Subaru XT Turbo Forester

17879818384131

Comments

  • deadeye5deadeye5 Member Posts: 93
    We all know the AC condenser drip a puddle in the driveway after shutdown.The other AM I saw a 4'' x 3" stain (not water} by my r.frt. whl. I could see the belows,lower shock etc all moist. I sprayed wiwth Degreaser then water flushed it.No stain the last couple days. Wonder if the AC drip while at speed sprays around{by wind)and takes the oily residue onto the ground ??? Any of you notice such a thing ?? Have about 4,800 Mi. on my XT now Tks,Deadeye
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    I got 25 mpg with 100% highway driving and I don't think I ever shift below 2,500. Usually 3-4k.

    When I first started checking it, I was getting 19 and 20 city. I got 22 on a February trip to Pittsburgh (using reformulated gas).

    -Dennis
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Nope I've not seen that but I haven't really used the AC much yet.

    -Frank P
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    Frank,

    Oh, that's also true! Perhaps we should take all mileage claims with the proverbial grain of salt.

    tidester, host
  • johnb2251johnb2251 Member Posts: 33
    I get better mpg when not babying it, too. Moderate acceleration, moderate RPMs for shifts nets me around 23 mpg, mixed driving.
  • jpfkkjpfkk Member Posts: 43
    I have an XT automatic with about 4,000 miles on it and couldn't be happier with the car--or Subaru.

    Funny thing happened to me after my first oil change that I thought would be worth mentioning.

    It seems that the dealer tightened the oil plug nut a bit too tight and as a result cracked the washer. Because of that overtightening, I had a slow drip oil leak. Since I only drive on the weekends, I really didn't notice it that much until the car started to smell (oil dripping started to burn and I could then smell it). I pulled over, found the oil level dangerously low, and dropped in two quarts before making it to the dealer's service department which was about two hours away. I figured out that as long as the engine was going the oil would circulate and therefore not leak so I was fine.

    The dealer was pretty open about the mistake and made it up to me with a lot of free stuff that really made me happy--and, look, car dealer or not, we all make mistakes--it's how we deal with mistakes that make us better or worse than others. Before we get into arguments about the dealer's mistake, rest assured, I have been taken care of in a more than satisfactory manner.

    I have been told by more the one source that the oil plug on the XT is non-standard and potentially finicky, so, anyone out there getting an oil change soon, it is worth reminding your service department to be careful...
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    FP:
    Did you mean that you've never averaged 22 mpg for a tank or were you referring to the lifetime cumulative average?

    Cumulative average. Currently around 21.5 through 7K miles.

    Ken:
    Are you comfortably past the break-in period yet? If yes, it might be an interesting experiment to measure your gas milage driving at higher average RPMs.

    Yes on the break-in, but...some engines make nice sounds that encourage higher revs - mainly inline sixes and V-12s. Unlike most Sube-ophiles, I can't honestly say I like the XT's engine note under part throttle at much above 3,000 RPM. The sound is coarse, and it's partly to avoid it that I usually upshift below 3K. It's a whole different situation under wide-open throttle at higher revs; then, the engine note is terrific. However, the XT has so much performance that there are few occasions in "normal" everyday driving when WOT-to-the-redline is appropriate (IMO).
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    After numerous horror stories about poor service and indifferent employees, it's refreshing to hear there are still reputable dealers out there and that yours did right by you.

    -Frank P
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    21.5 mpg is actually pretty decent. My cumulative avg is only 2 mpg higher and that's with mostly hwy miles.

    -Frank P
  • jpfkkjpfkk Member Posts: 43
    Frank P--

    I was really pleased.

    I called the dealer and said I was having the problem and they told me to rush right over (granted, not how I wanted to spend a Saturday morning, but what can you do?).

    After looking at the car for about 15 minutes they immediately apologized, admitted the mistake was entirely their fault, told me they were incredibly sorry, understood that I was peeved, and asked me to give them a chance to make it up to me.

    Long story short, they changed the oil, washed the car, degreased the engine, gave me free oil changes for a year, threw in a bunch of Subaru accessories (about $100 plus worth)...and covered the cash outlay for gas getting to the dealer and the oil I bought on the side of the road. I probably should have held out for lunch, at least, but I do want to go back there, you know. :)

    Others may feel differently on this message board but I felt that was fair recompense for what in the end was an honest mistake. Plus, I have to say, I really love this car.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    21.5 mpg is actually pretty decent.

    Given the XT's disappointingly mediocre 18-23 EPA ratings, my 21.5 overall average is 20% above the city rating and only 7% below the highway number. I've owned cars that did worse in comparison to their EPA ratings. However, as one who cares about reducing our dependence on mideast oil, there's just something psychologically off-putting about being in the low 20s instead of the mid-20s.
  • samiam_68samiam_68 Member Posts: 775
    Ballistic - that's actually not bad. Long term Edmunds Forester XS only managed that and that's a non-turbo.

