Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

134689478

Comments

  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    If given the choice of staying in the right lane at 65mph, then slowing to 50mph because someone just got on, then getting back up to 65mph only to slow for traffic exiting, then getting back up to 65 mph and once again slowing for cars entering at the next on ramp, I'd just as soon drive a constant 75 in the left lane. So shoot me.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    The discussion I created (this one) is a topic on a Wednesday Town Hall Chat, and on the day before my birthday. I'm extra flattered now. Please e-mail me and I'll give my address for the royalty check(s).

    I think I'll celebrate by getting some messy cheeseburgers in the drive-thru, and eating them while talking on my cell phone at 55 mph in the left lane on the Kennedy Expressway.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    Just because the car behind you drives inconsiderately, doen't mean you shoud as well. Plus, once he's in front of you, the cops will tag him vs. you. ;)
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    .......just the same, given heavyish traffic and cops notwithstanding, I'm not gonna pull behind traffic going 55 if I'm in the left lane going 75 *just* so the jerk behind me can save another ten seconds off his trip. More than likely, the guy in front of me is going 75 as well. Even if there's nobody in front of me, too bad, the guy behind can wait til there's a decent break, at which point I'll gladly move right. I refuse to go 90 or 55 if I want to go 75 just to make others happy, sorry. I'm not sacrificing my own safety and/or time crunch for the guy behind me. I'm not by any means an LLC, but I will also not be intimidated into moving over into really slow traffic just because someone behind me is being unreasonable. Does that make me inconsiderate? I fear the answer is yes, I guess I don't care. Flame on.
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    If I had an Impala, a TL, a Diamante, a Seville, a Milennia, or a Buick (any model!)... I would be tempted to LLC. However, I drive a 'tin can' (GM fanatic's words, not mine). On Detroit area expressway, this is not a LLC machine. WHY?
    I'll tell you why... Mr. Chevy Truck and Mr. GMC Truck don't like each other, so they gotta race at 85 mph in their trucks (hey, if you wanna speed 100 mph in your Bonnevilles and Impalas, cool, but not your 'sport trucks')... and they don't really give much care to, you know, little Japanese sport coupes. Thus, I can't LLC, even if I wanted to.

    Usually, Detroit traffic is where I am scrambling at 90 to reach the traffic in front of me. Inconsiderate? You bet! All those Big Three employees get in their cars at the end of the day and blast home to watch Channel 7 News and pig out on ice cream.

    Detroit rush hour is fun... betcha you didn't know a Malibu is a NASCAR racing speed demon ...
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    Rush Hour I-275 'Detroit 500'...
    Here's Bob in his Malibu
    Passing Chris in his Aztek
    Almost cut off by Mike in his Century
    Racing past Jim in his Taurus
    And here's Lance in his Sunfire on the onramp!

    Average speed: 80-85 mph
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    ... in her Grand Am... whoa Grandma, slowwww down ....!

    (Actually, this is a true case... my Grandmother loves her
    Grand Am... smoking and driving, lots of fun!)
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    I believe you are mistaken...it's Mr. Chevy Truck versus Mr. Ford truck, and the winner gets the rights to put the little "Calvin urinating on the logo of your choice" sticker on their back window.
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    I regulary "peg" the speedo in my 87 LeSabre. But I do understand where you are going with that. It is funny when I catch someone at the traffic lights choosing to get behind the other vehicle because I'm the first car out in my lane. I usually then take off exceptionally hard just to make them wonder why they always choose the wrong lane, LOL!

    I'd like to peg the speedo in my SVT Contour, but that's around 160+ MPH, so I'll need a bit more room and motor for that chore.

