Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Pete McGullam, Long Island, NY
a. The VCM does not make a significant difference
b. People disagree wildly about the real world MPG with some saying they only get less than 15 around town and others saying they get around 19.
c. QUESTION: Are people here saying the 2007 actually gets WORSE mpg than the 2006 or 2005?
Thanks for any info -- pretty sold on the Ody, just want to know what we can expect or be disappointed in relating to real world MPG.
Search the EPA site at http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/sbs.htm
For example the 2007 Odyssey without VCM rates 16 MPG city 23 hwy, combined 18.
The 2006 without VCM rates 17 city 23 hwy, combined 19.
With VCM, the 2007 is also rated lower than the 2006.
What will you, the prospective buyer get? If you get below EPA rating in you old car, the Odyssey will probably also be below. Maybe more below EPA rating since the Odyssey is so heavy. In city driving, weight and frequent accelerating from stop lowers MPG. Odyssey tries to compensate for low MPG in city driving by having the engine turn very slowly when cruising at constant speed to raise MPG. If you do not cruise at a constant speed, MPG will be influenced more by weight when accelerating than cruising at slow engine speed.
Odometer Reading: 12 - 341 miles (24.3MPG, 25% local)
Odometer Reading: 341 - 669 miles (24.4MPG, 25% local)
Odometer Reading: 669 - 960miles (27.1MPG, 100% highway with a couple of breaks)
My '06 gets in the 20's up to 27+ once in awhile on an interstate trip, but driving with traffic. YMMV
I drive very frugally, accelerating so the tranny shifts between 2000rpm and no higher than 2500rpm. Accelerating gently also helps in keeping the VCM active, especially when in overdrive.
I'm hoping that gas milage will improve over time since my rountrip to work is 60 miles. I fill up once every 6 days and it currently costs me about $60 each tank (about $13 more than when I had my 2000 Accord LX 5-speed, where a tank lasted about 8 days).
Longer trips - 26 mpg.
We are pretty happy with the milage so far. Much better then our old Town & Country.
What folks have overlooked is they use a term 'highway' universally when there are so many variables that take Ody MPG from bad to really bad. I've heard claims of high-20's, downhill both ways, at 55, no cruise.
Besides the obvious tire inflation issue there are two big and one small variable worth mentioning. How fast do you call 'highway'? The Ody is no drag coefficient champ and every 5 MPH over 65 seems to cut 1 MPG off in 30K miles of '06 Touring driving (not in a row). It doesn't really cut through the air, just beats it into submission thus the steeply increasing penalty above legal speeds. I often cruise at 82 and get 20-21. Dropping to 70 makes me doze off but the instant MID MPG indicator (not used in my refuel to refuel computations) jumps between 20 and 28 then. That transitions to my second point of how well and by what method you hold your speed. Ours and other VCM equipped Ody's don't seem to do as well with cruise set. They spend too much time turning VCM on and off in response to terrain even though most of our FL driving is mighty flat. If you're like my wife and almost imperceptibly but constantly adjust throttle, you'll get much lower MPG than holding it rock steady regardless of terrain. That can be annoying as your speed will fluctuate in the name of economy. Bottom line is I can get 25 MPG if I live and die by the ECO light, never bust 70, let off the gas a mile before a red light, but who wants to? I'm not complaining, just noticing that collectively we're assuming the terms city and highway fit all driving styles and blame the product for variance.
Last variable is Rear A/C. Turn it off in no one is in back to maximize your mileage. This seems to make a diff or 1 or 2 MPG or perhaps just in my mind but the engine seems less burdened and the vehicle no longer has a bladder control problem in the process (owners know what I mean).
- Cheers
......that's interesting (if disappointing) news, as I plan to look real hard at the '08 Accord with VCM.
..appreciate your informative post here...
best, ez..
2007 Ody touring nav/res. Started trip with 1500miles on the odo. 2 adults/2 kids with a decent load of luggage. Air con on all the way there and back. Cruise control on for most of the drive.
22-24MPG AVG. In 70MPH zones the average was 22-23MPG. In several long (100 mile+) 65 zones average was 23-24MPG.
These numbers are spot on the new 2008 standards.
May improve with more engine time but IMO adds to the argument that IF YOU KEEP YOUR SPEED DOWN YOU SHOULD GET DECENT MPG!
...especially from a car with a high Cd, air, new, loading et al........
(New AV6 gets VCM soon; my fuel-efficient, fast '05 coupe is imperiled............)
..thanks, ez..
I think you are right on this subject. I have an 06 without the VCM and was getting 17.5 MPG city and 25.5 on the highway. Since I have read some of the comments on this thread I have turned off the rear A/C and corrected my air pressure in the tires and now getting 20 MPG in the city. I do feel sorry for the guys getting 14 to 15 MPG because I think they must have a bigger problem.
Doug
I do not seem to have this issue on our model. I took a trip out to Idaho from CT and we were able to keep the ECO light on a lot using the cruise control at 80mph while going across NE and WY.
I do not seem to have this issue on our model. I took a trip out to Idaho from CT and we were able to keep the ECO light on a lot using the cruise control at 80mph while going across NE and WY.
....k, your CT - ID trip with the ECO lite on a lot: was your fuel economy anything special? 2008 Accord and VCM a possibility. 3 cyl fuel economy on a lighter vehicle merits some attention.
best, ez..
My brother-in-law followed me back to Elgin on his 02 Chevy Tahoe and I had to stop about 7 or 8 times so he could fill up his Tahoe. I don't think I ever got below half a tank of gas and while he was putting over $50 of gas every time we stopped, I was putting half of that in our van.
I like the cylinder deactivation feature on our van and if you change your driving habits a little to take advantage of this feature, you can get pretty good fuel mileage on the highway.
