Nissan Sentra SE-R & SE-R Spec V
SE-R and SE-R Spec V are returning to the Sentra model offerings. Both models will be announced on November 29th at the LA Auto Show.
What are your thoughts?
press release quote-
All-new for 2007, the Nissan Sentra will once again have SE-R high performance models; both SE-R and SE-R Spec V. As a pioneer model in the field of sport compact cars, the 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R offers more power, performance and technology to this highly acclaimed model. The SE-R Spec V model will be powered by a specifically designed high-output version of Nissan’s 2.5-liter DOHC 4-cylinder engine. Additional information on the SE-R with be announced at the LA Auto Show on November 29th.
-end
What are your thoughts?
press release quote-
All-new for 2007, the Nissan Sentra will once again have SE-R high performance models; both SE-R and SE-R Spec V. As a pioneer model in the field of sport compact cars, the 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R offers more power, performance and technology to this highly acclaimed model. The SE-R Spec V model will be powered by a specifically designed high-output version of Nissan’s 2.5-liter DOHC 4-cylinder engine. Additional information on the SE-R with be announced at the LA Auto Show on November 29th.
-end
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Spec V
200 HP
17" wheels
6 speed manual
limited slip
177 HP for the SE-R
"The last great component of the new 2007 Sentra SE-R is price. We're targeting a price of around $20,000 for the Sentra SE-R Spec V - which means 200 horsepower for $20K - which we believe makes SE-R Spec V one of the best values in the sport compact segment," said Bosley. "This new Sentra SE-R has a lot to offer even the most demanding enthusiasts. It'll be a thrill to drive, right out of the box."
-end
The pricing is fair.
It would've been pretty sweet if the Spec V came in a track model trim where it comes with extra light weight racing wheels like 16 inchers, no sunroof, no sound-deadening materials to lighten it up, power windows up front only and manual ones on the back to save weight and lower the cost, standard Brembo brakes which I think all the Spec V comes this way, let it weigh in around 2,700 lbs., all for around 18,000. That would be a modern day Type R killer with monster torque.
the 0-60 in the article says 7.1 Seconds... the same as the si
the 1/4 mile says 15.3 seconds at 93.3 mph... si was 15.3 sec at 93 mph
im not an expert, but a .3 mph lead in the 1/4 mile isn't exactly smoking the si...
6.7 seconds 0-60 mph is stated for the Spec V not the 7.1 seconds for Si.
the title of the article about the se-r today insinuates that it could "smoke" an si...
the 0-60 in the article says 7.1 Seconds... the same as the si
the 1/4 mile says 15.3 seconds at 93.3 mph... si was 15.3 sec at 93 mph
im not an expert, but a .3 mph lead in the 1/4 mile isn't exactly smoking the si...
And losing is losing.....
.4 of a second. Whoopee. And the quarter mile was .1 behind. And it was clocked going faster. its a wash.
by the way, they've edited the article since my post... now the numbers (though still far from "smokin") are more indicitave of a faster time for the sentra. i think they might have mistakenly posted the wrong performance numbers yesterday.
The times are EXACTLY the same as when they were first posted. They have not been edited.
The PROOF that they were not edited is that I posted the 1/4" mile time from the test in the post BEFORE yours and my posted time is still correct and unchanged while yours is still incorrect.
All I can say is that if people will not be truthful about small things and blame them on others, then .......... well, you can come to your own conclusion.
I'm disappointed with the handling results. I'd rather have the car slower and have it drive well than have the car fastest in a straight line.
The Sentra is a bit too heavy also.
1992 SE-R
1997 SE-R
EJ
1992 SE-R (track duty)
1997 SE-R (smokes B15's daily)
I think if Nissan would come out with a two door Sentra like the Azzeal concept and lightened it up quite a bit perhaps make it weigh in around 2700 lbs., gave it a more aggressive looking fascia, and stiffened up the suspension even more, it would sell pretty well with the new hardware.
I'd say the same thing if the si got slightly better numbers; a lot has to do with the driver, but it simply is not that big of a difference.
I like the se-r, just don't like the _____is crap kinda comments.
I love se-rs's with the brembos, even peformance aside, they look sick.
V-teck kicking in? Not the case with the newer i-vtecs like in your old rsx. Its just that all the hp is up on the right side of the tach, hence the sluggishness.
Again i love the new ser just for the fact it is available with an auto. But i think i'd still take an si.
I am looking at buying the Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V to replace my current car, a 2004 Toyota Celica GT-S. The main reasons I'm getting rid of the Celica are the poor visibility and the lowness to the ground (I discovered that the sports car style doesn't always work for short people). I have a lot of trouble maneuvering it through tight spaces, because I just can't see out of the thing. My question is, how do you guys like the visibility on your Sentras? Are they easy to maneuver through tight spaces? I've taken a couple SE-R Spec Vs on test drives, but I wanted to get the opinions of people who live with these cars, day in and day out. Do you think the Sentra will solve my problems?
Thanks much!
Rick A.
Pleasanton CA
I put a Magnaflow highflow resonator and catback exhaust, and a K&N cold air intake on the car. This gave a bit more power, but I was still disappointed with the rough engine. I found that JETCHIPS had a performance upgrade for the Spec V ECM so of course I tried it.
It was kind of a pain to have to remove the ECM and mail it to Jet, but it was worth the wait! The Jet Chip turned this into a new car. The engine revs much more quickly and very noticeably smoother now. More power throughout the entire powerband, and a slight increase in mpg if you don't always have your foot in it.
This is the biggest difference in performance that I have ever experienced in any of the cars that I have modified. Granted, none were turbo or supercharged, but all had intakes and exhaust. I would highly recommend this upgrade, and of course it works better with an intake and exhaust. The chip was only $399 and it was worth every penny!
Jeff