really distances itself from the 2.5T. As you are an aggressive driver I highly recommend getting an extended test drive, turning off the DSTC unless you have wet roads, and driving it like you stole it in order to allow the adaptive tranny to adjust from economical to power shifts.

    Good luck.

    -rollie
    rdollie@att.net

    1999 S80 T6
    2003 XC90 T6
  • 1sttimevolvo11sttimevolvo1 Member Posts: 189
    Can anybody give me a clue as to whether the "elegant design kit" noted in the Volvo 2004 XC-90 buying guide is or will be actually available anytime soon. Our dealer said something about "well since Volvo owners keep their cars >10 years that the company is still testing the adhesive and its not quite ready for primetime". Any truth to this?

    lagastro,

    I'm not sure what your dealer is talking about regarding testing of the adhesive. I don't know how they are applied, butr I would think that more than adhesive is used.

    Any idea Volvomax?

    You can, however, order them at this site:

    http://www.volvopartsworld.com/
  • schuhcschuhc Member Posts: 333
    I've talked to people here in Chicago that have purchased the 2.5T. They have communicated that in hindsight, they wish they had purchased the T6 instead. They emphasize that they are not unhappy with the power of the 2.5T, but rather believe that they would have liked to have more power such as the T6 delivers. I have a C70HT and we bought the T6 because I had 3 years of experience with the power on my coupe and have been ecstatic(sp?) with it. Given the extra weight of the 90 that's why we went with the T6.
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    grr, and just when I had made up my mind to get the 5
  • 1sttimevolvo11sttimevolvo1 Member Posts: 189
    grr, and just when I had made up my mind to get the 5

    Either choice will be a good one. Depends on whether you are concerned about 4 mpg difference and more power.
    Based on what rollie's been saying about the `used' T6 models, I would be comfortable with either one. If the T6 is starting to come into it's own after 8-10k, then it should stand to reason the 2.5T will improve in that aspect (more power) as well, albeit not to the same level as the T6.

    You should be happy to have such a choice.
    Enjoy!
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    Your guess is as good as mine.
    I believe the kit is on sale in europe now.
    Hopefully we'll see it in the first quarter of 2004
  • RickZullRickZull Member Posts: 1
    We are very happy with our new 2.5T, plenty of acceleration for us.
  • lagastrolagastro Member Posts: 5
    Anyone care to comment on what will be "new" or improved on the XC 90 2005 model and when will most dealers start taking orders for these.
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    Too early to say.
    Bet on body colored side moldings, a more powerful 2.5L engine and the V8 in Jan 2005.
    We'll prob start taking orders over the summer.
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    I love having the GPS and have gotten used to the button moving the arrow backwards BUT I am very frustrated with the Point of Interest (POI) feature and the "avoid" feature.

    1st: If you ask it for the closest restaurants the list is VERY incomplete. There may be a wendys BK, and MCD's next to each other and it will only list one of them...(all were built at the same time)

    2nd (and worse): It will say something is 1 mile away and it may be as the crow flies....but when you ask directions, it will be as much as 5 miles away. This happened over and over as I drove up 81 in VA last week. This was both when I picked "along route" and "around car". It also often picked routes that went in circles.

    3rd: many major roads that have been around for a while are just not on the map.

    4th: I was on the highway and there was traffic up ahead. I asked the GPS to avoid the next 1/2 mile. There was a parallel road that was perfect (I know because I took it). Instead of choosing that road or another road that would have bypassed the next segment of road, the GPS pointed me to another route that had me turn around and go on another highway adding 2 hours to my trip (I had about 4 hours to go and it would make it 6). Instead of bypassing the next half mile (or 3 miles or any of the other choices that I tried), it picked a completely different route as if I had chosen "avoid going on any road in the direction I am now headed and find a completely different route). I did this over and over as my trip progressed and it never just picked a small detour. This is not good.

