Subaru Crew Cafe

1113114116118119343

Comments

  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    As much as I have given up on MT lately, i have to say this article was good. I just can't bring myself to risk the reliability of a ZX5 SVT though.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    heh, I'd wager-- doing no research whatsoever, just having done Ford and Subaru-- that it would be no worse than the Impreza. better perhaps except for switchgear and cheesy electronics. Subaru is good at that! not great at powertrain longevity... definitely not even with Honda or Toyota.

    -c
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    That's true. Um...ok ok ok I know it's FWD and I am not really a fan of that! Yea that's it!

    ZX5 is a great package, utility-wise.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    How much HP and torque on that diesel taxi? It's so hideously ugly, though.

    Comparo just shows that the RS needs to either lose weight or gain power, preferably both. That Nissan is still using a non-indy rear suspension, basically a torsion beam adapated from the old Quest van!

    Even more interesting, I'd rate reliability in the opposite order, Subaru, Nissan, Mitsu, then Ford. Last Ford I owned had trim pieces falling off far too frequently. My Subie is holding together so much better there's no comparison.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    They've come a LONG ways between your late 80s Escort and the Focus.

    -c
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Colin- True but personally I'm still not convinced. I know for a fact that the Focus rental I drove last fall was a POS :-)

    -Frank P.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It was a '91 Escort GT, first year of that generation. The late 80s ones were even more awful.

    That car was actually based on the Mazda Protege, same wheelbase, track, even suspension. The powertrain was actually not bad, 1.8l DOHC with 127hp and 114 lb-ft, in a very light car. Torque steer wasn't too bad, either.

    It was the interior that fell apart. I'd literally open a door and something would fall out, some weatherstripping or door seal. The seal around the windshield came out at about 12,001 miles, just after the B2B warranty, and Ford would not fix it for me. Stitching would come apart on the seat and door trim. It had more squeeks and rattles than I could count. The carpets came loose.

    The Forester's assembly is done with much more care. There may be some cheap materials, but tolerances are tight, nothing has come loose, and NVH control is 400% better.

    The scary thing? Reliability actually dropped when the Focus came out. My Escort was about average if you are to believe CR reports. Focus was much, much worse.

    Scary!

    -juice
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    I totally agree with you that the Focus is a POS.
     A friend bought a new 2002 Focus wagon and I thought you know that does not look half bad.

      After driving it though what a cheap piece of crap, I drove it on a gravel road, Geez it was a bucket of bolts everything that could rattle did.

      Cheers Pat.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    but the ZX5 SVT is a great deal right now....
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    I have had Foci as rental cars on at least four occasions, and would have to lump them in the "cars you want to like, but just can't" category. They handle nicely for front-drivers and I imagine in SVT trim kick out a nice dose of power. I cannot get past their shoddy build quality and strange ergonomics, however.

    Try as I might I cannot find a comfortable driving position in those cars, and even when I get close, the seat cushions are so misshapen they cause saddle sores almost immediately. The shapes and locations of instruments and switchgear seem to have been chosen just to make a visual statement rather than to be useful.

    Ed
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think the SVT models are a big step up from their pedestrian cousins, in the same way the STi is for Subaru.

    The 5 door is still small, the wagon is huge and that would be the only one I'd even consider. It's getting the PZEV 2.3l engine with more power this year, so maybe that wouldn't be so bad. I doubt they'd make an SVT wagon.

    Like Ed, I also find the interior rather bizarre, in a bad way.

    Just be ready to tolerate "things falling off" syndrome. My neighbor has a wagon with the Zetec engine, and strangely enough he says he prefers the Escort wagon he had before. He seems like the type that would choose ride over handling, though.

    Dunno, I think that platform is ripe for a full redo.

    -juice
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    coming in MY'05 for Europe, I think. Mazda3 and Volvo S40 also on the same platform, and also already for sale.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yeah, I saw a 3 at a local dealer, haven't driven it yet though. It's bigger and some reviews say it lost a little bit of its edge, though. That would be a shame because that is the one thing the Focus has going for it, supposedly.

    I actually have never driven one, hard to believe. Went to a Ford dealer once, but they were not SVT certified, and wanted me to try a Rousch Mustang instead. No thanks, not my style.

    -juice
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Press Days start on the 4th, so info will start coming out slowly starting then.

    Bob and I will be there during the Industry Preview Days, Jan 6-8. I guess that's when dealers go? Employees maybe?

    Then it finally opens to the public on Jan 10.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    dang, that's a little ways yet. I'm impatiently waiting for the good news! :)

    -c
  • bigelmbigelm Member Posts: 995
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    We still won't know prices.

    We probably will know a lot more about the new powertrains. Will base engines get AVCS? What HP will the 2.5T make? What about the H6? Will that still be a 3.0l, or bigger?

    Subaru surprised us with the STi and the F-XT, so who knows. US is getting unique models, that, for once, FOR ONCE, are better than their JDM counterparts.

    -juice
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    My understanding is that the new Focus which shares underpinnings with the M3 and S40/V50 WON'T be coming to North America. Why - I don't know.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Ford can't figure out a way to dumb it down enough for US tastes? LOL

    What other small car do they have? Maybe they'll bring the new Mondeo? But that would kill the X-type. That Jag already has $7500 rebates to overcome.

    -juice
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Maybe the Focus in the US is fine just as it is per the focus groups. I kill me!!

    The Focus in Europe is a major product for Ford. I would venture to say it isn't here in NA and justification for retooling of the NA plants isn't there.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Thinking more about this...the Ford 500 will debut in Detroit, but that's a Mazda6 clone and definitely not a small car. They need a smaller car in the lineup.

