Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Acura RDX

1232426282955

Comments

  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Maybe I'm wrong, but I know they used to call it "leather trim" for the CR-V SE in 2001-2001. That vehicle had small strips of leather lining the edges of the seat and the panels of the doors.

    Meanwhile my 2001 TL is labeled as having "leather seating surfaces", which includes the cushions and center panels of the backrest (just not the bolsters and the sides).

    When I look up the 2002 Accord, it reads "leather trim".
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    [Over-used Homerism]!

    Just checked-up on myself. Always a good idea after posting. :blush: The 2001 TL is listed as having "leather-trimmed" seats. But I know it includes seating surfaces. Same with the MDX (except for the 3rd row).

    So it looks like they used that term for both trim and seating surfaces.
  • suiteniemansuitenieman Member Posts: 1
    Just a quick note: I work on the sales team at an Acura Dealer, so I know the products extensively. If space and is an important consideration, the TL and ES350 are larger than the G35. Plus, if you live in a snow belt area, one must choose the all wheel drive G35x to match the traction capablity of the TL and ES, thus burning more fuel. As for the RDX, it will be an outstanding choice. The TL will get better fuel economy, slightly. For honest answers to comparison questions, e-mail me at suitenieman@yahoo.com. For complete safety info, try www.informedforlife.org.
  • ncstewartncstewart Member Posts: 6
    Saw an RDX (with the Acura symbol on the grille, back and all four wheels, but not the steering wheel -- duh) in a McDonald's parking lot just off I-75 near Washington Court House, Ohio. It sits a lot taller than I expected...looks great. Didn't have the technology package (no nav) which surprised me. Had an Ohio manufacturer's plate (Marysville isn't too far).

    I can't wait for them to launch on July 27th. I think I'm going to like this car. :)
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    In a Macdonald's parking lot? Macdonald's? :surprise: Probably not exactly the marketing image Acura had in mind for the RDX! ;)
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Fast food = fast cars

    Isn't it obvious? :shades:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I know the SLX was an Isuzu, heck it was built at SIA (a Subaru-owned plant).

    But my point remains - Acura must have had some sort of relationship with BorgWarner at the time, because they were servicing these systems in dealerships across the country, and surely went to BorgWarner for replacement parts.

    So perhaps that's what planted the seed for B-W to supply SH-AWD, a good working relationship with the supplier.

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Borg Warner has a very extensive product line - primarily for transmission parts. I'd be surprised if they weren't a supplier for Honda long before the partnership with Isuzu. Besides, Honda probably got replacement parts from Isuzu, not BW.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm not sure how that works, i.e. who supplies replacement parts for a clone car.

    B-W is traditionally a supplier for American cars, though, right? I guess Honda has been building vehicles in the USA for so long that's not an issue.

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Well, look at it this way... Acura needs a new transmission for an SLX. That tranny contains 52 BW parts, 100 parts from Isuzu's own bins, and 33 parts from some other supplier.

    Obviously, for this situation, Acura is going to go to Isuzu and get the fully assembled transmission. For that to work, Acura would need a contract with Isuzu and a supply line to get parts back and forth.

    Now, let's say they just need a new clutch. They can go to BW and work out another contract and another supply line. (Lawyers and Logistics Clerks would appreciate this plan.) Or they can go to Isuzu where those details are already worked out.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I should ask mayberryguy, he works for a supplier to SIA. I honestly have no idea how that would work.

    -juice
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Borg Warner and Honda partnership has its own history.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'd never heard the term, but...

    A Sprag Clutch is a free-wheel device having an inner race, and an outer race either of which can be the input or output member

    You learn something every day!

    -juice
  • carquerycarquery Member Posts: 35
    I'm very interested trading in my MDX for the RDX. The MDX is bigger than I need and I like some of the technological updgrades in the RDX. One other reason for trading in the MDX is that 90% of my driving is city/suburban (stop and go up to 40MPH) and the MDX just doesn't do well on the mileage front. It's more philosophical than financial, I'll make that clear. Anyway, I was surprised with the 19/24 estimate for the RDX, figuring that with a 4 cylinder (even with a turbo) and a lower body weight, that the RDX would be better than the MDX's rating (17/23) by more than 1 mpg. I realize the EPA estimates are very unreliable anyway, but I'm wondering if anyone thinks the numbers might change once the RDX is actually road-tested. Thanks.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    "...stop and go up to 40MPH...."

    You need to look, seriously, at the RX400h.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    A basic 4 cylinder will do the trick. The more efficient ones include the RAV4, CR-V, and Forester.

    My Forester averages 25.1 mpg on the cheap ol' regular fuel, and cost me $19k, probably about $31,000 less than an RX400H. That's a lot of gas!

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    I can't speak to why the mileage is rated at 19/24 - except to say the little 2.3L is being pushed fairly hard to produce 240 hp.

    However, when you look at similar vehicles, the mileage isn't bad.

    BMW X3 (5AT with AWD) = 16/23 mpg
    Mazda CX7 (6AT with AWD) = 18/24 mpg
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think Acura would respond that those looking for peak efficiency have the CR-V to choose from. It uses less fuel, and regular at that.

