Ford Freestyle - Taurus X

15354565859146

Comments

  • barnstormer64barnstormer64 Member Posts: 1,106
    I could've sworn that I read 0-60 numbers that favored the AWD over the FWD . . mainly because of the taller gearing.

    I agree, though: if you need to haul a lot of things besides PEOPLE, then you need something with a V-8.
  • lenwlenw Member Posts: 14
    Well it just happened again. I got ready to go to the store after the car set since last night. Started the car I put it in reverse and nothing happened. Tried forward and nothing again. Put it in park and turned off the engine & restarted no it egages fine. Drove to the store, shopped came home no problems. This may be a computer or connectivity problem from the gear shift to the CVT?
  • barnstormer64barnstormer64 Member Posts: 1,106
    Sounds electical rather than mechanical to me.

    Have you taken it to Ford yet?

    Hopefully the computers on that part of the Freestyle will store codes. Otherwise, they'll have to wait for it to happen to them before they can get an indication of exactly what's causing the issue.

    When it's like this, can you rev the engine at all? Do the rpm's measure on the tach?
  • pnewbypnewby Member Posts: 277
    Don't know about towing, but climbing mountains with a full load is OK.
    At least in the mountains of eastern Tenn. and Ky. Steep grades don't bother it at all.
  • lenwlenw Member Posts: 14
    Last night when it happened I could rev the engine and the higher the revs it would move the car some. But I did not notice the tach. Today seemed different and it did not rev when I pressed on the accelerator.
  • barnstormer64barnstormer64 Member Posts: 1,106
    But you could tell that the car was running?

    Out of curiosity, is your fuel tank near empty? Just an idea, one that I've seen affect other vehicles.
  • lenwlenw Member Posts: 14
    No, full tank. I double check with my wife (she was in the car too) and she verified that it was running.
  • barnstormer64barnstormer64 Member Posts: 1,106
    So much for that idea . . . assuming the fuel pump is IN the gas tank (like other Fords), it uses the gasoline to cool it. If you get TOO low, it can sometimes cause problems like low fuel pump pressure.

    I recently had a somewhat similar experience in my 96 Taurus wagon, but it would happen on the road, and it was after the car got warm, and both times the fuel tank was below 1/4 full. It turns out that the fuel pump was just getting too hot and it was starting to fail.

    Your problem could be a fuel pump issue and not an engine or transmission problem. Unfortunately, if it's fuel-pump related, Ford will have to get it to "act up" while they have it in their posession in order to diagnosis it.

    If it's engine related, then codes should be stored. Not sure about transmission problems.
  • lenwlenw Member Posts: 14
    I did notice that this happened when I rapidly put it into reverse (both times) without allowing the reverse gear to "engage". Maybe there is some delay, but I would have thought that after driving it more than 4,000 miles I would have seen it before.
  • willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139
    " My FWD Limited will be built on 04/11. It has been a bit of a wait, but I hope it's worth it."

    Hey thanks Bruneau1 for letting us know about your successful order of the Limited FWD. This is a pleasant surprise as the last bit of news I got was that Job1 for the LTD FWD would be May 2/05, and I spoke to my dealer as recently as 3 days ago he was unaware of the earlier build date. Can you shed a little more light on this sudden reversal.
    Just two additional questions...
    1.Will you be able to get those original 18" wheels or is there still a supply shortage.
    2.If they substitute with 17" will they factor in a price adjustment.
    Any other helpful tips you have to offer. I hope everything goes well for you and thanks again.
  • 38793879 Member Posts: 2
    I'm hoping someone can help. After reading all the great things about this vehicle on this board we went out and bought a Freestyle AWD Limited on 2/26/05. The day after we brought it home the brakes started squeaking -- a terrible drawn out noise when coming from higher speeds to stoplights, stopsigns or slowing for turning vehicles, etc. After the speed is below 10 mph it stops. Basically, when the brake is depressed part way it squeaks and the noise is absolutely awful.

    We've had the vehicle in three times already. (In less than a month!) It's coming from the back and we had the brake pads replaced, rotors sanded and a de-glazing process done (which I'm not sure I understand because I don't believe they are ceramic brakes but am giving benefit of the doubt -- this is not my area of expertise). Service is now saying there is nothing else that can be done. I mentioned taking next steps because the noise was unacceptable and the service manager is now going to ask Ford engineering but still feels they have done everything possible.

