2007 Toyota Camry

13567102

Comments

  • collincollin Member Posts: 4
    how about a corolla hybrid? the prius is just butt ugly!
    does a hybrid have to be ugly?
    i am waiting to see the '06 camry hybrid,would seriously consider it.
    toyota has it right,accelerate away from the light up to 35-40 mph then use the gas engine,honda has it backwards.255 h.p. hybrid who cares? i want gas mileage
    let them drink the oil i say-collin :mad:
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    "SEs dont have silver instrumentation starting with 2005, fwiw."

    That is a welcome trend.
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    Since the regular Corolla gets almost 40 mpg without resorting to Hybrid technology, I am not sure whether a hybrid Corolla would be worth the extra money. While I think the look of the Prius is OK, I don't like the small skinny tires that compromises handling. A 4 cylinder Camry hybrid that can get 40 + mpg with power output in the neigborhood of 200 Hp would be a great car. A perfect balance of great fuel efficiency and good performance.
  • mi_satmi_sat Member Posts: 42
    AUTO INDUSTRY REPORT: Toyota to speed Camry
    Detroit Free Press
    May 13, 2005

    Toyota Motor Corp., the world's second-largest automaker, is speeding the release of its next Camry sedan by at least six months, aiming to keep it the best-selling U.S. car, three industry analysts familiar with the company's plans said.

    The 2007 Camry should arrive at dealers as early as February 2006, said Jim Hall, an analyst with AutoPacific Inc., basing his comments on discussions with Toyota. That would bring the new model to market 4 1/2 years after the current edition's release. Toyota has redesigned the Camry every five years since its 1983 debut and put it on sale around early September each time.

    link title
  • cammer2cammer2 Member Posts: 38
    Anyone with actual info on the next-gen Camry?

    I wonder things like -

    Will the transmissions go from 5 to 6 speeds (to jump ahead of Ford/GM's latest venture)?

    Which V6 will they use? I can't imagine they'll use the existing 3.0/3.3 since it seems they've developed 3 new engines - the 2.5 (IS), 3.0 (GS) and 3.5 (Avalon). I personally think the 3.0 from the GS with 245 hp would be perfect - in line with Accord/Altima, but leaving a gap below Avalon.

    Will they "hybridize" the I4 or the V6? If they want to sell 20% of Camry's as hybrids (as has been reported), it doesn't make sense that they'll use the V6 - particularly after seeing the slow response to the Accord which is $30K.

    And finally - will there EVER be a Camry wagon again???

    My fantasy car - Hybrid Camry Wagon using the 4 cylinder.

    Would love to hear any inside scoop from someone in the know!
  • chris65amgchris65amg Member Posts: 372
    I would love to see one too.... and wagons are making a comeback
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Hybrid Camry wagon would top my list, but a diesel might even surpass that. I just don't get why everybody isn't screaming for this type of vehicle. The room of an SUV, the efficiency and handling of a car.

    Come on Toyota. There are plenty of us that are smart enough not to fall for the SUV ploy, but we still want some room - bring over some wagons. We'll even forgive you if you have to give them some goofy name (or acronym) to avoid the alleged stigma of the wagon moniker.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    This may not be the "actual information" you are looking for, but I here's my speculation:

    The current 210 horse 3.0L unit in the Camry will be axed, as it is now the only vehicle that still uses that engine, and it doesnt really make sense to continue producing this. The 3.3L, Toyota-wide, I believe will eventually be phased out, but Im not sure as to the timing or how this will affect the Camry, since so many models use that engine. I will say that I have read that Toyota has already registered for trademarks on the names of vehicles like RX350, ES350, etc... so expect that the Lexus models using the 3.3L will soon be moving to the Avalon's 3.5L. (FWIW, the next Lexus ES is rumored to be introduced next spring as well, earlier than normal).

    The three new engines you cite are actually four new engines from the same family that was introduced first as the 245 horse, high torque 4.0L in the 4Runner.
    I agree that the 3.0L unit would be perfect; high efficiency, with good torque for the size (and doesnt occur too high on the tach). I, personally, am interested to see what is done with the 4 cylinder models. Toyota needs definitely to play with that engine a bit, and I'd LOVE for all sold in the US to be PZEV rated and have about 170 hp, which would be no small feat (but very possible if the company can move to dual VVTi on that engine).

    I'm doubtful that a 6 speed auto will be introduced initially with this car, considering the excellent Avalon doesnt use one. But as long as the 5 speed is refined and can be tweaked to be less reluctant to kick down, I think theres no problem.

