Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I'll bet he was one of those "new citizen" cougars, too--maybe migrated from another state, or even another country, so did not understand the laws of your state... or just didn't feel in the mood to follow them!
The only cougars in my neighborhood drive high end SUVs :shades:
Other than that, saw nothing bad on local roads other than the usual slowpokes.
Second was a woman in an Acura, wouldn't pull up less than 2 car lengths behind the car in front of her at lights, and was going slow. At a light, I eventually needed room to get into the upcoming right turn lane, so I beeped the fintail's horn, which is loud - she jumped out of her seat. I scared her and good. She must have been in her own dumb little world.
Third, old woman in a CRV. Right lane closed for construction, so she was going slow - not a problem as the upcoming light will be red anyway thanks to the efforts of our "engineers" who are so accountable and skilled. But when the lane opens and the construction ends,she continues to go 20-25 - in a 35. I went around, don't know how far back she was when I exited the road.
And topped off with a very short woman I won't describe, in an S550, driving with the gas door open. I guess when someone else bought the car, it doesn't matter.
I've also recently come down with a motorcycle itch, I think next month I am going to take some classes as it has been too long since I have been on 2 wheels. I expect to see some real intelligence on the roads then.
When I ride, I assume that I am invisible- and if anyone CAN see me, they will try their best to kill me...
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport; 2020 C43; 2021 Sahara 4xe 1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i Son's: 2009 328i; 2018 330i xDrive
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
Might be a good excuse to get that go pro camera I have been wanting, too. The dumb things I'll be able to put on youtube.
Plus, I knew it was a matter of time. Sooner or later, everybody crashes.
I'd end up being a Sunday/low hours driver, and keep off some of the negligently designed deathtrap roads (like any highway in Snohomish county). Just have an itch for a new toy I guess.
It's the smog. (WSJ)
"Recent studies show that breathing street-level fumes for just 30 minutes can intensify electrical activity in brain regions responsible for behavior, personality and decision-making."
around here there are miles inbetween exits, but nobody moves to the right as required. Especially Priuses - they really are the worst middle-lane-hoggers around here, always going WAY slower than the rest of traffic.
Priuses almost never hog the *left* lane however.
While on foot I saw a very old man with one of those 4-footed canes start crossing the road. It was obvious he was not going to make it by the time the light changed, so I went out to ask if he wanted assistance, and to keep any idiots from flying around the corner and hitting him. As I am out encouraging him to move along, woman pulls up in a Pilot and honks. Really? I was hoping the old guy would bash her grille in with the cane.
Guy flying up a narrow side street and she had to swerve (almost hitting the curb) to miss him.
Then SHE was inconsiderate and made a right hand turn into traffic a little too close for my comfort (naturally I didn't say one word) :shades:
2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Ram 1500 Bighorn, Built to Serve
If someone enters your travel lane and you hit them how is that your fault? Right of way laws should protect you there.
2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Ram 1500 Bighorn, Built to Serve
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Saw several "drivers" (term used very loosely) driving/turning like that today.
I wonder what the damage will be to those who sit too close to the wheel, as well.
It's pretty close. I live fairly south, but once you get up past exit 8A it gets to be a pretty quick pace.
I have routinely been passed like I was standing still at 85.
2 inches from the back of my bumper will earn them a nice, gradual slowdown
If I was driving that is what I would have done, but my Fiance doesn't like to do things like that. She just moves over and allows them to pass.
2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Ram 1500 Bighorn, Built to Serve
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
I remember years ago my sister tried to pull that trick while I was driving. I hit the brakes, she yelled, I said "brakes felt a little soft, thought I would test them". She got the point, never did it again.
Yesterday I was out on a mountain bike for the first time in a long while. It wasn't relaxing whenever more than one car was around. People either don't see you, or freeze up and stop.
The problem there is the failure to yield, not the California Stop on Right Turns. The California stop isn't designed to let you cut off traffic, only to make a right turn when there is no other traffic in the way.