    Is anybody else having a brake problem? Do I have a lemon???
  • bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    My dealer called me on Friday with the production news of 4/11 and said he already had a vin. I have been in contact with T J Karl at Ford- he is an assistant marketing manager for the Freestyle. He actually called me!!!!!!! He made it sound as though there would be a "new" wheel for the FWD Limited, but maybe he just meant the SEL wheel. He was ambiguous about price reduction. I have decided to take delivery of my Limited even with the 17" wheels. The 17" wheel gives us more choices in sizes and brands to upgrade later on. A 225/65/17 has practically the same diameter as the original Pirelli 225/60/18- that would be my choice later to move from the 215/65/17 that I assume will be on my vehicle. In any case, the 17 inch tire rides a bit better, but the 18 inch steers more firmly. I am still irritated and went out looking at other makes, but decided that the Freestyle fits us best. Please contact the marketing manager at tkarl@ford.com The more Ford hears from customers the better. Good luck with yours. and stay in touch.
  • bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    When the dealer says they have done everything possible, it is time to contact Ford Customer Service and set up a file. Don't be shy, and don't take it. Good luck.
  • lumber2lumber2 Member Posts: 184
    Take the car out and hammer the brakes hard a few times. That generally gets rid of the sqeaking on any car that has plenty of brake pad left.
  • willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139
    I got in touch with my dealer again today to check on the current status and he was completely baffled when I mentioned about your experience.His thoughts are that U.S.dealers get different treatment from ours up north as the products are marketed/priced somewhat differently.
    My advice to you is to be more cautious over this matter as you say the asst.mgr was ambiguous and vague about any price adjustments.My wife is also antsy over the ordering problem as this is intended to be for her new vehicle.As far as the 4/11 date you mentioned , again make sure what you're getting and get confirmation from the mktg mgr.This may be just a coincidence and not to rain on your parade, but lookup this website
    http://www.arifleet.com/pnews/2005OrderCutoff-2006Startup031105.pdf
    and you will find that 4/11 is the order bank open date for the 2006 models.If you're getting price protection then you're way ahead of the game(with new improvements), otherwise you will be stuck with expected price increases.
    If you are ok with the 17" wheels then you can also console yourself that the availability of cheaper steel wheels for snow tires will be an advantage should you require them in the future.
    Am taking a big interest in how you make out so please let us know. In my case I just have to continue to wait.
  • dbc123dbc123 Member Posts: 105
    There is a Ford TSB on noisy rear brakes on Freestyle and Five Hundreds. Seems the original pads absorbed moisture and made noise. My Freestyle will occasionally make a grinding noise after the brakes have been wet but it eventually goes away. The TSB directs dealers to replace the rear pads with a newer design that is supposed to correct the problem. Are you sure your dealer is aware of this and has used the updated pads? Brake problems CAN be solved - do not let this issue ruin your satisfaction with a very nice vehicle.
  • 38793879 Member Posts: 2
    Yes -- my dealer is aware of that TSB. The second trip in was to replace the brake pads with the parts specifically ordered from Ford. We had waited 9 days for them to come in. I was told they were the most up to date available.

    I have read in detail the information related to the TSB. Our brakes are not grinding. It is a squealing or squeaking. In fact, when it rains or snows, the problem diminishes significantly.

    In general I love the car and would prefer to get this fixed. I just can't afford the time to keep hauling this thing in on a weekly basis.
  • brianmabrianma Member Posts: 17
    > Have you taken it to Ford yet?

    Ford had 3 tries to fix/recreate the problem without success. Since I posted the first message, it happened a third time.

    > Hopefully the computers on that part of the Freestyle will store codes.

    They found no specific codes that relate to the transmission on each of the 3 occurences. They had test gear on the car and ran it 17 miles the first time, 30 miles the second, and 35 miles the last time without the problem occuring again for them to find a cause.

    > When it's like this, can you rev the engine at all? Do the rpm's measure on the tach?

    The engine runs fine and you can rev it to the limiter. It just won't engage the transmission. Multiple restarts, shifting it from P down to L and back with revs in each gear yields no movement. Every time it's at the dealer they clear the codes (none tranny related) and restart it and it will run.

