Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread

1114115117119120235

Comments

  • 150mphclub150mphclub Member Posts: 316
    I drove the Lexus IS & GS. My head touched the sunroof in both. I drove the Infiniti G35. Not very comfortable or luxurious. I drove the Mercedes C class, but it was $10,000 more than the Passat and offered nothing more for the money. My father has a Cadillac CTS, but he agrees my VW Passat 3.6L is quieter, faster, and more comfortable. I paid about $30,000, but I could have paid a lot less if I had found a 4 cylinder acceptable.
  • exshomanexshoman Member Posts: 109
    They key point you're missing here is that yes, your car does depreciate, but you are also paying off your loan at the same time. In the early years, a good chunk of your car payment is going towards interest. By year 4, almost all of your payment is going towards the principal. So you're paying down your car note faster than it's depreciating.

    So, for argument's sake, say you're paying $400 a month, and you're in the 4th year of a 5 year loan. You may lose $2000 of depreciation on your car, but you've paid off approx $4000 off what you owe. So, by delaying a year, instead of getting a new car for your trade-in plus 12K, you can get a new car for trade-in plus 10K. Go one more year, and assuming depreciation is $1500 (depreciation slows as a car ages), then a new car would by your trade-in plus $7500.

    If you hold onto the car after it has been paid off, then you can start putting away the car payment into a savings account, saving up for a large down payment on your new car, or college, or whatever.
  • njeraldnjerald Member Posts: 689
    Logic doesn't work in emotional situations or some math with some persons.
  • jeffyscottjeffyscott Member Posts: 3,855
    If I keep my car, let's say 8-10 years, then buy a comparable new car, would you have me finance the $18,000-$20,000 difference?? What would a 36 or 40 month (my maximum) loan like that cost per month -- $400, $500, or more!!! Maybe I could tighten the belt and save the difference.

    So since you say you do not finance more than 3 or 4 years...after 4 years you have no car payments. What were you paying on the loan, maybe $300 per month? If so, then you simply save the $300 per month that you had been paying on the loan. If you keep the car for 6 years after the loan is payed off you will have accumulated $21,600, plus interest of maybe $3000 for a total of over $24,000. So now you can pay cash for your new car.

    Plus if you plan to keep the car you buy for cash for 10 years, you can drop the savings rate down for the next car to maybe $200 per month.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,672
    If you keep saving the amount that you would have paid on the load druing the rest of the ownership time you accumulate enough to pay for some repairs that are normal with longer term ownership. You also start saving on insurance. That's especially true when your car is old enough you don't carry collison. Put the cash into a higher interest savings account and keep accumulating. Then you pay cash the next time you buy and keep putting away the payent amount.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Better yet, never assume a debt to anyone. Buy cars with cash. If you can only afford a used car, buy a used car. If you can afford a new one for $12K to $14, buy one. Got the money to buy your $30K to $40K car - go for it. Well I am too cheap to buy luxury cars, especially American. Did that once and lost too much. Cars over say around $25K, just seem to loose way too much, and are usually great used car buys. Got the PT so dang low, it in no way could lose as much money as a luxury car does in only one years time, in say three years on the PT. Was considering trading up to a Dodge Charger, which seems to run around $21K say discounted - maybe less. But wait - it is not a Japan make, perhaps in two years it could be had for less than $15K? Who knows.

    One thing for certain, it won't be a lease and it won't be on time. Cash and I would think around $2,500 off as a discount seems around the right price, or just wait and buy one used. Wonder how the Charger compares to Mustangs in reliability? Should be interesting to read the next CR magazine for 2007. My goodness - 2007 is near!
    -Loren
  • njeraldnjerald Member Posts: 689
    RIGHT ON!!!

    It's bad enough to buy a depreciating asset (which most people have to do), but its another thing to borrow and pay interest on it.