    Don't all Acuras require premium? Even the TSX, right?

    I'm excluding the RSX because it's being dropped. ;)

    -juice
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Unlike current MDX, RDX has a permanent AWD system (all four wheels are powered at all times). This may have cost an mpg or so on EPA rating.

    Besides, while RDX is using four cylinder engine, it is turbo-charged and produces power comparable to a V6. To get certain amount of power, certain amount of fuel has to be burnt. So, a 240 HP/260 lb.-ft I-4 turbo cannot be expected to deliver the fuel economy that the engine could if it were less powerful non-turbo.

    In reality, RDX could do better than EPA rating (turbos will burn more if they are pushed, again, for more power in exchange for fuel).
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think you could potentially get better fuel economy than in an MDX, *if* you stay out of the boost.

    Nice thing about turbos is that unlike superchargers they aren't as parasitic. They will "recycle" exhaust energy and use more fuel when you ask it to, but it's not using more fuel all the time like 50% more cylinders would.

    -juice
  • carquerycarquery Member Posts: 35
    I read a very scathing review of the RX400h in the NY Times a few months ago. Basically said that Totyota/Lexus was using the positive hybrid vibe from the Prius and hoping no one would notice that the hybrid Lexus only did 1-2MPG better than the non-hybrid Lexus. Instead, they used the hybrid technology to increase horsepower/performance. Taking into account my driving patterns (sub 40mph 90% of the time), I didn't think this kind of MPG performance made a whole lot of sense for the extra cost Lexus was charging for the hybrid. Was the NYT review wrong about the mileage?
  • toasttoast Member Posts: 50
    I've read that the octane requirement decreases as air pressure (barometric pressure) decreases. Barometric pressure is lower at higher elevations. Wikipedia states that "An engine that might require 93 octane at sea level may perform at maximum on a fuel rated at 91 octane if the elevation is over say 1000 feet."

    Would this mean that if nearly all my driving is at 5,000 feet I would be fine using an Octane of say 87?
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    You can run 87, but the engine will sense the difference, retard the spark, and cut horsepower. Not by much, but why pay for a hi-po engine if you're going to cheap out on the fuel?

    I think you'd be better off buying something that is less powerful and designed to run on regular.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Well...yes..sort of. Except I rarely associate "food" with Macdonald's! :P ;)
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    You win.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Doesn't sound like their math is very precise, so I would not rely on them as your primary source.

    The air up there is indeed less dense, but it's possible that the turbo has excess efficiency so that it would simply use the blow-off valves a bit less. This is why turbos don't lose as much power at altitude, compared to a wheezing V6 engine (normally aspirated).

    You can use slightly lower octanes but I would not push it. Maybe 91 instead of 93, sure, but not 86-87.

    -juice
  • jlee6jlee6 Member Posts: 13
    Thanks to you, I narrowed dwon to RDX or TL for my next car. Do you know when exact RDX is coming out to the dealerships? I live in SoCAL. One more question; is it worth to wait for 07 TL?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Me? Really?

    TL - varmint would be a better person to ask. I'm allergic to any FWD vehicle that costs over $20k. :P

    Just kidding, a Cooper S or Prelude SH wouldn't be bad.

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    The most consistent release date I've read for the RDX is July.

    Worth waiting? Only rumor I've read (with any sort of credibility) is that the mid-model change for the TL will include a Type S model with 290ish hp engine which probably will not have AWD. Changes to the exterior include new foglights and new rims. Interior changes are focused on the gear shifter and gauge cluster. However, even those rumors should be treated as suspect.

    Given that you are comparing a mid-size sedan with a small SUV, I'm gathering that features, styling, and image are more important for you then actual performance or utility. Which is fine - I'm just trying to look at this from your perspective.

    So, I would say, no. The next TL is probably not worth waiting for. You could get a current TL for less money and probably have enough to add your own rims and whatever other upgrades you have in mind. Or get the RDX and do the same. Personalization is fun and, if you know what you're doing, you can probably get better stuff via aftermarket vendors than Acura is going to offer OEM.
  • rdxsteverdxsteve Member Posts: 17
    The RDX website at acura.com has been updated. The technology and performance selections are now active. Cool graphics for the SH-AWD. Also confirms the 19" dual spoked wheels are available as an option.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I can't speak for Acura, but Subaru "requires" that you use premium (91 octane) on all their turbos. They "recommend" using premium on H-6 models, so you can use a lower grade if you wish.

    FWIW, I haven't gotten below 21 mpg on my '06 WRX, and have gotten almost 28 if driven gently on the highway, which puts out a little less HP than the RDX. The problem is "driving gently" is almost impossible to do :)

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    A 290hp SH-AWD TL would be sweet, but I think it would simlpy kill the RL.

    -juice
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. You beat me to the keyboard! ;)

    (Well, perhaps they could lower the price of the RL by $10K to compensate :P )
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Acura dealers may already consider the RL dead. Why prevent your top seller from getting a significant boost to save a car that's already a lame duck?

