BMW 3-Series Run Flat Tires

1131416181962

Comments

  • igglesiggles Member Posts: 11
    I followed up on e90post.com, and someone posted a link to the service bulletin:

    http://www.bmwtis.com/tsb/bulletins/bulletin_graphic_temp/B360606g.htm

    I wonder if I'm eligible for any sort of reimbursement. If anyone is in similar situation (paid for your own replacement recently), please let us know.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Excellent posts!

    I had over 12K miles and my dealer absorbed all costs for switch to Conti SSR's.

    Thank you!

    Regards,
    OW
  • imran62781imran62781 Member Posts: 26
    Did you go to the link above, print out that information, and then your dealer agreed to replace the tires? What did you have to do to actually get this free of cost, esp since you were over 10K miles?
  • actualsizeactualsize Member Posts: 451
    The interesting part to me is how the TSB stresses that "Bridgestone, when available, will be used for replacement." Immediately following are two Turanza EL42 part numbers to be used as replacements.

    This implies that the EL42 has, as rumors have suggested, been re-developed to eliminate the problem. But no explicit confirmation of this is contained in the TSB text link.

    Still, based on my time in the industry, re tuning the construction of a tire is entirely expected in a case such as this. If BMW have gone as far as a TSB and dealer reimbursement, you can bet they've fixed the unusual wear/noise problem in the tire if they are still using it.

    But as to the general discussion on the relative merits/demerits of RFTS, nothing has really changed. Sure, these presumably "new" EL42s could ride a bit better than the old ones, but its going to be hard to know until someone who makes the switch under this TSB reports in.

    Twitter: @Edmunds_Test

  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    I sent an e-mail stating my dissatisfaction with the noise and ride to the sales rep that sold me the car. She said she would forward it to the service team who then called me to explain my problem. They asked how many miles I had on the car and then told me they would contact me later that day.

    The service rep called back and told me that they had similar complaints with the EL42 and that they would change the tires at no cost to me to continental run flats.

    The sales rep called me back to make sure I had made an appointment for the change!!!

    Regards,
    OW
  • owner6owner6 Member Posts: 89
    I just received my second set of replacement Tires from my dealer. My 1st replacement set was EL42's old rubber. Free but had all the same problems. Two weeks ago I received a replacement set of Continental ContiProContact RFT. They charged me half price of $430.00. I pushed for a second free set however since I insisted on the Conties, BMW NA offered 1/2 price or no deal. I drove to Florida the day after the tires were replaced and what a difference. Like a BMW Should Be. I put it through many gruesome tests including the Sky Land Drive parkway in Virginia. I experienced the same favorable driving as Highland Pete. Ill keep you all posted as I accumulate more miles.

    Its just so SAD that I had to put up with 20 Months of hell on Bridgestone.
    Owner6.
  • lipplipp Member Posts: 58
    I took the 50% deal 10,000 miles ago on the Conti's and it was the best move I made. At that time I had 20,000 miles on the Bridgestones and I wouldn't take a new set if they were free. I really hope they changed the compound, the design or whatever was necessary to improve the tire. Has anyone found anything in print indicating that Bridgestone actually changed the tire to eliminate the problem?
  • skobolaskobola Member Posts: 207
    Has anyone replaced the Bridgestones with the same, but supposedly "improved" Bridgestones. It seems to me that all of the above people who replaced them did replace them with Contis. Not that I would prefer to have Bridgestones, I am just trying to see what to do, if I will get any options for replacements anyway, which I doubt as BMW dealers in Miami are not very user-friendly. By the way, I have only 6700 miles, and sometimes my Bridgestones are pretty quiet, but on some roads they buzz uncomfortably loudly... still no helicopter sounds, though. Thanks in advance.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    skobola, rotate your tires now to prevent early helicopter sound.
  • webby1webby1 Member Posts: 209
    Shipo,

    Do you ( or anyone ) know if you can put reg tires on wheels that RFT tires came with ?
    According to my dealer you can not .
    That means new set of wheels and tires ?!
    I hope the dealer is wrong.

    Thanks and Regards
    Webby
  • actualsizeactualsize Member Posts: 451
    Do you ( or anyone ) know if you can put reg tires on wheels that RFT tires came with ?
    According to my dealer you can not .


    What the dealer is telling you is BS. Its more a case of will not than can not. Only cars that use Michelin's PAX run-flat system have a real physical/mechanical restriction. (If you BMW guys think you've got problems, take a peek at the Honda Odyssey RFT discussion.)

