Minivans - Domestic or Foreign

1161719212273

Comments

  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    Plastic interiors may be some people's cup of tea, but I'd rather have the nice interior and deal with the relatively small inconvenience of having to put a plastic liner down the few times I need it. More often than not I am either transporting no one and nothing, a few people, or things that can't do much to my interiors. I wouldn't really choose any minivan as a work van, unless you are primarily hauling light things. You cannot beat the hauling capability of a full size van or pickup.

    I traded a 2001 pickup for this van lastwraith. My brother has a Plymouth minivan and when we were hauling our sister's stuff to her new house she bought, I found my brother could get more in his van than I could get in my pickup. As he could pack it higher than I could.

    I didn't really buy my van as a work van. I just knew that there would be times I would be loading it down with stuff and the stow-n-go seats sold me on it. I have a 2004 Honda Civic and I saw the Ody. I thought it was just beautiful inside.But I never gave it a second thought as far as wanting to buy it. I knew taking out those middle seats would be a pain in the neck, just as it was on my brother's Plymouth minivan.

    Besides, I have three grand children and I knew after hauling them home from school in my club cab truck, how handy it would be to stow one of those middle seats and let one set in the other one and the two others could set in the third row, and throw their back packs on the floor where I had the one seat stowed. It gave me so much more room getting them in and out. Stow-n-go was just what I needed for what I use my van for. Not only for the kids, hauling things, but the storage space for all my junk, under the seats. A person just has to realize what he'll use his van for, before buying.
  • lastwraithlastwraith Member Posts: 350
    I can't disagree that a minivan is more useful general purpose-wise, but for work transportation duties I would be looking to a full size van or pickup. I'm not debating the interior room of a pickup vs minivan, but for HAULING things (which includes towing and load capacity...ie weight) the pickup would easily best either of our minivans. Which is why all the contractors here have 1/2 ton or at worst 1/4 ton pickups. Most other house-centric businesses use full size cargo vans.

    Minivans are cool, but I don't think they have much use in the business arena unless it is a light-duty application.

    As far as I'm concerned though, having a minivan just means I can do increasingly more and more for both myself and others. It's quite nice.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    I've used it to haul furniture (for myself) and I haven't scratched any panels yet, or gotten any part of the interior extremely dirty.

    And yes, I drive an Odyssey.
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    The Koreans have improved quality and features at an exponential rate.
    How long before the Kia Sedona is # 3 in sales volume after the leader # 1 Grand Caravan and # 2 Town & Country?"

    Probably never. The Sonata has made great strides, even surpassed the Japanese cars in some quality surveys, but still doesn't come close to the sales of Camry and Accord. The new model with a real V6 and much nicer amenities should be an improvement in sales, but it still won't surpass the top 2. I don't see the Kia / Hyundai vans surpassing Honda and Toyota in sales, either
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    I've used it to haul furniture (for myself) and I haven't scratched any panels yet, or gotten any part of the interior extremely dirty.

    And yes, I drive an Odyssey.


    I'm not saying you can't use an Ody to carry stuff. You surly can, just like any other van. It's just that I felt the Dodge was much easier to convert to any situation that I would come up against that a minivan could do. None of the other vans can do that. Plus, none of the other vans had the storage space the Dodge/Chrysler has. I can name a number of situations that could come up that I would be ready with the Dodge, where I wouldn't be with any other van. It's a matter of convenience for me and knowing how I use my van. If I were mostly just hauling people, any van would do and if that were the case, the Honda or Toyota would be my choice.t I find the Dodge more lite work friendly and family friendly than anything else on the market.
  • bluedevilsbluedevils Member Posts: 2,554
    'The Koreans have improved quality and features at an exponential rate.
    How long before the Kia Sedona is # 3 in sales volume after the leader # 1 Grand Caravan and # 2 Town & Country?'

    "Probably never. The Sonata has made great strides, even surpassed the Japanese cars in some quality surveys, but still doesn't come close to the sales of Camry and Accord. The new model with a real V6 and much nicer amenities should be an improvement in sales, but it still won't surpass the top 2. I don't see the Kia / Hyundai vans surpassing Honda and Toyota in sales, either."

