Disturbing trend: eliminating front bumpers

richardrerichardre Member Posts: 3
edited September 2016 in General
I am wondering how Edmunds readers feel about this issue: more and more new cars have no front bumper! Designers have replaced the front bumper with a large plastic grille, usually black, that extends low to the ground. Examples are Lexus, Audi, Genesis, Toyota Avalon and possible the Camry, too. There is no protection from the bumps and bruises that are so common when you parallel-park. Anybody who drives in an urban area is familiar with the bumper-car action that takes place while parallel-parking. With this type of front end, it seems likely that repairs will be frequent and costly. It also seems that more makes and models have this feature (or non-feature). I am interested in buying cars terrific such as Avalon or Lexus GS, but I am really turned off this impractical front-end design. Just venting my gripes! How do folks feel about it? Oh, and one more thing: I thought cars were required to have a "5-mph bumper?"

Comments

  • richardrerichardre Member Posts: 3
    Sorry for typo above. Terrific cars, not cars terrific.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited August 2016
    "NHTSA amended the bumper standard in May 1982, halving the front and rear crash test speeds for 1983 and newer car bumpers from 5 miles per hour (8 km/h) to 2.5 miles per hour (4 km/h), and the corner crash test speeds from 3 miles per hour (5 km/h) to 1.5 miles per hour (2 km/h)." (Wikipedia)

    There's a bumper under the plastic covers. I think they are better for pedestrians and mpg, even if the crash test standards need to be improved. The height difference between cars and SUVs needs to be addressed too.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 260,829
    European pedestrian crash standards are driving a lot of that design.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • richardrerichardre Member Posts: 3
    Good points, especially regarding the height differences. Thanks for your comments. With the front bumper being hidden behind a plastic grill, minor bumps and scrapes will damage the plastic grill. I am guessing that replacing the plastic grill will cost at least $500. But with a traditional bumper, there would be no damage, or very little. Perhaps the automakers believe that people who spend $35,000 to $60,000 for an Avalon or Lexus GS don't care about such trivia. But personally, if I buy a $60,000 car, I would still care about this stuff. My expensive luxury car should be durable, and able to absorb some bumps and scrapes.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    You just need one of those aftermarket bumper guard thingys, like this one. A lovely accessory for every Mercedes. :D
  • Raz57Raz57 Member Posts: 1
    Drove a '99 Suburban in downtown & uptown Minneapolis for years as my winter ride/work truck. I would parallel park it on the city streets all the time. No sensors or cameras, never once did I bump another car with it or it's trailer hitch. Trash cans, sure. But if someone needs a bumper to parallel park, so they can bump the other cars. They should sell their car and use public transit.
  • rgcrgc Member Posts: 1
    The chief problem to not having the front bumper is that when a driver gets hit head-on, the entire front end is pushed up to the windshield. The driver is usually killed as a result. These automakers need to realize that the safety of their customers are utmost. Design does nothing if that driver is killed in the process. I am kinda apt to look for a used car that does have the bumper for this very reason.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,840
    edited March 30
    The safety of today's cars exceeds anything you can imagine from the past. Cars do have front bumpers; they are underneath the decorative bumper cover. The fact that cars can crush in the front end means the car is absorbing the impact and taking longer to actually come to a stop reducing the G-Forces that the occupants encounter. Combine that with the correct use of the seat belts, and the supplemental restraints (airbags) and the occupant survivability in a number of different crash scenarios is getting better all the time.

    This test was eleven years ago. There have been significant improvements since then. For the record, the Malibu driver is relatively uninjured, the Belair driver would be a fatality.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_r5UJrxcck
Sign In or Register to comment.