Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Questions About Auto Insurance and Accidents

11516182021107

Comments

  • goldrichgoldrich Member Posts: 7
    Actually , the car as I said is 4 years old. Volvos have a reputation as being cars that maintain their value; yes even with hi mileage.. They even award volvo's drivers for mileage. People are still driving their 15 year old volvo's. So I drive 25,000 miles a year; in this time and age, people are commuting and driving long distances.

    Yes insurance companies I"m told ,by the dealer, usually give DV for car's less than a year.
    It doesn't hurt to ask. I was looking for some input that would give me the best shot at getting some DV

    so if someone has a suggestion on what approach I might use, I would appreciate hearing that.
    thank you
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Understand you drive 25,000 miles a year and the Volvo is 4 years old.

    Any time any vehicle with 100,000 miles = the bloom is off the rose.

    IOW within only four years, it's been riden hard and put up wet.

    DV? Forget it!
  • 151ranch151ranch Member Posts: 109
    I have a 10yr old Volvo with 200k plus. I don't know where you live (Sweden?) but Volvos depreciate as fast American cars (or faster!). I love my car, but never recommend them as no one I know is willing to drive them into the ground, which is what it takes to get your money's worth.
  • accurationaccuration Member Posts: 2
    Somebody declared my Acura Legend a total loss. It was old but had very low milage and was in better shape then cars half as old. Im struggling to keep it but they want me to go through this awful process of retaining my vehicle and getting a "salvage title" which will diminish its value.
    Who is the person that judges whether the car is a total loss? Ive read so many complaints of true total losses being repaired (NOT as salvaged vehicles) . What can I do change thier decree? Why is there evaluation more valid that the people repairing the vehicle. (who say my car needs no major repairs, it wont be hazzard once it is drivable? )...... The margin was like 200 dollars only. It is so unfair. Does anyone know anything about this sort of thing?
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    as far as I know, as soon as the insurance company "totals" a car, that's it. If you want to rebuild it, then, yes, it will have a salvage title. But why are you trying to erase that black mark? If you love it so much and want to repair it, then do so and keep driving it. The only reason to clean that title would be to deceive any potential buyers. If you plan on selling it, then don't fix it. If you really want to keep it, then fix it and live with the salvage title. Seems pretty straightforward to me. Am I missing something here?

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • accurationaccuration Member Posts: 2
    Most people sell their cars and hope to get what they are worth. I may want to sell it later, or not. If I let them take it, that is what they are going to do and they will make money in doing so. There is someone at the repair shop that wants my car as is to race. The chassis may be messed up but the integrity of all else is preserved. I did not ask this question to be judged. If you read what my question was, or any of the other questions on this forum you would understand there is alot of questionable things going on with insurance companies actions. My question was who is the person who determines a total los? I believe it is a guy from the insurance company itself, not someone from the state. They want the car and who knows what they will do with it. Whos to say they will get a salvage title for it, how will I ever know? It is not a total loss, you just have to look at it to see.
  • moondog2moondog2 Member Posts: 2
    I live in Florida...hurricane central. Just bought a new car and the freightening thought of "is it covered if damaged during a hurricane?" is praying on my mind. You know, act of God and all....
  • mikefm58mikefm58 Member Posts: 2,882
    I believe that would be covered by comprehensive, but maybe collision. Either way, yes it's covered, happened to my neighbors S2000......Ouch.
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    had a wreck last night or this morn.. which ever, but it was right after hubby obtained new policy on our carwhat do i do about filling on my ins. also the idiot i hit was sitting at a green light w/ no lights on at all and it as dark raining and slick i tried to stop, but BOOOM!! he admitted to cops he had no lights on, whos totally at fault? 1 more thing the guy says he was sittin there b/c he was hit b4 i hit him by someone who ran, how will the damage be determined by me and the other vehicle, can i claim on the other vehicle that hit him ( the cops found him) and can i claim on the guy i hit for being an idiot because he didnt even turn flashers on? DESPERATE PLEASE HELP!!
  • jb_turnerjb_turner Member Posts: 702
    Well you rear ended someone... looks like your rates will skyrocket!
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    jb: Thank you for your helpful reply.