The sticker reads 19MPG city and 26highway. Factor in "real world" driving, I figured I would get ~17 city and ~22highway. For the first 1500 miles, we were getting 13/14MPG city and 17/18highway (with a roof rack). Our old Suzuki XL-7 got 16MPG city and 18 highway (with the same exact roof rack). This is terrible. This is worse than the the 4wheel drive SUV we got rid of.
Finally decided to take the roof rack off. After about 500 miles, we now get 15MPG city and 19highway. This is still terrible. FYI...I constantly check the tire pressure and it is @ 35psi cold / 38psi hot.
I agree with someone else's comment that city driving will be different for each of us, but if you live in the same city and drive the same (style) way and the Ody is rated to get better MPG than the vehicle you replaced, then it SHOULD get better MPG not worse.
I love everything else about the Ody, but the MPG is just bad. Maybe we (the ones that are not getting good mpg) should all get together and file a class action lawsuit. Just a thought.
Are you thinking the VSA button is for the VCM (Variable Cylinder Management)?
Please explain.
We got mileage anywhere between 19.5 to 26 on the freeway. (If the display was accurate).
The most amusing thing I found out after we got back I did a test loop and confirmed what I had began to notice while on the trip. I did a 30 mile loop at 55 MPH and got 19.5 MPG and then did the same loop at 70 – 75 and got 24.4 MPG. The loop was all freeway and mostly flat, the cruise was used for the most part.
It seems our Odyssey doesn’t like to go slow?
Has anyone else noticed this? It seems to maybe lug at the lower RPM.
We are pleased with it.
My around town, to and from school (country roads) is about 15 MPG average, so we are planning to limit the Odyssey use to when we need it for 3 or more passengers and when the trip is a little longer than 10 min. away. We want to use it where it’s most valuable, moving masses of people long distance in comfort.
So far we love our Odyssey, I have owned a van before (Chevy full size) and driven several others that belonged to my Dad and Brother, but have never enjoyed the actual driving experience before the Honda.
Great stereo and navigation, it was almost worth the price of admission just for that.
We took another road trip from Cincinnati to Columbus last night and we managed to get 25 MPG on the return trip with the cruise set at 70 MPH.
I also notice that if I increase speed to 80 MPH that the mileage begins to drop off.
We’re taking the van back to the dealer on Monday to have a towing package installed, I’m going to mention it to them and see what kind of response I get.
Has anyone done extensive testing to see if the computerized trip average MPG readout is correct? I have only did an actual old fashion mileage test on one tank of mixed driving and the overall computer mileage readout was within one MPG on that tank.
It is kind weird, when I first drop from 70 to 55 and reset the computer we will show good mileage of around 26-28 for 1 or 2 miles then over the next few miles it will make a steady drop to 16-19 and stay there as long as I maintain 55.
If there is someone out there with a 2007 touring, and you have the time and opportunity to duplicate the 70 then 55 MPH test I would really appreciate it. Be sure and let it run 55 for 5 or 6 miles. (Try not to get run over)
(Thanks for the feedback)
i imagine the characteristic as a bell-curve / normal distribution. beyond some speed, the MPG will go down.
don't spend too much time looking at the short-term MPG estimate from an onboard computer.
break the vehicle in properly, and for MPG estimates, use the manual calculation technique with highway driving.
We are in 5th gear for sure; I checked that, under moderate acceleration it shifts into 5th at about 48-50 MPH... Engine is at about 1550 or 1600 RPM at 55 MPH.
It may be that Honda just figures nobody drives 55 anyway, so maybe it’s just tuned for the sweet spot of horsepower to fuel at around 2000 RPM.
I routinely drive the loop to and from the elementary school to pick up my kids. It's about 6 miles there and 6 miles back. Starting at home with a warmed up car in the middle of summer I can only get about 15.0 mpg as reported by the car on this loop. There are a grand total of 2 stop signs on the way there and two on the way back. Most of the driving is coasting along country roads at 45-50 mph. In comparison, if I drive the Yukon (EPA 12/15,ouch) I'm able to get about 13.8 mpg. The yukon weighs about 6400lbs, has a 6.0L V8 and full-time AWD. Just for giggles and grins I even made sure to crank the rear air in the Yukon for an apples to apples comparison. So, the yukon is exceeding it's EPA City rating by 15% on this loop. If the Ody exceeded it's EPA City rating of 19, I'd expect about 21.85 mpg on this loop.
It's amazing to me that the Ody (3.5L, VCM, FWD, 4500lbs) can't get 10% better fuel economy than the Yukon running the same route under the same conditions. To me that indicates that there's something not quite right with this car. I already need to take it in to the dealer for something else, so I intend to bring this up while I am there. I'll be interested to see what they have to say about it.
I wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea, we love our new van, and if we have to go 72.5 instead of 55 miles an hour to get some good mileage, that OK with me.
Like I said in an earlier post, this van likes to go fast.
I would really like to hear what all you find out.
I have gotten <20 MPG less than a half a dozen times on 4 different ODYs. These poor folks who are getting in the low teens, there really must be something awry somewhere.
It appears the trip computer is incorrect, at least for this trip. I will do more testing and let everyone know how things turn out.
I think I may try a short trip and just drive in a fun sort of way (step on it a little) and see how far south the mileage drops.
Folks, this is a van, not a sedan. Try to fit 7 people in a sedan...
This is how I do it: Reset the trip computer, fill the tank. Call it the starting point.
Fill gas in increments of 10-15 gallons at a time. Do not reset the trip meter. Remember how many gallons you have filled in.
When you've completed 1,200+ miles, then fill up the gas to the max, notice how many total gallons you have added so far, notice the total miles driven, and do the computation.
'hope this helps. Thanks.
As they say in the software industry, the bad mileage is a feature.