Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

15681011478

Comments

  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    But I can kind of understand it. The other side of it is in that type of situation, even when you try to merge earlier, people get this 'my lane, nobody gets in front of me' attitude. And so you get frustrated trying to merge nicely and figure 'screw it, im flyin to the end of this lane at full speed so someone HAS to let me in.' I know that's not the reason every time and some just don't like to wait in line, but sometimes they're getting aggressive because tryin to be nice didn't work.
  • seminole_kevseminole_kev Member Posts: 1,696
    there's a road I used to travel here that connects to a major highway. Well there's no merge, or turn lane. You have to stay in the right lane until you get to the light at the intersection and turn right. Not a big deal but it backs up way back. Well you'd have these A-holes that will fly past everyone who's patiently waiting and get over right by the light. And when I used to go this way, you'd see the same people do it every day. Makes your blood boil. The kicker is, people would always let them in. I can't decide what's worse, the people doing it, or the people letting them in. ARGGGGGHHH. I'm getting pissed even thinking about it.

    *forgot to add that when I started going straight at the light and not going on the highway, of course I'd be in the left lane which would flow fine. Well these people that were trying to cut would block the left lane (for 5 to 10 minutes at times) with their vehicles while trying to get in the right lane. It really makes you want to get out and punch somebody for being such a selfish jerk.
  • bigzheng17bigzheng17 Member Posts: 81
    i can understand your situation, i would be pissed too. personally i never had that problem though, there always will be some nice guy who let you in, or maybe it's because i would chance line immediatly after i see a line close sign. i will always let others in if they are driving with the flow of traffic or even slower.
  • bigzheng17bigzheng17 Member Posts: 81
    last time i was in windser(sp?) canada, at an intersection. i was on the right line and going straight. it was green light for the road horizontal to me, and it got a bit jammed. when their light turned yellow, the part of that road to my right was filled up with cars facing redlight at next intersection. now, here comes a women, knowing she will be stucked in the intersection and right infront of me, still rushed up and blocking my way.
    i have to wonder what was she thinking, is going thirty feet more instead of stop at the light means that much?
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    We've got a similar deal in my town, and I'm one of the folks going straight rather than turning. Occasionally I'll get in the center lane and lay on the horn when one of these "me first" idiots blasts to the light and then stops with their blinker on, waiting for someone to let them in.
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    IT seems like it's a lose/lose situation more and more lately when I encounter left lane campers. If I try to be a good boy and sit a safe distance back waiting patiently for them to get over, they stay right where they are and I miss my only chance to get by for the next 10 miles. And if I try to get around on the right as soon as I see a nice sizable gap, they happen to wake up and realize where they are right at that exact same moment and move to the right at the same time.
  • artooartoo Member Posts: 13
    There's a similar situation near where I live. Road narrows to one lane, clearly marked "Lane ends, merge left" at least two hundred yards before the lane ends. I of course move over into the left lane, but every day (traffic tends to back up quite a bit on this road) I see people pulling the same "fly down the right lane, pull in at the last second" stunt.

    Couple days ago I'm sitting in the left, watching the jackasses go blithely on past in the right lane. The guy in front of me apparently got similarly fed up. He begins to pull over into the right lane, but traveling at the same speed and doesn't pass the guy in front of him. Eventually he's blocking the right lane and there's no room for people to go around him. Seeing where he was going with this, I left his space open in front of me in the left lane. People coming up in the right lane had to stop and pull into the left lane behind us someplace,where they had to wait in line like all the rest of us "normal people".

    When the lanes finally narrowed to one, the guy pulled back into his vacated space on the left, where I'd been keeping it open for him. He smiled and waved at me, and we shared a silent "ha ha ha" moment.

    I don't condone stuff like this all the time, but damn was it fun that time. :)

    cheers,
    Phil
  • seminole_kevseminole_kev Member Posts: 1,696
    it's nice to have a partner in crime, isn't it? ;-)
  • target3target3 Member Posts: 155
    That does work. But I think it would be easiest if everyone just drove up in both lanes and merged one after the other. I personally will stay in the lane that is ending. I will not speed up to beat everyone to the end. I just do not want to move over, and then have all of these idiots fly by me. I will end up passing some people, though, because the lane that does not end is usually going at 0-5 mph because there are people merging into it over a 1/2 mile stretch.