    TB
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    It's not always a look of cluelessness I see. Sometimes it is one of studious defiance, as if they made a point of staying right where they were and now they're making a point of staring straight ahead like they don't see me.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    If there's traffic in front of me, and traffic to the right is heavy as well, I don't yield as well.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    I'll always move right if it's easy, safe and convenient, but if Goofy in my rearview won't concede that he just can't go 85 when all other traffic is going 55-75, I'm not going to help him.
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    Let's say I'm in the left of two lanes going in one direction on a divided highway. I'm behind someone, and we're both going 15 above the limit. No one in the right lane.

    I see someone coming up behind me at 25 above the limit. Realizing I'm LLCing, I move to the right lane and maintain my chosen speed, as does the guy ahead of me, who stays in the left lane, typically oblivious to his surroundings.

    The guy behind us brakes, and has to endure our rolling roadblock for miles and miles.

    In this scenario I have followed the strict anti-LLC rules, so I have done absolutely nothing wrong.

    Right?
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    In that case, I might have tried to stay left to see if Mr./Ms. 25- Over would just pass us on the right (they typically will). Otherwise, if I had moved right and inadvertently created a 'roadblock' cuz the person in front didn't move over, I'd back off my speed for a few seconds to give Speedy an out. Then he'll know I was the one who at least *tried* be inconsiderate, while my former lane mate just sits there oblivious. Part of being a considerate driver is also knowing what's going on immediately behind you, it can be important.
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    The Saint Clair county sheriff deputy who just felt 65 wasn't fast enough on the ramp where eastbound I64 exits to southbound I255. So he crosses two solid white lines to reach speeds in excess of 80 MPH. (I know because I wasn't gaining on him at 80 8^) )

    No light bar going to warn folks or anything, 1AM. Very good chance of coming up on someone half asleep or unaware of what was going on.

    These are the same folks who want to give me a ticket when I'm 18 over, clear sunny day, only car on the road.

    Give me a break. Deputy Friendly was not worried about safety tonight.

    TB
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    LLCing itself is not the real problem, but it often causes the problem. The problem here is flow blockage - bunched up traffic that obstructs the flow of traffic that wants to move faster. Obviously if someone wants to cross Idaho alone on an Interstate, in the left lane, he is causing no problem. But in traffic, drivers need to take the necessary actions to keep the left side open for faster traffic.

    All this wrangling about when to move over, and brake-checking (there's a bright idea in heavy traffic!) etc. is dancing around the point. If people would just pass, spread out and get away from other cars as much as traffic will allow, then it will flow better, and give more room for reactions when something goes wrong. Bunched up packs are dangerous.

    I guess the opposite is true when traffic is too heavy to spread out. During heavy traffic periods, when all of the lanes are full, most of these rules are out the window. Usually there isn't room to get over, and the few morons who think they can get home 20 seconds faster by zipping through the slots between other cars should vaporized.
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    Yep -- the efficient flow of traffic is all that matters; thoughtlessly adhering to every little driving rule does not work.
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    Driving is about being awake... not thinking about all the ideas you get in driver's ed class. Drive = Think (and as Chrysler says after their K-car era hs ended... Drive = Love)!
  • davv62davv62 Member Posts: 76
    "The purpose of the law is to guide wise men and restrain fools."

    "Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds."

    I agree with these statements. Drivers should always always be aware of the higher purpose behind the law, and that should come above following the law itself.

    If I have an 18-wheeler on my tail, and I need to speed in order not to have him on my tail, you best believe I'm going to do it, for my own safety.

    I also make sure that I am not contributing to any blockage of traffic.

    The law cannot envision every circumstance, and the ideal situation is when drivers are smart enough to know how to create the safest possible situation on the roads, even if it means bending the old rules a little bit at times.
  • blh7068blh7068 Member Posts: 375
    This happens to me fairly often...I drive faster on the highways than a lot of folks, but certainly not all. I'll be happy to move out of the left lane for some one who is going faster than me...but not before I' m through passing the cars to the right that are going slower than me

    Common merging problem in OK- most here do not successfully know how to negotiate a safe merge. Speed limits are 65-70 on most freeways in OK. Its probably not a good idea to slow down to 20-30 mph(or in a rare and very dangerous instance..STOP!) just before entering a highway. Why others dont realize that the need to speed up makes slipping into the flow of traffic so much easier...