    Too many people get upside down with long financing terms.
  • driverdmdriverdm Member Posts: 505
    Just to let you know, the premise of only buying with cash is a bad one. I analyze businesses all day long and have a finance degree with a specialization in personal financial planning. Any business that purchases everything in cash is not utilizing leverage effectively and is not as competitive as other businesses in its market that do. In personal finance the same occurs. Instead of trying to make a large cash purchase, instead try to get the right total payment (that is total car payment plus insurance) is the best thing finacnially to do unless you were born with a or have discovered a tree which blossoms fifty dollar bills as leaves. These forums are great places to discover information but we've got to make sure we give people the right information. Take it from someone who has planned budgets, large cash expenditures to avoid interest may not be the best thing to do. My mother told me something that I had to go to college and get a finance degree to learn. "When you only get what you need, you are only existing. It's when you get what you want, that you are living." The is why we work. Work hard and make sure you can afford your finance payments with no trouble at all.
  • driverdmdriverdm Member Posts: 505
    I am planning to buy a VW Passat within the next 6 months if not sooner. I love the Passat. It is a great value considering how many features you get for the money. The power is also great. To me, the VW exists as top of the mid market class and bottom of the entry luxury class (mostly due to the cache in the name and FWD handling). When they stick to that niche they do well aka Passat, when they don't.. Phaeton.. I mean catastrophy.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    It is the right information. Debt is the killer. GM is near death and Honda is not. GM has a 15:1 debt ratio. Sorry, but you can get as deep in as you personally want, it cost me nothing. But to say debt is a good thing is simply wrong, and perhaps we shall see this by 2007 when so many people lose their homes they could not afford. Never carry debt on cars, or credit cards, and only buy homes after a down payment which is sizable, and with payments you can easily make. Have at the bare minimum a six months worth of cash in the bank for emergency use. Good luck getting what you want, and enjoy the payments on say a BMW. If your job vanishes overnight a tow truck takes your baby away. If you bought what you could afford, it is yours. They did a study, some time back, and asked self made millionaires what car they owned. Guess what? The car was a Crown Victoria. No wait, it was a used Crown Victoria.

    Now from a bankers perspective, yes indeed, it pays to borrow, or should I say lend. And yes, a business assuming debt to buy another company, or expand does make sense, if that yields more money. Personal debt on a car is not going to make you one penny.

    Work, BTW, is highly overrated and indeed a four letter word. If you enjoy the particular line of work, as it being somewhat of a hobby or special interest, by all means do it for life. To work a job, to support a car, boat, or whatever habit, usually leads to a life of misery, as in working until death. Plan on saving money, and avoid the work to death syndrome. You may just find by not making the banks rich, you, yourself can later on afford more expensive cars and toys, and live without debt hanging on your back for life.

    What college did you go to? GM needs some financial advice. Oh wait, they are in good shape now, if one believes in the current new releases, and the tooth fairy.
    -Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Be sure to check on cost of repairs, unless you plan to sell it before warranties end. Ask what a new tranny would cost on the car. And you may want to see what the company position is on when they consider their engines to have an excessive oil consumption, as in at what point would they replace an engine.

    Nice looking car, with classy interiors, and good looking materials, seats and all. If you like FWD, the handling is good, I guess. I kinda like the Altima, which with a V6 is less expensive, and has good resale, and perhaps good reliability. Still not sure about Nissan. It seems to be up and down these days. Are Passats reliable? Warranty is pretty good. Price seems high on some of those Passats, yet the base ones are not too pricey. As it nears $30K, I would be thinking BMW. In the twenties, it looks like a pretty fair deal.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Actually paying cash is a bad idea. Buying a car that is to expensive is also. Have to do the financial impact analysis both ways and see what works for you. Debt is not a bad thing, it's another financial tool that has to be managed correctly. It's always a compromise between putting some down and financing some.
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    Paying cash is not necessarily a bad idea. It depends on the rate of financing that you can secure. If the best rate I can secure is 8%, then I'd pay cash. If the rate is 3%, I'd finance.
  • lightfootfllightfootfl Member Posts: 442
    I have always considered the secret to having/making money is to as much as possible use OP's (other peoples). That means if I can save/make more money in interest by using the other guys money, then that is the way I try to go. As long as you have the wherewith to cover your indebtedness, what difference does it make. I don't think always having payments hanging over your head is a good idea and with payments stretching into the 5-6-7 year ranges the amount of interest you pay is ridiculous. If my money is making more interest than I am paying, then I am ahead, if not then I am losing.
  • lweisslweiss Member Posts: 342
    Debt- how did America function before debt (HaHa)? Debt is good for leverage, like when you are buying real estate (which usually increases in value, give or take some bad years, but the trend is usually your friend). Now in depreciating assets (like vehicles, furniture, etc), it depends- like I use my car for business, I can write off part of the cost of depreciation and I would rather use my money for other things that offer a better return. The worst is debt for consumable expenditures- like gasoline, vacations, etc- and on credit cards, it's often 20% or higher.

