By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Only 650 miles on the truck so far. I love the ride and the sport sound out the stock set up. I'd like to know what the thoughts are on exhaust and intake modifications. The aspiration is supposed to be great as-is. What are the H.P. improvements?
problem: I have noticed when shifting into drive or reverse from a stopped position, a kind of electronic humming sound. It is brief but seems to delay the drive engagement. The sound seems to originate from the tranny area. I took it to the dealer service rep and he told me this sound is a "normal" part of the transmission design and that all of these tranny's perform in this manner. He referred to the valve body as the source of the noise? I guess I'm just looking for confirmation that this is in fact the case.
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Steve
The way I understand it, when the gear shift selector is moved into gear the computer runs a short burst of solenoid signals to get electrical feedback on valvebody operation. This is a test sequence that's run every time. You may think it delays engagement, but it doesn't.
Regards,
Dusty
It is very likely that the item being discussed after the muffler is a resonator, but they are usually found mid-stream in the exhaust system ahead of the muffler. I have found that removing them from a system does not always guarantee the results you're expecting.
I've seen them removed from a number of vehicles (Pontiac Bonneville, Chevy trucks, a Ford Victoria, and a K-car, just for examples) with negative results. Some the difference was barely noticeable.
However, let this not prevent experimentation. Somebody's got to try it so that we'll find out. Just don't throw those resonators away immediately upon removal.
Best regards,
Dusty
I wish the exhaust were louder, than I wouldn't notice the swish.
What's the VIN number of this RAM?
Dusty
I'm waiting for a supercharger for my 03 4wd QC Hemi, maybe that'll help!
Dusty
Dusty
Want to save gas! buy an economy car!
Want a Hemi Ram, learn to live with the poor gas mileage.
I drive mine like a grandpa most of the time and my average mpg over 12,000 miles is 14.1 mpg. Best mileage on flat and level interstate doing 67 mph with cruise on was 17.6 mpg. Worse was when not in grandpa mode, 10.3 mpg. By the way most of these figures are based on 87 octane gas. The recommended 89 octane gas here in the Mid West contains 10% alcohol. I can feel no performance difference between 87 and 89 octane but I do see an average of slightly more than 1 mpg LESS using the gas containing alcohol! Rick
Still, a 5 MPG gain just doesn't seem realistic to me on anything. Heck, depending on what they were getting initially on that GM a 5 MPG increase could mean anywhere from 25 to 50%!
Bests,
Dusty
That goes for the tornado as well.
I'll be picking up my new truck in a few hours, and yes, I can't wait!!!!!!
Before: 10 mpg
After: as high as 16 mpg
Hey, I'm off to pick up my pick-um-up truck...
The ratios for the 545RFE transmission are as follows:
1st gear = 3.00:1
2nd gear = 1.67:1 (1)
2nd gear = 1.50:1 (2)
3rd gear = 1.00:1
4th gear = 0.75:1
5th gear = 0.67:1
rev gear = 3.00:1
I honestly don't know if you are experiencing something normal or not. But a few comments anyway.
The 545RFE transmission is fully adaptive, meeaning it learns and relearns your driving technique based on driver demand. You don't say how many miles are on this vehicle, but I'm assuming it has gone through at least one learn cycle. When you drive it everyday back and forth to work, or around town, the transmission will perform in that mode until you repeat a number of demand cycles to relearn a new shift pattern.
It's possible that you are not shifting enough to relearn a new shift pattern with an increased load. I experience this in my Dakota when I load my ATV and tools and make the 125 mile trip to my property. Since I only have one stop before I get on the interstate by the time I get into New York's Southerntier where it's quite hilly, the Dakota seems a little hesitant to shift into a lower gear. By the time I leave the property it has relearned the hilly country because it's gone through enough learn cycles.
In the case of the 5.7 Hemi engine, I believe it makes 301 lbs of torque at 1100 RPM. That's quite low, and I think more that the 5.4 Ford at the same RPM. I don't believe that the issue in your case is torque availability, but transmission shift points.
In your example noted in the previous message, where you in the tow/haul mode when it kicked down into 1st gear?
