By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I just looked up their test of the Mazda3 manual, and "giantkiller" is correct ... the Corolla XRS manual IS faster 0-60 and in the quarter-mile.
But that doesn't mean it's not a boring, ugly-looking car!
Meade
Corolla XRS manual transmission:
0-60: 7.1
Mazda3s manual transmission hatchback:
0-60 7.4
Face the facts. Manual vs. Manual. Apples to apples. CHEW ON THAT. That's hardly "beating the hell out of".
Also----the sedan is lighter than the hatch, so it should be a little quicker than 7.4.
Once again, you IGNORE the fact that the Motortrend comparo used an automatic Mazda3 and a manual Corolla.
Ford ZX4 ST/manual with 151HP@5750RPM and 145lb-ft@ 4250RPM with a curb weight of 2803lbs
Cobalt LS/manual with 145HP@5600RPM and 155lb-ft@4000RPM with a curb weight of 2853lbs.
Will Masda 3/manual/sedan post better times than the Focus ZX4 and/or Cobalt LS?
I gave you the 0-60 figure for the MANUAL transmission Mazda3 hatchback (which is heavier than the sedan), so you can answer that question yourself.
And the Gave the Corolla XRS 7.6 seconds
And Mazda3s 7.5 (with Manual)
Toyota Corolla XRS
Mazda3 s