    This drives me nuts. Are others experiencing this? Is this special for volvo or do other gps systems have these probs?
  • rollierollie Member Posts: 337
    Here's my comments on the navigation questions:

    1) This MAY be an issue with Navigation Technologies. They do ALL of the mapping for the North American market FOR ALL navigation systems (cars, internet, etc.) and often if they havne't mapped something there's simply nothing you can do aside from going to their site to report it. On the other hand, it is possible that the navigation system OEM decided to leave some things out when they coded their DVDs in order to fit all of their prioritized data on a single disc.

    2) This is a common problem with navigation systems in general. I've never figured out why this happens (I've experienced it with other systems including the Neverlost in my rental car sitting in the hotel parking lot here.) It's annoying because it usually consistently shows POIs as being closer than they are until you actually select it as a destination. I need to do some more checking but at times I think it calculates from your last turn by default until you select a destination and then perhaps it takes a current position fix into consideration? Who knows...

    3) Same as item #1.

    4) I've used the AVOID function to GREAT success in our XC90 T6. I can see why there might be an issue if you're moving at highway speed and select something as short as 1/2 mile. Try 3 or 6 miles at a minimum. You can always reselect your calculated route after you've done your 1/2 mile or so. The only time I've tried to avoid a distance as short as 1/2 mile was in a city and it worked fine. Better yet, next time select the specific roads on your mapped route that you want to avoid and see what the system does (it worked great for us this past weekend coming back from Palm Desert when we needed to avoid holiday traffic!)

    Good luck.

    -rollie
    rdollie@att.net
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    thanks for the info.

    I did try the longer distances but it still didn't do the avoid. I was on route 81 in VA and route 11 parallels it exactly (within sight of it). No matter what distance I picked, it had me to to another highway that goes at a 90 degree angle and sent me well over a hundred miles out of the way. I couldn't have it avoid the route because I wanted to get back on 81 a few miles up. You stay on 81 for a couple hundred miles through VA so if I chose to avoid it entirely, it would have to pick that other crazy route. Interestingly, once I got on highway 11, it still tried to take me off it and to the long detour. strange. I hope they refine the system.
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    Took my xc90 AWD T5 in the snow today. It did ok but not great. Seems like sometimes the back wheels work against the front...when going around corners it seems like the back wheels power you through while the front stop turning and become skids. Hard to tell when it was in 4 wheel mode.

    While coming down hills, I lost control a couple of times and fishtailed. The antiroll/anti skid only came on during one of these episodes.
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    snowed more last night. The xc90 did much better in the nonpacked snow. It was about 6-8 inches here and it seemed to handle very well.
  • akabubba1akabubba1 Member Posts: 11
    I have had my 2.5 for four months now. I traded a 6cyl Explorer and before that drove the Durango. My wife drives a V8 Explorer. Both of us feel the torque and overall power/quickness of the 2.5 is more than adequate. When you factor in gas mileage (I get 19/24) it gets even better. Maybe not all of us are into racing X5's to the next light. I can squeel the tires though anytime I get the urge.
  • akabubba1akabubba1 Member Posts: 11
    Shadowchaser - do you live in Philly as well?
    My 2.5T XC90 FWD did ok last nite. Winter mode and DTSC helped. Not as good as my wife's AWD SUV but certainly a lot better than other FWD vehicles.
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    Baltimore...

    what do you mean "winter mode?"

    I wonder...if you hit the W for wet road...do you hit it for snowy road?
  • schuhcschuhc Member Posts: 333
    Being from Chicago, I always understood it that the W was for Winter mode. I think that the tires it has on it are ok for wet conditions.

    Also...

