By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
thanks!
Typically, volvo radios can't be changed out in this manor.
The real problem is the software.
The first 07 XC90's should arrive in Aug, so maybe we will know more by then.
Do you or anyone for that matter know when the 2007 XC 90 will be in showrooms? Thinking about waiting but may not want to wait too long. Thanks
I will certainly have another XC90 on my September shopping list, along with the new Audi Q7. The 2007 BMW X5 and Acura MDX would also be high on the list, but it looks like they won't be available in time for me. Not many other choices for 7 passenger luxury vehicles. Any suggestions?
As for those other choices, Land Rover just doesn't do anything for me, the GL450 looks like an overgrown $60K Honda Pilot, LX470 may work but there's just something about the interior that I don't like, QX56 Escalade and Navigator are just too big and truck-like. But that's all just my opinion.
Revised bumpers and lights.
Sat radio from the factory(Dec cars)
Ipod interface
Active Bi-Xenon lights
BLIS-Blindspot information System
I like the LR3 but I can see why it might not appeal to everyone. I have not seen a GL450 in person but the C&D preview sounds positive. Of the other alternatives to the XC90, only the Audi would be on my list.
Will there be bluetooth?
Any color changes?
Bluetooth is already available for the XC90.
Shadow Blue repalces Lunar Gold.
We bought the excuse (although had it in a couple times to have them look at). We are now at 24K miles and about to replace the tires. Will not go back to the Pirelli Scorpions.
Did you folks have your tire pressure checked b/w maintenance visits? What bugs me is that they don't advise you of it happening or act as if no one else has had the same issue.
Absolutely. Maintaining proper tire pressure is among the most important routine maintenance you can do. It affects safety, fuel economy, handling and tire wear. I check the tires monthly and before long trips. If there are signs of unusual leakage or uneven wear I go to the local tire shop. If you went 8 months without checking the tires you were asking for trouble.
I have seen only a couple XC90's with Pirelli tires, they usually come with Michelin. Pirelli is common on the XC70.
I noticed with my Pirellis that the tire began to wear unevenly at about 18K. It appeared to be scalloping across the tread. Again, had it into Volvo and asked about alignment (although car did not drive like it was out of alignment). They said they would align it but it would probably be a waste of money. They had seen the Pirellis wear like that before.
Anyway, I'll report back on the Continentals after we have some miles under the belt.
I have learned my lesson and will pay better attention to the tires of new cars that I buy. The Pirellis may be high performance, but most people don't require that type of performance. I had no idea that I would be buying a new set of tires at 24K. (should have read this board before buying).
The Pirelli is rated 300 A A whereas the Conti is 680 A B, so the mileage gain is paid for by a lower temperature rating. Saying that people don't need the performance misses the point that tires are matched to the car and chosen to complement the load, suspension and braking characteristics (the scalloping of the Pirelli is a separate issue). A lower temperature rating increases risk of tire failure, such as when on summer vacation with a full load, and may even affect tire performance in emergency maneuvers. Given how important tires are to handling and safety it seems false economy to focus on tread life, especially on a premium car like the XC90.
I agree that there is a compromise between tread life and performance (which includes safety considerations). However there must always be a compromise even when a tire is rated 300 A A. If I'm not mistaken, there are lower treadratings than 300 and there is a AA temperature rating. There will always be a softer tire that will perform better and have a shorter tread life. Professional auto racers get about 100 miles on a set because the must have the best performance (an extreme example, but it makes a point).
In my opinion, the Continentals offer a level of performance that is consistant with my driving habits. Of course everybody has to decide for themselves.
I test drove the XC90 V-8 this weekend, and I really like the ride. Now, I'm torn between the XC90 and the Lexus RX 350. The Volvo seemed roomier, and I preferred the center console armrest vs the RX's seat mounted armrest. I had been drawn to the Lexus in part because it gets high reliability marks. Although I like the Volvo a lot, Consumer Reports and the posts to this forum are giving me 2nd thoughts.
I also have a 10 year old son; in 3 years, I'm concerned that the smaller back seat leg room in the V-8 7 passenger will be a problem. I understand I can gain 2 inches with the 5 passenger interior, but then I have to go with the smaller engine.
I may wait for the 07 model; If I go with the 5 passenger for the extra leg room, I'll be getting the new 6 cylinder engine. Does anyone know if this is a new engine for Volvo?