    Normal RFTs as found on BMWs use rims that have a standard bead profile which can accept any tire. Or to say it another way, RFT beads are shaped the same as GFTs, and a rim that can accept one will also accept the other.

    Twitter: @Edmunds_Test

  • imran62781imran62781 Member Posts: 26
    1. there is no doubt that the damn tires have a problem and have caused a lot of stress to the owners

    2. i do have a question about the whole road noise thing though. don't you guys listen to music? thats all i do, maybe thats why i can't hear sh*t. also, i have never owned a bmw before so i'm not really sure what impact these tires have on making it a harsh drive.

    3. at this point i think our posts should be all about the bridgestone refund link that somebody posted here. who tried to show this to the dealer and was succesful? how did you do it? information that will help us fix this problem and not really get into Lexus, Avalon's etc.....
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    2. i do have a question about the whole road noise thing though. don't you guys listen to music?

    Rarely have the radio on. Prefer silence. Until this football season I had never used my car's radio to listen to over-the-air transmissions as I have an ipod connected in the car.

    The harshness is readily apparent on a bad road. My 2003 with 18s would get jostled by bad roads but my 2006 with RFTs would bounce!
  • eds1325ieds1325i Member Posts: 1
    Has anyone had success in a legal Action against BMW USA or a BMW Dealer?

    BMW USA is not willing to stand behind the reason why tires are cuppimg and howling.

    Thanks,
    eds1325i
  • sborchmansborchman Member Posts: 8
    we bought a bmw 3 series last april my husband wanted the sport package. we had no idea that these new tires were going to be such a problem. i want him to replace them i don't care that we can't have a spare. any suggestions as to what tires would make a good replacement.. cost is not the problem. just as long as the tires can go with this sop called sports suspension
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Uh, RFTs come on all 3 series cars, so the sport suspension has nothing to do with it. Visit TireRack.com, enter your car, package and they will list about 37 brands of tires. From there it's entirely up to you what to get.

    I'd suggest a continental tire kit for emergencies, like flats.
  • webby1webby1 Member Posts: 209
    What car do you have and what size wheels ?
    Regards,
    Webby
  • webby1webby1 Member Posts: 209
    "sport suspension has nothing to do with it"

    It does not ???

    Regards,

    Webby
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    RFTs run rough, regardless of the suspension. By design RFTs do not absorb potholes or impacts.
  • webby1webby1 Member Posts: 209
    What difference is there between std and sport suspension ...your feeling ?
    I drove the basic 335i 4dr sedan with RFT contis grand tour touring tires and suspension felt just right for me.
    Drove the 335i coupe with Bridgestone tires and 18" wheels with sport suspension and it felt like a old truck with damaged suspension....made a U turn after 100 meters and returned the vehicle.
    Tomorrow I am testing a 335i 4 dr with sprt suspension.
    It feels really nice to go back to my 330i after test driving 335i's. The turbo engine is great but the engine in 330i is so smoooooth!
    Still 50/50 re getting the 2007 335i sedan
    Thinking of 335i sedan with sport suspension, 18 wheels , sport seats, and dumping RFT for reg tires.
    Regards
    Webby
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    I replaced EL42's at 12K miles with Conti's from my dealer. The Conti's are excellent so far in the first 2K miles. They do absorb some of the shock from significant bumps way better than the Bridgestones and are as quiet as GFT's (I repeat "So Far!").

    These tires are definately an upgrade to the original EL42's before they modified the rubber (est. mid 2006)

    My 330Xi has no sport suspension (not offered).

    Regards,
    OW
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    Disagree about the rough running. The RE050s give a smoother ride than the all seasons I've been used to, especially the EL42 GFTs on my Acura TL. What they don't give is the same level of impact absorption. Now the LM22s I have on for winter are a little on the rough and brawny side, but in our light, dry, snow so far, I've been pleased on the neighborhood hill. I want to see how the car does in a good 8" icy fall. The true tests are stability and not getting stuck. I saw E46s, a C-Series and a Crown Vic embarrass themselves over the last couple of years on a shallow incline, while our Malibu, great in the snow and, incidentally, with no ABS or traction control, pulled past effortlessly.
  • owner6owner6 Member Posts: 89
    See my Post # 774. I had about 15,000 miles on my second set of bridgestones (they were a free replacement for the originals. My 3rd set is Conti's under the replacement plan.