    The Hybrid situation is very interesting, and I have no idea where Toyota is going to go on this one. A wagon seems doubtful, theres still not much profit potential there, unless mindsets change. That said, have you considered a Subaru Legacy wagon? Its a phenomenal vehicle (We have both an 02 Camry and an 05 Legacy).

    ~alpha
  • cammer2cammer2 Member Posts: 38
    Alpha,

    Thanks for the thougtful reply.

    I, too, was kind of doubtful of the 6-speed transmission, but thought it might be a way to extract some more power/efficiency out of the current 4 - although you're correct that a move to dual VVTi would do the same.

    I am probably hoping for too much to see a Camry wagon again. I'm guessing that Toyota hoped the Highlander would fill that role (at a much heftier profit, I'm sure) or something like the concept that was displayed in Detroit this year (can't remember the name, but struck me like Toyota's version of Pacifica).

    I have considered the Subarus - would just like a little better gas mileage (hence the pondering about a hybrid wagon).

    Thanks again!
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The Legacy is significantly smaller (96 vs 103 cubic ft.) and uses quite a bit more gas than the Camry (or Accord) - about the same as the V-6 versions.

    Nice handling fun to drive vehicle though.
  • callmedrfillcallmedrfill Member Posts: 729
    Toyota will have 3 engines available for the Camry (4, 6, Hybrid), the question is which V6 will they use.

    Since the efficiency is so high on the 3.5 (with 21/29 in the heavier Avalon), I expect them to use a 3.5, with some beef taken out to increase efficiency to 24/32. Expect 240HP.

    The trunk may shrink (escpecially on the Hybrid Model).

    I expect them to do away with the SE model. Introduce Nav as a factory option.

    It's hard to come up with real changes for a car that has been SO successful.

    People don't buy in this class for sports-car handling, or manual trannys, or sexy styling. They want the basics done right.

    I just expect a more efficient V6, slightly more powerful than the Camry SE. Small increase in passenger space, balanced by a decrease in trunk space. Better options from the factory (maybe adjustable suspension on XLE, Nav, reclining rear seats). They'll cherry pick a couple from the ES.

    DrFill
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    I have a feeling that the hybrid Camry will most likely be a MY 07 car rather than 06. That makes sense since 06 will be the last MY of the current generation and the 07 will be released in the Spring of 06 rather than Fall. Given the high gas prices, a fuel efficient but powerful 4 cylinder hybrid makes mores sense than the V6 hybrid although offering both will probably be the best idea. Let the econo buyers have their cake and eat it too and the performance drivers leave everybody else in the dust. :D
  • chris65amgchris65amg Member Posts: 372
    The Camry is one of my more favorite cars and I really doubt that Toyota will drop the ball redoing it. I look forward to a more powerful 4 cylinder and the hyd\brid model.
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    ...as the 2002-06 models, so there won't be as much of a change at there was in 2002. I would expect the 4-cylinder to remain largely unchanged, since it just got a slight power and torque boost in 2005. But I agree the V6 will probably be replaced, and there will likely be a 4-cylinder hybrid.
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    It looks like the hybrid Camry will be coming in Fall of 2006 .

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/usautotoyotahybrid
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    is that the hp of the 4-cyl will remain around where it is (witness the evolution from one gen to the next in 1997, it gained, like, 5 hp), and the 3.3 will become the standard V-6 for a while. If that rises to around 240-250 hp, that will leave a large gulf in power ratings between the 4 and the 6.

    It would make perfect sense for Toyota to come in between on power ratings with a hybrid, selling for about the same price (or a little less) as the V-6 when comparably equipped. I think they could do this. They detuned the V-6 in the HL/RX for the hybrid version, and would probably do a bit of that to the 4-cyl for this hybrid as well. But imagine it: a 200 hp hybrid Camry selling at $2K more than the 4-cyl, and making better fuel economy than either of the gas-only models.

    If they do keep the SE, I wonder if it will continue to have more power than the other trims in the V-6.

    The news is saying that the hybrid Camry will start to be manufactured late in the year (2006) at Georgetown, so it will probably be close to a year after the launch of the next-gen Camry before the hybrid appears at dealers.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Im not sure why there's talk that the SE will be canned. From what I understand, it sells to forecast, and a salesman at the dealership told me that they sell the ones they get, especially the V6s since the 2005 mid cycle refresh. The SE isnt the volume model, and it doesnt have to be. IMO, the Standard, LE, and XLE border on too soft, even though the dynamic envelope is there. Toyota is smart to offer a Camry that offers a bit more in the way of roll control, ride firmness, and steering feedback, and this generation has seen plenty more takers of SEs than generation three.

