By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Denver-area dealership and would like to talk about your experience on
camera Saturday, January 31, 2004, please contact jfallon@edmunds.com
with your daytime contact information and the name of the dealership.
Responses must be in by Friday, January 30, 2004 for consideration.
What has the temperature been in your area lately?
DaveM
Other than the noise. car runs great. 48k miles without problems. Should you be concerned about the noise? well I don't know. I have an appointment for mine next week and will ask as well.
--Jay
-mike
DaveM
Liven up your evening and join your fellow enthusiasts every Tuesday from 6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET for our Mazda Mania Chat!
This coming week's chat on Feb 10 is also going to include a set of trivia questions about the 2004 Mazda models, gleaned from the pages of Edmunds.com! So study up and join us on Tuesday evening!!
/direct/view/.ef1b553
PF Flyer
Host
Pickups & News & Views Message Boards
I dunno, good luck, you're gonna need it.
-juice
Since your not too far from Minneapolis maybe call WhiteBear Subaru? They were the ones that fixed mine. They also have free loaners. Took them about 1 day to do mine.
--jay
Tony, I'm not sure you have a Lemon. The service guys told me its just a noise and doesnt affect performance. Still why did they fix mine? I don't know. Maybe they have some threshold? cetain amount of noise? not sure....Stick with Subaru. They seem to ussually come through for customers.
--jay
I imagine if Tony settles down and lets them hear it up close and in person then maybe they can help him also.
-juice
And I can understand his frustration. "I attempted to make another appointment with a different dealership. While explaining noise, I was cut off, and was told that Subaru just issued a memo on this noise and that due to a re-design of the engine, the noise I was hearing was normal and that they could take a look, but that there would be nothing that they could do for me. ... This conversation indicated to me that if a memo was just issued, I must not be the only one complaining."
And he has tried to duplicate the problem in other Bajas. "Prior to my first / original post I did not have the time to test drive another Baja. Since that time however I have had the opportunity to test drive 4 new models. I did not go back to the dealer that I purchased the Baja from. I drove to visit my brother in Madison WI. My brother and I drove two different Bajas and there was no noise. I also drove to the Minnapolis / St. Paul area and drove two more Bajas, no noise. All four Bajas sounded just like mine when I first purchased it. No clacking noise coming from the engine."
At this point, I think he needs Patti to get involved.
DaveM
I did not make the appointment
So they've only had one look at it. Get SoA and/or Patti involved, but a little persistence is required.
-juice
DaveM
-juice
Baja vs SportTrac:
I drove a Ford SportTrac 70k miles in one year before getting this Baja. Neither will satisfy the person with 'BIG truck syndrome', but for the suburbanite homeowner and dog lovers both qualify.
The Baja is a car that wants to be a truck... soft ride, low payload, great comfort and fuel economy.
The SportTrac is truck that wants to be a car....
Stiff ride, higher payload, spacious for 5 and if 20 mpg is good then it is good.
I like them both, but for driving lots of miles in the High Desert of Nevada and the mountains, the Baja is the best because of the AWD.
Supposedly there still won't be a midgate, but it should get the same improvements the Legacy got (longer wheelbase, wider track, more aluminum for less curb weight), and we should see less cladding also.
Plus, there will be a factory bed lid option, standard on the turbo.
Should be interesting. I wonder if that's enough to revitalize sales.
-juice
The Honda SUT will bear a close look when it comes out too. I see the Baja and the SUT dominating the small car/pickup crossover. The Nissans, Toyotas, SportTracs, etc, won't have the chassis, AWD, and mileage to compete.
John
-brianV
John
If so I think it'll be a low-volume model.
-juice
BTW, the Baja was the only Subaru that made the "green" list on greenercars.com. It is an efficient vehicle in comparison to many.
John
It's absurd to give trucks such a break, no wonder Subaru is calling the new Outback a truck.
The Outback is sold in a PZEV version in Cali yet it fails to make the list? Ridiculous.
-juice
By the way, Tony, if you go to 'Baja problem and Solution' board, you'll see my Post for my Baja gas tank sloshing gas problem. Patti told me to call 800 number and also opened a case number. I have been to the dealer's many many times (they all know me now) and had district engineer checked it. They could not do anything about it, but suggested me turn on the radio or CD loud to cover the sloshing gas/waving sound. See, Tony, maybe you should also turn on the radio loud to cover the Lawn Mower. Isn't that rediculous?!
I really hope Subaru continues to make the Baja. I really love the flexibility of the back area and it really gets alot of use especially in the summer. I have no issue with the payload because if I need to get something really big, I use my husbands truck. Overall, I still think its a great car.