    I am surprised that more people do not occupy both lanes, considering that so many get irritated by the drivers speeding to the end.

    A couple of irritating things, though:

    1. People who go half-way over, taking up two lanes. They have no right to keep people from being in a valid traffic lane.

    2. Merging in general. People have a real hard time with it. In Minnesota we actually have areas of the highway where traffic comes to a standstill (without reduction in lanes), and I think it is totally because of people merging on/off the highway. Kind of similar to the ending lane thing, where before the white lines come together, where you are supposed to merge, but instead people turn 75 degrees to cut over quickly (or go on the shoulder, grass, hill, etc).
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    In stop-and-go traffic, when two lanes merge into one, the most efficient place to merge is exactly where the lanes actually begin to become one. There, cars should alternate from each lane into the remaining lane. And none of this playing traffic cop by blocking a lane crap, unless it's to stop people from passing in the shoulder.

    If traffic's moving along, the merge should take place well before this point with drivers in BOTH lanes positioning their cars so that all goes smoothly when the lans actually ends. I have seen far too many people think that since they are in the lane that continues on that they need not do anything to assist cars in the other lane merge in front of them; indeed, these morons often go out of their way to block them.

    And if you're stuck in the stopped lane that continues and people are passing you in the lane that ends up ahead, don't cry and get all pissy about it -- it's simple jealousy, or embarassment that you've made the wrong decision. Grow up and deal with it.

    All that matters is the efficient flow of traffic.

    Like my grandfather taught me: You're not just driving your own car, you're driving every other car that's anywhere near you. Think about it.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    should not mark one lane as ending, while the other continues. Maybe the signage should indicate that both lanes end, and merge into one "new" lane. If they make the signs say that, and the pictograms show it that way, people might understand the concept of zippering better.

    As it is, those in the lane which continues figure that they "own" a piece of the continuous roadway, and don't have to let anyone in. The people in the lane that ends become orphans who have no status on the continuous roadway, and have to fit in wherever they can, without disrupting the others. Actually, it's all about traffic flow - n number of vehicles scatterred randomly over two lanes need to be put all into one lane. Neither lane should have priority over the other.
  • black_tulipblack_tulip Member Posts: 435
    Alfox:
    Excellent suggestion. In fact they may already have similar ideas as I recall having seen signs in PA like this:
    "Right lane ends 1 mile
    Use all lanes till merge point"
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    The problem that pisses people off is that signs will indicate that the lane ends in 1 mile. The "thru" lane is usually stopped or very slow, so many folks will pull out of the thru lane, blast up to where the lane ends, and then try to get in...which only serves to slow the "thru" lane down even more for the people who heeded the "lane ends" signs and moved over. Sorry, but I'll try to block those folks every time. Their time is no more valuable than mine. Perhaps they'll learn to read and heed the traffic signs next time.
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    Any ideas for traffic signage should be taken over to the Town Hall Department of Transportation


    aka THDOT




    PF Flyer

    Host

    Pickups & News & Views Message Boards

  • target3target3 Member Posts: 155
    Like scotian said, in stop and go traffic, traffic moves most efficiently if all lanes are utilized with a zippering at the merge point.

    If you do not like waiting in the slow line, you should move up in the other lane. I know that the thru lane is going to be slow - so why would I get in it?

    You say, "Perhaps they'll learn to read and heed the traffic signs next time." This is just ridiculous. Does the traffic sign say to merge immediately? Does the traffic sign say that this lane is ending, therefore drivers are not entitled to drive in it.

    Maybe the signs should say "Either merge or go the same speed as those in the through lane, so as not to offend anyone."

    People trying to block others on purpose for stupid reasons does nothing other than escalate the situation. I see people who will move half-way over to try to block people. I just drive past them as close as I can (I haven't clipped any mirrors or fenders yet - darn), flip 'em off, and honk the horn.
  • daysailerdaysailer Member Posts: 720
    Virginia sometimes uses an "Alternate Merge" sign, not that it seems to make a lot of difference in driving behavior. As many have noted, the most efficient (and equitable) traffic flow is achieved if both lanes are utilized to the end and then alternately merge. In practice, I have observed that the OBSTRUCTED lane usually moves faster. I believe this is because many people move to the unobstructed lane(s) as soon as they learn of the obstruction while traffic continues to move up the obstructed lane to merge at the end. Add to this the idiots that hold up the clear lane to "courteously" allow several cars at once to move from the blocked lane and you have illogical traffic flow and flared tempers.

