Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
There's not much difference, but the '66 has a more blacked-out grille, that's divided up into little squares. The '67 has grille inserts that are chromed, and has a diagonal, diamond pattern.
In back, the '66 has round backup lights in the bumper, and wide taillights that vaguely suggest an Impala, with three across, three bulbs most likely, but each of the three divided into three slim horizontal strips, for an overall 9x9 pattern. The '67 has rectangular backup lights in the bumper, and the taillights aren't as full-width, more Bel-Air like, two across, each divided into two horizontal strips, for a 2x2 pattern.
I also remember a different taillight pattern, that was kind of delta-shaped, like what Dodge was doing in the late 60's, but I think that was just on a cheaper model, like maybe the '66 Tempest? Probably just one bulb on each side.
I sent the listing to my brother who said "Nah, it's an automatic."
I think the auto used in those was a Borg-Warner unit...I think they were durable enough, if maybe unrefined. The MB-designed auto in my fintail is pretty clunky, but I suspect some of that comes from it not having a torque converter.
I think one ride around the block and you'd say "thanks but no thanks". You get lots of looks and thumbs up, and maybe that's worth $20K for sure, but the "driving experience" leaves a lot to be desired. Of course, if you like that kind of "slow tank" feeling, might just be your ticket. I wouldn't try any tricks in it though.
I've never forgiven my older brother who at 17 thought the clutch on my grandfather's old 49 Buick was too hard. As a result my folks sold it for $50. Dang!
I remember that overboosted steering on my 66 Galaxie. I also remember how stiff it would get when that thing would stall, which was too often.
Similar to this photo:
Jack up car -- 10 min
Remove 4 driveshaft bolts, unhook. 5 min
Remove two trans. mount bolts, drop to ground 10 min
Remove shift rods, clutch rod, and and clutch fork by pulling a few cotter pins 10 min
Remove bell housing bolts 5 min
Yank out little transmission 1 min
4 pressure plate bolts 2 min
Your done. 43 minutes out, maybe 40 minutes in.
-Late 60's-early 70's small-bumper/big tail light MGB-GT, BRG and in very nice shape. Back then sports cars came even smaller but this MG coupe was dwarfed by a smallish Kia (Spectra?) next to it.
-Volvo 1800E, the early 70's fuel-injected version of the Volvo Coupe popularly known as the P1800, in good condition, red with nice chrome and apparently in use as a regular driver, a guy was unloading photography equipment from it. Like most 60s designs the styling has held up well.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
behind me in traffic today, a few cars back, a light blue volvo 240.
NEW BABY ROLLS
gunmetal volvo 240 wagon, flush headlights, as opposed to the blue sedan i saw yesterday which had quad round lights.
early 90's white 911 convertible, no whale tail!
Oops... never mind.
I think I have seen this before...but a good name for a car anyway
I don't think I have ever seen one of these before
What does this "commemorate"? The death of good taste?
"The True Meaning of Luxury"
Lemko-mobile
"Classic Car"...but I will admit the condition looks amazing
Big red...big weird expensive red
If this marque returns, I hope it is more durable
"Extremely Rare Classic"
If you like blue, this is for you
He's baaack
Weird opera windows...never seen those before
"attractively styled"...well I guess the top half is ok
Camry's dad
"the power and force of the USSR"
Gem's grandpa
Tikicar
The '79 Datsun 210 would be more appealing with a 4-speed manual.
The claim of uniqueness is bogus, the wraparound glass in the back was the default set-up for full-sized GM 4doors from 1959-62. I estimate roughly 2 of every 3 were so equipped. :mad:
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
In the Series 62, they built 26,216 of the 6W style, and only 4700 of the 4W style, which had the wraparound rear window. In the DeVille line, they built 26,415 6W, and 4847 4W
The 4W style was a lot more popular in 1962, but it was also revised with a more formal, attractive C-pillar...
The 4W wraparound style really doesn't work very well on the '61 Caddy. It's too rounded off, in contrast to the angular, linear look of the rest of the car. I can see why it wasn't very popular. In addition to the Caddy, I think only the Buick Electra and Olds 98 still had that wraparound style on the 4-door hardtops. Chevy and Pontiac went to a more formal look with a thicker C-pillar, and I think the LeSabre and Olds 88 did as well.