    In reality, rear-ending some yahoo in front of a green light with no lights on is a lot more gray area than your normal rear-ender.

    But the damage is done. What matter now are not the facts of the accident but the facts off the evidence. I don't know how to go about it, but need2kno has work to do: Get the police report, understand what it says, get with her insurance company, figure out what's going to happen.

    First thing that matters is who is going to be "at fault" in the accident. Do you have comparative fault in your state?

    You need to consult with someone who knows this stuff to see if you even have a chance to wiggle out from under. In my book, you're maybe 1/2 at fault, I'd think less. But what I think doens't count.

    I'd hire a lawyer as a last resort; first figure out if it's necessary, and try to figure out if you even have a chance.

    Good luck, and let us know -Mathias
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    thank you for your output... but my biggest concernis the fact we were inbetween policies at the time of the wreck, we paid for a new policy 1 hour before (huh ny luck) the insurance co is saying it claims the policy shows went into effect @ 8:01 am the wreck was @ 2 am will they cover it or deny me. i always figured they go by the day of the policy which happes to be the same day as the accident. if you know please respond.... thanks a bunch......
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    I don't KNOW anything, so take my advice with a grain of salt.

    I have a difficult time believing a judge would let the insurance company slide by on a six-hour time slip. FWIW, I just insured my motorcycle with Progressive, and their coverage starts at 12:01 a.m. Same with the car I added to my Citizen's policy a few weeks back: 12:01. This might be a MI thing, but I doubt it.

    Now, if you called them a week earlier, saying "start the coverage next week", then it's your fault. But if you tell them, "insure my new car, now" then it's silly to have the coverage start mid-morning on the next day.

    I'd be interested to learn how this one shakes out...
    -Mathias
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    no we got online and payed for the coverage, but the adjuster is claiming we werent covered because it wasnt effective till 8:01 am ( we were sleeping )the funds transfer was made around 2am. she claims she has to now pull the internet records and blah blah.... i think its crap i specifically states in their disclaimer if an EFT as made as payment then that is when coverage began... we need a rental car and etc, but now she says it will be 6-10 days b4 she can get all this figured out.. BS i just dont know what to do now.... we have used this company for 2 years now and just never had this kind of ..ya know.. from them any more advise????? thanks again.. and i will keep you updated as well as asking more questions!!!

    ps... btw... our car is a 04 taurus, arent these new cars more expensive to fix?
    need2kno
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    now they are saying the car wasnt insured at the time of the wreck....can they really pull internet records and determine from that.. because this is really getting offcoarse and annoying now
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    "...can they really pull internet records and determine from that.. "

    I believe they can. Anytime money changes hands, there better be a time stamp on it.
    And that's gonna work in your favor -- right?

    -Mathias
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    I dont know whats in my favor now... they have screwed a bunch of crud up..... the put the claim on our old ins. policy we just found out. now they have to go back and redo everything i think.. they are the biggest crock of dog poo to be nice i have had to deal with. it is so stupid that a good standing company will act this way and preform business in this matter.... i dont know what to do at all anymore. i afraid im gonna come out of pocket in this & that they'll laim no insurance on us.. which we do have
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    you have a challenging situation...first, try and establish fault, because altho one is responsible for what is in front of them, generally, a car sitting still in the dark with no lights on (for whatever reason...he should have moved his vehicle out of the lane of traffic so as not to be hit, since the other car was no longer there) should remove some of the liability from you...must determine if it is a no-fault or fault state, contributory or comparative or hybrid-comparative negligence state ( the insurance commissioner will know as well as any PI lawyer)...