    Shadowchaser, please clarify because I am now honestly confused. I thought that if you had the T5 w/AWD or T6 that it was AWD all the time. Please let me know if I am off on this. Thanks

    My T6 arrives in Baltimore on Monday and then they'll check it in and truck it over to Chicago. Can't wait (though they still need to replace the windshield)
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    I have the T5 AWD. The directions say that the W is for starting on a Wet surface. It might make sense that it be used in the snow but they don't say that. My guess is that it limits the wheels from spinning by doing something with the transmission. Anyone else have any thoughts on the W with regard to snow?
  • islander71islander71 Member Posts: 25
    Shadowchaser,

    I purchased a 2004 2.5T XC90 AWD a month ago and in the owners manual it states that the "W" is for winter mode. When pressed (when the vehcile is not moving, say at a stop light), the transmission automatically begins in third gear to cut down on the potential of slippage. I have not used it to this point.
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    we are both right. Here is a cut and paste from the owners' manual:

    W - Winter/Wet driving mode - enhanced vehicle traction

    Mode W will only function if the gear selector is in the (D)rive position.
    Press the button at the base of the gear selector to engage/disengage this driving mode (see illustration).
    When the W driving mode is engaged, this is displayed in the instrument panel (see page 24). This mode may be selected for starting/moving off on slippery roads.

    6-cylinder turbo models
  • schuhcschuhc Member Posts: 333
    Was worried that I was going to start a W(ar) on that button.

    ;)

    Any thoughts on whether it is AWD all the time?
  • 1sttimevolvo11sttimevolvo1 Member Posts: 189
    Maybe not all of us are into racing X5's to the next light. I can squeel the tires though anytime I get the urge.

    If you have the AWD, you should have that looked at. The DSTC should prevent that from happening. I have never been able to do it, try as I might.

    The DSTC is supposed to sense as little as 1/7th wheel rotation and distribute torque proportionally to the other wheels.
  • gold233790gold233790 Member Posts: 183
    I've had my 2.5T AWD since last November. I've owned a Jeep and Infiniti QX4 before this. I must say the former two are MUCH better in snowy conditions than the XC90. In fact, the XC90 performed much worse than my Audi A6 quattro in the snow. I drove it around this weekend in NJ, and it fishtailed around quite a bit on the side roads.

    I love the car- but it is not as good as most other AWD or 4WD vehicles out there. I am seriously considering snow tires for this winter. Has anyone put them on?
  • 1sttimevolvo11sttimevolvo1 Member Posts: 189
    Most posters on other forums look at it as a given to have snow tires for any SUV. The majority of these posters live in the northwest or New England states and Canada.
    Most seem to be pleased with the snow-handling capabilities which is amplified with the use of snow tires.

    Check this site for snow tires. http://www.tirerack.com
  • aljalj Member Posts: 11
    I am still trying to come to grips to purchase a xc90 2.5T AWD.

    Living in the Colorado mountains, we get a lot of snow with steep terrain. I was hoping the xc90 was rock solid in snow. Now I am not so sure after reading a few of these posts? What vehicle would you compare to the xc90 to in the snow? I have a Subaru Outback wagon with no snow tires (good all season radials)that I feel does very well in snow! I really do not want to take a step backwards in terms of traction in adverse weather conditions or feel like I need to have snow tires. I would hope that the xc-90 without snow tires would be as good as my Subaru without snow tires? Any comments?
  • gold233790gold233790 Member Posts: 183
    Ok, let me expand on my comments. At no time did I ever feel "unsafe", or that I was out of control in the very heavy snow this weekend. I simply felt slippage several times, where with the Jeep and Infiniti I rarely felt it. One thing, though- whenever I slipped the vehicle did compensate very quickly and I was back on what felt like solid footing immediately.

    Yes, I was a bit dissapointed in what I felt was the snow ability of this vehicle- but still think it is more than capable in this situation.
  • 1sttimevolvo11sttimevolvo1 Member Posts: 189
    I understand what you're saying about the necessity for snow tires. Alot of the posters I have seen that live in the northwest have indicated that you aren't allowed on certain roads without snow tires or chains, even if you do have an SUV.
    On some of the other boards there is significant traffic regards to the XC90 and snow handling, most seem to have positive responses. Hopefully some of those folks will see your comments here and offer some thoughts.
  • gold233790gold233790 Member Posts: 183
    Ok, let me expand on my comments. At no time did I ever feel "unsafe", or that I was out of control in the very heavy snow this weekend. I simply felt slippage several times, where with the Jeep and Infiniti I rarely felt it. One thing, though- whenever I slipped the vehicle did compensate very quickly and I was back on what felt like solid footing immediately.