    Most of my cars over the years have been comparable to the Forester in MPG:

    85 Supra 2.8L - 23 MPG - same weight, RWD, good power
    88 Supra Turbo 3.0L - 21 MPG - heavier, RWD, great power
    ex-wife's 87 LeBaron Turbo 2.2L - 23 MPG - lighter, FWD, good power
    ex-wife's 96 Integra 1.8L - 27 MPG - much lighter, FWD, good power
    96 Legacy Wagon 2.2L - 25 MPG - a bit lighter, AWD, very underpowered
    00 GS 400 4.0L - 21 MPG - heavier, RWD, great power

    All were 5-speed manuals except the Lexus. All cars had electronic fuel injection, and were within 6 MPG of each other.

    If you consider the XT's awesome power, AWD, average weight, and worse than average aerodynamics, then 21-22 MPG is right in the ballpark. I'm not sure how it could be made that much more efficient without sacrificing one of those attributes unless Subaru starts making hybrid powertrains.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    That's a great story. I probably would have felt that the situation was well compensated for too. I'm glad to know that there are dealers that try and do the right thing.

    Ken
  • miamixtmiamixt Member Posts: 600
    Yet to surpass 20 MPG, however I live in the Rainy Steamy Bug Infested Tropics. Oh and my Break in Period, yes it was the first Week, nothing Broke!
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    If my observation is correct or if I'm even right at all, as long as your stay off the boost as soon as you get the car going, you'll yield very good mpg when vacuum is maintained at under -0.5 bars.

    -Dave
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    After almost a year of looking, bought a set of 4 wheels on eBay for dedicated snow tires. They're 16x6.5 factory alloy takeoffs from an Outback. By my measurement, they have the exact same offset as my XT wheels. Attractive, very nice condition, complete with center caps and lugnuts, $220 total price. I've seen 5-spoke Forester X steel wheels go for more than that.

    Now all that remains is to get an electric impact wrench (for quicker changeovers) and then decide between Winterforce and Hankook HPW401 studded snows. Given how outstanding the XT was on all-season Geolanders up and down major hills in over a foot of ice-crusted snow last winter, it ought to be without peer on real winter tires.

    Is there a good lift point under the side sill where a floor jack can safely lift an entire side at once, to enable rotating front-to-back more easily?
  • wintercruisrwintercruisr Member Posts: 13
    Hello folks, I have test driven xt with both transmissions; auto felt less responsive than manual, but for the amount of in-town driving I do I would prefer the auto. Any opinions about this? The manual was really a hoot to drive, so if people have issues with the automatic I'd really like to hear your thoughts.

    Regarding all the comments about xt gas mileage, I'm trading a toyota landcruiser, so I guess it's all relative. 20mpg or thereabouts sounds pretty good right now.

    Anyway, is the automatic trans worth considering and can you get leather with 5sp (don't need a sunroof)? thanks for the help.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    The 2004 models don't offer leather with 5-speed, unfortunately.

    I ordered a 5-speed XT, then test-drove the XT automatic and loved it. I went ahead and bought the 5-speed, but I think the XT with automatic is a better car.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    JB, I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that Foresters have a different wheel offset from other Subies. Can anyone verify that?

    Bob
  • bnaegelebnaegele Member Posts: 2
    5-speed auto trans; power seat option.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Forester wheel offsets differ from Imprezas, but (apparently) are the same as Outbacks.
  • cmunizcmuniz Member Posts: 604
    I have an FXT AT and think it's great. The power is there any time you want it due to virtually no turbo lag and the engine is a good match to the AT. For city driving it's ideal.
  • parigiparigi Member Posts: 7
    Hi, everyone. This is my first posting. Was just wondering if anyone has had a good experience with a Boston-area dealer. Since stumbling across this chat room, the passion of the XT has been growing in me. (The idea of this type of abundant space, AWD, reliability and V8-like speed is simply unbelievable.) I was thinking that perhaps some of the bigger dealers would give better prices, though in the long run I'd prefer a smaller nearby dealer who may be more responsive to my needs. Don't know if this theory is valid, though. Anyway, thanks.
  • ugly2ugly2 Member Posts: 22
    Am rotating the tires today. Does anyone have the Subaru number for wheel torque for the '04 FXT? Am doing it this a this afternoon so quick reply is appreciated.

    Thanks
    John
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Here's a thread about wheel torque -

    lbhaley Dec 10, 2003 12:23pm

    Looks like 65# was the target.

    Steve, Host
  • wintercruisrwintercruisr Member Posts: 13
    Thanks for the replies re. transmissions..I think more test rides are in order!