    It's a shame that driving tests can't measure "common sense".
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    Be a lot more space on the roads! ;-)
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    Blocking the ending lane before it actually ends is the worst sort of LLC behavior.

    Like I said, if you're in the slow lane in this situation, grow up and deal with it.
  • pat84pat84 Member Posts: 817
    I look for an 18 wheeler in the unobstructed lane and drive as fast as I can in the obstructed lane to get in in front of them. They are so slow accelerating, there is always space in front of them to merge. With any luck at all, the 18 wheeler will be close to the end of the unobstructed lane

    Pat dons flame proof asbestos suit.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    .....unless you run out of road right in front of the truck and have to stop quickly. Remember, trucks also stop a lot more slowly, and we don't want the 18-wheeler suddenly taking up trunk space!
  • kinleykinley Member Posts: 854
    Two 18 wheelers were side by side. They sat in one spot together for an hour or so while traffic in front of them gradually traversed the flooding at 2to3 mph. When the gap in front of the truckers reached about a mile. They would then move up and repeat the process. IMO they were very clever in not having to continually start and stop their rigs. Those of us behind could relax and walk around while waiting.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    I'm surprised the trucks didn't get passed in the median strip.
  • nyccarguynyccarguy Member Posts: 17,491
    I believe most SUVs in California are 2WD so they probably couldn't!

    2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD

  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    When the signs say "lane ends 1 mile" means you ought to "zip up" within that mile. If y'all would do that traffic might not slow up as bad. I don't have a problem with someone moving over well in advance - it's this "I gotta get there - itis" when you wait until the last 100 yards to finally move over that gets under my skin. Otherwise, why bother with the signs at all, if they are going to be ignored anyway?
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    I was merging into bumper to bumper stop and go 5-10 mph traffic on route 76 in philly. A white F150 in front of me did it totally by the book. Put his signal on, signalled for a good couple seconds, proceeded to try to merge nice and early into a good sized gap as soon as the solid line became a dotted line. And of course the guy next to him must have thought "Hey, no getting in front of me! You'll only slow me down and postpone my moving 10 feet forward for another 20 seconds!" So this guy scoots forward shutting the F150 out, then the guy in front of him does the same thing. The pickup driver seemed to get fed up and just said 'screw it' and floored it, forcing his way in at the end of the merging lane. I am just as civil as the next guy but sometimes when you're driving and people want to make life hard for you you gotta throw a little muscle around to accomplish what you want to do. Otherwise you end up being one of these people at a complete stop at the end of the merging lane praying that some merciful soul will get over the 'nobody in front of me' syndrome and let you in.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    The other night at about 3 a.m., I was leaving home for a, um, social engagement. As I'm pulling out of my parallel parking space (I was on the left side of a one-way street, so I was curbside), I looked in my right side mirror. There were some cars coming, so I waited a minute and let them pass. Apparently I didn't see a bicyclist on the right side of the street. He starts yelling at me through my open window.

    OK, my fault for not seeing him (on a pitch black street at 3 a.m.). I just think anyone riding a bike at 3 a.m. is pretty stupid to assume a driver is going to see them. I did have my headlights on, so he could easily see me. Plus, what if I were drunk or angry or something? A bicyclist yelling at a motorist is 'not a good idea'.
  • kinleykinley Member Posts: 854
    There will be a time when you will try to throw a little muscle around and later wishing you had prayed. So, why not pray first?
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    Up until the limit I'm the guy who will try to merge early when the lane is ending and signal for a good 3-4 seconds before changing lanes. I'm the guy who will wave others into traffic in front of me whenever it is safe and not inconcenient to those behind me to do so. But if you're gonna deliberately try to do something to keep me from getting in front of you even when I signalled, waited for an appropriate gap, and made every effort to be courteous, then I'm not gonna be the timid squirrel who gets trapped at the very end of the merging lane at a dead stop with lots of angry drivers behind me and no cars willing to let me in. One way or another I'm gonna end up in front of you, whether I have to stick my nose in just a bit so you have no choice but to let me in or speed to the end of the lane and end up forcing my way in 10-12 cars ahead of you. I repeat, I dont make a habit of this. I am Mr. Nice Guy first, and only get more aggressive if that fails. I know, it's a shame people have to be aggressive and butt in line sometimes, but if everyone made a conscious effort to wave other drivers into traffic in front of them when they can safely do so I bet line jumping would happen lots less often.
  • verozahlverozahl Member Posts: 574
    I'm with eharri3. If carrot doesn't work, use the stick.... or the accelerator.