Best regards,
Dusty
To answer a couple of your questions. I have about 13k miles on my truck and it should have had enough time to learn since the steeper sections of the trip don't start until you are 35 to 40 miles out and as soon as you start dragging the travel trailer it doesn't get a chance to even shift into overdrive except for a couple of short downhill runs. I'm quite sure that it isn't the shift points and as I mentioned it will rev right to the redline before shifting but then drops to only 3000 rpm and then just doesn't have the torque to pull it up thru the revs in second. I think the info you gave on the ratios really tells the tale, the step between 1st and 2nd is just too big. Compare the ratios of the Nissan Titan trans, 1st-3.83, 2nd- 2.87, 3rd-1.52, 4th-1.00, 5th-.83 and even with a higher geared axle ratio of 3.36 vs 3.73 which is what I have, the difference in ratios is quite substantial. I'm actually considering the possibility of installing a Gear Vendors (or similar)underdrive unit although there would have to be some sort of lock out to keep from activating it while in 4x4 mode. Also you asked if I was in tow haul mode and my truck( 2003 model) actually only has an overdrive defeat switch so I don't know how that compares to the 2004s. I tried it both in and out but it made no difference. I appreciate your input.
Thanks, Hemidudeaz
I'm in the process of buying a 2004 RAM, upgrading from my 2000 Dakota Quad. Current contestant is SLT, 4.7 Auto, All the SLT electrics, towing package, Timberline Green mono, chrome stepbars and bedliner for approx 21,500. Any input on the 4.7 vs the HEMI besides the massive power and torque improvement? I dont see much commentary on the 4.7 in the RAM to compare experiences overall. I have the 4.7 in the quad and am very happy with it's performance, and understand in the RAM its no slouch either.
Oh yeah, old time member, lurker but somehow my handle got lost.. AHASHER here from the Dak Owners Club..
Thanks in advance,
Bill
First off I think the Hemi is slightly overrated. Using my butt-meter I think my 2000 was faster than the Ram I now have and I KNOW it was much more economical. I drove both the 4.7 and the 5.7 before I bought my truck. The 4.7 was in a 4x4 Quad cab and had the offroad package. It drove OK but you could feel the 4.7 was working harder than it does in the Dakota. The 5.7 was in the truck I eventually bought. I ended up buying a truck off of the lot because they were really dealing, I got almost $9500 off sticker before we talked trade otherwise I would have ordered another truck like I did with my 2000 and got exactly what I wanted.
Unless you really like the look forget the 20" wheels, besides being $1000 - $1350 more MSRP they don't ride as well as the 17". I bought a set of takeoff 17" wheels and tires from Ebay so I would have something with winter traction. The steering is just as precise as with the 20" wheels but the ride is less jarring.
I have just under 14,000 miles on mine and the average fuel economy for those miles averaged out to 14.1 MPG. I have the SLT with the extra electronic goodies. You don't get the instant MPG like was on the Dakota anymore. The side steps are a good deal if you have altitude challenged friends. My mother in law is 4' 10" and could never get in without the side steps.
You come to appreciate the commanding view of the road you have with the Ram but you realize how BIG it is when you are parking in a shopping mall. I would recommend the upgraded interior with the fold flat platform. It is great for grocery shopping or for items you dont want to put in the bed.
Anyway getting back to the 4.7, one of the guys at work had a 4.7 auto SLT 4x4 with none of the extra options. His fuel mileage was running less than my 5.7 but then it is a company vehicle and probably gets driven harder than I drive mine.
Your purchase price will be less with the 4.7 but I don't think the performance will equal what you have come to expect with your Dakota.
Feel free to ask any questions I may be able to answer. Rick
The 4.7 rig does have the metal storage frame in addition to the SLT goodies, including a rear window defroster w/smoke glass.. and in New Orleans that’s a bit of a waste.
Your comment about the 4.7 feeling stronger in the Dak is interesting. I am used to the smooth power curve and shift of the tranny. I don’t want to save some $$ now but not have the performance and the engine best suited for how I drive (mostly commute, highway) and for long term uses; a bit too much engine for now is better than not enough when needed later AND of course I admit who dosent want a HEMI??
The low mileage comments vary from owner to owner, but that goes with owning a powerful truck.
I’m going to the dealer after work and have already told him I want to compare to a HEMI with the same options. Preferably no 20 inch wheels??
One last question, your earlier comment was you would have ordered your truck. After owning a Dak 4.7 2wd, do you think the 4.7 would meet the needs of a 2wd RAM (my configuration choice)or is it just a good choice if you want to save on gas and some up front $$ but sacrifice performance a full size rig needs (people hauler and eventually towing light).
Honest opinions are respectfully solicited here..
