Subaru Crew: Suggestions for Subaru

1272830323347

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Acura's would leave it on but I wonder if it would overheat in a track scenario.

    I doubt RL owners are shopping for a track car, VDC also.

    -juice
  • buddhabmanbuddhabman Member Posts: 252
    Where does Subaru go from here?

    The niche car maker who made a stake with AWD is now getting surrounded by the hordes. Since the wraps are off AWD and almost everyone is trying to take a piece of Subie's market. Toyota/Lexus have AWD in the G35 probably soon in the Camry? Honda just annouced their SH-AWD system for the Acura RL, just a matter of time before it shows in the Accord.

    Here are my ideas, and what order they should be brought to market.

    The mysterious 7 Pass Wagon/SUV/Van whatever? It had better come correct with lots of features, safety, performance and luxury. Pull out all the stops. 2 Models Sport & Luxury

    Upgraded, luxury Legacy STi to match the S4's M3's etc

    Hybrid Impreza, Outback.

    They need a large car/truck platform. I would size it like the Q45 or new VW Phaeton or Cadillac STS, a bit larger than the E-Class or 5 series. You can add a truck to this platform, one with true HD capability, Durango like. B11s engine platform

    To save costs. Ideas?

    Remove Outback from Impreza line

    Offer only WRX line for Impreza .

    Remove NA H4 except for Hybrid

    Remove Outback Sedan

    Offer 2 model style levels -
    One for Sport = Turbo H4 drivetrain, sport suspension, sport features (leather and alcantra)
    One for Luxury = NA H6 drivetrain, sport/luxurity suspension, luxury features (leather,suede, aluminum)
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://www.honda.co.jp/HDTV/news/2004-4040401a/

    Anybody see this video? It's 10:45 long and in Japanese, but it illustrates how this system works quite well, even if you don't understand Japanese.

    Also interesting, is the car in the video with the SH-AWD is not an '05 RL, but instead a LHD V6 US-spec Accord! If Honda decides to equip our Accords with this system, it definitely will spell trouble for the Legacy.

    No question, the AWD advantage that Subaru has enjoyed over the years is about to evaporate. The thing about this new Acura/Honda AWD is that they may have actually beaten Subaru at their own game here, and that's scary. Subaru has always promoted their AWD as a driving advantage year-round. Well it appears this new SC-AWD follows that same thinking, with the added advantage of sending all rearward power to the outside wheel when cornering (check the video). So when you're accelerating through a curve, each front wheel receives 15% of the power (30% total to the front), and (up to) 70% of the power goes to the outside rear wheel. That's smart IMO.

    Also, unlike some other so-called "smart AWD's, there is always some power being sent to both the front and rear axles.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    are applied to cars with automatic trannys. I'm wondering if SC-AWD thinking can also be applied to a manual tranny?

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    remember the AWD will likely be OPTIONAL on these cars Honda/Acura/lexus/etc. Which means that they will likely be rare finds and repairs down the road will be costly on low-production # vehicles. The other problem is they are still working off FWD based cars I would think, with a transversally mounted engine and extra diffys to send power to the rear.

    -mike

    PS: AWD is nothing new for Toyota and Honda... Remember the All-track Corolla and the Honda Civic AWD? They didn't sell well, and disappeared after a few years.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    judging from what I've read.

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Although I can't remember the last time I saw an RL on the road in my 40K+ miles driven a year.

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    my 2nd level boss drives one. :)

    ~c
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I see a few, but if this new model is as good as it promises to be, that will definitely change—and for the better.

    Bob
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    That is where Subaru will win. Keep the price reasonable. They also can't afford to alienate their core buyers so too radical a change can be hurtful. Subaru has one of, if not the best, AWD platforms. Unfortunately, most people don't know or care about the differences. Heck, they don't even know the differences between AWD and 4WD. I think they have a hit on their hands with the new Legacy and a rep for solid, reliable, go anywhere cars. As long as the reliablitity and quality keeps getting better they should do OK as a niche player.
    Greg
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Of the new items being feature with the new LR3, two items stood out IMO:

    (1) Land Rover’s Terrain Response system (4WD): This optimises driveability and comfort, as well as maximising traction. The driver chooses one of five terrain settings via a rotary switch on the centre console: a general driving program, plus one for slippery conditions (known as ‘grass/gravel/ snow’) and three special off-road modes (mud/ruts, sand, rock crawl). Terrain Response then automatically selects the most appropriate settings for the vehicle’s advanced electronic controls and traction aids – including ride height, engine torque response, hill descent control, electronic traction control and transmission settings.

    (2) swiveling headlights.

    Usually for off-roaders, the 4x4 system is just a hi-low affair, with maybe full-time capability thrown in too. It looks like LR has taken 4x4 drivetrain tuning to a new height, by fine-tuning the drivetrain, depending on what kind of off-roading you happen to be doing (sand vs rock crawling). Interesting. Let's see how it pans out.

