Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
Or, if this post is deleted, please email me : vgdistef at hotmail dot com.
Thanks.
http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/importation/VAFUS/list/Section5_4.htm
The CBSA reversed the figures for the date of build and recorded it as being month 07 of year 08.
Of course RIV would not issue form 2 until the VAFUS cleared this model for admission to Canada. We waited and got caught in the Nov 1, 2007 fray. Initially all 2008 Prius' were not admissible. Subsequently this was modified to allow pre Sept 1, 2007 builds to be acceptable.
We waited and waited for the form 2. I called about the status of my case and got the usual bumpf about inadmissibility and, once I said it was Aug 07 build that it would be forthcoming etc. etc. I kept chasing the status of my case, wrote emails to Cannon, my MP, the leaders of the the Liberals & NDP. I also contacted Jan and via him got in touch with Serge. I got a std response from the assistant to the MP and just a mere acknowledgement from the Liberals and NDP, no response from Cannon.
Anyway, one of the RIV clerks let loose that my vehicle was inadmissible since it was an Oct build. He had trouble explaining how it could be imported on Sept 16 before it was built! I faxed a copy of the MSO, the dealers detail on the invoicing and a photo of the US compliance label - fortunately the photo came out clear. I continued to keep calling about the status of our case and then found that they had not put the fax on file so we were back to square one and had to refax all the stuff again. Finally, on Sunday, we got our Form 2. Today CT did the inspection (we had the selling dealer make the mods for the DRL) so the inspection went smoothly.
Getting the vehicle plated was a piece of cake except that the registry office put the vehicle down as running on butane - we will have to go back and get that corrected.
Anyway, all that is needed is the Canadian Compliance sticker.
My thanks to this group for your support and encouragement, the providing of news and sharing your stories. We trust that all of you are successful in completing your purchase and import of the vehicle of your choice into Canada - at massive savings. My appreciation also is extended to Jan and Serge who have personally gone to a lot of trouble for all of us who got caught up There are others whose names are not publically known who also deserve thanks for their efforts as well.
Exactly what changes are required to the DRL's. I have a 2008 Highlander Sport pre-Sept 1 built that I will be bringing in soon. It has DRL's so what is required?
You mentioned that you had the deler do the mods.
Thanks,
I think you're in the clear. The compliance letter is only required for the Highlander base model but the sport and limited models look safe. At least that's how I read it and what I've read from other posters here.
netdog
If your vehicle already has DRLs then no mods are required. If it doesn't have the DRLs then it's a simple mod that you can have done at the time of your compliance inspection at Canadian Tire for roughly $170 or you can have them put in for much cheaper elsewhere.
netdog
Ford now charges $225.00 for that
GM now charges $$235.00 for that!
The letter are coming from the SAME system! It just will have a Canadian stamp. This is a exact quote from GM. GMCL has advised TC, that effective immediatley that they are the ONLY authorized issuer of recall clearance letters via its agent VVS. US dealers can and have been printing off VVS as well.
Since they cant BULLY you into buying from over priced Canadian dealer they are making some Vacation funds for them selfs this way! :mad: :confuse:
jrwinder's post below confuses me as he imported a Highlander Ltd that has DRL's. So what mods would he talking about?
the cannyscot
jrwinder post
I just got my inspection form 2 in morning thru email. Canadian tire did the inspectins. But DAY TIME RUNNING LIGHTS IS STILL AN ISSUE. In limited vehice there is switch called " DRL Off". it means If I want i can off day time running lights. That option should not be there as per canadian tire .Canadian tire charged me extra $ 170 bucks to fix it. I just cannot switch off DR lights. Everything else was ok and my car passed the inspection. I went directly to BCAA to get insurance and got my new plates right away. They took all originals like CO origin, bill of sale etc and gave us acopy of all documents. Finally I have car which is legal and registered in canada. I hope to get complaince label in next two weeks. But I am not worried any more.
Do this at the time of purchase:
To be a bit more clear, if it is a new vehicle in Mass, the dealer should be able to provide you with a temporary US plate (piece of paper) that is stuck on the back window driver side. This should allow you to get from the states to the border.
Do this after the purchase but before you go to pick it up:
For travelling in Canada, you need to obtain insurance from your insurance company for the vehicle (i think all they need is the VIN). Once you have proof of insurance, you take that with you along with the VIN (which should be on the insurance anyways) and bring it to a local registry where you can purchase a temporary CANADIAN plate that you stick to the front passenger side windshield. The one that we purchased in Canada was $25 for 7 days. This allows you to drive it from the border to wherever you live in Canada.