Thanks again,
Bill
Went back to the dealer, same guy who sold me the Dak.. nice guy. More test drives - drove 3 different RAMs, 1 HEMI SLT with Laramie and 17 inch wheels.. then the 4.7 again and one I didn’t see before on the lot (they always want to sell off the lot), a HEMI, SLT with the 20 inch wheels, Big Horn configuration.
It didn’t take much to make a decision. The HEMI won! What a difference, even on a fairly short test run. Great power, smooth shifting, no hint of it working hard as I hit the interstate fast.. just a THURSTY powerplant.
The HEMI with the big wheels does look good and had felt good to me, I don’t really know why some don’t like the big wheels (but I do see your point, Rick, the 17's did feel more forgiving on a un-smooth test drive service road).Overall however I thought it rode pretty much like my Dak with the Handling package.
The one I signed for was exactly what I would have ordered (except I would have gone for the 17 inch chrome wheels as well) , so I took it off the lot: 5.7 HEMI, Auto, 3.92 LSD, HD cooling, towing with receiver, 4 wheel anti-lock, rear slider window, metal rear seat storage rack, SLT and all the electric goodies, including fog lights, big horn configuration, premium cloth, chrome mopar step bars, NO slide in liner (for the $ - I’ll have it sprayed in), lug locks, Forrest green mono, side door guards, security package, dimming mirror.. and I signed for $21900.
I’m a happy camper, and its getting detailed today and should be ready tonight..
And I get a HEMI promotional hat.. whoo hoo <g>..
Great help here, and I appreciate the input.. and I now can say “YEAH, IT’S GOT A HEMI!”
Respects,
Bill
Your truck is very similar to mine. I don't have the security package or the rear slider otherwise they are the same. Mine is white with the silver lower body accent. Good luck with your purchase. Rick
Now, my first day/overnight/commute impressions of my HEMI rig.
First - AHHHHHHHHH! What a commanding powerful ride I had to work!!!
Ok, excellent dealer service, they are even going to order touchup paint (full monochrome timberline green with taupe interior), rear mats and a dealer discount on a rhinoliner sprayin and dark tint for the front windows. Very clean, but I wil do better this weekend. NO paint defects seen (bright sun at delivery). First ride home, had to adjust to the power the pedal delivers by just looking at it <G>. Chirped the rear once, but I suppose the lSD saved me other times. Smooth idle and shifting.
Dash display is excellent for me, as I drive usually early AM (<5), and the lights are AMAZING over the Dak.. bright and the driving lights are actually useful. Even had a cup holder curtsey light (big coffee drinker here).
The wife is happy too. high, comfortable seats, and she put up the center console and promptly tested the room for snooze mode next to me. It passed (she is 5-3).
The trip computer will be my next lesson in operation, but the computer did say 18.1 on the commute (45 miles pure highway) and dropped as I got to the facility and more stop and go.
Rick, how accurate do you think it is, based on your observations??
NO noise or problems in the cab, quieter than the Dak actually.
Only one "defect" to be mentioned to my dealer for fix, the drivers door pull handle has approx 1/4 play before it engages, all other are tight. I see potential for chatter, so I will have it replaced.
I hope to compare notes here to see how to care for the HEMI rig. One final note/question.. The book says 87 or greater octane is ok, but that 89 is recommended for best performance. Thoughts??
Respects again,
Bill
If your driving situation is constant I have found the overhead display to be very accurate.
My calculated mileage is generally within .2MPG of the overhead display, most often under the displayed mileage.
If the driving changes, say freeway the first half tank and city driving the remainder the accuracy falls off. Then I see differences of .5 to say .7 off of the overhead.
This can be above or below the display depending if the highway travel is on the first half or the last half of the tank.
I had read on the Dakota display it used just the last 100 miles in computing the average and it seem like this may be true for the Ram.
I tried using 89 octane fuel this past winter and felt no improvement on the butt-meter.
I actually saw a decrease in MPG compared to the 87 octane. 89 octane in the Mid-West is 10% alcohol which has less BTUs available compared to regular. So I have stayed with 87 octane but do purchase from a name brand station. It was Amoco but now is BP.
I have about 13,500 miles on my Ram and the only thing it has been at the dealer for is oil changes. I used to change my own but when I bought the truck I also bought a Damlier/Chrysler oil change contract. In my case I bought the 7 year/4 oil changes a year contract. I paid up front for the contract and the per oil change cost came out to less than $6. I couldn't buy the oil and filter for that. Of course when you bring it in they offer other services for additional cost but if not required for warranty I pass.