    That view seems a little naieve, don't you think? There's no way to predict the future, but people never imagined the Japanese carmakers would have anywhere near the level of success in the U.S. market they have enjoyed for the past 10+ years.
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    "That view seems a little naieve, don't you think? There's no way to predict the future, but people never imagined the Japanese carmakers would have anywhere near the level of success in the U.S. market they have enjoyed for the past 10+ years. "

    It's just my opinion, based on what I see in the marketplace. There are still many people that prefer Japanese cars, but wouldn't even walk into a Hyundai / Kia dealership. And besides, you are comparing apples and oranges. The Japanese carmakers started to fourish in the 80's because they were producing something very different: a reliable, efficient and somewhat sporty car at a good price. Think K car vs Accord. Today, the Koreans are producing extremely similar cars as the Japanese, with a price and warranty advantage and as of yet, quality and amenities disadvantage. Will that be enough to close a humongous sales gap? I personally don't think so...

    Like I said, the Koreans are gaining big strides, but they have a LONG way to go before they start to approach sales levels of the competitors (the topic of this thread). Is it impossible for it to happen? Of course not, but I'd be interested in hearing someone try to make the argument that says it is likely..
  • 97xpresso97xpresso Member Posts: 249
    After reading the Kia Sedona problems board, I am not convinced that they have a quality product. Why do Hyundai vehicles get good reveiws/ratings, when it is basically the same company as Kia? The new (and hopefully much lighter) 2006 will have to really outshine the current heavy MPG gobbler, and that will take a long term test to find out.
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    Even if the Koreans don't pass the Japanese in US auto sales they can still be a force. I know people talk about the demise of the American auto industry, but GM and Ford are still the 2 biggest auto makers in the world. (This is subject to change however.) When we got our MPV, our other choice was the Sedona. If our Explorer lease ran for another year, who knows, maybe an '06 Sedona might have topped our list. At least on paper, it seems more than a worthy competitor to the Odyssey and Sienna...same as the new Sonata is to the Accord and Camry. Of course, real world experiences will tell a much better story.
  • bluedevilsbluedevils Member Posts: 2,554
    All vehicles have problems. Does the Sedona have more problems than average or not? Hard to say. Our 2002 has been solid and almost trouble-free. We get 22-24 MPG on the highway with 600-800 pounds in the van, averaging 75 mph with or without the AC on. As with all vehicles, some folks report much better or worse fuel economy than other owners of the same make & model. Overall, the fuel economy on Sedona seems better than the reputation.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    3 years ago the DCX vans were nowhere near as flexible as the Odyssey of yore, but I have to admit that today's Grand Caravan is probably more flexible than the Odyssey.
  • navyairnavyair Member Posts: 202
    I think Bluedevils said it well. No matter what vehicle you have, if you are on a "problems" board to post, chances are, you aren't there to comment on how many cupholders the vehicle has or how the trim stands up. Many folks get on the board to vent their frustration. Notice that same tone on the other problem boards whether it is TC, Ody, or Sienna. Bottom line is that the dealers have their hands in your pocket, and the way they treat you has a lot to do with our "perception" of the car/van.

    I like the Ody, but dealers in DC areas were very arrogant and smug about overcharging for unwanted add ons. The "take it or leave it, someone else will buy it" attitude was pretty much the same as the US dealers in the "old days". So, I said OK, and tried the Sedona, which my wife and I really like. Problems-yes a few, but no more than my other (3 US and German) made vehicles.

    Kia dealers are still hungry enough to work hard (OK, many of them) to gain a customer base. BTW, I owned a first year Hyundai Sonata and sold it before the extended warrantee (my own purchase back then) ran out...I saw it in Korea and really liked it. Figured it had been on the market there (Korea's = to GM there ) it probably was reliable. I was wrong. It was the only car I haven't driven until it was ancient. They upped their quality and really emphasized the warantee AFTER they had all the problems with the Canadian made cars. Our Sonata had nit noid problems (5x ac repairs, all power window motors, all door locks, reverse gear out in transmission) that required 1 trip a month to the dealer. New Sonata owners report nothing of the sort, and now Hyundai is considered a "reliable" brand.