Please respond to newswiz@earthlink.net and/or jfallon@edmunds.com by Friday, March 5 with your name, daytime contact information and some information about your vehicle.
Thanks!
Jeannine Fallon
PR Director
Edmunds.com
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Anyway, I prefer the looks, utility, and price of the Baja Turbo over the Forester XT, and I plan on buying one. My only issue with the XT was the short gearing of the 5 speed, and my perceived ill-mated combination of the engine and tranny. The only time I could smoothly shift the XT, was when it was not in boost. When I would wind it up to redline, the shifts were very herky-jerky. The short throw shifter and the copious torque made the XT very difficult to shift smoothly and drive aggressively simultaneously. Has anyone driven both the Forester XT and Baja Turbo 5 speed? I have always owned stick shift cars, but my idea of a smooth shift, and the XT's idea are two polar expectations. I love the diabolical thrust of the 2.5T, but I'm thinking the automatic may be the better choice for me.
The salesguy drove the car off the lot and for the first few miles, and he too could not shift the car smoothly while the turbo was on boil. I'd love to hear from any 2.5T 5 speed owners. Do the gear changes get smoother as either the clutch is broken in or you get more familiar with the right RPM/clutch action? Thanks!
I think the Baja has taller gearing, so the issue will be less pronounced.
-juice
In my mind, this is a good thing, since the low first gives a good start for towing, but the tall 5th gear gives reduced RPM and mpg improvements. Note, the BT gets 1 mpg better than the XT, despite its 500 lb weight handicap and much less efficent body size and shape.
John
I went to the "Reliablity Histories" for the Baja found on p. 92 and found that it scored in the middle for Body Integrity. Everything else had a full red bubble or half full red bubble indicating it had few trouble spots. At the bottom it received a black X indicating "Worse than average reliability". After some looking for a detailed description of Body Integrity I found this, "Seals, weather striping, air and water leaks, wind noise, rattles and squeaks".
I have had my Baja for 3 months and 3700 miles with only one small complaint which the dealer fixed no questions asked. I have been very pleased with the car/truck/whatever it is. I have no evidence of any problems that the above description describes, even with -20 F temperatures and roads that are very rough due to frozen slush.
My guess is that Consumer Reports had an extremely small sample size for their data collection which skewed results.
Any one have problems of this nature with their Baja or have further insight into Consumer Reports flip flop on the rating for the Baja?
-juice
I live in MN a little ways north of Minneapolis. I currently drive a '96 Chevy 1/2 ton V8. I am single and mid-20s (no kids or family). I am considering an '04 Baja Turbo 5-speed for the much (!!) increased mileage, comfortable ride, reliability, and versatility. I am looking to current Suby/Baja owners for their experiences and advice.
Trailering: I have a 14 ft aluminum fishing boat (about 1200 lbs fully loaded), usually pull it short distances, occasionally up to 2-3 hours. Will the Baja Turbo 5-spd handle this? This boat or a small utility trailer will be the max of my towing.
I love my current truck for its hauling capacity, but the most I ever really haul is a small ice fishing shelter, a canoe, a portable tree stand and bow, or a dozen duck decoys. All of my duck hunting is from a canoe, which I presume will fit on top of the Subaru (again, 99% short distances).
I would like to change to a Suby (will be my first) as my driving mileage is greatly increasing. Along with the fishing and hunting, it will be a daily driver and for mtn biking/backpacking/camping/skiing trips. With high miles almost anywhere I drive, the 13-14 mpg of my pickup isn't cutting it anymore.
I can count on one hand the number of times I have really needed the 4X4 in two years. I don't think switching to AWD/lower ride will get in the way. Even with the 4X4, I still usually choose to hike it rather than risk anything that would probably out-do the AWD Subaru. If it can take 3-4" of muddy road/two-track, I'm set.
I considered a Forester/Outback, but for the muddy/dirty stuff would really prefer even the small pickup bed.
I would love to hear from people esp in cold climes and their experiences/thoughts on this use of the Baja Turbo. Also, any drawbacks/negatives/alternatives. I'm new to Subaru!!
The Baja did not suit me because I am 6'3", and my head was in the roof both front and back. The Forester is quite spacious, head and leg room in the drivers seat are adequate. I think for towing, the Baja would handle your boat very well.
John
And now to a comment for Yooper.