    Yes, I was a bit dissapointed in what I felt was the snow ability of this vehicle- but still think it is more than capable in this situation.
  • dachshund2dachshund2 Member Posts: 39
    The XC90 has a electronically controlled AWD system made by Haldex. In normal driving conditions it essentially functions as a FWD for better fuel mileage (95% front/5% rear torque distribution). When the front wheels slip 1/7 of a rotation an electronic control module (Siemens 16-bit microprocessor) will transfer power to the rear wheels to almost 100% of torque if necessary. The ECM checks the torque demands 100 times per second to feed the power where it is needed. The system is deactivated when the ABS is activated and in low-speed parking maneuvers.
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    can't imagine the XC90 w/out snowies is gonna handle as good as a new-ish AWD Subie w/o snowies, as the Subie is about half the weight and much easier to throw around

    my understanding is that winter handling is all about the tires. I bet the tires on the Subie aqre better than the OEMs on the XC90, especailly the 18-inch ones. Those suckers are bald right out of the box. The 17's have much deeper tread (at least the ones I saw at the dealer this weekend did). I'd never go to the snow on the 18-inch ones I saw at the dealer. No way.
  • e350v10e350v10 Member Posts: 92
    We have an Lincoln Aviator AWD and an XC90 T6 AWD. I drove them both yesterday in Denver's new snow and ice. The XC90 was much more surefooted than the Aviator - although the Aviator does not have AdvanceTrac.

    Stability control is being heralded as the safest innovation since the seatbelt and many mags are saying don't buy a new vehicle without it.

    Once again, Volvo leads the way!
  • schuhcschuhc Member Posts: 333
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    OK, it’s time to order my XC90, and I am interested in your informed opinions on various options. I plan to do factory delivery (if that is relevant to your analysis). What do you folks think of the following?

    ●Bi-xenon headlights
    ●18-inch wheels (the tires, not the aesthetics of the wheels)
    ●security package (specifically, the non-tinted windows)
    ●reverse warning system
    ●Nav system
    ●leather gear shift knob (OK, just kidding about the knob)
    ●upgraded stereo
    ●trailer hitch

    So far I have seen one vote for the reverse warning system and one for the upgraded stereo.

    Also, I had heard about two things that I wanted to confirm:
    1) maintenance included for a certain number of miles
    2) a driving class (other than the driving you get at the factory)

    Posts 2471 and 2502 talked about color-coordinated side moulding, and 2502 said it can be bought at http://www.volvopartsworld.com/ but I could not find the moulding there.

    Best to all.
  • 1sttimevolvo11sttimevolvo1 Member Posts: 189
    The moulding is under Accessories - Exterior, XC90: http://www.volvopartsworld.com/volpartpage15.htm

    As for the pros and cons of the following items, part of my purchase decisions were based on need versus use and the fact that I was paying cash instead of financing the vehicle.
    (1)●Bi-xenon headlights
    Not something I felt was real beneficial (to me, but might be to others). I felt I could spend $500 on other things, like $300 towards a subwoofer. However, had I financed it (ugghhh) I would have only payed about 8 dollars a month more for it.
    (2)●18-inch wheels (the tires, not the aesthetics of the wheels)
    According to many who live in snowy climates, the 17-inch offers better drivability, and more choices of snow tires are available in this size.
    (3)●security package (specifically, the non-tinted windows)
    I opted to NOT get this package for the same reason noted in number 1.
    (4)●reverse warning system
    I viewed it as a `neat' item to have, but not necessary for me.
    (5)●Nav system
    Same reason as item no. 1. I definitely didn't want to shell out $$$ for something that I could replicate with a handheld if I chose to by one later.
    (6)●upgraded stereo
    This was a priority for me, as I LOVE music, and most SUV's are notorious for poor bass response, thus why I added the subwoofer. I have been TOTALLY pleased with the Dolbly stereo as it pertains to the cd's. Dolby is hit and miss with the FM reception, depending on the strength of the station (Typical with Dolby system).
    ●trailer hitch
    This I would buy after-market, as the Hiddenhitch can be had for around $104+ and you can install yourself.