    So far they are a BIG change from my EL42's.
    Owner6
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    I drove the basic 335i 4dr sedan with RFT contis grand tour touring tires and suspension felt just right for me.
    Drove the 335i coupe with Bridgestone tires and 18" wheels with sport suspension and it felt like a old truck with damaged suspension....made a U turn after 100 meters and returned the vehicle.


    so you want a car with a soft suspension. to each his own. I feel sick when riding in a non-sport equipped BMW or pretty much any car with a soft suspension.

    The e92 coupe comes with the sport suspension, I believe. So really, the only difference would be the seats and tires on the coupe with sport package.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    I just had a 2007 Malibu GTZ as a rental car this weekend. How GM can sell cars like that is beyond me. People must demand very little of their vehicles.
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    For $13K after GM, dealer, and card discounts, I demanded that mine have reasonable power, good transmission, reasonable CD player and stereo, strong A/C (manual single zone much preferable to my BMW's). The car is built like a tank -- I'd think nothing of driving it any weather while the transmission, ignition coils, window mechanisms, glove box door, front bodywork and electrical system were failing in sequence on my GTi.
  • owner6owner6 Member Posts: 89
    What dont you like about the Turbo Engine compared to the 330i.
    I also have a 330i and plan to test the 335, however the dealers around here dont have a 335 coupe. They are sold as soon as they are driven off the delivery truck. There are waiting lists in the greater Baltimore/Washington area for the coupes.
    Owner6
  • webby1webby1 Member Posts: 209
    "so you want a car with a soft suspension. to each his own. I feel sick when riding in a non-sport equipped BMW or pretty much any car with a soft suspension."

    I guess it depends on what you consider soft suspension.
    My 330i 2004 std suspension feels just right for me....but then again I like auto tranny now after many yrs of driving manual.
    Regards,
    Webby
  • webby1webby1 Member Posts: 209
    I do like the 335i engine but it has a little lag....salesman tells me that it does get better with more miles. It reminds a bit of my '69 GTO many yrs ago....power that is.
    I guess it depends on how much power do you want/need ?
    Perhaps owners of 335i can comment if the engine performance changes with more miles ?

    Regards,
    Webby
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    BMWs tend to "loosen" up as you break 10k miles. Hard to explain but the past two inline 6s i've had from BMW did the same thing at 10k+: suddenly the engine revs more smoothly, easily. Others with BMWs tend to report the same phenomenon.
  • toonstoons Member Posts: 13
    I am one of the BMW owner, who has to replace the two front tires just yesterday. My car is a one-year-old 325i with 17000 miles.

    I was told that the tires are "feathering" and I had to replace them. The dealer offers to pay 50% of the tires, so I will end up paying one tires plus labor, which comes to $260.

    Unfortunately, I learned about numurous Bridgestones RFT problem today, and didn't have a chance to ask the dealer, what kind of tires they are giving me.

    Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    17k on a set of tires and you're getting new ones for half off? My god, I'd be dancing the jig.
  • toonstoons Member Posts: 13
    Well! at this time I don't know what kind of tires I am getting yet. They could give me the same Bridgestones RFT, which could still give me the same problem again.

    I'll pick up the car tomorrow. Should I try to pursue to ask for something like Continental Conti RFT?
  • steveinvtsteveinvt Member Posts: 17
    I am very close to picking up a 328xi coupe. Here in northern Vermont, snowtires are a must. What I am wondering is whether folks recommend run flats for the snow tires and, if so, what brand.

    Also, I will likely have to get a set of winter rims for the car. Can I go down to 16 inch without too much pain?

    Thoughts and advice most appreciated!!
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Good news, 16s will not only fit your car perfectly well, they are the preferred tire and wheel size for winter time operations. I just checked and TireRack has a set that can be built for less than $800 (shipping and taxes extra). If you know someone over here in New Hampshire you can have the set shipped there and even skip the taxes. ;-)

    FWIW, a second set of alloy wheels for your car is only $340, and you'll easily burn that in twice per year mounting and balancing charges should you decide to stay with your factory wheels.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    My 325i has Bridgestone LM22 runflats on 16" ASA rims from TireRack. Ask for BMW logos for the wheels when you order. The rims look good on the car and so far have handled light snow well, black ice not bad.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    toons, I have the Conti's with about 2kmiles so far. The quietness is deafening! I would check with the dealer but I assume you will need to wait until delivery to see the brand.