    As to turning headlights, it's certainly nothing new, as the '47 Tucker had this feature too. However, I've noticed several big-ticket carmakers now incorporating this re-discovered feature in their cars. LR is just the latest.

    I'm wondering if either of these new features might make their way into future Subies? I don't think a 5-stage off-road system would be necessary, but perhaps a 4-stage (normal, slippery conditions, sand/offroad, towing/hauling) would be possible.

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'm not a big fan of pre-done off-road stuff. If you are serious about offroading, you are not gonna want those 5 offroad settings. Most LR folks I know who offroad will rip out that when it gets home from the dealer and throw in a lift kit etc. Anyone who doesn't do that much of a serious offroader, doesn't need 5 settings. I guess it's a cool feature to show off at cocktail parties or at the golf course however.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Or strengths, anyway. Subaru should stick to its AWD wagons. Manage costs by streamlining models a little, it's almost silly how many different variations they have for a company with just 1% market share.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Except they need to make larger versions of the legacy and outback. A superwagon, the size of say an old caprice with an H6t AWD, raised up, similar to the Pacifica, but larger, would be great. Then add a "full-size" car based on the same platform as a premium sedan to go after the full-size car market.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Also, the Impreza needs to go on a diet. It gained 200 lbs while the 2003 Forester redesign made that model lose 80 lbs. The Legacy also lost 180 lbs.

    Time to put the Impreza on Weight Watchers.

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Subaru Lineup:

    Impreza- Slightly smaller/lighter than current models
    Coupe
    Sedan
    Wagon
    2.5/2.0t/2.5t motors

    Legacy/Outback- As is for 2005
    Sedan
    Wagon
    OB Wagon
    2.5/2.5t/3.0H6 motors

    Paisan- Larger than the legacy platform, wider, longer along the lines of a full-size vehicle. Sedan/Coupe would be a normal car-type item just a large sedan, wagon would be raised up/variable raised system 7 passenger along the lines of the pacifica wagon or an old caprice-sized vehicle. These models would get the goodies everyone always is begging for Nav/HID/gadetry and be Flagship vehicles. They'd compete with the Volvos/Audi A6s/etc. and be stickered in the low 30-mid 30s.
    Coupe
    Sedan
    Raised-wagon
    3.0H6/3.5H6/3.5H6t Motors

    D-max based SUV 7-passenger with truck frame
    SUV, AWD standard, Low-range gearcase for true offroading.
    3.5L V6DI

    D-max based Pickup Truck same motor etc as above.

    -mike
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    but outside of that, fun car.

    i wished subaru had a slightly larger wagon that fit 5 more comfy when i was shopping last august...
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'd keep that too :)

    -mike
  • atlgaxtatlgaxt Member Posts: 501
    so I am sorry if I am retreading old ground. My number one suggestion for Subaru is to back off and don't put that awful new nose on whatever new models they decide to build.
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    like the nose. They should add a convertible. The new Legacy should have this option, although the ring shape platform will suffer.

    Greg
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    it's going to be the look of the Zapatinas designed Subaru's. The new Legacy will be the last of the breed.

    -Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You'll never get everyone to agree. Some say the new Legacy is handsome and want all Subies to look that way.

    The other camp calls it boring and derivative, and is asking for something more imaginative.

    I like the 2005 Legacy, but a Saab owner just came by my desk and saw my new brochure, then asked, "when are they coming out with a new Legacy". So he couldn't even tell it was new.

    -juice
  • atlgaxtatlgaxt Member Posts: 501
    Following up on the discussion of a couple of days ago, I've been giving the question some thought and it seems that as the hordes adopt AWD, Subaru can continue a two pronged strategy that it seems to be adopting, in order to use its history and reputation to stay ahead of the AWD game.

    It seems that most new AWD adapters are either adding AWD to cars with existing FWD architecture in order to limit the shortcomings of FWD, or are adding AWD primarily to improve driveability in inclement weather. Therefore, Subaru can continue to exploit two niches.

    1. Very high performance vehicles at reasonable prices, such as the WRX and the new Legacy GT, with numerous STI permutations possible.

    2. Building crossover vehicles with what I call true "real world" off road capability. This looks like the direction for the new Outback. These cars would not necessarily be aimed at rock crawlers or recreational off roaders, but aimed at people who for work or other outdoors recreational activities (hiking, camping, fishing, hunting, canoeing etc.) end up driving on the rougher USFS roads or on private logging trail type roads.

    I do a lot of this type of stuff for work and play, and based upon what I have learned so far would much rather be in my Forester or preferably a new Outback XT with 8.7" of ground clearance than any other cute ute or family oriented crossover.