    But the best rates are given to the people that are the most able to pay cash- low risk for the financial institutions. My wife used to work for GMAC- did you know that at one time, half of GM's income was from GMAC? Pretty amazing.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    They are going to have to rob Peter to pay Paul. When they are so called giving 0% they are taking from the discount pricing on the car. Now if they offer both, and it looks like a deal, I guess go for it. The dealership has a sharper pencil, as does the banker.

    Another element in the buying decision is the amount of compromise. I am guilty as sin of buying a four cylinder Mustang, way back when, while I coulda' had a V8. One of those days when I wasn't thinking straight. The low cost of the car, a whole lot of extras on the car (for it's time), and better gas mileage seemed to add up. But alas, the real Stang was the V8, so the poorer handling and no get up and go finally ended in trading it in after less than three years time.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    You reminded me. I bought my last vehicle at a discount and 0%. I bought a year-end model and made out. Subsequently, I paid the loan in full.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Why would they offer both? Must be some angle to it. Is this 0% for the entire length of the loan? You said you paid the loan in full. Was that after the first years which were 0%. Not any of my business to know yours, but you got me curious as to how that worked. If all the years are 0%, why not just pay over time. I hate payments, even without interest - one more thing to remember. But in this case, you made some money. Good deal - great buy! Especially if it was a car with slow depreciation. ;)
    -Loren
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Got lucky...At the time there was a special promotion. The 0% was for three year loans or less, the entire length of the loan. Had the opportunity to pay it off, and swapped car payments for savings "payments".

    I didn't make any money on the deal, but the way I look at it, I minimized the expenses associated with owning a car.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    are a couple of links that will be of interest to all you recent posters: Percentage of monthly income spent on a car? and Questions About Financing New Vehicles. Enjoy!

    And we'll let this discussion get back to the cars... ;)
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Plays a key role in how much you really pay for a car. 0% can save you thousands over the lifetime of the loan of a vehicle. However, usually folks with top notch credit are the only ones that qualify for 0% financing. So, not everyone can take advantage of this great opportunity to purchase a car, and have every dime to purely to the principle... :shades:
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    If you take one of those 0% interest loans, don't you have to pay the msrp. If you could get the car for $3,000 under msrp, the 0% is not saving you much.
  • driverdmdriverdm Member Posts: 505
    I think the general concensus is that it is not necessarily true that using debt is a bad thing and paying cash is not the most prudent financial strategy. I bought my Mazda6 and finacned 5K. My payments came up to 135 a month and that was about 2% of my monthly income. It wasn't a big deal and I paid it off in 24 months with money I saved up. Should I have just bought a used car that was 5K less, I don't believe so. I believe the use of debt as a financial means is a prudent idea and to not buy something because you don't have the money sitting in cash is not financially prudent.

    When/if I purcahse my VW Passat. I will be buying at the end of the model year, getting top dollar for my trade in, putting down a good amount that doesn't hurt my savings too much, and financing a nonmenal amount that won't be a big deal month to month. And as my mother told me, I will have what I want, not just what I need. Though I don't want to work forever, you have to make a plan to get what you want. Usually, that involves work, the other alternative may find you in a cell with a guy checking you out all the time.
  • bhmr59bhmr59 Member Posts: 1,602
    Nope, you don't have to pay MSRP. Negotiate your deal and then get 0% APR financing. Maybe some dealers try to pull the scam you mentioned, but reduced rate financing is just another way to market a factory to consumer rebate.

    Remember, a rebate or reduced rate financing does NOT come out of the dealer's profit.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Got to drive a Mazda6 V6 yesterday and today in Detroit courtesy of Hertz. Fun car to drive! Crisp handling, and plenty of oomph when you need it from the V6. (And I needed it once, to get over to an exit ramp on the freeway when a line of vehicles filled the right lane.) When you don't use all the power, the engine is very smooth and quiet at cruise, thanks in part to the six-speed automatic tranny (2250 RPMs @ 70 mph).

    One thing that wasn't so great is the firm suspension. The freeways in Detroit are, well, not the smoothest around, so there was a lot of bumpiness and suspension noise. The body soaked up most of them, but I did notice a few rattles over the worst stretches. If I lived there, I might have to go for a car with a smoother ride. Also, the rear seat is not very roomy compared to mid-sizers like the Camry, Fulan, and Sonata. Otherwise a sweet ride.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Ah, double wishbone suspension. It's all about the drive, so yeah, not as soft. The Mazda6 would be fun one of the bunch.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Well enjoy the ride. The Passat is pretty cool looking and German cars are noted for a more connected ride, even in FWD cars.