    I am assuming you did not do the foolish thing like cancelling your old insurance before the new one took effect...always have them overlap for 1-2 days so that you have coverage no matter what...if your payment was not sent prior to the collision, you may have trouble...hence, why it is imperative to establish fault, as you may only have to pay for your but not his...and do not be surprised if your new ins co drops you at the first renewal, since you did not wait too long to make yourself a certain risk to them...
  • prophet2prophet2 Member Posts: 372
    In our state, coverage begins at 12:01 a.m., not 8:01 a.m. or any other time. This applies to homeowners and other kinds of property & casualty (P&C) insurance, also, not just automobile insurance.
  • farazharoonfarazharoon Member Posts: 1
    Hello I have found this BMW in Florida which apparently is in good condition but the title is a CERTIFICATE OF DESTRUCTION.
    The car was stolen, the owners were paid by the insurance. Then it later showed up.

    Now as far as I understand it in Florida if a car is found after the owners have already been reinbursed for it the car becomes a parts car with a destruction title And it can't be put back on the road.Even if the car is in good condition.

    My question is can a Florida Certificate of Destruction be converted to a salvage, reconstructed, or clean title in any other state? e.g TX or PA

    Do all states have this law that a car which has already been paid for by insurance cannot go back on the road?

    Please do give any advice that you might have.
    Thank you.
    Faraz LalDin
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    i agree w/ you 110% he should have known that tx state law requires a stopped but running motor vehicle have hazards on or parking lights hence their situation. the cops at the scene made sure that he had working lights in the back and front and he did. the cop did tell me that he puts him at fault for the impact i madebecause of the light situation. he was sitting there after his first collision but then decided to pull off when i hit him so we know he wasnt knocked out and he admittted to his fault of leaving them off, but why did he turn them all off and sit there is my quest. i begin to think some if it was a purposly sought after incedent....... 1 more thing..should i leave my ins. co alone for the time being and step up on his or stay with mine, depending on the outcome of them messing my claim up ???
  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    I read up on your profile and you seem to have knowlege i seek... can you help???? i know i reside in a totally diff. area, but some things have to be similar or even the same when it comes to dealing W/ ins. cos.. and we found out ours starts at 12:01 also!!!
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    That the crash was caused by your failure to drive within your headlights and not stopping in time to avoid an object in the road in front of you does not license your attempt of trying to make some insurance company look bad. Had you been rearended under the same circumstances, I'm confident you would find the adverse driver 100% at fault. Standard form casualty insurance policies begin at 12:01 A.M. There is still time for the investigating officer to mail a citation to you.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    sorry i haven't been able to get back here in a few days.

    I wasn't judging you. I merely asked some questions and tried to point out that there is no reason to want a clean title. Now, if you went ahead and accomplished this, then I'd judge you. :P

    Now, as far as stating that the chassis may be messed up, but the inegrity of all else is preserved ... what exactly are we talking about? Integrity of the headliner? The carpet? The chassis is the backbone of the car. Everything else just hangs on it.

    If anyone else takes that car and rebuilds it, it will still have a salvage title and they will suffer the same depreciation results that you would. If they clean the title, that is dishonest and, as far as I know, illegal.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • need2knoneed2kno Member Posts: 9
    FYI... The word FAILURE is not intended for me in my situation.....I didnt fail to do anything, and im not trying to make some insur. CO look bad. ( they are doing that for themselves!) i was driving within my headlights and only going 30mph if that... it was pouring rain and the only lights were my headlamps, the truck on the left of me had his headlamps on, and then a green stop light. there was no POSSIBLE way for me to see him or avoid him....ad its MY insur. co that has actually messed alot of things up and i am having to wait till next week till i can even begin repairs to my car, so they make themselves look bad ...

    UPDATE ... ill be happy to add.... the mother of the car i struck doesnt want to file a claim at all, besides we looked up value of his car,now worth only $236 LOL, his mom says the carisnt worth even keeping a picture of, and says her son has to go off to college w/out a car now and its his own fault!!! BTW mother doesnt have a car b/c she dont drive.... in other words i wont be out of pocket on his piece of crud now!
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Now I think I was once married to you.
  • cadillacmikecadillacmike Member Posts: 543
    Mathias:
    The Judge sure will allow a company who's policy starts at 8:01 am to not be held responsible for a wreck that happende at 2:00 am earlier that day. That's why hey stipulate to you the day, minute and hour that the policy starts. Now in your case of an internet purchase, I'm not sure how the timewould track, but please do try to get some records yourself.