    Classic- When negotiating a cloverleaf...you merge on and the person who wants off cuts right in front of you.
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    Had your classic yesterday. Getting on the freeway and I'm accelerating. Clown trying to get off tries to pass two more cars before getting off, mine and the one in front of me also getting off. BTW, no one behind me getting on the freeway.

    The guy in front of me slows in the acceleration/decelleration lane and our intrepid passer completes his exit in the safety vee.

    It's a good thing I wasn't first, because I would have continued accelerating on the shoulder if I had to 8^), at least long enough to make Mr, "I don't understand courtesy or driving rules enough to know that I shouldn't try to pass two accelrating cars when I ultimately have to slow down to take the ramp."

    Sheesh.

    TB
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    Especially if you're on the Missouri side, some of those cloverleafs in St. Louis are *quite* treacherous. My mom used to live off 40 and Lindbergh, there was never any room to accelerate or decelerate on those exits, and the 'loops' were very sharp turns.
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    I know that one. Many people stop at the end of the ramps from Lindberg to 40. I've seen them stop in every possible direction getting onto 40.

    However, my favorite ramps are the ones from Northbound 255 getting onto eastbound Illinois 15 and Eastbound I64/US40. Both have some nifty ess turns in them that I like to take about 75+ in my SVT, probably 65 in the Buick with the 16" wheels/tires on when possible. (Rarely, too many people in SUVs who have to do the recommended speed or lower! Many of the drivers go fast on ice when they need to slow down, then the slow down in the curves when I want to go fast.)

    And don't even get me started about I270 Northbound, just north of I44. The curve is not so treacherous that everyone needs to slow to 35. Yet let a little traffic get on the road, and that's what happens, maybe we go 35 MPH until we get past that gentle right hand curve.

    Sheesh!

    TB
  • oldharryoldharry Member Posts: 413
    Every time I travel any distance on an expressway I see this phenomenon several times. While I am moving a conservative 15 mph over the limit, a line of three to six cars passes me going at least triple digits with less than a half car length between them. I guess their speed, as I fear that if I used my moving mode radar gun, the front car may have a detector, and brake suddenly. I don't want to cause anyone to get hurt, not even these idiot that do not understand basic physics.

    Harry
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    People need to understand the importance of the smooth flow of traffic, but when that becomes an unreasonable expectation we need to realize that everybody is late for something or wants to get somewhere. However, if we start acting rude and uncivilized with our cars it sets a precedent and encourages everybody to buy into the 'me-first' mentality, the idea that their right to go faster than everybody else overrides everyone else's right to a safe, peaceful drive.
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    That if the "flow of traffic" is 75 mph, the people driving 55 mph are a hazard, but the ones driving 100 mph are not? Indeed, to those travelling 100mph, someone who is driving with the flow of traffic is the hazard. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    People who insist on driving 90-100 mph while others are driving ~75 mph are definitely at least as hazardous as those driving 'too slow' (just based on the basic science(s) of velocity vs. potential for accidents, etc.). The people driving that fast are invariably the same drivers passing on the shoulders, weaving, driving at excessive speeds in inclement weather, with their children unteathered, etc.). Categorically unsafe.
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    ... do not necessarily disregard other rules of the road, such as driving on shoulder!
  • kinleykinley Member Posts: 854
    the diesel driver pulls into the mall parking space next to you and lets the engine idle while wife shops for a couple of hours. Result: a stinking headache. Does he care? And why doesn't the engine get turned off?
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    Ouch Kinley, that one takes honors!
  • oldharryoldharry Member Posts: 413
    It could be the diesel driver recognized the LLC that held him back on the freeway last week, and seeing him sitting in the car, deliberately parked up wind and kept the engine running. :<)

    Harry
  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    Last garage sale. And we have a big sale, lots of stuff, lot of people stop.

