Subaru Forester (up to 2005)

1156157159161162344

Comments

  • leo2633leo2633 Member Posts: 589
    I had the same problem with my clutch. I took it to the dealer twice and they were unable to duplicate it. I wound up leaving it overnight, so they could check it when cold, and then they confirmed the problem. They wound up replacing the entire clutch assembly and flywheel under warranty. You may want to speak to your dealer about leaving it overnight.

    Len
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Cold clutch chatter is not an unknown problem and it's severity seems to vary between vehicles. If it's bugging you, I'd have the dealer note it in your repair order. The best way is if the dealer can reproduce the chatter, but as Len mentioned, it sometimes requires leaving your vehicle overnight.

    Ken
  • nypaulnypaul Member Posts: 35
    Hi folks,
    I haven't posted in a while but now I'm looking for information or to hear your experiences with this. It seems that my low fuel light won't come on as my fuel level goes down while I'm driving or even running my '02 L Forester. Once I shut the car off and restart it the light will be on.
    I haven't talked to the dealer yet, but I'm wondering what the list's collective experience is on this. Thanks in advance for any info you can provide.

    Paul
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The manual tranny is good - some very early '98 models had a 1st gear synchro problem, but no other problems since.

    Wow, Len, they replaced the whole thing? Is it significantly better? That's great that they were willing to do that for you.

    Paul: my light will turn on while driving, so yours is defective. Ask the dealer to look at it.

    -juice
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Paul- FYI: I think that the majority of drivers rarely have an occasion to see their low fuel light because they usually refuel before it gets that low!

    What you're experiencing may be normal if you're only taking short trips when the tank is almost empty. The gas sloshing around may prevent the light from coming on during a short trip but after the vehicle sits for a little while the light should come on. If the needle goes below the empty line then the light should be on for sure. Otherwise, I can't think of a logical reason why the light would only work when you're not moving.

    -Frank P.
  • gened1gened1 Member Posts: 256
    Hi,
    If anyone is contemplating a leather steering wheel cover I highly recommend the Wheelskins brand. I just installed a red and charcoal eurotone cover on my L + Forester and it really looks sharp and only took about an hour. If I knew how to post pics I would.I ordered it through a company in Autoweek and saved some money to boot!
    Gene
  • maf03maf03 Member Posts: 4
    I just had the 3750 mile service on my 2002 Forester and was told the rotors were warped. The service advisor didn't have any idea why. I sure hope rotor warping is not going to be a chronic problem with this car. This is my first Subaru, and first new car in 13 years. Have other owners experienced warped rotors at this mileage?
    Thanks!
  • leo2633leo2633 Member Posts: 589
    juice,

    They replaced the pressure plate, clutch disc, flywheel, throwout bearing and pilot bearing at around 29K. It worked great afterward, light and smooth. However, I've recently been getting the chatter again when it's cold and/or damp. I've got about 41K now. I'm going to take it back again, but maybe not until I'm closer to the end of my 60K powertrain coverage. Hopefully I can stand it that long!

    Len
  • gened1gened1 Member Posts: 256
    I also had the 3750 service done recently and no warped rotors on my 02 Forester L+.
    There should have been some pulsing at the pedal. Did you have them turned and was this covered under the Sube Bumper to Bumper warranty? This is my first Subaru as well and it is performing beyond my expectations.
    Gene
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    maf03- Your's is the first instance I've heard of. My 2001 (which already has 40k, groan!) ceratinly hasn't had any problems.

    -Frank P.
  • studleystudley Member Posts: 4
    Help!
    I bought a 2001 Forester new and the rear wiper only makes one sweep every 6 seconds. I adjusted the ring on the stalk and it didn't make much difference. My dealer says this is normal speed, but I have been driving behind other Foresters in the rain and their rear wipers seem to go as fast as the front wipers.
    Is my situation normal? Is there anything I can check myself?
    Thanks,
    Bob Studley
    r.e.studley@att.net
  • ninianninian Member Posts: 16
    This is normal behavior for the 2001. Some other years did not have the intermittent timing for the rear blade, which accounts for what you're seeing on other Foresters.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Wheelskins are awesome. So good, in fact, that I was able to remove it from my previous car after 7 years of use, and reinstall it on my Forester. 4 years later (11 total), it still looks new. Better, much better actually, than the OE leather covers on my Miata or our old 626.

    maf03: at 48k I'm still on my original pads. :-)

    If the dealer replaces them, I wouldn't worry too much. Be sure that whoever intalls your wheels torques them down properly, it only requires 70-75 lb-ft. Do not overtighten them, or let anyone else do that.