    Whenever I make internat payments on (credit cards) I always print out the confirmation page, in addition to the confirm code, the page header / footer has a nice datre / time stamp. But then again I never purchased an initial insurance policy online (I pay the monthly bill on line, but that's on an existing policy)

    Need2no:
    Now, what was the old policy in force at the time. You didn't let the old coverage lapse did you???

    What you didn't have an old policy?!?!?!? :surprise: If that's the case, bad on you, you shouldn't have ever stopped coverage on a car that you are driving until new coverage is in place... :confuse:

    Also, you are ALWAYS responsible for hitting a car in front of you or if you are turning left. Now mitigating circumstances might preclude the other party from suing you, but the ins company of the rear- ender will always defer to the rear endee! you say you were "driving within your headlights" but you "couldn't see" Listen to what you are saying - you are contradicting yourself. The ins co has heard this a milion times before and they have no sympathy, believe me, been there done that, got the huge bill for it.
  • cadillacmikecadillacmike Member Posts: 543
    In most states the DEFAULT start time is 12:01AM on the date in question, but USAA always asks me first and if I don't care, then they set coverage start at 12:01. I could however say I want it to start at 3:01PM because that's when I expect delivery of the car, or whatever, thus making the dealer repsonsible (in theory) for anything that happens between 12:01 AM and 3:01PM on that day.

    need2no needs to track down their initial application and payment information.
  • jb_turnerjb_turner Member Posts: 702
    need2no,

    Lets look at the facts concerning your case in a simplified way:

    A. You rear ended someone.
    B. You were not insured at the TIME of the accident.
    C. Your insurance rates will skyrocket.
    D. You are in deep financial doo doo.

    Need I say more?
  • kbstitchkbstitch Member Posts: 1
    Hello!!
    I am a new member. I need your advice, help.

    State: Florida

    My husband and I had an accident in Dec 2004. The other driver was at fault. We were at the stop light and the other driver (truck) didn't see it and rear-ended us. We were having therapy for 3 months since the accident. We sued the other driver insurance a month ago. We had $20,000 in medical bills (my auto insurace PIP paid 80%). The car was totaled (10,500 value). We sued on April 18th , 2005

    These are my questions:
    How the lawyer valued our loss? because she told us she will call me after the adjuster (other driver's insurance) present their offer.
    How much we can get?
    How long can it takes for settlement?

    Thanks for your help.
    Kary
  • millspdmillspd Member Posts: 104
    Hey All,

    We had quite the hail storm pass through our area on Thursday, and, unfortunately, my 04 Avalon took quite a beating. There is very noticeable damage on the hood, roof, trunk, and on some of the side panels as well.

    I called my State Farm agent and put in a claim. I got a voicemail today from SF that indicated they will need to schedule an inspection of the car, and that makes sense.

    I was just wondering if anyone out there can share any tips, advice, etc. on what I might expect out of this process. I did visit my body shop of choice and they indicated that they would try paintless dent repair first but may end up having to replace pieces. That's not going to work for the roof, though.

    Thanks in advance!
    Paul
  • genec11genec11 Member Posts: 1
    I was rear ended by a truck. The truck's front right bumper damaged my car's rear left bumper. The police report says I made a lange change from r/l to l/l and that I crossed from r/l to l/l, which I am agreement with (I was hit several seconds after the lane change in bumper to bumper traffic). However, the officer's next statement says my car struck the truck. I have pictures and a witness (and even the other driver agreed at the scene) that show the truck hit my car. There's no way I could have hit the truck unless I was going in reverse.

    I am trying to have the accident report amended am not optimistic (I've tried contacting the officer w/o any luck and have spoken to several friends in law enforcement who say it will be unlikely that the officer will amend his report).

    How will the truck's ins co view this police accident report along with the pictures and a witness' statement? Will the pics and witness statement override the police report?

    Thanks in advance for any help.
  • rroyce10rroyce10 Member Posts: 9,332
    ........ Sorry to hear about your hit .. hail damage can be a big pain in the Aardvark ...