    Rather than deal with the lemon law and an unhappy customer, Ford has agreed to take the car back, cancel my loan, and refund my down payment. I'm out of pocket for the two car payments paid. It sounds like a fair deal, so I signed off on it and the car is gone. I drove a 500 SEL FWD and a 500 LTD FWD both with 6 speed autos. I'm not sure it's the car I want to replace the Freestyle as I like the wagon versatility. The dealer is a Chevy dual and I was impressed with the Malibu Maxx and may go that route.

    Good luck to all on here. I loved the Freestyle, but needed a reliable car given my odd hour commutes and long family trips in the vehicle.
  • nitromaxnitromax Member Posts: 640
    I have read in detail the information related to the TSB. Our brakes are not grinding. It is a squealing or squeaking. In fact, when it rains or snows, the problem diminishes significantly.

    It may sound way too obvious but it sounds like the anti-chatter grease wasn't used when the pads were installed.
    High frequency chatter will sound like a squeak. Brake pads usually are installed with an aniti-chatter grease behind them to dampen the chatter and eliminate the squeaking.

    my .02
  • rachel_35rachel_35 Member Posts: 6
    I am planning to buy a Freestyle Limited AWD on Thursday. I have two kids in carseats, one rear facing (Britax Roundabout) and one forward facing (Britax Marathon).

    I am planning to get captain's chairs in the second row without the console so we will have access to the third row. Rear facing will likely go behind the passenger seat because that seat is obviously used less often than the driver's seat, so I can pull up the driver's seat some to accommodate the rear-facing seat if I need to. In the Limited, the second row captain's chairs adjust back and forth, too. The seat will be rear facing for another five months.

    Has anyone had any problems putting a rear-facing Roundabout in the captain's chairs? (I don't want to just try it because I have my carseats professionally installed.)

    Out of curiousity, has anyone put two carseats next to each other on a 60/40 bench and still been able to have access to the back seat?

    Thanks!
    Rachel
  • lumber2lumber2 Member Posts: 184
    Brian: Which dealer were you working with?
  • 05freestyler05freestyler Member Posts: 7
    Hello Rachel,

    I can answer your last question about the 2nd-row benchseat. We have 2 carseats (I think they are both Graco), but both are front-facing as my kids are 4 and 2. We have the 2nd row bench seat in our SE. At first we put both carseats in the 2nd row. When 1st installing our carseats, we learned that if you have 2 carseats in the 2nd row and you want to access the 3rd row w/o removing a carseat, you have no choice but to configure the carseats behind the driver's seat and in the middle (not behind the front passenger's seat) because these 2 seats are connected, i.e., one fold-down piece. The seat behind the front passenger's seat is separate from the rest of the bench in terms of folding down. However, it is still difficult to get the "separate" seat down because the middle seat carseat gets a bit in the way (may depend on the type of carseat). You have to sort of squeeze the fold-down seat past the carseat.
    We have just moved both carseats to the 3rd row to avoid the fold-down issue and found it to be much better. Besides, my kids want to sit back there, you get a better view of them on the conversation mirror, and adults have more legroom in the second row. Hope this helps.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    On the way home tonight, a mile from my home was a Pueblo Gold Freestyle Limited - the third Freebie I have seen on this side of town. It was beautiful! (So is 65 degrees in Minnesota in March).

    By the way, the April, 2005 Car & Driver did a six way comparison of SUVs. Regarding stability control, all six vehicles had it, though the Ford Explorer was the only one with "roll stability control".

    There is a note saying that stability control could not be completely disabled on two of the vehicles (not the Explorer), "which can affect skidpad and lane change numbers." No major feature is without some tradeoff it seems.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    Though I would suggest reading the comments here a bit deeper before jumping to conclusions, I can say that the Smart Car, which has sold 600,000 copies in Europe, has a 60 HP engine @0.7 liters displacement pulling 1500 pounds. That is small.
  • lumber2lumber2 Member Posts: 184
    Frieberg, sounds like you want the 3.5 liter engine 250plus hp/six speed tranny which is coming in a couple of model years.
    As for cheap my guess is the american car buyers like cheap.
  • jethrojacksonjethrojackson Member Posts: 33
    I just read an interesting article about the trouble Ford is running into with lawsuits regarding roof collapses in earlier year Explorers:

    http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0503/30/A01-132711.htm

    This got me thinking about the roof structure of the new Freestyle. While Ford has utilized some of the safety features along with the AWD system from the Volvo XC90, I'm not clear if they've done anything with the actual roof structure to prevent a collapse in a rollover. I'm guessing that they're not using Boron Steel like the Volvo XC90 does, due to the added cost.

