Chevy Silverado 2500 LD vs 2500 HD 6.0 liter
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I got a 8600 Ado.....or a 9200 Ado..
Now it makes sense!
But yuppys gotta stay with a 1500.....so 1500HD it is...
- Tim
Ryan
2500's don't need Z71...as they already have beefed up everything!.....and skid plates are available...
I think the only thing not available are the jounce??bumpers.....big deal....a 2500 suspension isn't that sloppy....
whatever....I just look forward and buy what I want.....Like that HD I drove the other nite...
..Now how to get a 480E tranny with an 8.1....hmmmmm
- Tim
Why not build a two-speed rear end for the 2500HD?
Boy, that is a novel idea! Good mpg and it would be able to pull a load. In the current 2500HD Crew Cab with the 6.0 it comes standard with a 4.10 rear axle ratio. I have went round and round with the dealers trying to get GM to put a 3.73 in it but no luck...so that forces you into the 1500HD Crew Cab.
It it correct that the 2500HD is truly a 1-ton truck, not a 3/4 ton and that the 1500HD is a 3/4 ton truck. A 3/4 ton truck is an all around truck that is hard to beat, and chicks dig it and guys think your cool.
So, I think I will keep my 2500 emblem off of my 97 C-2500 and slap it on the new 1500HD (or buy GMC because I believe that they are not putting emblems on their trucks)
Adios'
Ryan
who knows?...perhaps I will have one..
it has a series of clinks and whines that are normal as I understand it..
it was a solid firm shift...and heated up very fast....but I like the feel of my 480 better
- Tim
There is a surprise!
- Tim
It didnt say 1500HD on the side of the truck it just had the regular 1500 badging.
Ryan
Crewcabs should be left for the bigger trucks
Ryan
- Tim
Im in such suspense
- Tim
If you need a crew cab and not alot of towing capacity or bed room my suggestion is get a burb or tahoe. Tahoes can carry 4x8 sheets of plywood pretty darn good and have the passeneger room also.
Thats just me though.
Ryan
No back seat necessary.
But how often is it really?
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
The avalanche would cure this problem....but it's too damn ugly for now
hmmmmmm
- Tim
Years ago the Japanese trucks were advertising they had 3/4 ton trucks. Technically they were right, their 3/4 tons carried 1500 lbs. While American 3/4 tons carried about 3500 lbs.
Could never understand why American manufactures shorted themselves.
I need a crew cab with a flip up seat like an extended cab!
- Tim
A crew cab with a topper on it is like a suburban with an 'unfinished basement'!
- Tim
John
I have driven the 8L/Allison and it is quite a bit slower than my existing truck but I guess at 64 I need to stop being a kid.
Thanks for any feedback! ........Al
Something I read somewhere also indicated the factory horsepower ratings for the 6 liter HD motor were extremely conservative. Sounds like the muscle car days of the 60s huh? I drove a 2500 HD ext cab short bed with the 6.0/automatic and it was a hotrod! Lots of ooompf but I ordered the 8.1 with a higher rear gear figuring to get towin oompf from the torque and let the rear gear even the mileage out.
Someone asked about dual catalytic converters on the new HD's. I don't know about all of them, but the Chevy brouchure shows a 3500 dually chassis and it does have dual converters. I think the engine was the 8.1 with the Allison. I have the 2500HD with a 6 liter and despite already doing one oil change at 1500 miles, didn't really look that closely at the exhaust. I will try to remember to look sometime. On the pictured 3500 dually, the pipes went in dual to one muffler but back out as a single.
The power numbers have varied on the 6 liter. Some say up to 325 h.p. on the 6 in the HD, others say 300 (same on the 2500 8600 GVWR trucks). One said the torque was up 10 ft lbs for the HD from 360 ft lbs. The 2001 Chevy brouchure says 300 h.p. for both but a GMC brouchure from last year's Chicago Auto show said 325 for the HD. Although, the Chevy brouchure did focus more on the new 8.1 liter and the Duramax diesel than the other engines. Go figure, the new Vortechs still tromp over the old 5.7 and 7.4 engines.
Randersen, I might look into those roof lights. I have always like the way roof lights look on a truck. We shall see. I think the first thing I will invest in will be a spray in liner. I would like to get a cap for it also but, I have a 2300lb (Dry weight) slide in camper that will go into the back of the truck--not all the time but, putting on and pulling off the shell to accomadate the camper will be to much of a headache. Also, maybe a Buell front step bumper with a 10,000lb Mile Marker winch ( I have to have something to go along with the skid plate package I got with the truck).
All the specs, etc. listed on the Chevy Silverado website are the same for the 2500 and the HD models.
Mike L
00 2500 4x4 6.0L 5spd 3.73
Deadhorse, Alaska 6-6-99
As for the Mile marker winch, just a caution here, but be prepared to add an auxiliary hydraulic pump if you want to run one of these. The stock power steering pump already provides hydraulic boost to both the steering and the brakes. The power brake booster is hydraulic rather than the conventional vacuum unit in the 1500's. I would have reservations about tapping into the stock pump for a third appliance, even if it was a rarely used winch? Just my thoughts?
Another way of getting around this is to pave my driveway. Then a winch wouldn't be necessary in the winter months (sometimes in the winter months) to get back and forth to my house.
Thanks,
John
I don't know very much about the boost system, so I can't answer your questions? You are certainly right that you wouldn't be doing much turning or braking during winching. And it seems reasonable that the system would have full pressure for just the winch in that case. It just seems to me that as you add more volume to the system, at some point you would need a larger pump to maintain the correct pressure? I would talk to Mile Marker about the whole situation, and get their advice? If they know that the system is providing boost to the steering, brakes, and the winch, and they think that is OK, than I'm sure it is.
Let me know what you find out from them. I was considering a mile marker also, until I thought about the pump situation. And in my case, I wanted the rear mount, so I would have added a bunch of volume to my system!
So, if you get in a situation where you can't run the engine (or it won't run) you can't winch at all, not even the little bit that might get you out.
But, I wouldn't worry about using the PS pump just because it also supplies the brakes. As the others have said, in a winching situation, you don't steer much, and you don't brake until you are done winching.
If you want to winch up a long hill or similar, the Mile Marker beats any electric winch hands down. It can winch forever without overheating.
Mike L
00 2500 4x4 6.0L 5 spd
Over the holidays, we went to Death Valley. Even 10-12 hours of 4wd low range didn't bring me below 10 mpg. Without the camper I would expect another 2-3 mpg or up to 17 highway.
My 1500 mileage increase after 10K miles, and I have just over 10K miles on this truck, so maybe it will go up a little. I would also expect the 2001s to get slightly better mileage because of the aluminum heads. The heads allow more ignition advance without pinging, and that should give a little more economy.
Mike L
00 2500 4x4 LS 6.0L 5spd
Deadhorse, Alaska 6-6-99