Hope this helps!
I have highlander ltd model. DRL was already in it when I bought this vehicle. But My candian tire inspector was really old grumpy peron and was very stubborn. In USA you always have an option to switch off DR Lights . But In canada That option has to be removed. So the old guy added some peiece and charged me $ 170 for that. Now I also know many other people who brought theihighlander from USA and candian tire passed their inspections without any changes. Do not worry about this issue. This all depends upon inspector at candian tire. best of luck.
Anyways, back to the topic at hand. Now it looks good for bringing home our CR-V that we have a deposit down on. My next worry is the warranty. Anyone have any late news about Honda's warranty coverage in Canada on imported vehicles? How about on exported vehicles being brought back into the states for warranty coverage (we only live 5 minutes from the border)? Have read alot online but just wondering if there was anything new or any lawsuits that were being settled in this regards.
TC is not immune to criticism over this issue as this situation certainly could've been prevented but what is clear is that they've recognized that the introduction of CMVSS114 has had unintended consequences and by means of this proposed amendment and a shortened consulatation period (15 days instead of 60) they have demonstrated their resolve to correct it.
This one amendment will not fix all of the problems with the current process but with your support it will become law and correct perhaps the biggest problem that most of us are currently faced with and allow us to purchase and register these vehicles.
The full text of the proposed amendment is at http://canadagazette.gc.ca/partI/2007/20071201/html/regle14-e.html
Please register your support for this amendment to the following coordinates:
Daniel B. T. Davis
Chief
Regulations and Standards
Road Safety and Motor Vehicle Regulation Directorate
Transport Canada
330 Sparks Street, 8th Floor, Tower C
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0N5
Telephone: 613-998-1956
Fax: 613-990-2913
Email: Davisda@tc.gc.ca
netdog
$500 for a re-call clearance letter for the RIV
$350 for a Letter of Admissability that must be shown to customs when crossing (otherwise customs will not let you cross - this has to be from BMW Canada apparently)
BMW Canada Authorized retailer HAS to be the one make modifications to the car and they can charge you whatever they want.
Has anyone gone through this process yet? if so would you mind sharing your experiences? What did BMW charge you?
Also anyone have any idea how we can fight this type of bullying?
You say the only group resoundingly opposed to the amendment were the auto manufacturers and their associations.
The Carswithoutborders minutes don't imply that. They say GM and the CMVA attended Tuesday's session and had no opinion and the manu. associations blamed TC and were more inclined to keep the status quo. Soft language.
Is the "resounding opposition" your interpretation or do you have some other facts not reflected in the minutes.
While picking up my morning coffee at STARBUCKS, I took a moment to look at some merchandise. Up until yesterday, every item at Starbucks was priced (on the sticker) in both CDN dollars and US dollars. Not anymore. Just a Canadian price. Does anyone think they lowered the Canadian price to the lower US pricepoint? NO!!! They simply removed the US price and left everything at the much higher Canadian pricepoint.
When I mentioned this intriguing price change to the Barista, and inquired as to why, he looked at me like I was from another planet.
Perhaps it is time I vote with my dollars and tastebuds and start drinking Timmy's instead? Sure, I am just one consumer, but this site has demonstrated to me that the voice of a few can be heard by many and a groundswell revolution can be started!
While we have all chosen to single out car companies and their dealer outlets, this issue applies to a myriad of products and retailers -- clothing, insurance, food, sporting goods, etc. Hopefully the Competition Bureau will put some effort into this once they have solved the Caramilk secret and returned competition to the chocolate bar market in Canada. What a farce!!!
We all know Cannon could improve things at TC, but what are Flaherty and others in the House of Commons doing to protect consumers and promote true competition in a North American Free Trade marketplace? Frankly, their US counterparts should be hitting them over the head on this too....
With the recent decline of the CDN dollar, the true cost of your vehicle in limbo has gone up. I'm not naiive to think that anyone will get compensated for this, but this is just another example of how this mess continues to cost consumers.
For those of you looking to save some money, don't convert your $$ at your bank branch. Use the discount brokerage arm, as they don't usually charge an admin fee (which can be as high as 2.5%). It is typically free to set up an account. I saved between $400 and $1,000 going this route.
"... GM and the CMVA attended Tuesday's session and had no opinion ... "
This was on Tuesday which had very little turnout.
" ... the manu. associations blamed TC and were more inclined to keep the status quo."
This was on Wednesday which was attended by over 30 representatives from four groups including consumer groups, insurance and aftermarket groups, provinces and territories, and manufacturers and their associations. The first three groups were almost unanimous in their support for the current option, whereas the auto manufacturers and their associations either preferred the status quo or did not express an opinion.