    I think you are seeing Kia do the same business model, but a lot sooner. Enter with cheap cars (al la Honda and "Datsan" aka Nissan) then after saturating that market, move rapidly upscale. Any bets on a Hyundai/Kia pickup soon? Look at the Japanese business model and how they did it. Now that model has been proven, Korea is capitalizing on it.

    Anyhow, you guys both raise good points. I hope we are moving back towards more civility in these boards. I for one am getting tired of the "personalities" dominating the chats and demeaning anybody who dares disagree with their opinion. (...and hope I haven't been guilty of the same).
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Chrysler plans to use Lee Iacocca(with an unspecified handsome sum of cash) with his above subject quote to promote their employee price offer soon.

    Now we know why we bought our Ody, Sienna or Quest! :)

    Have a great weekend!
  • dennisctcdennisctc Member Posts: 1,168
    We do for each other, because it's Family

    Marine - I'd much rather be part of your family than Mac's!!!!

    These are just stupid minivans, doomed to be junk in 10-20 years. Family will always be around, if you treat em right!

    Marine - just think of all the great thinks we could do together with our two "Stow N Go" Minivans!!!! We could rule the neighborhood!!!!
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    "We could rule the neighborhood!!!! "

    More politically correct: "we could help move the neighborhood" :)
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    Marine - I'd much rather be part of your family than Mac's!!!!

    These are just stupid minivans, doomed to be junk in 10-20 years. Family will always be around, if you treat em right!

    Marine - just think of all the great thinks we could do together with our two "Stow N Go" Minivans!!!! We could rule the neighborhood!!!!


    It seems like family helping each other is going the way of the dinosaur dennisctc.

    The reason I bought my Dodge minivan is because of all of the stuff I could get in it. There is only my wife and I now. The grand kids changed schools this year so I won't have to pick them up anymore. But the house always will need fixing. The yard will always need work. Things wear out and need replacing. Not only with our place, but with my family. I could have kept my truck, knowing I only had a few more months to go picking the kids up. But I liked the room I have with a minivan. It also gets a little better gas mileage than the truck.

    If my wife and I want to take a trip and we get tired, I can pull into a road side park, drop the second and third row seats down, pull out the inflatable bed I just bought to put under the stow-n-go seats and we can sleep right there in the van. I didn't just buy a people mover when I decided to buy a minivan. I decided to buy a vehicle that I could take kids and friends in, haul stuff in for me or my family. To take trips in and have all the room I needed, even if that meant sleeping in it instead of driving another 100 miles to a motel if I get too tired to keep on going.

    For me, the Dodge/Chrysler vans make perfect sense for a family person, or someone that does a lot of his own work around the house, helps out family or even taking trips. It's multi useful. More than any van on the market. :blush:

    Grand daughter is here telling me what kind of face to put on my post.
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    Just to add. To a guy like Mac, his Honda Ody is perfect for a guy like him. He only uses his van to drive around in, carrying people now and then. The sporty handling and five speed tranny makes him feel like he's driving around in more than a minivan. It's good looking inside and makes him feel good.It's the perfect van for a guy like him. It's not for me. It won't do all the things I want to do, when I want to do it. But we'll both be happy with what we bought. Because we knew when we bought our vans, what we were going to use them for.
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    www.thestar.com/NASApp/...

    Don't think I want to sign up just to read it Mac
  • dhfddhfd Member Posts: 22
    I was just curious out of the forum members, who mainly drove the van and what car did you replace with the minivan? Wife and I are to expecting to receive our '05 Odyssey this week (hopefully). We're replacing my car, an '02 VW Passat wagon. We got the wagon b/c we were having a baby. After having the wagon for almost 4 years, I should've listed to the wife and gotten a van in the first place!

    I've enjoyed driving the wagon, but as far as convenience, comfort and utility, a van has it beat! Initially, I thought I'd like to replace it with a used MDX or Pilot, but money, and the rising price of gasoline said otherwise.