    Scheduled maintenance on all `04 MY Volvos is free up to 30,000 miles.

    Volvo has held the Driving Events in California and Minneapolis, MN, to my knowledge. It would be great for consumers AND for Volvo if they expanded those to other areas!
  • amiretamiret Member Posts: 29
    I've been told by local Ford sales rep that the new Ford Freestyle will have the same AWD as the Volvo XC-90, and uses the Escape V6. Any truth to this?
  • schuhcschuhc Member Posts: 333
    OK.
    When you said Factory Delivery, did you mean Sweeden? If so, I highly recommend it. I think everyone that can do it should do it at least once.

    First off. The stereo is not an option...It is a MUST HAVE!!!! I have it in my coupe and we got it in the truck. It is truly phenomenal.

    My only other 2 cents is on the Bi-Xenon's. It is my understanding at the dealership that people have voiced that they do not like these, or do not get as much of a benefit out of them as they had hoped. When I was told this I opted for the regular ones and was very happy with them while driving around Europe.

    And 2nding 1stTimeVolvo's comment. Free scheduled maintenance to 30,000 miles.
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    Yes, delivery at the factory in Sweden unless the dealer comes up with an already-built XC90 that has a grrreat price.

    I am buying the third seat, which precludes the subwoofer. Would you still buy the stereo upgrade?

    I am SURE I read somewhere that Volvo is now offering a driving lesson/course for all XC90 purchases. (I wonder if I dreamed this....)

    Thanks for the reminder about Hiddenhitch. Am hoping it works with my existing, real nifty bike rack.
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    Wheelhouse Side Décor
    Elegant, rugged, color-coded design kit. Covers the front wheel arch, lower part of front and rear door, and rear wheel arch. Completely color-coded wide-body side décor increases sporty image of the car and protects the side of the SUV. Available by mid-summer 2003

    http://www.volvocars.us/VolvoOwnership/Accessories/?model=XC90
  • shadowchasershadowchaser Member Posts: 94
    audio...didn't get the upgrade. 700 bucks is a LOT. my system sounds great.

    backup system. got it for safety...not helpful because it goes off as I back out of my garage because it senses the sides...boy who cried wolf BUT, it is great for parking. didn't think I would need it for that....love it.

    nav. great toy I thought.. would never get a car without it now... It has gotten me out of binds so often when I needed to get somewhere quick for work and didn't have the time to find a map and try to figure it out. Each time this has happened I have said to myself this was worth the price of admission! Not a perfect system but overall great. Love it on trips to tell me where to eat, where the next gas station is etc.

    Xenons. I put my car next to another Sexy90 without the Xenons...WHAT a difference.

    I got the add on wood kit by Sherwood. Looks great (check out swedewpeed for the pictures). bought it from a guy on the internet (search past posts for his address) for 130 or so. Looks great.

    A must have is the 2 part floor liner. Protects the carpet. 68 dollars or so. Got it from one of the online dealers in TX. check past posts.