    As I said it looks like Subaru is already aiming this way, and I think this is the ticket to keep the company viable.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    I've always said (and suggested to SoA for 7 years), that they need to come out with more technical info on their AWD systems.

    Symmetrical AWD sounds nice, but doesn't tell you enough about the capabilites of the system. Sure most of the enthusiasts can find the information, but the general population probably doesn't know enough details.

    A few years ago, I went to an Audi dealer and was pretty impressed by their Quattro brochure. Not some short blurb in a catalog, but an entire booklet about Quattro.

    Speaking of off-road, the 99 Outback was one of the few Subes to have a metal engine underguard as an option. Now they're all plastic.

    -Dennis
  • bigelmbigelm Member Posts: 995
    about their AWD system? Afraid of exposing too much then end up with the short end of the stick in the market of the only thing that's bringing them profit?

    Who knows...
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Now we carry aftermarket ones due to the desire for underbody protection :) Probably cheaper than the SOA ones... :)

    -mike
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    The big question in the end for Subaru's future will be how it sells itself. Like it or not, the company would likely be in a much different business situation if not for a certain Australian actor. The vehicles were good, but it was the ad campaign that made them a success. The quality and superiority of the design over SUV's are irrelevant if the public isn't emotionally sold. We all know that 95% of SUV owners have no use for the off-road capability of the vehicle. AWD full size minivans would be much more functional and economical, but where are they? Our Sienna minivan slaughtered our Yukon XL in kid-loading, dry road handling, parking, gas and QUALITY. Trouble for us was poor winter performance and it doesn't haul a 6000lb trailer, but very few people have those issues.
    We all sit here and talk about how this design may be inferior to Subaru's, but I had no idea what Honda's "Real Time" AWD design was until I started researching it (still don't know what the #%&@ "real time" means). I prefer the Sube design and performance, but most car buyers won't even come close to tripping the CR-V's AWD function on their test drives. We've seen our profiles, we are the analytical/technical/pragmatic types by and large. Most car buyers aren't. The overwhelming majority of consumers will just say, "OOH it has all wheel drive", and that will be the extent of the research. Well, maybe they'll look at the diagram in the brochure. Until Bob at the water cooler starts saying, "I here that Subaru has the best AWD design", the rest will be irrelevant.
    You always have to contain costs etc, but I think interior finish is where Subaru's need work. I personally think the standard level interiors look real cheap, and I'll bet that probably kills more first look sales than anything. My wife was really disappointed by the quality feel of the OBS interior given it's $$. Only good news is that most other brands are cheapifying down to meet Sube.
    In the end though, it will be marketing and looks that really define the success of the future brand. Without that, they'll remain niche to a few loyal followers. I think what many want is to see the gospel spread.
    My $0.02

    Nicholas
  • atlgaxtatlgaxt Member Posts: 501
    I actually think the interior of our Forester XT is attractive and good quality. It's definitely competitive.

    The new Legacies and Outbacks also look pretty darn sweet. In general, I like the moves Subaru has been making.

    I'm just a little worried about that new nose...

    (Harping on this I'm starting to sound like Ballistic talking about the gearing on the XT).
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    "I actually think the interior of our Forester XT is attractive and good quality. It's definitely competitive."

    No disagreement there. The one I tried was leather and nicely done. But that's not the "base" or "standard" finish. I hope the '05 Legacy is better updated than the Impreza was in '02. I think those interiors still look dated.
    Love the interior black treatment on the Rex though, but again, that's an upscale item.

    Nicholas
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    the AWD used in every manual Subaru except the WRX STi is actually not very sophisticated at all.

    the automatics have a variety of implementations, with the VDC being at the topic of the technical heap.

    ~c
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    It may not be as technical as others, but IMHO having power to all wheels all the time is a good thing v. FWD with rear axle kick in after visable slippage.

    -mike
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    "Most sophisticated" AWD system does not always translate to "best", particularly when it comes to durability and ease/cost of maintenance and repair. Having said that I think even the most naive consumer can see that "Symmetrical AWD" is just marketing talk and that there is no dramatic difference between new Subaru AWD systems and those that have been around for the last several years.

    As for Forester interiors yes, the current-gen cars at all trim levels (X, XS and XT) are nicer than the L and S interiors in the first-gen cars. Time will tell if they are more durable.

    Ed
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    I agree with Mike!

    Seriously, just because a system is so complex you need a PHD in engineering to understand it doesn't automatically mean it's demonstrably better than its simple manual counterpart.

    Just my .02,

    -Frank P.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    there IS power to all wheels all of the time. :-)
    None of this 100% FWD until after slippage.
    I hope it stays that way. Starting to get CAFE nervous now.

    -Dennis
    p.s. re interiors. If you look back to the late 90's Subaru's, the interiors have improved dramatically . Still a little catching up to do though.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    They need to go back to the early 90s and late 80s interiors that were significantly better than the late 90s cost-savings era.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Legacy is there already, IMO. I hope they can get that level of materials into the Impreza and Forester. But at the current prices that might not be possible.