    Before the the claims guy comes out and does his inspection you need to help yourself out, because he won't .... take the car to a good hand car wash (or do it yourself) and wipe it down real good, then take take some tape or some post-it dots and mark all the spots ... most of the time the body guys miss them and the adjustor will make a point of it ..l.o.l... ... no sense in calling the guy back or having the body shop call when you can't be there, a new paint job you don't need ......

    Terry.
  • millspdmillspd Member Posts: 104
    Thanks, Terry, that sounds good. I meant to wash it today (the adjuster plans to show up sometime this week while my car sits at the office and I am not sure which day) but didn't get that done today. :P

    There are sooo many dings n' dents on the hood and trunk that I'd need go through a roll or two of tape. Our "family" (I call them that because we have given them so much business over the years and I really trust them) body shop thinks some of the panels are just going to have to be replaced, but that'd be pretty darn tough on the roof. :surprise:

    So, I'll be sure to let you know how it goes. I really like the car and it pains me to see it banged up this way.

    Thanks again,
    Paul
  • rroyce10rroyce10 Member Posts: 9,332
    ....... If worse comes to worse ... new hood, new panels, "maybe" the trunk lid and ALL new OEM parts (did I say new.?) .....

    Terry.
  • millspdmillspd Member Posts: 104
    I hear ya about the parts, and I believe. :)

    Lots of car damage around here. A friend had her late model Infiniti get all banged up, a co-worker had her just purchased Ford truck get dinged. Ugh, what a mess.

    Which reminds me, I need to ask about trade in values before/after hail in the real world forum. I'm curious what Mother Nature did to my resale.

    Thanks,
    Paul
  • cadillacmikecadillacmike Member Posts: 543
    Should have gotten a Cadillac, - thicker sheet metal panels :P

    Actually I had hail damage in 2003 when I was in the giant sand box. 3 or 4 dings, all came out with paintless dent removal - the padded vinyl roof took no damage ;)
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    First, if the officer will not amend his report, take the issue to his supervisor, which may work...you may need signed (and notarized) affidavits from the witnessess (since I doubt they will traipse to the police station with you) stating what they saw, and the supervisor or the officer may change their tune...also have the affidavits for your insurnace and the opposing insurance, as if it went to court, a jury would most likely believe multiple disinterested witnesses who saw the same thing (disinterested means no one like your mother or brother, but random other drivers or passersby) and believe the cop made a mistake...good luck and keep this board posted...cops are great folks, but sometimes they can be so pigheaded...I have had clients where the cop only asked one of the drivers for his version of the accident and did not take the time to ask the other driver for his version...how can they overlook that??? :mad: :mad: :mad:
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    I had an accident with my girlfriend's new Buick LaCrosse on May 16th. A dump truck owned by the City of Philadelphia didn't see traffic stopped ahead, slammed on the brakes sending out a plume of blue smoke, lost control, spun out, and tumbled in front of my car. It looked like something out of an action movie. I was in the left lane, the truck was in the right about a car length ahead. It crossed into my lane as it was tumbling just clipping the very front of my vehicle. I think a part of the truck landed on me rather than my car hitting it as the airbags didn't deploy. The accident caused about $2,500 damage to the LaCrosse. I was not injured and had no passengers. The driver of the truck miraculously emerged from his vehicle as well.

    I believe the city is clearly at fault. From what I understand, (per the police officer at the scene) the City of Philadelphia is self-insured. I imagine my girlfriend's insurance company, (Harleysville) will pursue the city for reimbursement. Her policy has a $500 deductible. Will the city reimburse the deductible or do we still have to eat it?
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    when your ins pays for repairs, you must pay the deductible...since you are not at fault, when your ins pursues the other ins (or the city) they will recover all they paid plus your deductible...within two weeks after they recover, they will cut you a check to refund your deductible...

    be glad you did not deal with the city of Atlanta...they havea policy of paying only $1,000 in damages (that's one grand TOTAL for auto repairs, medicals pain and suffering combined), as the remainder is exempt under sovereign immunity...even if you are killed by a wayward garbage truck or police car, the wrongful death claim will only get you $1,000, and that's it...that is why I recommend EVERYONE should have 100K in medpay, 100K for UM, and a separate umbrella policy for UM to 1 million bucks, in case something happens and the City of Atlanta is at fault... :mad: :confuse: :mad:
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Very good advice on carrying high limits and here's another reason.