    I heard that Bridgestone changed the rubber compound for the EL42's.
  • jbrock22jbrock22 Member Posts: 18
    I have the ASA 16" wheels w/LM-22 run flats. So far smooth good handling.But no snow this season so far.If interested I have OEM BMW #156 wheels perfect cond. for sale if you prefer over non stock wheels.
  • toonstoons Member Posts: 13
    Thanks!

    I picked up the car today, and they gave me the Bridgestones Turanza again. The explaination I got was it's their protocol and would not give me something else.

    I did try to explain to the technician about how Bridgestones tires are the problem, but he said that he cannot do anything beyond what's in the protocol and he cann't speak for BMWNA.

    I asked what if the new set tires have the same problem again, but then this time my car will go over 20000 miles. He said that now I have to pay 100% for the tires. Nothing He can do. Great!
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    Shipo, are you using H-rated winter performance tires or full Q-rated snow tires (REVO or equivalent)?
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    I debated about going with the H-rated winter rubber, however, the lower rated tires had better traction characteristics. I reasoned that I'd need good traction more often that I'd need to do in excess of 100 mph and opted for the Michelin Arctic-Alpin tires (which have since been replaced by the X-Ice in the Michelin product line).

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    I picked up the car today, and they gave me the Bridgestones Turanza again. The explaination I got was it's their protocol and would not give me something else.

    I got the same line from my Acura dealer when I tried to swap from EL42s to Michelins. With that car, the dealer had nothing good to say about the EL42, and recommended changing brands at the first replacement. But no luck with them either. Bridgestone must have engineered some very close relationships with the car manufacturers. The retail prices are certainly high enough.
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    If I had had the option of a Q rated runflat full snow tire, I would have gone with it.
  • steveinvtsteveinvt Member Posts: 17
    Guys,

    Thanks for the advice. Will definitely look into the Bridgestones with 16" ASA rims.
  • toonstoons Member Posts: 13
    I heard from somebody in this forums that Bridgestone supposedly changed the chemical compound for the EL 42 so we'll have to wait and see how it performs for the next 10k or so.

    The other thing was when I asked the technician about rotation of tires. He said that BMW does not recommend it. But he said that the tire manufacturer all do recommend it. I asked him what should I do. I didn't get a straight answer from him.

    Anybody with any input?
  • capriracercapriracer Member Posts: 907
    ".....Anybody with any input?......."

    BMW's recommendation is based on handling concerns. The tire manufacturers' recommendations are based on wear concerns.

    So the answer depends on what you want to have - good handling or good wear - you can't have both.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Assuming that you don't have an SP equipped "i" model (which have an entirely different set of reasons for not rotating), rotating (even cointrary to BMWs recommendation) is perfectly acceptable.

    In my case, while I never tracked my 530i, I did lean on it pretty good. With that in mind, my experience of rotating my tires is that IF there was a handling difference, it was so very slight (and short lived as the tires wore in for their new position on the car) that it wasn't noticeable. I suggest rotating.

    Said another way, I am a very definite fan of SP equipped BMWs, unfortunately, virtually every "i" model SP package from the factory now comes with staggered wheel and tire sizes (my 530i SP was possibly the last exception from this rule). Were I to go out and fetch a new 3er or 5er with the uprated suspension, I would also invest in at least a set of new rear wheels and go to the same tire size all around. Why? Simply to allow me to rotate my tires.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Shipo, when will you be in the market for a new car? If you go for a 3er or 5er (I believe you mentioned the wagon for more room back a few posts)and will you keep run flats or go for the RFT's? Since I know you prefer GFT's and snows, that would be a rather large investment in rubber.

    Regards,
    OW
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    "Shipo, when will you be in the market for a new car?"

    Hmmm, when will I be in the market for a new car? Tough call. As of last November when my (then) current contract was ending I was looking forward to finding a new assignment a little closer to home and thus changing the economics of a new car back into my favor. Prior that that contract I'd driven between ten and fifteen thousand miles per year for some twenty years, and so leasing new cars (through my business) was an easy decision. Coincidentally, the lease on my 530i ended just as that contract was about to begin, and given that it was only a six month gig, I opted to drive our old spare car for the duration and wait on the new car. Turns out that was a good decision as the contract lasted seventeen months, during which time I bumped the mileage on our old car (a 1998 Dodge Grand Caravan 3.8) from about 86,000 to just over 130,000. Yikes, 44,000 miles in seventeen months, I haven't driven that many miles in that period of time since I put 72,000 miles on my 1979 Scirocco in twenty-two months back in 1980 and 1981.