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I dunno it's kinda funny IMHO. Take an econobox and slap on some parts call it SVT. I mean when you boil it down it's still the ultra econobox from a major car manufacturer. I'd just spend the money of the SVT on a better car.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, yes and no. Here the Focus is a cheap rental car, even then a decent one.

    But in Europe Ford has a couple of cars beneath Focus in the lineup, the Ka and the Fiesta. So it's the 3rd step up in the lineup, not really an econobox from that standpoint.

    I should drive one just to see, all these press wags can't be wrong. It must drive quite well for people to overlook the awful launch glitches and nagging quality problems.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    SOA has some sort of announcement. it's either the B9SC or the Legacy. There's also an announcement on the 5th, IIRC.

    Bob
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    Hit the nail on the head, the problem with Ford is they take what is basically a very good car in Europe and then for some reason totally screw it up for North America.

      The Mondeo is an excellent car in Europe yet Ford took it made it the Contour and screwed it up, Nuff said.

      Cheers Pat.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    "Take an econobox and slap on some parts call it SVT. I mean when you boil it down it's still the ultra econobox from a major car manufacturer."

    *cough* WRX *cough* ok well 2.5RS anyway.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    is way way more vehicle than a base-line focus could ever dream of being...

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    it better be, it costs way way more.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Man, I am getting so excited for you guys.

    Don't know how technical you want to get with your questions, but there has been quite a debate on nabisco (2.5 forum) about pistons. Are they really forged? APS Australia and RalliSpec say no.

    One response on one of the threads mentioned that the Subaru info says "based on" (insert exotic internals here).
    There's a sticky over there.

    -Dennis
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    In my view, both the SVT and the 2.5RS are bottom rung econo-cars gussied up with nice rims, sport seats, a bit more power, and some trim. Take away the RS's AWD and it would be SVT, no contest.

    SVT is to Focus as 2.5RS is to Impreza L. Well except yours, of course!

    At least we now have WRX, the more legit contender. Focus SVT guys still have to live knowing the real deal is only available in UK and Europe.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm not sure they'll even know, Dennis, but we'll ask. That's a question for Patti's techie friends.

    I don't think the RS is a whole lot different than the base Impreza (TS now).

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Colin, what a lousy way to start off the new year. Really sorry to hear that.

    Bob
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Sorry man, that sucks!

    Craig
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    Glad you're ok though.

    -Brian
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    I know it has been said before cars are replaceable people are not, glad you were not hurt or worse.

     It s especially sickening since you were just waiting for the legacy so you could sell the car.

      Cheers Pat.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    imagestation album, if you're a member:
    http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4288154025

    if not, go to my original link as I've updated that as well with more info and hopefully pics that non-imagestation members can see.

    it might be totaled actually. private party value is about $12,000.

    thanks for the well wishes, all. and of course Pat is right, this is just a machine and I'm just fine. no whiplash or anything.
    -Colin
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    Colin sorry to hear about the M3. Considering what's happened, you sound very level headed and accepted responsibility. That shows class and maturity. Hope it all works out for you.

    Jim
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Colin,

    Sorry to hear about the accident. I'm glad to know that you were okay though.

    Any estimates on the repair job yet?

    Ken
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Glad you're ok, Colin. Summer tires in the winter? You should know better. ;-)

    -Dennis
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    on the Speed channel today, 1/1/04.

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    oh no question I should've known better in many ways.

    I probably should've have been at the party I was at either. it was OK, but hosted by an ex-gf who is probably better left alone.

    yee haw, what a wonderful new year so far. OTOH the weather is awesome and I'm thinking about taking the CBR for a spin. I'll be gentle!

    -c
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    Given that it needs a new front and rear quarter at least, rear bumper looks to have a sizable gouge, if private party retail is $12000, the cost of repairs plus salvage value on an M3 will be in the insurers favour I would say there is a pretty good chance they will write it off.

    If you were thinking of selling anyway this may be the best way out a lousy event.

       Cheers Pat

      Looked at pics. again missed that large gouge on the door first time around, front bumper is also toast, if they do fix it Colin I will be one surprised dude.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    yeah rear bumper is iffy. front bumper is repairable, the metal fascia above the bumper next to the headlamp is definitely toast. hood needs repair & respray (probably spray whole hood), door skin complete replace is probable and rear quarter looks too invasive to repair.

    drivetrain is solid and super expensive so you could be right about them totalling it... still, I would be surprised myself.

    -Colin
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Hey Colin, your little mishap reminded me of one I had in Kansas years ago... it was outside Manhattan (the "Little Apple" for you non-Kansas types). I was driving to work after it had snowed about 6 inches and the road was partially plowed so that there was about a lane and a 1/2 in each direction (4-lane divided hwy). I got impatient and went to pass a slower moving car, it was a tight squeeze but I would have made it except for the fact that I came up on an underpass and the plow had swerved around the bridge abutment leaving a lump of unplowed snow extending halfway into my lane. I had no place to bail out cause the other car was right next to me and no time to brake. The two left wheels hit the snow and I immediately got sideways. Miraculously I managed to keep it in my lane and not hit the other car and almost recovered but I over corrected and the next thing I know the left rear is tagging the guardrail. Fortunately it was just a glancing blow and all I had to do was repair the quarter panel (didn't even file a claim). Of course I had no business driving as fast as I was nor trying to pass given the conditions but I learned my lesson. Oh yeah, it was my first new car and it was barely a month old at the time :-(

    -Frank P.
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Colin: Sorry to read of your mishap. I know from experience the kind of sick feeling you get when you're in a one-car accident. As others point out, better the damage to the car than to you.

    Good luck in getting things resolved.

    Ed
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.