    Up North, middle of January, Blizzard conditions, 35 below, dense fog while waiting for the light to turn Green, you take your foot off the brake & fast idle the engine in Neutral (stick shift) when all of a sudden you get rearended by a tractor, two trailers loaded with very expensive cargo. Flames erupt as a result of the impact and the total property damage is a million dollars. In a Comparative Negligent state you are judged to be 10% at fault and the trucker is 90%. Why, because you failed to have your brake lights on so you could have been seen sooner. Thus you are obligated to pay $100,000 to the trucker while his company pays you $900 for your old clunker.

    When you think it can't happen to you, then don't buy any insurance at all, but when you do, buy the high limits. You may think you are judgement proof, but your future income and inheritance can be attached due to your negligence.

    "Sovereign Immunity" should have been done away with when the South lost the Civil War. A city councilman driving his M/B needs to be rearended by a city vehicle.

    Again, really good advice Marsha.
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    Your point is well taken, but the example isn't so good.
    When I'm waiting at the light and I know it's gonna take awhile, I put on the parking brake.
    No brake lights.
    That's not illegal.
    There's already lights at the back of the car.

    -Mathias
    (who carries high limits)
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Obviously you are not an alpine skier. Experienced downhillers never apply their parking brake in severe cold weather because the condensation causes the pads or drums to freeze and lock up.

    Too bad the example didn't merit your approval, however, it is an actual case that involved a Pinto with a stick shift. Only his tail lights were on while he kept the engine going to enable the heater to work and the jury was made aware the rear and much brighter brake lite was not on. Had the brighter brake light been illuminated he would not have been found 10% negligent.

    Actual cases are the best examples.
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    So it was an actual case.
    I was afraid of that. It seemed too hokey to be invented.

    Please PLEASE tell me it was a civil case.

    This is idiotic. Guilty while stopped in traffic with the lights on?
    Is there a state law mandating a foot on the brake?

    Only in America, and I don't mean that in a good way.

    "Do not go in and out of court so thy name may not stink"
    Can't remember who said it, but it was about 2,500 years ago.

    Opinions aside, high liability limits are an excellent idea.
    -Mathias
  • shortymcaffyshortymcaffy Member Posts: 2
    I live in PA. I was at a stop sign turning left and pulled out. As i was pulling out a noticed a car coming towards me in the lane i was crossing. I did not hear the lady use her brakes and she hit the side of my car in the rear of the backseat door.

    Now my question is since she hit me behind the driver door, is she at fault? I was told this was true but am unsure. We did not go to our insurance companies and she went ahead and got the car fixed. The total she claims came to $725 but i find that tough to believe since it was only a headlight and some scratches on the bumper.

    Before i discuss the matter with her I need to know if she is at fault. I am also curious what the result would be if I refused to pay. Would she be able to sue or would she be left with nothing to do since neither of us claimed it with our insurance and she no longer has any damage.

    THANK YOU SO MUCH to anyone who can help me with this.
  • mikefm58mikefm58 Member Posts: 2,882
    Assuming there is no witness that could say who was at the stop sign first, who would have had the right of way, I believe the insurance companies would say it's a case of "he said she said" where both of you claim that you had the right of way. And I believe in this case, you each would be responsible for damages to your own car, nothing would be paid to the other party by each of your own policies.
  • shortymcaffyshortymcaffy Member Posts: 2
    The lady that hit me was not at a stop sign. She had the right of way because she was traveling on the road.

    Im also still curious what the repurcusions would be if I were to not pay for this accident and pretend it never happened.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    I think its definitely your fault. Just because you got most of your car out of the way does not mean you didn't cut her off. The repurcusions? You mean besides living with your conscience? Well, it depends on what the insurance investigators turn up.