    Most people in Detroit won't let me in front of them... Impala guys tend to be, you know, anti-Japanese car and especially anti-"tin can" Integra types. Thus, it's either butt in or hope the lady in the Saturn is nice. Being Detroit, it's just better to butt in and go.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    I just love when someone pulls out in front of me (usually when there's nobody behind me), then can't even 'stick with' that decision. Today the guy pulls out, then stops halfway in my lane, forcing me into oncoming traffic. If you pull out, at least have the courtesy to gun it.

    Another favorite today was when the taxi driver pulls into the right (turning) lane to go around me (cut me off, we're on a two-lane street) at a light (he was going straight, as I was), then pulls over at the next intersection. Did he think I was going to steal his fare or something?
  • wishnhigh1wishnhigh1 Member Posts: 363
    Today on the drive to school, some [non-permissible content removed] in a minivan decided he was in more of a hurry than the thousand people in front of him. I saw him come up from behind me cutting people off, and he pulled up to the right of me right as I was about to move past a truck, and he decides to move over. I have to slam on my brakes, as well as the 4 or 5 people behind me. I lay on the horn and he gives me the finger.

    Once the traffic clears the side of the truck, he pulls out in the right lane and does it again, but this time in front of a white intrepid. The intrepid brakes and swerves to avoid the minivan barging into his lane. Guess what happens?

    The guy in the intrepid pulls out a little dash light kit, and starts flashing those great little blue and red lights. Yep, he ran an undercover cop off the road!

    To make it better, I stop right after they pull to the side of the road, and walk back to the cop. I let the cop know that he nearly ran me off the road as well. To make it even better, another car sees the cop to the side of the road and decides to stop off and let the cop know his experience as well. The bottom side of his car was scraped up horribly, and he came and told the cop that this guy ran him off the road into some bushes planted in the median.

    The cop was writing a ticket when I pulled up, but thought it was interesting when I pulled up and told him the same thing happened to me. When the second car pulled up, he called the sheriffs department, and the sent a car out. I had to leave so he took my number down so I could make a statement, put the guy under arrest, and thats the last I see.

    This is the first time I have ever been grateful for undercover cops.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    ....a less-than-subtle reminder that if we are in a big hurry, we generally have nobody to blame but ourselves and poor planning. Take it easy.
  • artooartoo Member Posts: 13
    I have just now calmed down to the point where I can write sanely about these two idiots I almost ran into on my way to work this morning.

    Scenario 1: Merging onto the interstate at my normal high rate of acceleration. Nobody in front of me to hold me up and keep me from merging. I'm looking over my shoulder as I do so; nobody's in the far right lane. There are two cars coming up fast in the next lane over, but they won't interfere with my merging. I'm about to merge in, when all of a sudden there's a car in the far right lane. The trailing car in the next lane over has decided to PASS ON THE RIGHT, with me 90% on the highway at this point. I slam on the brakes and dive onto the shoulder to keep from being hit by Mr. Impatient (who, by the way, had THREE EMPTY LANES to his left that he could have used to pass). It was such a close call that I didn't even time to lay on the horn, so the guy probably doesn't even know he ran me off the road.

    I pull myself together, and continue on. After a couple miles, I'm faced with a great deal of slow traffic in the right lanes. So I start moving to the left, lane by lane, passing when I need to. This brings us to:

    Scenario 2: I'm cruising in the far left lane at about 80 in a 65. The lane's clear ahead of me for at least eight hundred yards. The next lane over is occupied about a hundred yards up, which is why I'm in the far left. As I get closer to the car ahead, I see another car moving into that lane from the next lane to the right, still a good fifty yards behind the car that's already there. As I come up on HIM (about one car length away), he moves over into my lane. No warning whatsoever, no reason for doing so (he was still fifty yards behind the car in front of him and moving slower than they). I stand on the brakes again and this time I DO lay on the horn. The guy stays where he is for about ten seconds, then moves back into the next lane over again. And stays there. I passed him and he was still in that lane when I lost sight of him five minutes later. What in !@#$!@# was his reasoning for moving over into the left lane and giving me a heart attack?