    Ford diesel truck driver (woman), a F250 or F350, pulls into the driveway and within 10 feet of the garage doors. People had to move aside as she was coming in.

    She then got out, letting this noisy, smelly monster run and started talking to a friend she found that was there. You actually could not talk over the noise of that thing.

    People are such a$$hOOOOs.

    Look back, I should have gotten into it and driven it down the block, leaving it there idling.
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    It's comical, if it wasn't so inconsiderate as well!
  • im_brentwoodim_brentwood Member Posts: 4,883
    Yeah... those are my real favorites... especially here in Orlando, particularly on I-4 where the Turnpike meets.

    You have one lane at 40, one at 60 and another with the odd 90+mph nutjob blasting throuygh slow traffic.

    They're as dangerous as LLCs.

    Good post on the traffic flow.

    My other pet Peeve?

    Damned REAR fog lights!

    Bill
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    From speed differential, yes, both 100 mph and 55 mph are very dangerous. The difference I would note is that driver going 100 mph has to pay attention to the traffic around him, while the driver going 55 may or may not.
  • ranaldranald Member Posts: 147
    I hope you're not serious about that.

    Everyone has to pay attention to the traffic around them, all the time. It doesn't matter whether they're going faster or slower than the "flow of traffic".
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    The problem is - is the guy going 100mph really paying more attention? I would venture to guess that while some do, some will be cruising at 100+ mph with a cell phone against their ear. Either way, if the flow of traffic is 75, then someone going 25mph faster does pose a threat.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    I hope you're wrong about that. Most of the high speed drivers I've seen are the ones who weave in and out of traffic. You have to pay some attention to traffic if you're going to do that.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not defending them by any means. It's just what I've noticed. Many of the slow drivers are oblivious to traffic around them, while high speed drivers at least have to pay some attention to the traffic in front of them to weave through them.
  • alexradualexradu Member Posts: 9
    about this. While I'm VERY tolerant with honest mistakes, nothing makes my blood boil more than the "me first" "important" [non-permissible content removed]-holes. But the main idea here is the mentality in North America that driving is a right, not a privilege. Therefore, the driving exams are a simple formality (I am in a continuous amazement as to how many drivers (especially women, I must say), for instance, are completely incapable of parallel-parking). I have learned to drive in Europe (narrow streets, extremely dense population & traffic, etc). The exam consisted of a) theory b) skill with the car, while in the "parking lot" - timed exam - all kinds of parking (front, reverse, parallel left, parallel-right, stopping on a steep ramp and starting from there without going back a single inch, slalom, breaking, etc c) day-time street driving and d) night time street driving. All in all, it was tough.

    The circulation in Europe might seem very chaotic to North-American eyes, but trust me, it's not. The rules are more logical, in my opinion the drivers are more skilled (because of the training & practice), and while sounding scary, it's much faster & fluid. Whereas here, it's slow and yet quite hazardous.

    They made the following experiment - they simply removed the speed limits on some streets & highways (by simply not enforcing them at all). The whole traffic settled at a much higher speed than the previous "legal speed". And yet there have been *MUCH" fewer accidents - people "arranged themselves" to drive at speeds they were comfortable with. Very few people drove faster then the average - the whole traffic was much better. This reminds me of that French park designer who created the parks but did NOT set the alleys at all - he first let people set their own paths in the grass. Obviously the people decided themselves better which were the better directions for them. Only after a year or so, after the trails have formed, did the architect order the paving of those trails. Smart ? No. Elementary. But not for our traffic law-makers & police.

    There are highway curves and merges here in Montreal where the posted speed limit is "45" km/h - about 30 mph, even if you have reserved merging lanes ! Honestly, it's perfectly safe, in good weather, to take them at 90 km/h, even in old econoboxes. In bad weather, people automatically adapt - the traffic thru there is then at about 40-50 km/h, without any police enforcing it.