Yooper, I can attest to the Seal Problems. All four window seals and the sun / moon roof on my 2003 Baja have air leaks. The noise is not very noticeable when driving in town under 35 mph, but on the highway at 55 - 70 mph the leaky seals around the windows is very noticeable in normal weather conditions. If the day is a breezy or windy day, watch out, they actually squeal, and I swear that I can see the glass moving in and out. I was rolling down the windows and then rolling them back up to have a better seal, but this does not even work now.
I have not contacted the dealer on this as of yet. I have not had the time, just got the Baja back after having the pistons replaced, and am not sure if I am ready to do battle with their service department again. As long as they don't leak with water, I'll have to ignore the noise for now, until I have more time.
Comment for Tooth2.
I too hear the sloshing of the gas on the in side the Baja. It's nice to know that I have gas, but isn't that what the gas gauge is for? It is un-nerving hearing the slosh of the gas as I turn corners, stop etc. The noise kind of creeps me out.
Subaru does recommend you get trailer brakes for a load over 1000 lbs, but so does everyone else, including Chevy trucks I believe.
I think you're on the right track. Demand is slow to deal hard, you should be able to get a deal.
My worst mileage ever was 17.3mpg during a towing trip, but I was towing the entire time. I normally average 25mpg. My (educated) guess is the turbo will average 20-22 mpg and get about 17mpg towing that kind of load.
-juice
I enjoy my base OB Wagon for lots of hunting and fishing. The AWD is great for wet dirt roads and grass fields. Navigates well on the lakes with and without snow.
Both the Forester and OB Wagons have a big heavy floor mat for wet and muddy items in the back. Hauls my ice shack (38"x 54") without problem. Baja might be to short unless you have the gate extention?
I average 23mpg in winter and 27-28 in the summer.
For towing it should be OK. Chevy trucks will pull 2000lbs without brakes. That is what our Tahoe is rated for. We use the Tahoe for the camper and 3 kids. (15 to 18mpg)
Fun factor...Baja turbo, Forest XT or 2005 Outbacks... lots of choices.
Lower cost: plain Baja, Forester or base OB.
All good choices.
I bought mine at Rudy Luther Subaru/Isuzu/Accura in White Bear Lake MN.
--jay
note: Yes I said drives on the lake. For the rest of you, it is a common practive in MN and WI during the winter months. Lake Millacs even plows and puts up road signs.
-mike
BTW, Chevy is one of the few vehicle makers to list unbraked towing in their brochures.
Bob
-mike
Bob
The turbo's hardware is beefier and should be fine.
-juice
Hopefully, more people will answer their survey next year giving the Baja a more deserving rating.
It was a non turbo 2.5 automatic, and my only complaint with the vehicle itself was the lousy stero.
The only reason I didn't buy it was because of a nasty case of being upside down in my current loan.
The dealer asked for $9000 over the MSRP of $23,595 to cover my negative equity. For $9000 I decided to keep my 2003 Accord LX and enjoy it (and maybe start making double payments on it :-{
Oh yeah, there was no price break on the Legacy 35th, either. I was approved for the 1.9 financing, but we were too far apart in price, I guess. I may consider trying to do this transaction online, but it's tough when a trade is involved.
But really, you're better off waiting until you're not upside down.
-juice
Anyway, Saturday night I was at the Volvo/Virgin All Access Drive event in Foxboro, MA, and I got to drive a manual and automatic version of both the T5 and 2.4i Volvo S40. The non turbo 5 cyl is actually very pleasant with the manual, and for $24,200, will have my serious consideration along with the new Legacy/Outback/Baja. What's funny is that there is always quite a bit of talk about Subaru in the Volvo forums. These two car companys seem to design and build cars that appeal to similar sensibilities, yet, are very different.
CR surveys owners and asks them if they'd buy the same car again, once again Forester came out on top in its class.
So yeah, we tend to like 'em.
I'm actually registered for the Volvo event in DC, that's funny. I like to sample as many cars as possible, to see what's out there. I've sat in an S40 and found it sorta small, about WRX sized, though. The V50 looks bigger.
Then again the Baja is kinda tight inside.
-juice
Forester was tied for 3rd in the JD Power Initial Quality study, CR-V was 1st, then RAV4, then Forester and Santa Fe (tied). That's not bad.
Besides, though, that's only looking at 90 days when everthing is under warranty and fixed for free. I say "who cares?". IQ is just a forecast, really.
JDP's own Durability Study is much more significant. It looks at 5 year old models that are out of warranty.
CR also looks at longer term numbers. Subaru tends to score better on longer term studies.
Unless you lease a new car every 2 years...
Back to Baja, AN says Subaru might discontinue it, but only after the 2006 model year. Wonder if it'll continue on the current chassis until then?
-juice