    I never thought I'd see the day, but I'm excited and really looking forward to owning/driving the van!
  • jipsterjipster Member Posts: 6,299
    We have a 2004 Mazda MPV. I am the primary driver...but technically it is the wifes van. ;) We replaced a Buick Century Wagon with the MPV. Agree that convenience, comfort and utility is hard to beat in a minivan...especially with a growing family. Good luck and congrats on your Ody.
    2021 Honda Passport EX-L, 2020 Honda Accord EX-L, 2011 Hyundai Veracruz, 2010 Mercury Milan Premiere.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    The husband. Replaced my wife's Toyota Corolla station wagon that became too uncomfortable for driving any distance. :sick:
    BTW, my Ford F-150 is THE most comfortable vehicle to drive long distances but fuel economy is too low and the T&C is much quieter. ;)
  • strstr Member Posts: 64
    Hey,
    How do you like the MPV? We are negotiating a deal right now for a 2005 Toyota Sienna XLE but if the price doesn't work out we will consider the MPV. I was just wondering how it has worked out for you and what you like and don't like about it.
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    My wife drives our Passat while I drive the MPV. I drove the just turned in Explorer, too. I guess I get the bigger car. Don't get me wrong, I'd much rather drive the sedan, but my wife does too. Just happened that way, I suppose. Actually, the van seems reasonably sporty. Coming from a Y2K Explorer, though, that's not much of a stretch.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    I own a 2002 Honda Odyssey EX. I am the primary driver, and the Odyssey replaced a 1997 Honda Accord Special Edition Coupe painted in San Marino Red.

    The Accord Coupe, although silky smooth at 97,000 miles, wasn't practical enough for the family, nor did it hold enough stuff for family road trips. The Odyssey fits my needs perfectly, as my commute is a 110 mile roundtrip commute on the freeway.

    :)
  • jipsterjipster Member Posts: 6,299
    str, check out post #7702 in the Mazda MPV topic. I give a review of our MPV's performance in the year that I have had it. Like Gieco...you'll be saving a bunch of money by switching to an MPV.

    Basically we love our MPV. We like the styling interior and exterior, the handling and carlike ride, cools quickly(just came back from trip to Florida),comfort, gas mileage is just as good as the others,the brakes are great, fit and finish and overall quality is tops in it's class.Reliability has been excellent. Comes with a better warranty(4years/50k miles)

    About the only thing I wish was better is low end torque. It's not as quick off the line as the other minivans. But,it has all the power we need....and I'm not a lead footed driver...so It's not really a big deal. Also, if you're into all the electronic gizmos(i.e navigation,backup sensors, etc) the MPV's higher end model, the ES, doesn't have some features that some of the other minivans come with.Good luck.
    2021 Honda Passport EX-L, 2020 Honda Accord EX-L, 2011 Hyundai Veracruz, 2010 Mercury Milan Premiere.
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    My wife drives the van (04 T&C) primarily - we have 2 toddlers and she works from home. We traded in an 02 Santa Fe when we had our daughter a year and a half ago. I will drive most of the time when were are all together on weeknights and weekends. My other car is an 03 Saab 9-3 - which had sadly become almost exclusively a commuter car. If we have the kids, which is almost always, we take the van.
  • masterpaul1masterpaul1 Member Posts: 421
    We have a 01 DGC EX to which I am the primary driver. It replaced my 87 Lincoln Town Car. We have a 98 Pontiac Sunfire too, which my wife is the primary driver. We have four kids and the minivan was the way to go. At first, we wanted a SUV, but after doing careful research, it just wasn't a good choice. My wife on occasion does drive our minivan. I love the space, comfort, utility, sporty feel, safety features, looks, power and gas mileage. The way I see it is a minivan is a car, truck, and minivan all in one. (And for some a sports car.) ;)
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Everything in life is relative...

    You switched from a 87 Town Car to a 01 DGC. The Town car then(I drove a few of then) was a big boat with a wallowing feeling as if you are in the high seas. The 01 DGC has a relatively firmer ride and stiffer suspension so it will give you a sporty feel and believe that you are in one as you said.