    The intermittent was new in 2001. 1998-2000 models had one, fixed speed.

    -juice
  • eps105eps105 Member Posts: 216
    Just to add to ninian's reply....

    The rear wiper on the '98-'00 Foresters is continuous only.

    The rear wiper on the '01-'02 Foresters is intermittent only.

    The rear wiper control on the '03 Forester has positions for both intermittent AND continuous.

    The reason why the adjustment ring didn't do anything for you is because that ring controls the intermittent timing for the FRONT wipers only when they are set to the intermittent mode.

    There is nothing wrong with your '01 Forester's wipers. They are working normally.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Excellent summary, thanks.

    -juice
  • studleystudley Member Posts: 4
    Thank you all for the info on the rear wiper on my 2001 Forester. I thought I had a problem, but now I know it is normal behavior. I will rest easier now.
    Many Thanks,
    Bob Studley
  • peterson10peterson10 Member Posts: 116
    Subaru uses good ol' cast iron rotors (heavy, expensive, worth every dime) instead of the skimpy aluminum rotors found on many cars today. Several things can cause rotors to warp: over-torquing the lug nuts (common!), and keeping your foot on the brake pedal after the car has come to a stop (braking causes the rotors to get very hot, and keeping the linings pressed tight against one spot causes them to cool/contract unevenly) are pretty typical. FWIW, Subaru rotors are surface hardened, so if you have them lathed down, you'll have softer, less uniform rotors, which will likely increase the likelihood of warping.

    Check your lug nuts with a torque wrench; if the dealer overtightened them have THEM pay for new (not "turned") rotors.

    good luck, YetAnotherDave
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    Sat in a $28,300 Forester yesterday (MSRP, inc. delivery). Figured I might as well start near the top. Nice and a bit more front room than I was expecting from regular driving in our OBS, even though the stats look the same.

    I was really deluding myself at that price, but it's a nice vehicle at the 24-25,000 level with less options. Dealer said I could get it down a little by having the rear spoiler (which I didn't even know was there) removed :) BTW, I actually don't like the "monotone" body as well even though it's an upgrade. Go figure.

    Now 28,000 for a six cyl or a turbo...
  • storytellerstoryteller Member Posts: 476
    Fitzmall sells the XS Premium with auto and leather and moonroof for about $4K less. Nobody needs to pay $28K for a Forester; those are not "real world" prices.

    Steve
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Great info Dave, just one thing - you can't always tell what the torque was because it takes a little extra torque to break a bolt from a position it's been in for a long time.

    If you're happy with a 5 speed and heated cloth seats, I've seen those for about $22,400. That's a bargain.

    -juice
  • scirocco22scirocco22 Member Posts: 721
    my '02 S premium has both intermittent and continuous settings (?) ...it just doesn't have adjustable timing for the intermittent setting for the rear wiper. The '03s have adjustable timing for the rear wiper? ...wow, that's great!

    --'rocco
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    Yeah, my post was not real clear on the fact that I didn't mean to imply that was the *real* price.

    I was actually surprised that you even could get it that high on a MSRP basis. I guess my real point, assuming I ever have one, is that the best cost-benefit equation on this car is IMO around the 24-26000 MSRP, and, above that, it starts to tilt to the Outback VDC and Bean, which are also deals at Fitzmall.
  • storytellerstoryteller Member Posts: 476
    I was surprised when doing real world pricing to see Foresters higher than OBs, which I used to think were higher on the Subie food chain. I do like the way Subaru held the line on 03 Forester pricing. It is hard to work up enthusiasm for a low-mileage used Forester now because they cost almost as much as the 03s.

    Steve
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Don't be shocked by MSRPs, MotorWeek's Navigator was $59k plus as tested.

    Almost nothing stickers for less than $20k, so the Forester is very near the bottom if you look at the whole spectrum of prices.

    Fitz has a 2002 VDC for $25.5k! Dang! I think I'd be pushing my wife to buy that if were still shopping today. For stability control and all? It's equipped like most $40-50k luxury cars are.