    After two close calls in twenty minutes, I've decided my coworker can drive us to lunch instead of me driving today.

    Sheesh....

    Phil
  • kinleykinley Member Posts: 854
    In the first scenario, when attempting to merge onto a freeway, it is the merger's duty to see that the way is clear and to anticipate any last second moves by those with the right of way already on the freeway. In other words, wait until they have passed. Rushing into traffic you think is not in the outside lane is to be avoided as the outside lane driver has no duty to honor your entry. You wait for others. In the second case, the driver in the adjacent lane in front of you saw you coming up on his left at a speed he felt was not in harmony with the rest of the traffic herd. He moved to slow you down and after he was successful - he moved away, but he did succeed in slowing you down. Those were close calls, because you called them. By chance were you driving a BMW?
  • daysailerdaysailer Member Posts: 720
    You think that a driver who takes it upon himself to moderate traffic flow and does so in a manner that endangers himself and other drivers is "respecting" others and not inconsiderate?

    Speed doesn't cause accidents, idiots cause accidents!
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    You really need to consider hormone replacement therapy.
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    I've said it before, I'll say it again:

    You are an idiot.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    There are others who actually believe what kinley said!

    I think that in most places when a car is entering an empty lane on a divided highway, it is illegal to change into that lane and block him. It certainly is stupid to do so everywhere. Also, it's illegal to pass on the right in free moving traffic in most places. The driver moving into a lane where another car is merging in was driven by either a moron, or an incredibly inattentive person.

    The other situation was also the other driver's foolish fault, although the situation was made worse, in part, by too much speed. With traffic slowing ahead, even far ahead, traffic gets squirrely, and we all know it. That's time to back off, keep passing speeds minimized, and watch for morons to move around suddenly. You know they're there, right?

    That's my view, which I assert doesn't coincide with Kinley's in any way. If it does, it was purely accidental, I assure you!
  • mchappellmchappell Member Posts: 52
    This is from the Illinois 'Rules of the Road':

    "MERGING LANES: This merge sign tells you that two
    lanes of traffic going the same direction will soon
    merge into one lane. Be ready to either change lanes
    or allow other traffic to merge into your lane. You see
    this merge sign on expressways just before expressway
    ramps. The driver on the expressway slows down to let
    the driver on the ramp merge."

    Hmm - Sounds like there is an obligation on thru traffic for safe merging...
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    Merging, contrary to what some ignorant and inconsiderate drivers believe, is a team effort between the driver entering the freeway and the cars already there. IF you are in the right lane, slow down, speed up, or move over temporarily to try to make life easier for other drivers. Just cruising with blinders on could at the least frustrate people trying to merge, and could at worst cause accidents. This is especially true if you force merging cars to slow down or stop, which I believe is the absolute stupidest thing you can do on the on ramp if traffic is flowing freely. IF you are in the middle lane, avoid jumping into the right lane to pass other cars near merging lanes. Part of being a good driver is tring to make life on the road easier for others and trying to avoid making it more difficult whenever safety and convenience permit you, even when the law does not necessarily require it.

    Second: You are obviously completely ignorant on the issue of traffic safety, and I picture you as one of those silver haired, Crown Vic drivin crime fighters, making the roads safe for conscientious drivers by trying to trap speeders behind the herd where they get impatient and start tail gating and weaving in and out rather than letting them by to meet their own fate, whatever that may be. You act like an expert on traffic safety because you've worked in insurance, but talk to any state trooper and they'll let you know how completely foolish they think it is to try to block faster drivers.

    I hope one day you make a deliberate attempt to impede the forward progress of a derranged driver behind the wheel of an SUV with a nice, sturdy grill guard.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    "I picture you as one of those silver haired, Crown Vic drivin crime fighters..."