    Any Ford insiders or folks in the know care to comment?

    Thanks!
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,814
    i have a bicycle with a boron frame. it cost me about 90 bucks.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • frieberg44frieberg44 Member Posts: 33
    I think Ford can, and should, do BETTER than the mediocre little 3 liter motor in the Freestie. The reason they are using the CVT is that the engine is too darned small. We all know that. It wasn't a question of quality engineering, it was a question of what was available and CHEAP. That is the reason Ford will play second fiddle to Honda and Toyota. The sad thing is: THEY DON'T HAVE TOO !! Ford HAS the ability to compete. They should have designed the RIGHT ENGINE for the this car FIRST, and THEN RELEASED IT !! They are just too worried about pension and health insurance obligations for retired auto workers (who are killing the Yankee automakers) to keep their EYE ON THE ROAD. So, until changes are made, the Freestie will be 75% of the quality of a Honda or Toyota, and it will DEPRECIATE much faster, also. Rest assured. Just be aware of this when buying. Hopefully, these reports of bad transmissions will be ANOMALIES and not commonplace. I hope those who bought this vehicle will AT LEAST get decent reliablility to compensate them for dismal depreciation.
    Peace, all.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    This was from a recent post on the BON site that might interest we Freebie drivers, FYI:
    *************************************************
    Robert Lane
    29 March 2005

    Unlike GM's Saturn Vue, Ford Motor Company is placing a lot of confidence in their CVT transmission. Starting on 04 April 2004(they mean 2005), Ford will equip all Five Hundred SE front wheel drive models destined for dealer stock with Continuously Variable Transmissions (CVT). Through the end of 2005, Ford will allow retail order types: 1, 3, A, X and Z, along with fleet sales to order the Aisin 6-speed transmission.

    Any unscheduled dealer stock orders will be converted to be built with the CVT.

    Beginning in 2006, the CVT transmission will be the only one available on the Five Hundred SE front wheel drive model.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    My Freebie dealership took out a post-auto show ad today announcing discounts/rebates on their line of Fords. A Mustang had a $1400 discount, EscapeXLT - $4600 discount/rebate, and an Explorer XLT - $9300 discount/rebate. The 500 SE had a $2900 discount, but absolutely nothing off of the Freestyle. It may well have a good chance of holding value more than the other Ford models.
  • freestylegalfreestylegal Member Posts: 70
    "They are just too worried about pension and health insurance obligations for retired auto workers (who are killing the Yankee automakers) to keep their EYE ON THE ROAD."

    You're kidding, right?
  • brianmabrianma Member Posts: 17
    > but absolutely nothing off of the Freestyle. It may well have a good chance of holding value more than the other Ford models.

    Ford has a dealer cash incentive or spiff on the Freestyle here in the northeast that allows the dealers up to $2500 a unit sold payout when modest sales targets are reached. Most dealers are hitting the mark and the out the door prices reflect the "hidden" rebate. In the Boston area papers you see advertised cars below the cost shown here on Edmunds.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    "I think Ford can, and should, do BETTER than the mediocre little 3 liter motor in the Freestie. The reason they are using the CVT is that the engine is too darned small."

    Name me an alternative engine that's already in the Ford family that could have been used over the 3.0L.
  • brianmabrianma Member Posts: 17
    > Which dealer were you working with?