    As for working for what you will need and want in life, sure that's a good thing. But if you save and invest, you will reach a point in time earlier where you no longer have to work the 9 to 5 job to achieve your income. By all means, if it is not a huge portion of your income going into buying a car on time, go for it. Actually, if you are making lots of money like that, you could save two years and pay cash.... but that's just me ;) The general consensus on saving in America is to put it off for another year. The general consensus on buying things on time is that you can have it all. The average saving now in America is a negative figure. Sad but true.

    Your making a bunch of money, you got say six months cash on hand in case you are out of a job and American economy hits the skids, and the car may be your reward for hard work, so yeah, just enjoy the ride -- have fun! I think young people should spend on something else in life too. That is vacations which include travel. See things, go places when you are young. Some wait until retirement, and no longer feel well enough to travel. So what seems like the most stupid use of hard earned money is not. The great memories of travel and adventure are worth every penny--- within reason. See the National Parks, travel to cities, and well whatever the intrest for vacations. Too much work and no play also is not productive. As I age, I am taking less long trips, but have the time to do other things, and shorter travels. Take that Passat and drive on!
    Life's good!
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Please visit the links I provided in pat, "Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread" #6108, 15 Aug 2006 2:30 pm to pursue these lines of conversation about financing. We need to get back to the cars themselves here.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    A casting director seeks drivers who think of their cars as extensions of their personalities and are able to participate in a rally from Vancouver to LA for two weeks in October. Please visit http://www.carspace.com/bullrun for more information.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Nope, I did not pay MSRP for my Fusion SEL V6. In fact, I got my Fusion for even less than the lowest price you can find on the internet..
    Negotiating is key. They knew I could go anywhere and buy a Fusion from any Ford dealer. Not only could I buy a Fusion I could have bought an Accord, Camry, Sonata, G6, Malibu, Altima, Jetta.. competition is great. Also having stellar credit works to your advantage.. :shades:
  • jordanrobinsonjordanrobinson Member Posts: 42
    So long as you don't let them know right away you have that credit! ;)

    Forgive me if this was covered earlier in thsi thread, but what ended up convincing you to take a Fusion over your other options? I certainly don't mind being that I'm a Sales Consultant at a Ford dealership, but I do like to see/hear feedback so I can relay that to my potential customers.

    Personally I love the Fusion, but it may be for reasons completely different then yours. :)
  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    Forgive me if this was covered earlier in thsi thread, but what ended up convincing you to take a Fusion over your other options? I certainly don't mind being that I'm a Sales Consultant at a Ford dealership, but I do like to see/hear feedback so I can relay that to my potential customers.

    Forgive me for stepping in here, but my wife is looking for her next car, and the Fusion and Milan are at the top of her list. Why? Simple (according to her), price and style.

    Despite the fact that they're selling well, you can still get a good deal on a Fusion if you work for it, saving thousands over the competition (all except the Sonata anyway).

    And style? Nothing else like it. Despite the Gillette Fusion front end (which looks smooth to me, especially in black), it's a great-looking car. Everything else, including the Camry, Accord, and Altima, look like a melting jellybean. It's old, and the interiors aren't much better (especially the Altima, ugh!)

    You want to sell the Fusion? Tell your customers that it's like nothing else out there, for a great price. But apparently, you don't need help selling them, since they're flying off Ford lots nationwide. The local dealer has at MOST 5 on their lot at any time, and they're usually gone within a week...
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    Everything else, including the Camry, Accord, and Altima, look like a melting jellybean. It's old, and the interiors aren't much better (especially the Altima, ugh!)

    The current Camry just got a brand new re-designed and the whole new Altima is coming out this fall. However, the Accord is old though I'll give you that.

    As for the interior, IMO, Camry and Accord are miles ahead of Fusion in term of ergonomics and styling. And yes, even the 3-year-old Accord has a better interior. They utilized higher quality plastic and less hard plastic. The fit and finish is unrivaled by any other midsize sedan. In another word, the Camry and Accord are still the benchmark in this segment and you get what you paid for. However, rumor states that the new Altima's interior is going to be much better than the current model and it's driving dynamic is going to be the best in class so I am looking forward for its debut.
  • mfletou1mfletou1 Member Posts: 508
    I have no idea how you can look at a NEW (07) Camry and think it looks like a melting Jelly Bean. The 02-06, yes, I agree. I really disliked thoses cars inside and out. But 07+...styling wise, its the boldest car out there.