Speaking of which, there are some cars out there capable of making a 90 degree right turn at speeds faster than 5-10 mph, and safely.
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport; 2020 C43; 2021 Sahara 4xe 1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i Son's: 2009 328i; 2018 330i xDrive
I haven't been on 2 wheels more than a mountain bike in many years. I am going to take some MSF classes in the upcoming weeks. I want to get into it even though part of me is telling me to keep away due to expense and risk. A co-worker is egging me on as he rides a lot.
Eh, why not? You're a single guy in your 30's; if it is something you want to do, now is a good time to do it. It seems to me like you're approaching it in the right way, so that "part of you" should be satisfied. It's funny to think that twenty years ago, there likely wouldn't have been any peep from that part at all. :P
There's risk in everything that is worth doing.
20 years ago, I was still looking forward to getting my license. About the peep...I'll just say I'm not telling my mother or my siblings about this :shades:
Hahahahaha; good call... better to wait until after the decision is made. Maybe show up to the family reunion on it or something.
I would really like to get one, but my other half has words about that. Maybe when I finish my house and have a garage in which to keep it. Then again, I don't think that a garage will change her mind about it.
Speaking of bad drivers, yesterday's evening drive was the easiest I remember in weeks - nothing sticks out. Did get to yell at a few dawdling phone yappers while I was on foot, though. This morning was a breeze, too. Maybe the dopes are on vacation.
A couple things stick in my memory today: Lexus with several "8"s in its personalized plate, 40mph divided 4 lane road, it was in the left lane going insanely slow, I think it actually might have stopped after awhile as it dropped way back fast. Second was a 90s Suburban towing an old trailer overloaded with gravel. Of course it was out crawling along in rush hour traffic. The ancient cracked bias ply tires on the trailer were downright scary.
A case in point:
This morning, a driver (some sexless ageless creature, maybe young boy, maybe middle-aged woman) entered the street from a gas station right in front of me, crossed lanes at 90 degrees, almost created an accident, ant then proceeded with more barbarities for which they used to suspend licenses in the past. I stopped behind it at a traffic light trying to write down/take a picture of his/her/its numberplates, and when the light turned green, the creature didn't move for a long time. All the while yapping on a cell phone.
The most frustrating is not the danger itself (so far, I managed to anticipate or handle all emergency situations), but rather our total helplessness to do anything about it. I almost jumped out of my skin trying to attract attention of that driver by very intense honking and all kinds of gestures, but the subject was totally oblivious to my very presence on the road, and I believe it didn't fake it.
In the past, we used to cut off in a lane, then hit the brakes and gas in the next instance. I haven't done it this time, though.
While on foot I also saw 2 cars pull right in front of others when entering a major street from a minor cross street or driveway. Corolla and Camry. Latter got a nice loud horn aimed at it.
It also probably has something to do with the 1 point on my record for speeding from the CHP about 1.5 years ago that I didn't have time to fight so just plead guilty and did my traffic school online. They like to charge progressively more for subsequent tickets in CA.
Oh to top it off, the traffic engineering survey shows that this portion of roadway has approximately 1/10th as many accidents as would be expected on an average roadway given the length of roadway and vehicle miles travelled upon it.
So why is the La Mesa PD issuing so many speeding tickets on a portion of roadway that's TEN times safer than average? That's right, it's all about safety! :mad: :confuse: :sick:
Maybe because drivers in the area know that the La Mesa PD patrols this road regularly thus (most) drivers keep their speed down?
Yet, from a long 8 years ago, the 85th percentile speed was measured at 6 MPH over the underposted speed limit of 35 MPH. That means 15% of drivers are going faster than 41 MPH regularly.
And call me logical, but since were setting a speed limit (an upper limit) and not a speed average, I'd set the speed limit at 45 MPH given an 85th percentile reading of 41; why round down when setting an UPPER limit? Am I being too logical? I'd certainly never lower the speed limit below 40 given that measurement, unless I was corrupt.