    Three different dealers had a crack at the problem due to where I was stranded and Ford's 35 mile rule on towing. Framingham got the first shot, Hyannis the second, and Muzi the last. It wasn't until the third time that I leaned on Ford's regional rep and got satisfaction of sorts.
  • willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139
    My wife is currently driving a 1996 Mercury Villager with the excellent Nissan 3.0L eng. and built by Ford at its Avon Lake,Ohio plant.Is this plant closed now, and I heard Nissan was experiencing heavy financial difficulties a few years ago.Ford might have missed a good opportunity in acquiring Nissan wholly or in part. Looking back now, Ford could have saved a huge sum from the Duratec35 development and everyone would be swooning over the sweet VQ3.5L all ready to be installed in the Freebie today.Oh well,just daydreaming.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    Brian, Just my simple observation that they are not using overt incentives to push the Freestyle at this one dealer (not a national survey), whereas they seem to be for the 500 and Mustang. Imagine being the F-150 owner seeing 35% MSRP reductions.

    I am sure that all of the cars have varying levels of dealer holdbacks, based on milestones and end of season performance. Time will tell how the Freebie will do.
  • sallygsallyg Member Posts: 2
    I have a
    2005 Freesyle and have had it to the service center three times!! The brakes are still squeaking!!!Did the replacement pads stop the noise?Its gotten so bad that every time I stop they squeal. It seems like this may be a problem with several of the Freestyles. I checked the Kansas Lemon Laws and this may not be bad enough of a problem to bring it in.Thanks!
  • frieberg44frieberg44 Member Posts: 33
    Not only is Ford having quality problems, so is GM. I think if the Yankee automakers would 1) spend more time on quality control and 2) training assemblers and 3) seeking out better parts, they would be back in the race to compete against vehicles such as Pilots and Highlanders and 4-Runners. Until such time, those Yankee vehicles will depreciate at a much faster rate. It will be interesting to see how much a Freestie will be worth on the used market a couple years from now, compared with the depreciation on a Japanese counterpart. (BTW, I ownd both a 2000 Ford Ranger 4x4, and an 89 Honda Civic. I hope to buy an SUV or large wagon soon. I have still not completely ruled out the Freestie IF I can get it at a huge discount to make up for some of the depreciation.) Also keep in mind that American or Canadian assemblers are MAKING vehicles such as Pilots (Ontario), Tundras (California), Nissan Pickups (Tenna.). So, it isn't a problem with the worker per se, it's a problem with teaching the ASSEMBLY protocols, and instilling PRIDE in WORKMANSHIP. Peace to you.
  • lumber2lumber2 Member Posts: 184
    I'm finding very difficult to say no to the space that the freestyle offers. I love the CVT but a part of me is extremely cautious about investing $30k because of it.
    Since FWD freebies have the regular box (AFAIK) I'd like to hear from FWD owners who have used the Freestyle in snow how well it does.
    My driveway for example slopes up, enough to have stranded several FWD cars in as little as an inch or two of snow and made us buy snow tires for the car I'm selling.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    I saw an NBC (I think) news story on the improving quality of the big three compared to the offshore brands. They believed the bigger problem was not the quality mark (which they felt was now on par with Japan for many Detroit cars), but the consumer education process when their quality has improved. The blind eye to quality (or poor engineering) by Detroit in the 70's has left a stigma that many consumers have not forgotten to this date. It may take twice as much work for Detroit to change the perception about their vehicle quality - and they still may not get customers back. Cultural beliefs change slowly.

    I am not a big fan of stereotyping. That being said, this is exactly why it pays to do your homework when buying a car. Come to discussion forums like this, read the reviews, talk to friends. If a Detroit vehicle is not your thing, don't buy it. But do make sure to look at the discussion groups at Edmunds or others on your Honda, Lexus, Toyota, Hyundai, etc. before buying one of those as well. They are not without issues either.

    I was told that I shouldn't have bought my 1986 red Taurus sedan years ago. Too new, too many thing to go wrong, made in Detroit. I thought the Freestyle SEL I bought would replace it, but the Taurus runs at 20 below zero, has the original stainless steel muffler, and have just now worn out the floormat under my accelerator pedal. I have replaced a water pump and a fuel send unit in 19 years. Not bad for Detroit iron, I think. Just breaking it in.
  • rachel_35rachel_35 Member Posts: 6
    Doesn't it hurt your back to put the kids into carseats in the third row?

    I'm going to go with the captain's chairs and no console in the second row. I'm going in today to buy.

    Thanks for your feedback.
    Rachel
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    "My wife is currently driving a 1996 Mercury Villager with the excellent Nissan 3.0L eng"

    Your talking about the 3.0L OHV V6 engine, that was found VIllager/Quest of years ago, you believe that to be excellent or your pulling my leg here?
  • brianmabrianma Member Posts: 17
    > they would be back in the race to compete against vehicles such as Pilots and Highlanders and 4-Runners.