    $725 is not at all unreasonable. Have you seen what body shops charge these days? Heck, repainting one panel is like $500. Add a dent in there and you're typically over $1K without batting an eye.

    My advice is to pay up. If you deny it and it goes to insurance and they find you at fault, you'll be suffering much more through premiums over the next 5 years than if you just pay the $725 and be done with it. She could have also called the cops and you would have been issued a ticket for failure to yield to right-of-way. Be thankful you are getting off this easy.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...and avoid all the grief with the insurance company. My girlfriend's car was damaged to the tune of $2,523 and I feel I should have just paid it myself and then pursued getting a refund from the City of Philadelphia through my attorney. My girlfriend's insurance company has turned this whole deal into an inquisition because I was driving her car. She lives in a suburban county, (Montgomery) outside Philadelphia and I live within the city limits.

    The most idiotic thing one of them asked pertaining to the accident, "Was the truck damaged?" Gee, I told you guys three separate times that the truck spun out, hit a concrete wall, and rolled three times! What do you think?" Another person called my girlfriend about the accident a few hours after I explained to them I was the only one in the car. How the heck would my girlfriend know when she was nowhere near it?

    They were asking her, "Why was he driving your car in Philadelphia?" Well, duh! I live there and briefly borrowed her ride. What if we were in Texas on vacation and the car got wrecked. Would they ask her what the car was doing in Texas? I didn't know she was limited to driving the vehicle within a ten-mile radius of her home.

    I believe they thought she had me as a driver and failed to put me on her policy. If anybody knows what car insurance is like in Philadelphia, (double or triple what it is in the suburbs) you can see why somebody would do this. However, I'm totally legit. I have been insured by the same company for 20 years and have my cars registered in Philadelphia. They investigated it and their underwriters determined I indeed DO have my own insurance. Still, these guys wanted me to fax a copy of my declaration sheet, (which I did). I think they have a crap attitude towards Philadelphia residents in general. I guess we're just a bunch of thugs and gangstas straight out of a 50 Cent video.

    From the beginning, they seemed more concerned about getting their money back rather than my welfare. When I told them that the truck that caused the accident was owned by the City of Philadelphia they commented, "Gee, the City of Philadelphia! It's going to be tough going to get reimbursed by them!"

    Second, they told my girlfriend she could either take her car to one of their "preferred shops" or one of her choice. Gee, their "preferred shops!" Probably some goober with a sledgehammer, a can of Krylon, and counterfeit parts who will do a lousy job and charge the least amount possible. I took her car to my buddy's shop - a place I know does an excellent job and is close to my workplace. It took them four days to send out an appraiser whereas my company sends one the next day. I told them right from the beginning where the car was and they said "OK." However, they called my girlfriend and asked her why the car wasn't taken to one of their "preferred shops!" On top of it, she called the company on Friday to find out if the appraiser was out to look at the car ant they said "no." My bodyshop guy said they looked at it on Thursday. Good God! They can't even keep track of what their own people are doing!

    I urged my girlfriend to drop these guys and go with somebody else. They just don't want to pay for her claim and are weasling around for some reason. Now, this woman who has delusions she's Nancy Drew is hassling my girlfriend about sending copies of her utility bills, and a copy of her license to determine her residency because I live in Philly and they think she's living with me. I think this is going way over the top. Should she get an attorney to stop this harassment?
  • mikefm58mikefm58 Member Posts: 2,882
    Oh, then it's definately you're fault, you pulled out in front of her. If a cop investigated, you would get a ticket for "failing to yield the right of way".

    If I were in her shoes and you refused to pay, I'd first call the cops and see if they could write you a ticket. Then I'd call YOUR insurance company and put in a claim. That can be done in Florida, not sure about PA. And I'd then consider sueing you in small claims court if your insurance company is a pain. As soon as she calls your insurance company, it's on YOUR record, even if you end up paying it out of your pocket. And if she's really ticked off, she might start complaining about some neck or back pains. Is all this really worth it for $725?

    Be a man and own up to your responsibilities.....pay her.
Sign In or Register to comment.