    It's better and safer to educate people about driving instead of fragmenting the traffic and handing sppeeding tickets left and right. Unfortunately, the police is only doing the latter.
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    The drivers probably don't even know they have them on their car, let alone have them on.

    I asked my gf what the bright orange light was on the headlight control of her Mercedes. She had no idea, but it had always been on when she drove at night. I quickly figured out it was a rear fog light, and told her to never pull the knob back that far, unless it was actually foggy.

    I think the Aurora has not one, but two rear fog lights, separated from the other taillights.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    Saabs and Audis have them also. I would bet half the drivers don't know they even have them, and many of those don't even know they're on all the time.

    OTOH, I guess driving with too many lights on isn't as bad as driving without them (like my brother, who drove my Saab 900 the other night about five miles without the headlights on). I always keep the switch on, they turn off when the car goes off. Unfortunately, the dash lights are on even when the headlights aren't on, so dufus brother thought the headlights were on. D'oh!!
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    Lots of people here in Chicago head to the nearest 'gap' between parked cars, or the nearest parking lot, to turn around when they see the never-ending line of traffic in front of them. This is usually done on two-lane roads, which is fine in principal (though I don't think it's kosher to turn around by 'diving' between two parked cars, but it's common practice here).

    The problem is that many people do this without making sure nobody is coming from *either* direction, then they take both lanes to back out into traffic. I saw a driver in a Celebrity or some other old junk almost get *smacked* by a new Audi wagon recently doing just that.

    Also, I think if the driver is turning around by pulling into a parking lot, they should at least use that lot to turn around. This way, they can at least leave the lot facing forward, giving everyone a better chance to avoid a collision.
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    Sham-social-science v. alcohol

    For lack of a better discussion topic for this...


    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,50104,00.html

    "Why is Hingson playing fast and loose with the data? He's on the board of directors of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)."

  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    How come there's no Drunk Driving topic here?

    ;|
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    MADD called me this morning as I was opening my beer... my root beer, that is. Stupid surveys.

    Inconsiderate drivers? How about old people who need an invitation to make a left turn, so the traffic behind them doesn't wait forever? It's a one-way street, pull out and go. Today. Please.
  • prophet2prophet2 Member Posts: 372
    This really happened last year. A "fugitive" got drunk while driving a stolen car and crashed it .............. IN FRONT of the police station. Upon hearing the crash, officers came out of the station, and after running a check on the plates, cuffed the driver.

    You think he'd have driven on a different route.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    A few weeks ago, we had a guy try to CARJACK an unmarked police car (complete with municipal plates) exactly a half block from a police station! It's not like this car was incognito, it was a plain, gray Crown Vic with big tires and no hubcaps, with two big white guys in the front seat. How the culprit picked this car is totally beyond me. I happened to be driving by about ten minutes after this happened. Amazing how many cops come out of the woodwork when one of their own is in trouble.
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    You assumed that the fugitive was THINKING! :)


    image


    Just a reminder that our Town Hall chat happens on Wednesday (5-7pm Pacific/8-10 pm Eastern). This week, our topic will be:


    Import Trucks: Can they compete with domestics?


    http://www.edmunds.com/townhall/chat/newsviews.html




    PF Flyer

    Host

    Pickups & News & Views Message Boards

  • pat84pat84 Member Posts: 817
    I went on a 300 mile trip on I-81 this last weekend. I was keeping up with traffic (about 75-80 in the 65 MPH zone) on the two divided lanes through VA. At about 10 mile intervals we would have to slow to maybe 50-55 as two or more 18 wheelers were passing each other. If one could go 53. it had to pass the one going 52.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    That's Virginia's idiotic split speed limit: 65 for cars, 55 for trucks and non-commercial busses. The tighter they enforce it (which they do on occasion) the worse it gets. I've never understood why they continue with a speed limit law that causes congestion and bottlenecks.

    Unless the real reason for the goofy law is ticket revenues...
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.