    Switching from the DGC to an Ody would give you a similar comparo feeling in terms of sporty feeling. I know as I have done that 70 times in the past 2 years.
  • masterpaul1masterpaul1 Member Posts: 421
    In a way you are right about the boat feel in the 87 Town Car. Mine had independent front and rear shocks and coil springs. But the rear shocks where air adjustable, which gave a stable ride. Even though my old 87 Town Car weighed less then our 01 DGC, the minivan seems lighter and handles better. While my 87 Town Car had a softer ride over bumps, our 01 DGC has a stiffer ride and body lean is minimal when loaded up with our family. Even though a lot of people like the independent rear suspension with coil springs and gas shocks. I like and prefer the leaf springs, solid rear axle and air adjustable shocks. I will replace our current gas rear shocks, with air adjustable shocks when the time comes. Leaf springs and air adjustable shocks give a better and stable ride when under heavy load conditions from my experience :P
  • brooklynmommybrooklynmommy Member Posts: 1
    My car is about to give out and I can't afford to put any more money into it, but I can't afford a new car right now either. I really need a minivan to handle the children that I have on a routine basis (I'm a foster mom) Any suggestions for a good used minivan that is reliable but not to pricey?
  • masterpaul1masterpaul1 Member Posts: 421
    You might want to try a 2001 Dodge Caravan, which is the SWB (Short Wheel Base) opposed to the LWB (Long Wheel Base). You should be able to find one for under $10,000. with good mileage. I wouldn't go with a year prior to the 2001. It seems that they had a lot of problems. You can do a search on Edmunds under used cars to see what the TMV (True Market Value) is. Good Luck. :)
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    I'm sure the MPV is a worthy van in its own right, but just bear in mind that it's one size smaller than the usual candidates. No offense jipster.

    We replaced our trustworthy 02 Malibu LS...well, I was gonna keep in as my commute car but it was totalled right before we got our 05 Nissan Quest S. With 3 kids, any midsize (or full size) sedan is simply not an option. With two kids though, it was still be managable with our Malibu.

    A couple friends of ours bought a Carolla after they had their 1st baby to replace an aging Taurus :confuse: Now they wish they had bought something bigger.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    I've always found it hard to understand why people hate to be seen driving a van. Well, maybe in the last generation Toyota Sienna ;) That thing is just hideous! But in general, I don't have a problem with minivans, and don't mind being seen in one, definitely not in our futuristic Quest :P . Plus, those SUVs, boy aren't they expensive!
  • jipsterjipster Member Posts: 6,299
    Thanks tamu...no offense taken. The only real difference to us size wise, I thought, was the seating not as roomy in third room in MPV as others and space behind third row seat not as wide or deep. We are a family of 4 with small children so the the size of the MPV is just right for us. I believe our next minivan purchase in about 7 years will be one of the larger minivans. I don't know if Mazda will be bring our a much bigger MPV in the future than the current one. I am hoping they do.

    My choices after the MPV were the Sienna and the Quest. I really liked the center console and exterior styling of the Quest. The smooth ride of the Sienna.I was leaning towards the Sienna...the wife the Quest. Sienna dealer started playing games with us(Sienna very hot seller at the time) We test drove the MPV and both liked it just as well or better. Came with a $3,000 rebate...bingo. ;)
    2021 Honda Passport EX-L, 2020 Honda Accord EX-L, 2011 Hyundai Veracruz, 2010 Mercury Milan Premiere.
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    I'll second jipster there. The MPV is smaller than most of the other vans. If someone feels that it's too small for them, well, there are plenty of really good vans that are a size above.
    The Sienna and Odyssey were the original top choices for me. The Quest, although very capable, seemed a little quirky for my tastes. The MPV and Sedona were always just under the radar, till the very end. I'll admit it though, if price were not an issue, I might have gone with the Odyssey. (If we had gotten an Ody, my wife and I agreed we would get personalized plates, either HOMER, or D OH ) :blush:
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    The MPV is too small to play with the bigger boys - Ody, Sienna, Quest, DGC.

    Most/all minivan major comparos don't include the MPV or Sedona. The 2006 Sedona is larger and more competitive in size with the big boys and will likely be included in future comparos.
  • jipsterjipster Member Posts: 6,299
    "The MPV is too small to play with the bigger boys"

    Actually, except for cargo space...the MPV beat up on the bigger boys quite well. Cargo space was not a priority in our purchasing decision. When we test drove and looked at the 2004 Ody we were not that impressed. Handling and ride characteristics were not as good as MPV. Exterior styling of Ody was almost nonexistent in my opinion(2005 much better as they stole front end design of the MPV) Ody interior also a bit bland. MPV has much nicer interior.Better warranty and a much better price. Despite being offered invoice, plus about $1,800 in semiworthless dealer add ons(pinstriping, upholstery protection, mud flaps, alloy wheels(a good one)etc) we turned the Ody down. It came in fourth amoung the 4
    vans we looked at. It's a very good van and all...but a bit overrated in my opinion.

