By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I think the test they did on Dateline didn't have much to do with safety, which ultimately is the purpose of a bumper.
If you want a bumper to survive impact, get a rubbermaid bumper, or a solid-core steel bumper that will deliver maximum whiplash per minimum impact. To heck with crumple zones! They cost money!
I thought it was kind of amusing that they accused the one car (can't remember which) of cheating, because of strategically placed foam padding under the bumper. How is that cheating? The car company adapted their design to the nature of the test.It was totally wrong that the testers removed the padding and changed the location of impact on just that one car. Maybe it was the test that was flawed and insufficient rather than the bumpers.
Anyways, I consider safety over the little things. To me, Onstar is an incredibly important safety feature that makes the Malibu stand out.
I'd feel more comfortable in my Malibu knowing Onstar detected air bag deployment and help was on the way rather than bleed to death in a Toyota.
It reminds me of a few years ago when Toyota was being accused of having flawed seatbelts. In a press conference, Toyota used a crane and picked up a vehicle by the seatbelts ever so slowly in order to prove their "strength."
What exactly did that prove? Nothing, really. That seatbelt demonstration was a static, linear load, not a dynamic shock load.
-juice
I'd be interested in comparing the results of the aforementioned test with crash safety ratings. Perhaps there are tradeoffs to achieve well in one test over the other.
I wonder why they didn't do a perpendicular barrier to either the front or the rear? My guess is that maybe all cars do relatively well in that category, which I think would be the most common type of impact.
On another subject, oldntired...did you know that your intermittent wipers are speed sensitive? Try it out sometime! I've had my Malibu for about 5 months now, and I feel like I'm discovering something new all the time.
I had read this forum before we took delivery so a couple of things I looked for. Yes, the radio responds to the remote that opens the doors. I asked the salesman about that and he said they all do that now, but for some reason it's not in the owners manual. This has actually worked for us because the wife and I listen to different radio stations and like the tone set differently.
So, now Momma has a new car. I get her 5 year old Alero, and my nine year old S-10 goes to her son. Is that an example of Tickle Down? *L*
Congrats.
-juice
I think he was ribbin ya!
And most people only rib peeps they like.
Congrats on the vehicle. And feel free to shout about the quiet!
-juice
I just drove by my local Chevy store yesterday to get a look at their Maxx inventory -- the styling is starting to grow on me -- and I couldn't see any sign of a trunk/hatch lock. Are the remote key fob and the inside release the only ways of opening the hatch? I see a conventional trunk lock on the sedan.
One of these days I'll actually go in for a test drive but I just thought I'd ask you happy owners in the mean time.
1) There is a button on the remote keyfob
2) There is a button on the driver's door at the front of the map pocket that releases the hatch
3) There is a microswitch with a weatherproof rubber cover in the top of the hatch handle slot that will open the hatch if the doors are unlocked
Very easy to use and very well thought out. Whether in the car or out, with doors locked or open, there is a way to access the hatch. It came in very handy this evening when I had to put the groceries in the car in the rain/sleet.
The suspension. On every other vehicle I've ever owned (and at 54 I've owned quite a few) the suspension always felt like it was a part of the chassis. Meaning that I could always feel every movement of the suspension as the chassis flexed and twisted in response. With this car there doesn't seem to be any chassis flex at all! The car stays level and solid feeling. I read that the Epsilon chassis had vastly improved torsional rigidity, and now I am a believer! I feel lie I'm suspended between the wheels as they go about their business, but the movement isn't transmitted to my butt like on other vehicles. Some will decry this as lack of road feel, but to me it is just a feeling of a good solid comfortable ride.
Now for a nit to pick. Whats with that ugly tail pipe? It's just a piece of cut off pipe sticking out the back. On my Alero I have two polished pipes that blend in nicely. Hey! Design guys! Details! Details! Do soemthing to set the LT model off from the rest besides two chrome letters on the backend.
in high-end real estate they always say privacy is the greatest luxury--my maxx gives me high-end car quiet.
gas mileage has gone up to 24 mpg now that I'm not showing off the remote start all the time. with all the in-town I do that ain't bad!
I still haven't seen another maxx on the road.
I have a couple of questions:
1. Have you noticed the gap between the body of the car and the rear light assembly when the hatch is open? Is this done on purpose?
2. On the model I saw, the front fender panels did not line up properly with the body. Was that a fluke on the model I saw or is it common?
Thanks.
Someone else here mentioned the remote affected the radio. What can the remote control on the radio?
As for other Maxx aspects, it does have a few small rattles but the mileage seems to be improving (1500 now). So far - furiously knocking on wood as I type this - the car has been very good. I sincerely hope the brakes and electrics will hold up (past Malibus have had major problems in these areas).