    In searching this thread, I saw one comment that the 05 FXT would have an option of the premium package with the manual transmission. Does anyone have any knowledge about whether this is the case or not?

    BTW, what do people think about the 05 outbacks with 250 hp? There are so so many outbacks here in VT, I like the FXT because they are a lot less common.

    This is a great way of sharing info..thanks!
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Although I prefer MTs, it's my understanding that the FXT's AT is a decent one. You should definitely take an extended test drive in each before you decide.

    Yes I think there will be a 05 FXT premium MT with both leather and moonroof (and power drivers seat). If you want an 04 with leather but without the moonroof you can always go the after-market route.

    -Frank P
  • zmanzman Member Posts: 200
    We're in about the same boat, except that I have already decided on the MT (and that I'm in upstate NY).

    I've been awaiting the '05 Outbacks to compare to the FXT, but the deals are so good on the '04 FXT that I'm wavering.

    The '05 FXT PP is slated to come with the MT, so I'm probably going to hold out.

    Zman
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    If you drive in heavy traffic a lot the manual will quickly become annoying. First gear is so short you'll be shifting constantly. If performance is important to you however, do back to back test drives and you'll see that the MT is a better pick ( plus you can coast in neutral).
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    I've been doing my own oil changes on my XT - the plug seems to be the same as the one on the wife's OBW. I've since switched over to a Fumoto valve for ease of operation, but I saved the old plug and can't see the difference. Also can't see how you could ever crack one of those crush washers. However - I have had a dealer installed oil filter that "wept" oil. When I went to remove it I had to brace my feet against the underside of the wheel while I grabbed the filter with a wrench. It was a tad over torqued.

    Wheel offset on my 03 Forester was the same as the 04 XT's. Also I believe some very helpful person posted a list of different wheel offsets quite a while back. I seem to recall the later model Outbacks are the same as the Foresters - 48mm?

    Parigi - email me (use the one in my profile) and I'll let you know how I made out.

    HTH

    Larry
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    There's no one side point that should be used to lift the entire side. You can use two jacks per side however. But - if you're doing a full changeover you could lift the entire rear and then the entire front. I believe its supposed to be safe to lift the entire rear by jacking under the rear diff or the rear diff protector. I know the garage did that on my 03 Forester when they fixed a flat for me.

    Also, I believe its been posted you can lift the entire front by lifting under the front cross member. I think Mike (paisan) says he's done this with no problems. But better check to be sure. I think I asked this of SOA and if so I'll check my archived e-mails and post again.

    Also - major caution - the side rails underneath are not very robust - nowhere near as solid as on the wife's OBW - the dealer already had to replace one of mine by putting it on a lift about 2 inches back from where it should have gone. Even when its placed on a 4 point lift properly, have some touch up paint ready when it comes down. They're plastic, so they won't rot, but when you're approaching the car from the side, they're plenty visible.

    I can't remember - does your XT have the monotone paint, or do you have the different color lower cladding? I think the non-monotone cladding is still more like the OBW and somewhat stronger.

    The dealer told me he has no idea why they're not as well reinforced as on the OBW. I can attest to that personally as its a heck of a lot easier to jack / lift my wife's OBW.

    HTH

    Larry
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    Jack - forgot to post earlier - I didn't realize how noisy my Winterforce tires had gotten (5k when I took them off) until I put back the OEM Geolanders.

    The Geolanders are stealthy by comparison.

    HTH

    Larry
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Also, I believe its been posted you can lift the entire front by lifting under the front cross member. I think Mike (paisan) says he's done this with no problems. But better check to be sure. I think I asked this of SOA and if so I'll check my archived e-mails and post again.

    It's safe. Just don't mistake the oil pan as the jack point.

    -Dave
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    It's safe. Just don't mistake the oil pan as the jack point.

    Now that would be painful..
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Just filled up again today and got 24.8 mpg using mid-grade. I was honestly expecting the mpg to be less than avg as I did a fair amount of spirited driving over the weekend in the north GA mountains while following the bike race. Since I got 2-3 mpg better than I was expecting, I may now have to give a little more credence to this “higher revs = better mpg” theory. Honestly I hadn't given it much chance since it seems to run counter intuitive to what I've always believed about how to achieve optimum gas mileage. But, it’s hard to argue with facts and if I can get one of my best mpgs after a day of engine-gunning tire-squealing fun on twisty mountain roads, then I suppose anything is possible ;-)

    -Frank P
  • samiam_68samiam_68 Member Posts: 775
    More Revs = More Fun = More MPG

    My kind of formula! :-)
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    juice uses a long wooden board with a slot milled in it to pick up the entire side at once. The slot is for the body joint rail so it does not get smashed, as mentioned above. I haven't had time to make one up myself, but that sounds like the way to go.