    I like the styling of the Fusion except for the backend...its got a very high beltline back there and a very high trunk which I think looks a little disproportionate. But I like the sharp grill. Interior is nice enough, but its not Camry or Accord. The new Camry interior looks and feels like a Lexus.
  • jordanrobinsonjordanrobinson Member Posts: 42
    You want to sell the Fusion? Tell your customers that it's like nothing else out there, for a great price.

    I completely agree. And from what I have seen so far, it's only going to get better. Add to the the introduction of an AWD model for the 2007 year and a hybrid in development, there are a lot of things to keep up the excitment.

    As for the styling in the Camcord, they are nice, but I don't see how the Fusion is lacking to them in any way. Especially on the higher trim levels with the analog clock and "piano key" black satin finish. Granted maybe I'm not paying as much attention to how much of what type of plastic is being used, but then again none of my customers have said anything about it either. (Again, I AM in Pullman, WA.. not exactly the largest city in the world.)

    I'm not saying your wrong, just that I disagree with the idea that the Fusion doesn't provide the same level of quality, especially if you are comparing apples to apples with trim levels and/or price points. :shades:
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    IMO all the midsized vehicles now are pretty good looking with clean lines and no wierd look to the lights. One might say that they are all regressing to the mean and that only the slightest styling differences will differentiate any of them.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Style is kinda interesting with the Fusion / Milan, though it has the big butt syndrome. As for price, you have to consider resale, does it include all the safety features in the price, and is the warranty covering the car for as long as you own it - or at least a good part of those years. For dramatic style, I would say Camry. The new Aura may be stylin', as perhaps the new Accord, once available. The Sonata has a pleasing style, great price and warranty. Altima may have some great close-out deals, or if you want CVT transmission wait for the 2007 model. Altima has good style, even after all these years, and good resale value. Honda has good interiors, and is a great engine builder, if the engine is key to your focus on a car. Honda has the resale, and reliability too. Camry may need a year to work out transmission woes. Will be a good car, some day soon. Mazda6, if you want zoom-zoom, handling. That's my take - your mileage may vary :shades:
    -Loren
  • bobadbobad Member Posts: 1,587
    IMO all the midsized vehicles now are pretty good looking with clean lines and no wierd look to the lights. One might say that they are all regressing to the mean and that only the slightest styling differences will differentiate any of them.

    Correct! And it's no accident, and it's not copying. It's form following function. Current technology and all the requirements of the midsize cars dictate 90% of the styling. By the time the engineers get through, the stylists don't have much to work with.
  • jeffyscottjeffyscott Member Posts: 3,855
    Of course, style is always going to be a personal preference. For instance, my opinion is the Mazda6 is the best looking of the moderately priced mid-size sedans. In second place, for me, is the Milan.

    None of the rest have much appeal to me, in terms of appearance.
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    "I have no idea how you can look at a NEW (07) Camry and think it looks like a melting Jelly Bean. The 02-06, yes, I agree. I really disliked thoses cars inside and out. But 07+...styling wise, its the boldest car out there."

    Styling is subjective and everyone has different perferences.
  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    Of course, style is always going to be a personal preference. For instance, my opinion is the Mazda6 is the best looking of the moderately priced mid-size sedans. In second place, for me, is the Milan.

    Exactly why I bought a Mazda 6 in '04 and haven't looked back since!
  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    Styling is subjective and everyone has different perferences.

    Thank you.

    I'm sorry, but the '07 Camry, like every Toyota, does nothing for me. And yes, I still see a melting jellybean, along with the Accord. I may be in the minority, but it's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it! :)

    They debuted the new Aura at the local dealer this past weekend, and I have to say, I was impressed. The styling looks great to me, smooth lines and sharp details. The interior looked top-notch, better than the almighty Camry in both materials and execution, although the peanut butter colored leather was definitely not my style.

    This car is leaps and bounds better than the laughable L-Series and if, and I mean IF, Saturn markets it right, they have a winner on it's hands.
  • maxamillion1maxamillion1 Member Posts: 1,467
    And I was impressed both inside and out. I'm loving the new styling.