I'd love to hear comments, good and bad, on the XC90's reliability.
The XC90 is roomier, has 300 pounds more payload, and tows 1500 pounds more than the RX350. It should since it is a couple inches larger in every direction and heavier. The XC70 would be a better comparison.
Yes, the new 6-cylinder is a brand new engine made to fit the XC90. It is barely longer than the 5-cylinder and has no turbo.
And as an anecdotal evidence - our 2004 XC90 has 0 defects in 18 month and 38K miles.
Great car, which I will recommend to anyone.
I do expect to maintain the car as recommended by the dealer; but I don't want to have to keep bringing the car in for repairs which are covered by the warranty. I view the warranty as insurance for things which shouldn't go wrong with the car.
However, if the style, versatility, handling, safety features, off-road capabilities make a difference, you might consider XC90.
Or if you like Volvo, buy Volvo. It does not have the best reliability score by CR, but it ain't that bad at all. If you really like it, and worry about reliability, lease the car, or buy the extended warranty for ~$2000.
Or like I said, buy Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla. Virtually no vehicle is more reliable than these. The best deal around. Period.
My original tires have lasted 32K miles, and actually two of them have more than 50% of usable life, (I keep them, so if someone need 2 very decent Michelin Pilot 18" - I can sell them cheap) but I change them to move to the different brand and size.
I do believe that two tires worn out prematurely because of the misalignment that was caused by the minor "encounters" with the high curbs. It took some time for my wife to get used to the larger required swing around the corners. And both "bad" tires worn out in the same position. I did not realize that, and asked for the wheel alignment too late. The new set of tires Continental LX looks totally brand new after 7k miles.
BTW,
I also do believe, that it could be a reason why so many people that move from the smaller vehicles have unusually low tire life span.
I have replaced brake pads at 37.5K service, with front having 20% and rear having 30-40%, so I should probably keep the rear, but it was just $69 more from my Indy mechanic. He things, that the rotors will last till the next pad replacement.
I think both numbers are very reasonable for any vehicle.
Rather than that - absolutely 0 defects. No repair/warranty/recall work has been done on this vehicle since September 2004 @39K miles.
Looking for a great bargain...35k range...$400/month lease range
Leaving out the domestics, the import utes are doing ok.
Most of the people that buy the XC90 or Land ROver or Sequoia, or bimmer or benz are well off enough that they can afford to feed their vehicles.
Plus, the Volvo, the bimmer, the Acura and a few others get decent gas mileage anyway.
It is typically the buyers of domestic SUV's that panic when the price of gas goes up. We have traded for several domestic utes recently, but not one import.
Because of huge incentives(like 0% apr) alot of people who have no business buying big SUV's were able to afford them.
Now they are panicking.
If you are looking for a "deal" the domestics are where to look. If you are looking for a superior vehicle than look at the imports and be prepared to pay a little more.
Steve, Host
The approach was similar to the short I5 that is in the S40 and C70.
Volvo will use the engine in transverse applications, so the a/c compressor and alternator are driven by the engine itself, via a gear system and mounted directly to the block.
The engine is only a couple mm longer than the current I5, even though it displaces 3.2L.
There will also be a turbo version for Volvo down the road, as well as a diesel version.
Jag and Land Rover will also use the engine, albeit in the traditional longitudinal layout.
Jag may even create a supercharged version for their R line.
The engine debuts in the XC90 3.2 in 2-3 months.
i suppose it may be years from now if volvo maintains it's typical pace of homologating a minimal # of drivetrain combos per year for USA. or, maybe quicker homologation could be a benefit of ford ownership now? speculation...
http://www.canadiandriver.com/news/060602-1.htm
It would have to be able to be sold in the CARB states as well as the federal ones.
Going thru EPA and CARB certification is expensive, plus the parts and training issues.
IF Volvo feels enough vehicles could be sold profitably, than you will see a diesel.
The 2.5T AWD is rated at 17/22
The V8 actually does better than the epa rating on the highway.
If you do alot of highway driving that car is the way to go.
Also, the V8 is alot more repsonsive than the 5 cyl. However, spirited driving will decrease your fuel economy.
Volvo hasn't posted any mileage info on the new SI6 yet.
From the performance data they have released, it would appear that the new XC90 3.2 won't be any faster than the 2.5T. However, since the 3.2 will come w/ the 6 speed auto tranny, mileage should improve.
My guestimate would be 18 city, 24 hwy.