    So, come January this year I started looking for another contract and wouldn't you know it, I ended up accepting an offer from a different division of the same company I'd just left. This new assignment has me once again driving about the same number of miles as before, not good for my new car prospects. To make matters worse, they are moving to a different building this September, a move that will tack ANOTHER fifty miles per day to my commute. With the prospect of accruing an easy 45,000 miles per year staring me in the face, I'm back to a plan that I cooked up a year ago or so, namely to shop for a deal on a low mileage/good condition 2000 528i 5-Speed with PP, SP and the "M" interior as my minimum set of requirements. These cars are fairly rare, however, at any given point I usually can find a few for sale, typically for ~$16,000 with ~70,000 miles on the clock.

    Assuming I don't scare up a better paying contract closer to home in the near future, this looks like a much more viable option for me as I figure that a car such as that can be fairly easily pushed to a quarter of a million miles without too much difficulty.

    To your other questions:

    "If you go for a 3er or 5er (I believe you mentioned the wagon for more room back a few posts) and will you keep run flats or go for the RFT's? Since I know you prefer GFT's and snows, that would be a rather large investment in rubber."

    Hmmm, assuming I go for a 328iT SP, I have a couple of options for the summer rubber, and both would cost about the same (although I'd probably get 10,000 to 15,000 miles out of the OEM set first, taking them down to ~6mm of tread depth, enough to send back at end of lease).

    Option 1: Find two 17 x 8 Style 161 wheels via E-Bay or Craig's List (probably cost about $500-$600) to be used for the rear of the car. Then I would pull the rear wheels and the two front tires and mount something like a set of 225/45 ZR17 Kumho ECSTA ASX GFTs at all four corners (235/45 ZR17s are an option too). Total cost (including the necessary mounting and balancing): ~$1,100.

    Option 2: Buy something like a set of 17 x 8 ASA AR1 wheels for $676 or the Rial Combo wheels (which kind of look like the Style 161s) in the same size for $596 and wrap them with the same tires from above. Total cost (no mounting and balancing charges here at all): ~$1,100.

    The second option is probably my best bet as it saves me from paying for a couple of mountings and balancings, and I like both sets of wheels as much as the OEM wheels. In either case, since I won't have to buy a new set of worn out factory RFT rubber (at about $1,000 per set), the cost of the new wheels and tires will be a wash.

    For the winter set, tires that I'll need to buy whether I opt for the old 528i or a new 328iT, I'd probably opt for a cheap set of 16 x 7 Sport Edition F6 wheels for $340 and a set of 205/55 R16 Michelin X-Ice tires for $408 giving me a total of about $800 with shipping. Given that if I simply stayed with the factory rubber year round I'd probably need to buy a third set of the expensive RFTs, this set of tires will pay for itself too.

    The thing is, if I opt for "Option 2" for the summer rubber and buy the winter set as well, I'll end up with two complete sets of wheels and tires on my hands when the lease ends. Since those sets will have been completely paid for by virtue of the fact that I was able to send the car back with the actual wheels and tires it was built with, I effectively got them for free. Of course they still have value, and I would certainly be willing to sell them via Craig's List. In the end I suspect that I will actually SAVE about a thousand dollars by spending about two thousand dollars up front. Go figure.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • jfdiamondjfdiamond Member Posts: 6
    I finally got "approval" from my dealer to change out my el 42's (with 10,800 miles on them) with Conti's. Drove 200+ miles on them last night -- the car finally feels as it should. I am amazed at the difference and delighted with the way the car now drives. I encountered dry pavement, rain, then snow, then A LOT OF SNOW (drove to the Catskill Mountains in New York from New York City). There has been discussion between Shipo and others about Winter rubber vs. Summer rubber. I was pleasantly surprised with the performance of the new Conti's in the snow. Granted, there was only 2-4" of precipitation, we passed dozens of cars spun-off the parkway.

    For those still wrestling with the dealers to pay for the swap, here is the process I went through and hope this helps others get rid of the bridgestone's:

    *The dealer has to call the BMW NA territory "rep" to get approval as well as a bill-back code for the "faulty tires"
    *Once this is done, the dealer of your choice can then get full reimbursement for the work from BMW NA
    *The total invoice was $1,280, of which, I paid $0

    Good luck...and for anyone teetering about whether or not to make the switch to another set of RFT's, I say "go for it" and happy driving.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.