No, not at all.
You noted the low accident rate on this stretch of road. Ever consider that the low speed limit, coupled with regular enforcement, has something to do with that?
Still complaining about being a "victim"? It 's always unfair, isn't it?
I do have a suggestion...try NOT SPEEDING! What a concept!
Since studies show that the 85th percentile is hardly changed at all (maybe 1 MPH for every 5 MPH change in the speed limit at most) by increases or decreases in the posted speed limit, I would say that the speed limit has nothing at all to do with the low accident rate. They are not even correlated.
Since the actual real life speeds people drive are much higher than the posted speed limit, and the accident rate is low, it makes sense that the speed limit should be increased so that we don't make "criminals" out of the average driver.
I definitely don't think regular enforcement reduces accident rates. In fact, I'd bet big money on heavy enforcment increasing accident rates substantially, as drivers will then have to pay extra attention and effort to spot cops instead of potential road hazards. And after all, we all know most all accidents are caused by inattention, and almost never by speed.
If low real world actual speeds actually reduced accidents, then all of the slower residential and underposted arterial roadways would have lower accident rates than say... freeways, with their high speed limits. Why isn't that the case?
That doesn't work. The first time I was pulled over for speeding in La Mesa by a La Mesa PD cop, I wasn't even speeding.
Falsely accused. False charges alleged. Found guilty by mail. Case dismissed at the real "in-person" trial (officer didn't show and this was at their "home" courthouse, in El Cajon).
At least this time I was within 5 MPH of the alleged speed by the officer. The problem is.... I still wasn't speeding because the sign is wrong, it doesn't follow the 85th percentile traffic engineering survey. Also, in CA, we have that safe, reasonable, and prudent speed standard. He's going to have to prove I was posing a hazard in some way to someone or something.
And while I will grant you that speed in & by itself is not the primary cause of some accidents, it is contributory - speeding can be part and parcel a result of inattention.
While speed may not cause them, it still has much to do with the severity of damages & injuries that occur when crashes do happen. You can't argue physics.
It almost seems as if you're out there baiting the cops with your driving behaviors, daring them to stop you so you can generate yet another little spat. You must have too much spare time to spend so much of it on this. My advice would be just slow down, enjoy the ride & use up some of that spare time.
That's simply not true. It's a common misconception, but it is exactly that, a myth. Countless studies have shown this to be false. Many speed limits have been raised and lowered over the years, yet the 85th percentile speed measurements almost always remain virtually the same with little impact or correlation to the speed limit.
People simply drive what they feel comfortable and safe driving, regardless of what the two numbers on an aluminum sign say.
Go to Arizona or Texas, then to CA.
I guarantee you'll fully 100% grasp this concept easily by observation. In CA, you'll see that a good percentage of drivers go 10-15 MPH faster over the speed limit on freeways posted at 65 MPH or 70MPH. In Arizona, you will not find nearly as many going 10 to 15 over the 75 MPH speed limit.
In Texas, I'm positive you won't find an equal percentage going 90-95 in zones with the new 80 MPH speed limit.
That human nature argument is false.
That is one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever seen.
But let's assume you are correct. If so, your assertion condemns you and your driving behavior. You frequently exceed posted limits by a considerable margin, correct? You are thus on the lookout for speed enforcement, correct? Thus you are driving in an unsafe manner and potentially causing more accidents because you are paying attention to spot cops vs. potential road hazards.
So why not slow down and focus more on looking out for those potential road hazards?
Also, your statement re slower speeds on non-freeways not causing reduced accident rates vs. freeways has flawed logic. Speeds are relative to the road, traffic, etc. So 35 mph on a given city street may be unsafe, while 75 mph on a freeway might be perfectly safe.
Although many do pay attention to the sign and hold themselves to it no matter what. I see people tapping their brakes and slowing down on wide open roads as they approach the usually arbitrary limit. Speed kills, show me the money.
I have to say, he does remind me of myself...when I was seventeen.