    Nippon- I feel that if your suspicions are true, it will be a sign that Toyota is rushing this vehicle to market, as the automotive landscape in this segment is much changed since 1997's generation 4.

    The 4 cylinder needs more power to remain competitive with the other segment leaders (the Accord is supposed to get a 10 hp bump to 170 with its 2006 mid cycle refresh, and the Altima is already above that, the Saturn Aura will debut with an advanced 2.4L around 170 hp as well).The older 3.3L engine should start to be phased out with this Camry, IMO, especially since the ES is moving to the newly designed V6 family when it debuts. If Toyota wants to maintain its market share (without the impetus of incentives) in this segment, it needs a home-run redesign like its had with the Corolla, Sienna, and to the greatest degree, Avalon.

    [I'm referencing your comment: "is that the hp of the 4-cyl will remain around where it is (witness the evolution from one gen to the next in 1997, it gained, like, 5 hp), and the 3.3 will become the standard V-6 for a while. If that rises to around 240-250 hp, that will leave a large gulf in power ratings between the 4 and the 6."]

    ~alpha
  • collincollin Member Posts: 4
    i was considering a hybrid camry,but i think it will be pricy??
    only 48k of them to be made,i guess i'll just get a 4 cyl le for now and wait a few years till the prices come down. my wife agrees the prius is really ugly,how much mileage would they lose with wider tires?? it really needs some side molding or something??? those slab sides are terrible!! i don't know of anyone who says the prius is good looking,back-end also. they should have put the powertrain in the good looking corrola to start with. don't you agree? heard some are shutting off on the hwy here in cal. it was on the tv. hybrids still the way to go
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    I dont agree that the powertrain should have gone in the Corolla instead of having a unique vehicle like the Prius. Part of that car's charm is that it stands out. I certainly dont think its going to win any beauty pageants, but part of trumpeting the kind of extreme technology that is employed in the Prius required making it a unique vehicle. Now, as we've seen, Toyota is mainstreaming the technology for a broader market. This was a good strategy- Honda hasnt been nearly as successful purveying its Civic Hybrid, save for the first 6 months, and the Accord Hybrid is pricey as all get out- 33k with NAV (but no moonroof, and very ugly alloys, lol). I, for one, believe Toyota will make the Camry Hybrid more accessible. Generating 48K units per year of Camry Hybrids will also mean that there should be enough supply to prevent demand from getting the best of pricing, though we shall see. Given current levels of Camry sales, 48K would be about a 12% mix.

    Speaking of mix, I wonder what the rest of the Camry line-up will look like for the next generation. In terms of content, I feel all models are fairly well equipped, save for the XLE 4 cylinder. The 16 inch alloys should definitely be standard on that model. And the LE V6 should be using 16 inch wheels and tires, as well. Naturally, side airbags and curtains should be made standard on all models, and I'd like to see the 'Standard' renamed CE... whats wrong with that designation? The Sienna and Corolla use it....('Standard' is so 1980s).

    ~alpha
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    If the Corolla does get a hybrid powertrain, it would seriously hurt Prius sales IMHO. I think Toyota could sell a hybrid Rolla for around 18 to 19K. My 99 Corolla CE with and automatic has pretty good acceleration for a compact econo car. I am guessing 0 to 60 around 9 seconds. A hybrid version would be at least a second quicker. The Prius does 0 to 60 in about 10 seconds. Remember the Prius ICE is only 1.5 Liter whereas the Corolla's is 1.8L. The Prius seriously needs bigger, wider tires.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I am with you on the SE - it is the only one my local dealers can't keep in stock, while their pricey high-profit XLEs just sit and gather dust. The volume line is obviously the LE. My vote would be to go back to three trims for the next gen. The line is getting very bulky, with four trims and a Limited package on top of it.

    Anything with an XLE designation should have standard alloys (I thought it did for '05?). Indeed, with $12K cars having alloys these days, it would be really nice to see the Camry have standard alloys across the line, except maybe a "standard" if they continue that trim. Auto climate control is becoming very prevalent industrywide too, and more Camrys should have this next time around.