Not sure why the huge gap is there....anyone know?
Otherwise the sheetmetal fits very well.
I did discover that the car is incorrectly badged. The correct badge was previously ordered. In fact most of this dealers LT's are badged as LS's. The only flaw I have is that the keys are hard to get out of the ignition. It feels like the keys when cut were never run against a buffing wheel. One key has edges sharp enough to cut a finger.
This is my first car with a moon roof. I found the wind noise excessive. Is this normal? Are there deflectors?
I look forward to reading the posts and plan on contributing as I gain more experience with the car. Part of my decision to buy the MAXX was based on the positive comments here. I had looked at or test driven about 12 other models over the last 10 weeks.
Thanks
-juice
Car looks nice though I still don't see where there is any more room than my Grand Prix unless the seats are folded down.
-juice
Hopefully it will be easy to fix (mechanics trying to remove rattles from my ION's roof damaged the new headliner _and_ ruined the rear defroster).
No rattles in my skylights, but the backseat was rattling when scooted all the way forward.I was afraid it was the skylight and it was driving me nuts until I remembered that the kids had been sliding the seats back and forth.
My XM radio quit working within a week of taking delivery. I got it fixed, but wasn't that happy with the way the dealership wasn't that kind to my brand new car. I may try a different one next time I need service.
I thought the hatch was supposed to be light, etc., but if you don't bang it down, it doesn't close.
My hatch closes easily. The more I drive the car, the more I like it. This is a big change for me as this replaced an 8 yr old pickup truck with a std. transmission I hope the MAXX treats me as well as the truck.
I have yet to see another MAXX in RI on the road.
The car was quiet and composed the whole time. However we did notice that it doesn't like payment ripples. It seemed to set a sort of harmonic vibration on the slightly choppy payment. The cars seems to have a split personality. Around town it soaks up the payment irregularities, but on the open road at 60 per it doesn't. Very curious.
The wife loves the seats. They fit her great and to her are very comfortable. I last about two hours in the drivers seat. No matter how much I play with the seat I can't seem to find a truly comfortable position. The ridge on the seat bottom front edge hits me in the middle of my thighs, and if I adjust the seat down a bit in the front then I feel like I'm sliding off. Very distracting. I'll keep playing with it though till I find the 'sweet spot'.
Oh, and one other thing. My father owned a long line of Buick Park Avenues before switching to Chrysler LHS's. His comment after riding around in it for half a day? "This is a Chevy? I'd never have guessed." *L*
Also happens quite frequently (almost every trip and I drive daily): after reverse, as I am moving forward, Service-Engine-Soon light, brake light, ABS light, and TCS light all come on. Have to turn off engine and turn on again to remove the lights. Sounds serious and will have to have dealer address it right away. Read somewhere else that others have had this problem and waited weeks for the dealer repair.
Also looked at the '05 Chevy Equinox, but Maxx had a much better ride & handling and more interior passenger room, albeit in a slightly less sexy package. I'm 6'3" and 220lb and spent half of the test drive in the rear seat in absolute wonderment over the headroom and legroom. More room in the rear than my Cadillac CTS. With my wife driving (5'6") I could move the fore/aft rear seat adjuster all the way forward and still had 2" knee room. Now that's versatile.
Only downside to the car is the cheap looking/feeling cloth on the base car. I'm wondering how it will stand up to stains and general kid dirt, but I couldn't justify the extra $$ for the leather trim bundled with a bunch of toys we won't use. ScotchGard, anyone?
By the way, my CTS has no keyhole for the trunk, either. Seems to be the new design trend, though I still miss the old days where the trunk key was separate from the ignition to keep the valet jockeys from exploring.
Wagons are superior to Sedans in utility and if you combine the rear seat reclining facility, Maxx is unbeatable.
Hatchbacks and Wagons are spreading fast.
May be we should call this category of vehicles as 'Quint' for its 5 doors.
I don't think I've opened the glove box since the first week, so I don't know if I missed a light in there or not!
Yes, my Maxx has the odd shudder as well over some bumps - one publication called it "gut jiggle". Not sure if it is chassis flex or wierd suspension harmonics.
Three things of annoyance: 1.the rear seat plastic backs can bang the rear shock towers (seat backs are too wide or mis-aligned). 2.the rear skylight trim is downright cheap (tapping it brings sounds of tinny sheet metal). 3. the front seats require a bit of squrming around to find a comfortable position.
However, car is definitely solid feeling, rides well, is improving in mileage (around 25 - 26 mph for mixed driving, and has proven a huge step up from other American cars I have driven (by comparison, a short ride in a new Impala was pretty depressing).
Adweek
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6