    So yeah, if you want auto and leather, you may as well pay the extra $1500 and get the bigger car (the wife wanted the extra space). But a 5 speed cloth leaves a price gap that would still make me prefer the Forseter for me, personally.

    Also, keep in mind that 2002 has a rebate and the 2003 Foresters don't (yet).

    -juice
  • maf03maf03 Member Posts: 4
    Thank you all for responding to my question.
    I noticed no pulsing, just a sort of pull. The dealer turned the rotors. I will check the torque on the lug nuts.
    I also contacted Subaru USA and I now have a 'case number' if the problem occurs again.
  • silfacesilface Member Posts: 14
    Thanks all for your comments! I forgot to mention the tip the service representative told me. It was to engage each of the gears before departure. It seems to reduce my warmup time. This tip also works if U have trouble engaging the reverse gear. I'll see how it goes through the winter... I'll keep U all posted of the outcome!

    Later,

    Sil
  • terry4848terry4848 Member Posts: 8
    I found out that the reason I was having such a awful exhaust smell coming in through the vents was that the place that did my oil change had neglected to install a washer between the bolt and oil pan that should be there and oil was slowly leaking onto the manifold. They had also failed to put the oil cap back on! I'll stick to Subaru for my oil changes. Got the gas tank cover fixed, but was dissapointed to hear from the service guy that pinging and hesitation are normal. I told him that I had no pinging or takeoff hesitation when I bought the car. So I guess I'll try some gas solutions and see if it gets better.
  • rsunicorsunico Member Posts: 82
    A few months (?) back someone posted a web site where Subaru had discontinued accessories on sale. Does anyone still have the link? Thanks.
  • dcabdcab Member Posts: 101
    Log in to mysubaru.com to see the discontinued parts list.
  • leo2633leo2633 Member Posts: 589
    I've used that techique for so long, and on so many manual transmission vehicles, that it has become second nature. I routinely shift into 4th immediately before shifting into reverse every time I go to back out of my driveway. You're right - it does make it easier to engage reverse gear. I believe it has something to do with reverse not having a synchronizer, whereas the other gears do, and 4th using the same gear selector fork as reverse. Anyway, this seems to be a foolproof way to allow reverse to engage without difficulty. (I don't recall ever having such problems engaging reverse on a "3 on the tree" column shift on a couple of '70s era Ford pickups, or a late '60's GMC pickup.)

    Len
  • silfacesilface Member Posts: 14
    Hi! I'm going to use your overnight technique so they can inspect the car cold on their own. Although, I'll wait a little since I'm backed up with projects and all... I believe something is wrong or isn't as it used to be. It sure wasn't like that when I got the car. It seems to chatter for a longer time while driving when not given a warmup period. If I warm it up somewhat, it may happen once or maybe twice then it stops.

    Later,

    Sil
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    shifting into a synchronized gear stops the gears turning - that is why it helps to go into 4th before putting it into reverse. Another helpful tip is if you attempt to engage first or reverse from a standstill and they won't (stuck right on the gear) you can engage another synchronized gear to "jog" the gears a bit, then engage first or reverse easily.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • felch1felch1 Member Posts: 19
    Some Feedback please:
    I was quoted 20k plus tax for a 2003 Forester x
    with dimming mirror, security upgrade, splash guards and armrest extension.
    $21,650 out the door.
    Does this sound like a reasonable price?
    Also, I got a price on the Impreza Outback Sport Wagon with armrest ext, fog lamps, hood deflector,splash guards and mirror for $17,734 plus tax and DMV. Is this a decent price?
    Trying to determine which one would be better.
    Thanks
  • xccoachlouxccoachlou Member Posts: 245
    If there is such a thing as too much research, I've done it.

    My present car is a 1999 Ford Contour V6 Sport Edition with ABS. The car is 4 years old, and, I am just getting tired of it. I usually keep cars till just before they die, with previous cars being kept 7 and 9 years.

    All the research indicates that among the safest, most reliable cars built today are the Subarus.

    I love the Forester. It meets almost every single criteria I have for a car.

    It's the right size. I live in a city and finding parking can be difficult.

    It's roomy so I can move lots of stuff around.

    The EPA mileage estimates are good. The cruising range is good.

    Handling is good. Not what I can do with the Contour, but good.

    BUT... after test driving two vehicles, there was leg pain in the calves. I have never experienced this before. Are the Forester seats shorter? Has anyone else experienced this?