    Also, FWIW, the rumors suggest that it will be 290 hp from the same 3.2L block. Very different character than the RL.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    TL-S would indeed have a different character than RL, even if it came with SH-AWD. Likely, it will be sport tuned that RL is not. So, SH-AWD may be served two flavors instead of limiting to a luxo-cruiser that RL is designed to be.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I agree the character differs, but I wonder if that's enough to set them apart. Such a TL would cannibalize maybe half the current RL sales, basically putting the last nail in its coffin.

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    I believe the RL is going to get decontented and come down in price. The goal being to reach a larger audience.

    And I expect there will be a price premium for that TL Type S. Meaning it will be priced high enough that it should be a low volume seller.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    One option for Acura, which has been suggested by a salesman at my Acura dealership, is to offer a FWD version of the RL, along with a few choice amenities deleted. Mind you, I'm not sure if that wouldn't be one more reason just to buy a TL instead. One basic problem with the RL is that it can't even win the styling bragging rights against the TL. :sick:
  • hbc75hbc75 Member Posts: 37
    I am just chiming in for the first time here. I have an '04 Saab 93 currently, which I am thinking of trading for the RDX. The only issue is, I love the turbo on my 4 cylinder 210 hp 93, with super fantastic gas mileage. Highway driving, long trips, I get from 30-35 mpg!! You can't beat that with the prices at the pumps today. However, a small SUV would be nice to tote the bike around and when you have to buy something in a big box, it might actually fit in my car ;) . I've seen the updated RDX Acura site, which gives a lot of information. I've always gone for the mid grade above 90 octane on my turbo 93, and the car performs wonderfully. I just can't wait to test drive the new RDX, my first car was a 1993 Acura Integra GS , and that car lived through a lot... I never should have traded it, my biggest mistake ever with a car :(
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Don't expect the same mileage from an RDX, it's a lot less aerodynamic, heavier, and has more driveline drag from the SH-AWD system. You might get 28mpg in ideal conditions.

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    I checked out the Acuracom RDX pages and noticed something on the Exterior Accessories list - Sport Suspension.

    I asked at TOV, but so far nobody knows exactly what that means. There has been no news of an A-Spec package. It also "looks" like the suspension and other items (ground skirts and such) can be purchased individually, but I can't be certain of that. If true, this would not be typical of A-Spec.

    Anyway, it's something to ponder.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Unless there is a choice of different suspension setups, then "Sport Suspension" to me is just Honda vernacular for standard suspension.
  • 2skipowder2skipowder Member Posts: 4
    From what I can tell Acura overdrives the rear wheels by something like 5% and lets the read axle clutches slip to make up the difference. This should allow the outside rear wheel to be "overdriven" by the same 5% as on the RL without the extra planetary gears (for good handling). Now you can't get something for nothing, and that may be the friction losses in these clutches. If the rear wheels normally have 30% of the torque and are slipping by 5% then the friction losses are 30%x5%=1.5% of the drivetrain power. This may explain some the low MPG of this vehicle. The 240HP is not free either.
  • music287music287 Member Posts: 116
    We were looking at the upcoming Ford Edge/Lincoln MKX. They'll have a six cylinder w/ a six speed transmission. Plus that huge moonroof is appealing. OTOH, all that new technology worries me AND (here's the big one for us,) Ford isn't offering HID xenon headlights as of today! The Acura seems to be a similar size i.e. five seats w/ hatch but the four cylinder being driven to 240 hp concerns me in terms of long-term durability. The Acura looks like it will be less money, too.

    What am I missing here? Are there any other medium-sized cuv's I haven't noticed? (We need enough hauling room to get our kids and their debris to college!)

    Jay
  • buyingsoon2buyingsoon2 Member Posts: 10
    What about the Subaru B9 Tribeca or the Volvo XC-90?...Both bigger than the RDX.

    Carsdirect.com comparaison
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Ditto those, or a CX7 or CX9 at the Mazda store. Not sure who offers HIDs, maybe a BMW X3 or VW Touareg?

    -juice
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    "Unless there is a choice of different suspension setups, then "Sport Suspension" to me is just Honda vernacular for standard suspension."

    No. Sport Suspension is listed as an exterior accessory. Take a look at the list on Acura.com. It goes something like...

    gold package
    front underspoiler
    moonroof visor
    wheel locks
    19" rims
    sport suspension
    running boards

    I checked with my dealer and they have no clue.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    The RDX is not a medium-size CUV. It's a small SUV.

    The MKX is a replacement for the discontinued Aviator (glitzy Explorer) and would be competition for the Acura MDX.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm not so sure....the new MKX is a lot smaller than the outgoing Aviator. If it even offers a 3rd row seat, I'm sure it'll be tiny compared to the Aviator's.

    They downsized that model a lot.

    It's weird, because the Edge will sort of slot between the Escape and Explorer, but it's probably closer to Escape size.

    -juice
  • jimbo3123jimbo3123 Member Posts: 1
    Has anyone heard where they're making the RDX?

    I've heard that they plan on ramping up to 40k units/year, so I would guess that they would be making they in North America. That's purely speculation on my part though.
Sign In or Register to comment.