    If you are speaking of this year...I have not seen many comparisons of the MPV against the other maxi minis. That may be due to the question of the MPV returning for 2006 and beyond. Last year a little known magazine called Consumer Reports did a major comparision of minivans...which the MPV was included and did quite well.
    2021 Honda Passport EX-L, 2020 Honda Accord EX-L, 2011 Hyundai Veracruz, 2010 Mercury Milan Premiere.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Since they cannot play with the bigger boys, I believe that they are being discontinued.

    Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder as they say. For me, the MPV reminds me of those minivans in Japan(during my several trips there) that appear to be squished between a vise grip to fit into their narrow roads.
  • bluedevilsbluedevils Member Posts: 2,554
    Sedona has been included in plenty of major comparos.
  • bluedevilsbluedevils Member Posts: 2,554
    Yes, beauty IS in the eyes of the beholder. I think the MPV looks sharp and athletic-- for a minivan. I the Sedona looks classy. And I think the pre-2005 Ody is just about the ugliest minivan of the 21st century.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    "And I think the pre-2005 Ody is just about the ugliest minivan of the 21st century."

    I think the honor should go to the previous generation Sienna :) I can't stand looking at that thing.
  • lastwraithlastwraith Member Posts: 350
    I almost second that, but I think the Previas were even more hideous. Take a look at a 96 Previa sometime......ick.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    No. NO.

    Go back further to the Previa. Looks like a strange space alien.

    It is only when the American designers were hired did the evolution to western looks started... :)
  • jipsterjipster Member Posts: 6,299
    "It is only when the American designers were hired...."

    I doubt that. How then would one explain the Pontiac Transport or the Chevy Venture(an almost evil twin of the pre 2005 Ody)?
    2021 Honda Passport EX-L, 2020 Honda Accord EX-L, 2011 Hyundai Veracruz, 2010 Mercury Milan Premiere.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Fast forward to the present to the Aztek, Mon!

    Maybe there ex-Previa designer was hired by GM????
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Leave the Aztek alone man. Call me weird but I'm kinda fond of its strange looks :)

    The Previa and the old Sienna are the same ilk. Now that's a minivan I don't wanna be caught drivin...
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    The MPV is too small to play with the bigger boys - Ody, Sienna, Quest, DGC.

    You're right, it is smaller. I've never understood why people dismiss the MPV (as well as the short wheel base Caravans) just because it's smaller. The minivan segment seems to have a one size fits all mentality. Granted, the Ody/Sienna/GC segment is the most popular, but does that mean that all minivan owners want/need that size van? Heck, even SUV's come in all sorts of sizes. I don't often hear folks cross shopping CRV's and Durangos. Maybe it's because the minivan segment is smaller than sedans and SUV's. Certainly it's less sexy. I'm dissapointed with the possible demise of the MPV, but sales aren't all that good. The new Sedona is dimensionally, right in the heart of the major minivan players. Maybe Mazda's Zoom Zoom marketing prevents them from making a full size MPV. It seems they could do it and still have the small minivan market with the 5. Shoot, if Porsche can make an SUV, anything is possible.
    The shame of it is, is that there's less choice for the consumer. Talk to me in 5 or 6 years. Maybe I'll agree that the MPV is too small, maybe I'll love it's smaller size. Just be nice to have a choice.
  • bluedevilsbluedevils Member Posts: 2,554
    Okay, I'll call you weird :) The Rendezvous' looks have worn well on me, but the Aztek still strikes me as scary ugly.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    ABSOLUTELY NOT !! :blush:
    The 1999-2004 Odyssey is very attractive and to many of us, it is ALMOST as attractive as DaimlerChrysler minivans. ;)
    My vote for the ugliest minivan would go to the boxy Mitsubishi van of the early 1990's. :lemon:
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.