    Funny thing is the Audi TT doesn't really use Quattro at all, it uses VW's 4Motion. And the Passat doesn't use 4Motion, it uses Audi Quattro.

    So even they have a bit of an identity crisis.

    -juice
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    the interiors have improved drastically.

    The interior of the '97 OBS was dramatic. :-D

    -Dennis
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    the interiors have improved drastically.

    The interior of the '97 OBS was dramatic. :-D

    -Dennis
  • buddhabmanbuddhabman Member Posts: 252
    I think Subaru does a pretty good job in geting their enginnering concepts across. This AWD fad and cross marketing by other brnads is evidence.
    They are now begining to get the rep as the performance brand.

    Again going forward to gain broader appeal and market share, it's the concept of style and presige that needs to be improved. The days of Subaru being a cheap little sturdy durable runnabout are over. They still have to present reliability / value and bang for buck but they also have to offer a level of luxury and prestige that people want in an aspirational car.

    They are on the bubble but need to get firmly into the premium car segment like Acura, Infiniti, Saab, Volvo Saab. They might not get to true luxury like Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Jag, Lexus but they need that extra.

    The key is to keep the faithful from traitoring? to other brands as the prices goes up. That shouldn't be a problem as long as the content goes up. At this point they still need to make sure they offer more car for the money than others.

    I for one will be looking at the 7 passenger Adirondank, or Montauk or Surveyor or whatever they will call it. But i will be shopping it versus the SRX and the Dodge Durango. We need the room.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They're saying it'll go up against the MDX and RX330. I was hoping it would be in the price range of the Freestyle and Pacifica.

    -juice
  • atlgaxtatlgaxt Member Posts: 501
    Juice - I think that when they say the MDX / RX 330 is the competition, they are just using these vehicles as benchmarks. Hopefully the pricing will be significantly lower - hopefully staying in the low to mid 30's and not approaching or exceeding $40k like the Acura and Lexus. If that is the case, I think the Subaru would still be cross shopped with the other two.
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    the comment I get most when I tell them I am a Subaru fan is "those things run forever. I know someone who owns one.......etc, etc.". The second comment is the snow performance.

    Greg
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    * I'm more convinced than ever that the Outback VDC and LL Bean need to be combined into one vehicle. Last year the VDC had a premium audio system (as compared to the Bean); not so this year. So why the two (premium!) vehicles? It doesn't make sense.

    * Self-leveling suspension should be made standard on all Outbacks (except Outback Sport) and all Foresters. It's now on the Bean Forester, so let's spread it around next year.

    * Limited models should get a Nav system.

    * Base GTs and XTs should have a moonroof.

    * All turbos (WRX and F-XT too) and H-6s should have HIDs.

    * Drop the Outback sedan

    * Bring over Legacy H-6 Spec B with 6-speed manual/5EAT)

    * 6-speed manuals for all turbos.

    * 5EATs to replace 4EATs across the board.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Definitely drop the Bean, at the $30k+ price level stability control is a pre-requisite. So have a VDC and a VDC-n model with Nav.

    Put self-leveling shocks on all models that are pre-wired for towing. That would be all Foresters and Outbacks.

    Make the moonroof a stand-alone option on non-Limited models. Last year you could not get a Legacy without one, now you have to spend a fortune on a LTD model to get one at all?

    I disagree with Bob about the HIDs. Give your customers coupons for discounts on LASIK eye surgery. The projector beams are fine. They could be an SPT option, or something saved for the VDC model only.

    I like the other suggestions.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    as it figures so prominently in their overall marketing. I would just give it the VDC, and drop the separate VDC model.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    bring back the cloth Outback H-6, but with a moonroof! Maybe even offer it with the HD 5-speed manual.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Sure, call it the Bean, but yeah, every Subie over $30k should have stability control standard.

    Can't wait to see the sales split. I bet the turbo outsells the H6 by 3 to 1.

    -juice
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    people overall shy away from turbos due to their problematic history. Given 2 more cylinders, they will take the H6. You know, it's the "I need the bigger whatever" to make up for other things in my life syndrome.

    Greg
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,399
    Stop! I don't want a moonroof on my base GT!

    I'd go for the H6 over the H4 turbo except that the H6 is currently not available with a manual tranny.

    Jim
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    When I was at the auto show there was a lady checking out an expensive import (which one I can't recall) and she refused to believe it had enough oomph because it "only" had 5 cylinders. It didn't matter to her one bit that said 5-cylinder put out a very respectable 300hp. Apparently to her way of thinking, a $50k vehicle should have nothing less than a V-8. I think that attitude is pretty prevalent with American buyers.

    -Frank P.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.