    Interior materials and quality weren't bad either and much much better than the Pontiac G6 that I had an the Altima in which I've owned for two years.

    I'd say the new Aura is at least on par with the 2002-06 Camry's interior materials. Not quite on the level of the new Camry or current Accord, but CLOSE.

    The model I saw as an XE and I think the car will do well for Saturn.
  • exshomanexshoman Member Posts: 109
    I'd have to agree with you. When we were shopping for a car for my wife, my personal preference was the Mazda6. We ended up buying an Accord EX-L 5 speed. The wife just liked the feel of the Honda better. That, and the fact you could get heated seats with the 4 cylinder. Kudos to Honda for being able to order a fully loaded car and still get a stick.

    Although I liked the styling of the Fusion, the interior just seemed lower class than the Accord. The dash gauges were especially ugly (contrasted with the beautiful illuminated gauges of the Accord). The only stick Fusion was a bare bones SEL.

    I did regret not checking out the Milan. It looks like a really nice car, and the interior looks a bit nicer (at least from the commercials).
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I bought from a large dealership that had Honda/Toyota in thier group. The Ford salesperson was confident the Fusion could match these two vehicles in fit/finish/quality of build. He took a Fusion SEL V6 loaded over to both the Toyota and Honda lots and parked right beside a like vehicle. We went over them with a fine tooth comb. Along with 4 or 5 other salespeople. I was convinced the Fusion was on par with the Camry and Accord in fit/finish ect..
    Driving experience of the Fusion was another key seller. The car drives confidently and handles like its on rails. I wanted different, I wanted a vehicle that was going to standout in the crowd of Accords and Camry's. I wanted style. My personal feelings were the Fusion was it. Some custmers may balk at the smaller V6 in the Fusion. Educate them, let them see .5 liters is not that much in size, let them see the 0-60 numbers, 6 tenths of a second difference is negligable.. With all the Fusion/Milan have to offer along with being thousands less.. The car will sell. :shades:
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I totally agree on the higher trim levels in the Fusion.. The analog clock, the white stitched leather seats, the chrome accents in all the right spots.. The interior is on par with Honda/Accord. The Fusion has won awards for its interior.. Along with the Most Appealing in its class by JD powers :D
  • luvmbootyluvmbooty Member Posts: 271
    For all you adults with families...shame on you deciding on style and comfort!

    How about safety! Does anyone find this important? Does anyone know IIHS.org? Most midsize sedans do well with standard or optional side airbags, except for the Nissan Maxima or the Suzuki Verona. If you own a Maxima or Verona and have children, go and trade it in for a Malibu which received a sliver rating by IIHS w/optional side airbags. FYI, the Fusion was last on the list w/out optional side airbags. :lemon:

    My pick for a family car will be number one on the midsize sedan list, the Subaru Legacy. Not to mention Impreza tops the small car list and Forester tops small SUV list. :shades:

    Also how about dependability? Consumer Reports gave the Legacy a 'better than most' rating and 'much better than most' rating for both Impreza and Forester. The only set back is the rear seat room but fortunately for me I have only 2 kids that are 3 and 9. If you have 3 teens that are 6' tall, I'd say buy a Ford Five Hundred, Toyota Avalon, or Hyundai Azera. ;)

    Safety and dependability combo is on the top of my list! :)

    GO SUBIE! :P
  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    'd have to agree with you. When we were shopping for a car for my wife, my personal preference was the Mazda6. We ended up buying an Accord EX-L 5 speed. The wife just liked the feel of the Honda better. That, and the fact you could get heated seats with the 4 cylinder. Kudos to Honda for being able to order a fully loaded car and still get a stick.

    You CAN get a 6 with 4-cyl, manual AND heated seats. All you need is leather seats.
  • jeffyscottjeffyscott Member Posts: 3,855
    Exactly why I bought a Mazda 6 in '04 and haven't looked back since!

    I'm guessing you have a gray one, mz6greyghost? That is the color I intend to get sometime in the next year, after finishing paying off my wife's car and paying the last of my daughter's college tuition (or when the old minivan I am driving dies, if that should occur first).
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Hummm? Fusion is good, but far from the best interiors. Really doubt is will last as long, and be squeak free over time, as say an Accord. I would rate it adequate, as in would not consider it a negative in a the buying decision. I do think they could lower the car a bit, and get the big butt end down lower. Looks nearly as tall as some SUV or something back there.
    -Loren
This discussion has been closed.