Edit: Here's a pic of a 1961 Buick Invicta, with the thicker C-pillar. So I'm pretty sure then, that the LeSabre used a similar treatment.
i saw a volvo wagon yesterday that may have been one of those with a ford 5.0 transplant in it.
'Lemko-mobile' seems more like an Andre-mobile.
'Big Red'. i like that car, price is stupid, don't go too far to the right when pulling into the driveway.
'Extremely Rare Classic'. Sad, from a gararge to a trailer park in only a couple of years.
'He's baaack'. I didn't even have to look!
Lemko used to have a 1985 5th Ave, that he gave to his brother years ago, who still has it, although I think it's pretty ragged out now. They're decent cars, tough and sturdy, and do a good job hiding their Volare underpinnings I think.
I really like that '60 Dodge Polara, but yeah, the price is ridiculous! I guess being a convertible it's rare, and having cross-ram makes it even rarer, but still, that price is way out of my league (and I'd guess, out of the seller's mind!) Also, I hate the fact that it has crank windows. I know that's a petty nitpick, but I've decided that if I ever get another convertible, I want it to have power windows! My '67 Catalina just has crank windows, and it's too big for me to easily reach across to the passenger side. I guess I didn't mind it so much when I first got that car. The top mechanism didn't work, so I had to put the top down or lift it up manually. And since I was already out of the car to do that, I didn't mind walking to the passenger side and putting down the windows. But now that the power is fixed, it's annoying. Plus, I've been mostly driving cars with power windows since 1998 now, so I guess I've gotten a bit spoiled. :P
Funny, but when I saw fintail's "He's baaaaaack" comment, my first thought was, watch it be that overpriced Olds 98 with the Buick mag wheels and the greasy looking undercarriage! :shades:
MotorTrend project car
Oldest car there was a 1909 Daimler, and the usual makes were represented - including about half a dozen Borgwards, for example, but the emphasis was on ordinary cars, rather than real exotics.
I did manage to buy three issues of "The Motor" magazine which I didn't already have - one from 1958 (the road test in that was the last of the Ford Popular 103's ie pre-war styling and transverse leaf suspension,) together with London Motor Show special issues for 1957 and 1948 - the latter was particularly rare and I was pleased to be able to get it.
The big automobilia shop in Vancouver has a small selection of old British magazines, mostly Autocar and Motor. Some of them are prewar, which were fascinating for me because of the classified ads. They wanted $15-20 CDN apiece for these - I don't know if that's a good price or not. I have a pile of 60s Autocars I bought when I was younger, at a swap meet for very little money.
I forgot to mention but a few weeks ago, during one of the first sunny weekends, I spotted a guy driving a mint shape Messerschmidt same as this one
I spotted it about 2 blocks away as it crossed the street we were driving on, and I sped up to catch up to it. Althought I never paid attention to vehicles like this, somehow, I think from all the chats here on Edmunds it's name got subconsciously implanted into my head.
I told my wife as we were approaching it from a few hundred feet "Look it's a Messerschmidt!" She's like "what's a messerschmidt?" I said "that is!"
As we pulled up right beside it, my wife was trying to read the name badge on the side of it, and said "I can't even read the name of it, and you knew from half a block away what it was"
What can I say you married a car nerd. I told her. :shades:
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
The oddest thing I ever saw driving in Van was a 50s Fiat Multipla, it sounded like a hyper chainsaw.
Not a two tone or tri-tone? I think I actually liked the 55 better, but really most 55-57 cars were decent lookers. I think the instrument panel designers should go back and take a look at the interiors on a lot of these since its one area where I think a lot of today's cars come up short.
You can pick up odd issues of Motor and Autocar for very little really (maybe £1/£2 each), they turn up at swapmeets and even in ordinary charity shops etc, but of course when you have a load of them already it is more difficult to find ones you don't already have. The two magazines merged in the late eighties, and it's just Autocar now, so Motor - which I bought every week until it merged - is a bit rarer as a result, although no more expensive. If I started buying the backnumbers of Autocar as well I would have to find a new house - probably on my own...