    As for the output of the 4-cyl, I hear what you are saying. But Toyota has always sold well despite being on the low side powerwise, and I would really like to see this car do better than 24 mpg city when they reintroduce it next time. That is just not a very impressive number these days. They could probably achieve some gains just by fooling with VVT and other tricks with the head, and maybe boost low-rev torque at the same time.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    There is no Limited model for the 2005 model year, unless you are talking about some package that is regional. The Limited was actually fairly limited in production and sales, and available only as an 04. Personally, I dont think alloys need be standard on LEs. They're quite expensive to replace, and steelies are just fine for bread and butter. But once you're up above $22K on the sticker, as in the case of the XLE, theres no reason alloys shouldnt be standard.

    You make an interesting (strange) comment:
    "I would really like to see this car do better than 24 mpg city when they reintroduce it next time. That is just not a very impressive number these days."

    It's not impressive? Really? Can you name a midsize vehicle that achieves better? I can only think of the Prius, which doesnt really count, and the 5 speed manual Accord.

    ~alpha
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    welll, my recent test drive of the A3 is still fresh in my mind. That is a turbo that makes 40 hp more than the Camry and still does better (25 city) than the Camry. OK, it is FSI and costs 20% more. It is just as heavy though, and probably less aerodynamic with its hatchback shape.

    Anyway, I am not saying Camry's current rating is junk or anything. I am saying what I would LIKE to see, since whatever it ends up being will be all there is for the next five years. And when I said it is not that impressive now, what I meant was that competing cars get almost the same mileage from their V-6s. C'mon, I know Toyota must have a trick or two up its sleeve to bring that number up a little. And I would prefer to see that than a big power increase. (Indeed, I don't know how much more power they are going to be able to get from an NA 4-cyl engine - at some point if you want more power a standard V-6 just becomes inevitable).

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Passat diesel does a lot better than 24 in the city. ;)
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Right,

    So, we have one Hybrid (the Prius) and one Diesel that sells for 25K plus (the Passat), and one sports hatchback that sells for 26K plus.

    I agree- theres always room for improvement, and I think it would be awesome to see the Camry 4 cylinders in the 25-26 range for city economy.... but 24 is still right at the top of the class for GAS powered, MIDSIZE, MODERATELY priced vehicles.

    ~alpha
  • chris65amgchris65amg Member Posts: 372
    And considering that a Camry is bigger than an Accord.... however I would like to see a more powerful !4. Is the 3.5 going to be the V6 now of are they going to hang on to the old 3.3L?
  • andrelaplumeandrelaplume Member Posts: 934
    did I read this a few posts back. My neighbor has one (very nice car ) but she gets no where near 40 mpg. Is this the EPA number or is that driving under ideal conditions (no traffic, 55 mph) with no air an a manual tranny?
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Corola is currently rated 30/38 automatic, 32/41 manual. In the real world that should mean that most folks can do better than 30 in their daily grind without trying TOO hard.

    In the hypothetical world, I would like to see a next-gen Camry improve fuel economy by 10-15% without losing power.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    Considering that I get 35-38 mpg on long trips at 65 mph with the a/c running in my '04 Camry 4-cylinder with auto trans, it should certainly be possible to achieve 40 mpg in a Corolla.
  • chris65amgchris65amg Member Posts: 372
    Before i messed with my Corolla I could get 40mpg. Mine's a stick though. I loved that!
  • kycamrymankycamryman Member Posts: 1
    You almost guarentee that the 07 camry will look more lexus like, with a sportier look then the current gen. Poor Honda, they will have to spice up the accord or continue to be our sold. I would be nice if the V-6 from the Avalon would find it's way to the camry. I will keep an eye out when around the georgetown factory for a good photo opp.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I wouldn't mind it a bit if a scaled down version of the Avalon's face made it to the Camry too! And they should really hard to reduce the slabby look of the sides of the car.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • dmortholedmorthole Member Posts: 29
    Vague pictures:
    image

    Note the badging:

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    Wow great job dmorthole. The front looks similar to the new Avalon only a little sharper. Hopefully the production version won't be too off from this. Now if someone can find a site about the specs of this car please post. :D
  • lexi4lifelexi4life Member Posts: 181
    Looks a lot more agressive than the current one! I hope I won't be deceived when we're gonna see clear pictures of that next Camry. I think they should put the 3.0 engine (at 245 hp) for V6 versions and use the 3.5 (at 275hp) for the SE V6.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Wow! Nice find. Even with the blurry images, this thing looks great. Thanks :D
  • bklynguybklynguy Member Posts: 275
    If they are, the 2007 Camry looks good (even better than the new Avalon). I hope the mirrors bend.
  • claudius753claudius753 Member Posts: 138
    You forgot this one ;)

    image

    I see some lines of the new IS, especially in this side view. I hope this resembles what the new Camry will look like come production. Add a decently powerful I4 and a 250+HP V6 and they would have a real winner. Not that they wouldn't have a winner no matter what it looked like and what engines it had...