    Honda has had lots of problems with the Pilot. They have had even more problems with the 5 speed automatic used with the Pilot, TL, and Odyssey. Lots of 2001 and 2002 Odyssey and TL owners are having transmission failures just out of warranty and Honda hasn't been offering much to reduce the cost of tranny fixes.

    I think it's unfair to categorize GM, Ford or DC as not being with the program. All have invested heavily in new models. Some have been hits (300, Magnum) and some have been misses (G6, Ion). Sure the Freestyle would have been a better vehicle with a 230HP engine and a 5 or 6 speed auto box. Sure the Volvo stability software would have been a great feature. The bottom line is that Ford built the car to a price point in the market and you can't have everything when PRICE is the driver. The bottom level trim Pilots, Highlanders, and 4Runners start at 30K or above with a V-6. They run close to $40K fully loaded. Compare them to an XC90 T-5 at that price and you have apples and apples. Consider the Chevy Cobalt or even the Mazda 3. Both are premium small cars and offer much more than the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla market standards with equal or better interior materials quality. It will take a lot of good product from the Big 3 to win consumers back. I'd say a lot of the product is there now in the pipeline, it just isn't at the price points like the Freestyle or 500 which still have a price/value component. Move up to the near luxury price point and you get Pilots and 4Runners which didn't have a lot of price/value consideration in their development. Just my 2 cents of course.
  • cep1cep1 Member Posts: 11
    frieberg what you need to do is go buy a honda or toyota which by the way is made in this country. and stop the whining. you sound like my 13 year old daughter.
  • 05freestyler05freestyler Member Posts: 7
    No, it's no strain on the back to put them in the 3rd row, b/c my kids are old enough to climb in by themselves. I just follow them in to fasten their carseat belts.

    BTW, the conversation mirror makes it easy to have a bird's-eye view of the 3rd row when driving. This is not so in the 2nd row, b/c you can't see anyone behind the driver's seat.

    The downside of having them in the 3rd row is that you can't hand them something while driving or stopped at a light. I guess you could toss something back there, but that might get ugly.

    If you have (or plan to have) more than 1 child it is good to know all of the Freestyle carseat configuration pros/cons before purchasing. We learned after purchase, and found that there's no perfect configuration once you have kid #2.

    I hope the captain's chairs work well for you. We went with the benchseat so that we could fit 7 passengers total. I would imagine the captain's chairs make it easier to get the kids in and out, though. Good luck.
  • willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139


    Not trying to pull your leg here because you know more about engines/drivetrains than I do.Maybe using the word "excellent" for the Villager 3.0L was a bit excessive but it was great for its time.BTW,its an OHC V6.However I think any mftr trying to build the perfect car and sell it at the lowest price point is a losing proposition. I think the key to all this is to form QUID PRO QUO alliances, even with the competition. Why waste money on additional R&D when you can use components from a common and proven parts bin and free up the resources and concentrate on designing vehicles to meet specific customer needs.
    I think the Freebie is a well designed job and hells bells I would be glad to purchase it If they only offered it in the Limited FWD trim today in spite of what the naysayer auto scribes tell everyone.Heck if one is wishing for the Duratec35,say in model '08 with the new GM/Ford tranny, Ford is not going to leave money on the table and then the future gripe will be that it will be overpriced. So take your pick, I still want the Limited FWD today.
  • willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139
  • lulu54usalulu54usa Member Posts: 9
    lumber2-
    I have a suggestion: Get the Freestyle, and have the dealer install the remote auto start in it. (We got our dealer to throw it in for nothing). Then the car will always be warm for you in the winter and cool in the summer too.
  • willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139



    Huh?!! I gotta find a professional hypnotist to brainwash her into becomming a trucker. At 35% savings you can cover big gas bills easily. LOL,she won't even drive my hot 2001 Explorer Sport Trac under any circumstances !
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Yes, it's a OHC 3.0L, I had a flashback. It was reliable, but nothing orgasmic. It did well, for what it was, at that time, but nothing more. Although years later, many of them are having leak issues, but nothing dramatic.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.