    He's a Caddy pilot, and his GF has one of the best known Impala's on the planet. (Ask him what it's better than...)
  • keith24keith24 Member Posts: 93
    we were headed to the local Sunday buffet for lunch after church. Now, this is a rural, 2 lane highway we were on. We're about 200 yards from a major intersection where this 2 lane intersects with a 5 lane state highway. I'm heading downhill, within sight of the stop sign, and my wife slugs me & says "Keith, CAR!!!!!" (she happend to see the car just as he pulled out) This moron has just turned onto the 2 lane & has decided to pass 3 cars on a double yellow line. I had to swerve completely off the road to keep him from hitting us head on!

    Now, I was too busy trying to keep control of the car to get a plate number, so I couldn't call the sherrif's dept. (and have them do anything!). White Pontiac Sunfire. It was all I could do to keep from chasing him down & beating him within an inch of his life! Violent, yes! Would he have deserved it?

    Absolutely! But my wife, who's about 8 months along with our first child, would've been right in the middle of it all. I just couldn't risk their lives for this idiot. We cheated it once Sunday. No need to go for twice. Now, if I happen to catch him out one day by myself.....................my truck's a little bigger than the wife's Accord. However, does this make me a bad person?

    Keith
  • artooartoo Member Posts: 13
    I've said this before and I'll say it again: You are a dangerous driver and your vigilante "I'm going to make these people slow down" attitude is going to get you into a bad wreck, or shot, one day.

    I do not drive a BMW and don't see what difference it makes if I was driving one. I'll have you know that in thirteen years of daily driving I have never ONCE been in an accident that was my fault. Not even a minor fender-bender. NOT ONCE. Think about that for a moment before deciding to paint me as an overly aggressive, unsafe driver.

    Now. In the first incident, I fail to see how it was my fault that the driver of the car who almost hit me decided to change INTO the lane that I was already 90% in. Read the story again: I stated clearly that I was already 90% merged when he decided to change lanes. I also clearly stated that there were three empty lanes to his left that he could have used to pass if he desired to do so. I won't even address the idiotic argument that it is 100% the merging driver's responsibility to fit themselves into traffic. It is, as eharri3 said, a mutual thing between the traffic on the highway and the merging driver. Also, I did not "think" the two cars I mentioned were not in the outside lane. I checked multiple times and they clearly were not -- until I merged into it, as I said.

    In the second situation, I don't care who you are or whether or not you think I'm driving safely. When I am coming up on you at 20 mph faster than you and you pull suddenly into my lane with less than a car length of space separating us, any accident that might result is YOUR fault. You do not have the right to create a dangerous situation because you don't like the fact that I am speeding. I was bothering no one, obstructing no one, and causing no problems. Read the story again: I clearly stated that the lane I was in was open for at least eight hundred yards in front of me.

    Generally I ignore your troll bait when you post in these forums, but I refuse to sit still for direct personal attacks.

    Phil
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    Logic and reason will not avail, Grasshopper.

    Just talk about his comb-over instead...
  • milt721milt721 Member Posts: 83
    On my way home from work, I travel an eight lane divided highway with traffic lights every so often. There was this van in the lane next to me that was matching my speed whenever I sped up or slowed down (one of my biggest pet peeves). At the lights, if I accelerated hard, he would be right next to me, if I accelerated slowly he did the same. Anyway, my Valentine One goes off and I try a bait. As soon as the detector goes off I downshift and accelerate quickly. The van copies the move. I let off the gas. The van goes whizzing by. The cop appears from his hiding spot and nails the van. I wish I could have heard his explanation to the cop or even seen the look on his face. I smiled the rest of the way home.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    ........I think lemko would have enough sense to not think it's OK to 'slow down' traffic entering the freeway.
  • scotianscotian Member Posts: 1,064
    Beautiful!
  • im_brentwoodim_brentwood Member Posts: 4,883
    Kinley, you're telling people how to drive courteously?

    That's like me telling people how to live healthy lives while I sit here smoking.

    I'm still glad that I don't have to share the road with you. We have enough dangerous drivers as it is in Florida.

    Bill
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    Here is the ultimate test.

    Tell your insurance agent that you help inforce traffic laws to your satisfaction. See if there is a discount for that 8^)

    TB
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    If you'd just pick up an' move to Raleigh, you WOULD be living healthy!...;-)
Sign In or Register to comment.