I believe the minutes captured this accurately. And no, this is not my interpretation of the minutes, I participated in this session myself and the message regarding this group's position was quite clear.
Hope this helps,
netdog
I think ultimately this is the only "vote" that will be heard by the retailers, be it Starbucks, or GAP, or BMW. As bav fan07 asked, how can we fight the bullying, we can only effectively fight with how and where we spend our $$. We hit them where it hurts, and sooner or later they have to come around. Of course, it is easier said than done, because they are fighting us with collusion. They figure if they all employ the same tactics, then we have nowhere to turn for our coffee, cars, magazines, etc, etc.
Does anyone know if RIV will/has take(n) a Dealer's letter indicating "no recalls outstanding", with his corporate seal, and a printout of the Vehicle Inquiry Report also indicating "no recalls outstanding"?
I've got my form 1 but am waiting on form 2 for a vehicle built prior to Sept 1.
serge@bergeron.ca
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
enqserv@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
1-800-267-8376
This sounds like a reasonable route to go to fix these warranty issues and other barriers to the free trade of vehicles across our border. Can we mobilize to mount enough pressure on them to seriously look into the matter? Just thinking ahead...
netdog
Guarded optimism.
netdog
The Treasury Board contact info can be found at link title
These are the guys that need to make a decision to let the CWB cars in...
The Honourable Rona Ambrose, M.P. Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable John Baird, P.C., President of the Treasury Board Baird.J@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Maxime Bernier, P.C., Minister of Industry and Minister of Foreign Affairs Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Lawrence Cannon, M.P., Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable David Emerson, P.C., Minister of International Trade Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable James Flaherty, P.C., Minister of Finance Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Steven Fletcher, M.P. Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca
The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Robert Nicholson, P.C., Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Bev Oda, MP Oda.B@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Jim Prentice, M.P., Minister of Industry Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Charles Strahl, M.P., Deputy Speaker Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., President of the Treasury Board Toews.V@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Peter Van Loan M.P., President of the Queen's Privy Council VanLoan.P@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Gordon O'Connor, M.P., Minister of National Revenue OconnG@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Christian Paradis, Secretary of State (Agriculture) ParadC@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Jay Hill, Chief Government Whip HillJ@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Senator Marjory LeBreton, Secretary of State (Seniors) lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Peter MacKay, Minister of National Defence MackaP@parl.gc.ca
Sorry, don't know how to make e-mail addresses work.">link title
Has anyone heard of any problems using this strategy, especially getting back across the border with U.S. plates on a Canadian's vehicle? Would CBS hassle you or put you on a watch list to make sure you don't keep the vehicle in Canada more than the 30 days or whatever that you have before you have to get Canadian plates?
http://forums.ebay.ca/thread.jspa?threadID=500022243&start=0
I've put a down payment for a X3. Will probably be heading down to US about a week or two.
Still trying to find out what a "Letter of Admissibility" looks like. If anyone has any info, please post so BMW Canada gets as little money as possible.
Thanks again to you guys and all of your work on the resolution to the current issue at hand. Now on to the next chapter, eh? It seems there will always be one more hurdle to overcome.
Yes wrajinder, I just wanted to see you say it one more time!
OK, I have now received the 'RIV Inspection Form' to take to CT. It does not say FORM 2 anywhere on it on it. It says 'Vehicle Inspection Form' and tells me to take Form 1 to accompany it when I go for the inspection.
I'm just checking with you guys to be sure I have the right stuff.
Thanks, Maluna
Service manager @ westhills cdn tire is a great guy but he knows the drill (as he has imported a pilot himself). Marlborough inspector - young guy, didnt make me have my DTRL off disabled - easy japanesie.
Guarded optimism.
I was hoping you would say I'll bet my house the amendment becomes law
2008 gmc duramax = GM vehicle inquiry system printout showing "no outstanding campaigns" under recall section
2007 honday odyssey exl = faxed printout from honda ownerlink website. Form2 indicated no recall letter required
2008 honda ridgeline = same as odyssey
All vehicles built pre-sept.1
netdog
Since the letter was "signed" by Gary Moriarty, the Deputy Registrar, I decided to Google "Gary Moriarty" to see if I can find an email address for him. I did stumble upon this presentation, however, that he gave to the NAATA in September. It's an interesting read for anyone looking for some background on the RIV.
The presentation contains his direct line: 416-626-2800 x4307.
I also found his email on this forum (thanks civicexportit): gmoriaty@riv.ca. I suspect that gmoriaty@adminserve.ca might also work.