    At the moment, I pick it up in the front, jack stand it, then pick it up in the rear with the floor jack. Bit ackward.

    John
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Now you're talking Frank...

    Yes, my highly modern lift technique (old piece of wood, slotted) works quite well. I can rotate the tires F<->R in just minutes.

    -juice
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    Walked away from an argument recently with someone who said that gearing that makes a car rev higher will de facto mean poorer gas mileage. That is of course piffle. It wasn't until the next day that I came up with the obvious counterargument. Do you really think you would get better mileage running 25mph continuously in 5th instead of 3rd?
    My Dad used to say that all cars will have power output and fuel efficiency sweet spots which are mostly a combo of fuel/air mix,rpm, and afterload. Fun part is finding those sweet spots. XT must be running leaner in around 3k range.

    Nicholas
  • deadeye5deadeye5 Member Posts: 93
    A few days ago I posted about a 2" x 4" oil spot
    in driveway just inside R.F tire. Oil all over the axle,boot & suspension. Went by a dealer today--found the shock was leaking at the top. Seems a O ring and or gasket is bad. They ordered me a new shock (all under warranty..}Car was not sagging or did not have any other noticeable ailments.

                                  Deadeye
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    Jack's investment has me thinking about a FXT all over again. There are so many late-model OB's around here that I could readily find and afford separate sets of true summer tires and true winter tires.
  • edunnettedunnett Member Posts: 553
    I just bought my new F-XT automatic this weekend and have taken it on three 20-mile trips, each ending in the car being so hot under the hood that I could barely touch the bar to prop the hood open with. The engine temp is normal as far as I can tell by the gauge on the dash, the fan goes off when I turn the engine off and the antifreeze/coolant level looks normal. I had an '01 Forester S before this and it never got this hot under the hood. Is this normal for the XT or normal for an automatic transmission during the break-in period? What's the deal?
  • miamixtmiamixt Member Posts: 600
    what you describe sounds pretty normal, and yes the XT will burn you! Turbo cars run & get hot, however I thought the Fan was designed to continue running for a Minute or Two if needed when Hot. I know some of my other Cars did?
  • bobshere1bobshere1 Member Posts: 59
    +48 is FXT offset.

             Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    In my svx and xt6 manuals they actually suggest using the "jacking plate" on the X-member for jacking the car up and the diffy in the rear. Unless you are rotating tires or changing a single tire, then the side jack points are used.

    -mike
  • dtos01dtos01 Member Posts: 22
    When do the '05 FXTs show up at the dealerships? Thanks!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Try Redline Water Wetter if you want the engine to run a little cooler, but it sounds normal.

    -juice
  • zzzzooomzzzzooom Member Posts: 5
    Hi! I'm new here...

    I just brought home my 2004 Forester XT, manual, in Java Black Pearl, yesterday.

    Got my first head turn/stare this morning dropping my daughter off at school. I don't think many people have seen these, because I'm looking for them on the road, and they're hard to find. Makes me feel like part of an exclusive club!

    It's hard trying to be "good" during the break-in, but you can still feel the turbo acceleration under 4K rpm.

    It's also nice to have such a lethal vehicle with such a low police profile. No "turbo" written on the vehicle or anything. Most people probably don't even know what the "T" in "XT" is for!

    I went to the dealership expecting to buy a WRX, but when the salesman said "you know, there's a turbo in the Forester, too", I was very surprised. I think the Forester interior is much nicer than the WRX, and has better visibility and is more practical. That mix of practicality and VRRRRROOOOM sold me on the FXT!

    Also, I got a great deal using the VIP program. (My son's baseball coach is some sort of regional manager...) If you're reading, "Thanks, Scott!"

    Walt
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    I'm waiting for my java black MT...should be here early next week. I can't wait!

    I've only seen a couple silver ones and a red one on the road around here.

    What options did you get?

    -Brian
  • zzzzooomzzzzooom Member Posts: 5
    I got the only one available in town. There were more coming in next week, but that would be too late for the 1.9% financing, so I went ahead with the Java Black Pearl. It is beautiful. I love the gold flake in it!

    Mine came with Packages 1D, 3B, and 7 (from memory, I think that's right)

    that included: auto-dimming mirror/compass
                    cargo net
                    mud guards
                    cargo tray
                    bumper cover
                    armrest extension
                    interior air filtration system
                    security system

    It was $24378 invoice, including ad fee and freight. I added the Subaru extended warranty, taking it to 6 yrs/80K miles. Usually, I don't do this, but since it's Subaru and not some fly-by-night insurance company, I bucked for the no-deductible plan. I got it at a discount as part of the VIP program.

    The lines on this vehicle are incredible! I stand there staring at it from all angles, like I do my '65 Mustang FB. They are both works of art!

    Walt
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.