Speaking of costs, if you don't change your own sparkplugs you may get a shock at the 30,000 mile point. That service will cost you near $200 from what I heard. The Ram also gets pricey at the 15,000 mile point under service plan "B" The differentials get new lube every 15,000 for about $100 per axle.
Rick
I go in next Sat for the spray-in liner the dealer scheduled for me at the local truck shop; dealer price $275 OTD. Tint is next on the front windows.
I have noticed on closer engine compartment check (using a step ladder) a white "dusty" residue on the valve covers and certain areas.. not sure what it is, but otherwise everything looks good. Do you or anyone here know what it is from and how to clean, or if I even should worry about it??
Also the oil filler neck looks to be the same as used on the Dak.. which we all remember had the milky oil residue problem.. It's set back a ways now, so is that an issue here??
My dealer did not suggest or offer an oil change contract. or I would have gone for it as well.. Oh well, Mobile 1 and I'll do it myself at 5,000 miles or so I think.
Thanks for the $$ heads up.. I'll be prepared now as I tend to follow the fluid replacement schedule..
Bill
Smooth power curve and I believe it seems to be learning my driving habits.
One wind noise concern where I have that loose outside drivers door handle, but Tuesday it goes in to have that adjusted/replaced. A minor issue all things considered, especially since they jumped right on getting it fixed ( I chose the shop date to accommodate my work schedule, and honestly I wanted to take it thome the day I went in to accept deliver, otherwise they would have fixed it the next day). I’ll admit it should have been noticed by the salespeople, but who knows why the seem to ignore obvious things like that.
4 wheel anti lock brakes tight and positive, and yes I feel the lights are much better now.
So at one week in my driveway, I’m completely satisfied and happy with the Ram. And YES, I have gotten a few double takes and looks from other truck pilots.. Lets face it, the Ram has a unique commanding appearance coming at you.. (I’m all timberline green with lots of chrome, including Mopar step bars. Bed rail bars coming soon)..
Bill
IMHO, using my butt-o-meter (with due respect, it's not my term, I borrowed it)I know I had an immediate change in the behavior of the 5.7. She seemed to have a bit more low end power, and responded better at highway speeds in lane changing/passing. And it might be my imagination, but I believe it SOUNDS different out of the pipe (resonator and all).
Real or perceived improvement, I am happy with how she performs and handles. I showed 18.4 MPG this AM on the commute so I will make an official MPG check soon, when I’m within 1000 miles logged.
My NeoChanger arrives Wed to hook up with the OEM head unit.. I’l post details in the Accessory thread when I have evaluated it for anyone interested.
R/
Bill
p.s. a whistling sound coming from the front quarter panel somewhere at above 30 mph or so... but through trial and error I'l find it. Anyone else have it??
Are you telling me I can drive our 99 JGC Laredo 4Liter and get it changed over to a 545rfe, how much would that cost.
Congratulations on the purchase of your new truck.
When it comes to gas mileage it's all how you drive them. I think people are prone to complain about the RAM or any Dodge because they're just convinced by the repetitive comments that Dodge's are thirsty. The difference of one mile per gallon in my opinion doesn't define thirsty.
My son just returned from Iraq this past week and I followed some friends of his in a new Silverado. There was a claim that the driver got "18-19 miles per gallon," and an unqualified implication that is was all of the time. Well, our trip down to Ithaca and back proved that my Dakota got 20.7 MPG with a 700 pound ATV on the back while the Chevy could only get 15.8 with three passengers. It seems the driver relies on the trip computer a little too much. And, the 4.7 Dak will out run that 5.7 Chevrolet.
I was told some time back that Dodge engines take a lot longer to break in and I believe it. An aquaintance's husband has a 4.7 RAM that now gets a steady 17 or better after 30,000 miles, and he hasn't touched the engine.
Good luck with the new ride.
Best regards,
Dusty
I've not heard a 45RFE-to-545RFE conversion by reprogramming the PCM. However, if you have a 4.0 straight six I'm pretty sure you do not have a 45RFE transmission. In fact, you should have the A500SE or a 42RE. Those replaced the Aisin-Warner AW-4 transmission in '93 or '94 on 4.0L engines.
To the best of my knowledge the 45RFE/545RFE was introduced with the 287 (4.7) motor and used only on that engine. The 318 and 360s got the 45RE and 46REs repectively.
Best regards,
Dusty