    I believe these are pictures taken from a movie that revealed the new Camry at a "Toyota Banquet" I think that was for dealers and are supposedly the actual 2007 Camry. The guy that took them said if he remembers correctly that the engines will be the 3.3 V6 and a jazzed up version of the current 2.4L I4.

    Looks like the new Camry will give the Accord even more competition. I wonder how the Corolla will hold up against the "upmarket" redesigned Civic.
  • bklynguybklynguy Member Posts: 275
    the Accord is receiving a more extensive MMC than usual this summer. I'm sure Honda knows alot about the 2007 Camry. Besides the LED taillights, I read somewhere that the 2007 Camry will be getting HID headlamps (XLE/SE). It looks more like a Lexus or even a little like an Acura. Will the new Camry come out first in Japan or will it be launched simutanously in Asia & North America early next year ?
  • carzzzcarzzz Member Posts: 282
    Gen 4 Camry + 2006 IS + 2005 Avalon = Gen 6 Camry (appearance)
    It's good to hear that toyota finally phase out the old 3.0L engine, and put 3.3 as standard! I just dont get why the current gen5 V6 XLE get the 3.3L.
    If it has VSC, Traction, SAB, SCAB, ABS, etc as standard equipment. It would be definitely a "better buy" compare to accord/sonata!
    Also, looked at the last pic from claudius753, it seems that the wheelbase has stretch + finally a new set of rear suspensions!
    IMO, the 2006 Civic seems to be a bit overstyled, but it is great to hear from honda that majority/all safety features will be standard!
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    We can definitely see that the new Camry will have projector style headlights rather than the reflector type.
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    The current 3.0L 210 Hp engine will definitely be gone by MY 07 and I have a hunch so will be the 3.3L engine. I think a detuned version of the 3.5L engine from the new Avalon will be the only V6 engine available.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Interesting! If this really is the next Camry, I'd honestly call it one of the most stylish cars in the family sedan category, certainly with more flair (hate it or love it) than the Accord and new Sonata, for example.

    I will be disappointed if the 3.3L sticks around unchanged. The new generations of engines are much more efficient; the Camry SE's current 225hp 3.3L rates 20/29, whereas the Avalon's 280 horse 3.5L rates 22/31.

    Really, I was actually expecting the *new* 245 horse 3.0L or the 3.5L detuned from the Avalon. Important to note that Lexus has registered the name ES350 with the US Govt, for what thats worth.

    ~alpha
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I would also hope for the 3.0L. Why must engines always get bigger? 245 hp is plenty.

    I am anxious to see the hp and mileage of the 4-cyl.
  • carzzzcarzzz Member Posts: 282
    If the Gen6 camry offers 3.5L, It will be very likely has better mpg than 300lb more heavy weighted avalon, which rates @ 22/31! (23/33) My Guess! Almost as high as a 4 cyc
  • callmedrfillcallmedrfill Member Posts: 729
    Looking pretty good! :D

    Wouldn't worry too much about the Avalon having better mileage. 23/33 sounds like a good guesstimate to me.

    HP on the V6 will probably be 230 (RX330 engine?)

    The 4 may go to 170HP, with 28/38 EPA. I expect at least 5 MPG better than the V6.

    The profile is still Camry.

    At least they didn't wreck it (like Honda did the Accord)!

    DrFill
  • motownusamotownusa Member Posts: 836
    A bigger engine gives you more low end torque. As long as gas mileage is good, I have no problem with more displacement. The 3.5L engine in the Avalon actually gets better gas milegae than the 3.0L engine in the GS ( I think).
  • jlsnmjlsnm Member Posts: 2
    I'm new here, trying to get my bearings. I have two questions.

    1. Do I understand correctly...this fall's 06 Camry will be largely a carryover of the 05, with the next-generation 07 model released next Spring?

    2. I've read here that the 07 may feature standard side airbags. Do you think the 06 would also feature standard side airbags?
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    Just a guess but if the 2007 model is going to debut early in 2006, I doubt you'll see any changes to the 2006 model.
  • claudius753claudius753 Member Posts: 138
    I would be thouroughly impressed if the I4 Camry could pull off 170hp and 28/38EPA. That is almost equal to Corolla and Civic, smaller cars with less power.

    If it did get that kind of power/economy, with the more agressive styling, the Camry would become a major contender for my next new car.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.