    good luck
  • mmmm8mmmm8 Member Posts: 26
    As a first time posting on the board, but enjoy reading since the beginning of XC90 boards. Just try to share some of my experience.
    After reading the XC90, went down to a local dealership and put down $2000 deposit for a T6 on June of 03 (LAST year!). At that time, I was told I was No.23 on the list and should expected delivery on Dec 03. Wasn't sure which color to get but put down crystal green. Went to the road show on Nov/Dec in Alameda, CA last year. Only had time to take the Moose course and saw the demo on the laminated glass, very impressed. However, all the demos were silver. Then the sales guy told me trouble in getting the cars (especially Tricolor went down). Asked the sale guy to give us a call if any XC90 was in so that we could decide on the color combinations. During the time, from these boards learn about some hicups (defects) on the first model year. So wasn't press on getting a delivery. Finally, my wife and I saw a crystal green parked on a street. After checked out the color. My wife hated the crystal green since it is more like silver under the sun. On April, the manager called to confirmed the interest. And I told him to switch to Ruby red. My delivery was pushed to Aug 04. Meanwhile, started seeing black, white, and more crystal green running on the roads. Glad to switch to Ruby red. On the first week of Aug, contact the dealership and they didn't have the combination we ordered. We felt they had not placed our order. When we tried to cancel, they said our car wasn't in for another month. Checked back after a month, was told our order wasn't placed at all. The original sales guys had left the dealership long times ago. And they tried to push a ruby red without security package. They said, not too many people order the security package since people liked the tinted window. Stand strong on the combination. And they said we could take a europe delivery on Jan 04 or dealer delivery on Dec. Finally took the delivery over the weekend and haven't regret for the LONG wait. We draw so much attention on the streets. One time, we parked in front of a restaurant for lunch. People stopped to check out the car. One guy even came in the restaurant and asked about it.
    By the way, it is fully loaded (all packages and options) Ruby red T6 with Taupe interior and aluminium inlay, exterior styling kit and dvd is in order (should available on Jan 04 according to dealer). One more thing, dealer said the exterior styling kit is for demo cars on the beginning of the year, it is not available to order (which I highly not believe that, there is $300 difference if charge items separately). At the end, I am still paying MSRP. But they gave us discount on the labor for the exterior styling kit, extended warranty, and leather surface protection, and throw in a set of rubber floormats. Sorry the long message. As why I stand strong on security package is mainly the laminated glass. We live in the city. On the past, we had several break-in into our car. Lost is one thing. Broken glass eveywhere is the worst. Even clean it, I was got cut by some glass which hidden somewhere. Now, we have two daughters, definitely don't want them to get cut. That's why we pick Volvo Xc90 for the maximum protection for our love one. And finally, a wise man definitely need to listen to their wife. Thanks all
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    Hey, are you in the Bay Area? If so, I bet I poked my nose in your car last weekend. I opened the door and the salesman almost killed me ("That's a sold car!") Did you buy on the peninsula?

    ps It looks great with the security glass. Different, but great. My wife is leaning toward wanting the tint, but I like the clear look. I also think it may be safer as you can see better when looking out (I KNOW I am supposed to be using the mirrors, but....)
  • rjsmomrjsmom Member Posts: 8
    I just leased a 2.5 FWD XC90 last week after a tremendous amount of research. All in all, I am quite pleased with the SUV except for the rear visibility. Between the headrests (which can be lowered in the 2nd and 3rd rows) and the columns in the rear of the vehicle I have a hard time seeing as well as I could in my Mercedes ML320. Wish I had gotten the reverse warning system because I'm terrified I'm going to back into someone or something.
  • adp3adp3 Member Posts: 446
    LOL - you should try driving a minivan!!
  • schuhcschuhc Member Posts: 333
    We got the third row of seats as well and I did get the upgraded pro logic stereo.

    Things to be aware of on the European buying excursion...
    Rocks...Autobahn...120mph...Not a good match.
    Teplice, Czech Republic. If wife is going, go through this town during the day. If wife is staying home, drive very slow past the brothels BUT DO NOT STOP.
  • bigeddybigeddy Member Posts: 181
    > I plan to do factory delivery (if that is relevant to your analysis). - Good choice.

    > Bi-xenon headlights - Yes.

    > 18-inch wheels (the tires, not the aesthetics of the wheels) - Depends. 18" standard with T6 and handles slightly better on-road. 17" is better for snow and off-road.

    > security package (specifically, the non-tinted windows) - If the tint is not important to you the "safety" glass is good to have.

    > reverse warning system - Seems unnecessary to me.

    > Nav system - Useful in big cities, not so much in countryside.

    > upgraded stereo - Yes.

    > trailer hitch - This is an accessory that may not be available at the factory. I'd get the Volvo model for warranty reasons.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.