    I also checked on the Legacy wagons and the Outback. The outback in particular is a very nice car. I thought the Forester was quieter and smoother, and had a better driving position.

    Then my dark, cheap side asks, "But if the Forester is built on an Impreza platform, with basic Impreza guts, why not just get that?"

    So there you have it. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,

    - Lou
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    forester is just a higher squarer body style on an impreza platform, but there are certainly other differences between them options-wise, etc. Mainly, there is a lot more space in a forester than an impreza.

    The seat cushions are a little short, if you are of the tall persuasion. personally, this never bugged me that much, but I am not very tall. I will say that this is the case on a lot of the Japanese vehicles out there today...

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • jtm4jtm4 Member Posts: 60
    Wouldn't you know it. 60k miles w/out a single problem out of my Forester. I got my 60K service a week ago. Well, today the Check Engine light came on. It blinked three times and stayed on. I hope it's something related to the emissions system. I put gas in a few days ago and always make sure the gas cap is on tight. The light came on today so I doubt it's related to the gas cap. Oh well, I'll call the dealer tomorrow after I run to Auto Zone and have them hook up their diagnostic computer. Hope that gives me an idea of what's going on. The Subaru dealer I use is 45 miles away. I guess I'll just have to make another trip.
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    I'm not sure anybody can really answer the Imprezza v Forester (or OBS v Forester) question for someone else, but, having been down that road, I guess I'd look at a) whether the options available on the Forester are important to you, b) whether the extra room you get in the back with the Forester's squared off shape is important (my math says 15% bigger based on Edmunds info), and c) how much you like the fact that the Forester looks (at least subjectively IMO) to be a more substantial car. I don't believe there is any difference in terms of room other than in the cargo area, but I could be wrong.

    What's really hard to judge for another person too is how important the extra $$$ for the Forester, probably compounded by sales tax and interest charges, are. I would imagine most people with a fair amount of cash in their pocket would opt to spend the extra, especially if one of the reasons above applies, but there will always be others whose philosophy is to save wherever possible, and the fact is the "guts" of the cars, as someone said, are pretty much the same.
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    have you seen the sunroof in the Forester? That was the deciding factor for getting the Forester. But the main differences on the forester besides the huge sunroof is the extra space and extra ground clearance. Even though the two cars are almost identical in specs, they both drive a little bit differently. And I don't know if the Forester is just an impreza with a different body, at least it didn't use to be. I think the Forester used to share some components with the larger Outback, but maybe the new ones are different. You just have to drive both of them and decide whether you really want to spend more money for the extra room or ground clearance. Did I mention the huge sunroof? For me, the price difference was insignificant by the time I added everything I wanted that I didn't really have a tough decision. But, there will come a time when you'll wish you had just a little more room or a little more ground clearance. And, I doubt if you'll ever wish that your car was a little smaller or lower.
  • tamara6tamara6 Member Posts: 38
    When we first started looking at cars we test drove a Forester and an OBS. The OBS was considerably smaller inside. We have 2 kids (8 and 5 years old), and they had trouble being comfortable in the back seat. In the front, my shin kept banging against something when I would move my foot from the accelerator to the brake. I had the front seat all the way back (I'm 5'10") and it still felt very cramped. There is really only one functioning cup holder in the OBS (vs. 4 in the Forester).

    Then we tested a Forester X. We could feel the difference as we got in - it is just roomier. The kids claim the back seat is more comfortable, and I know the front seat is.

    We, too, are trying not to spend more than we have to. But, as my husband pointed out, you get so much more for the $1000 or so more you spend for a Forester, it just doesn't make sense to consider the OBS anymore.

    HTH,

    Tamara
  • storytellerstoryteller Member Posts: 476
    "I doubt if you'll ever wish that your car was smaller or lower."

    Well, you might. Smaller cars cost less to buy, license and run. In this society it is common for people to drive around in huge empty vans or SUVs every day, vans whose capacity is put to good use perhaps once every other week when the family takes a trip. If we all choose to drive large cars whose capacity is rarely needed, both we and "the planet" pay some kind of price.

    Lower cars generally handle better than cars that sit high off the highway. It is possible to modify a car with stiffer antisway bars to help it hold its composure during turns, but the same vehicle will corner better if it is low to the ground than if it is set up high. I personally need the extra ground clearance of a SUV to drive some of the places I go, but that is true of very few drivers whose cars are set up high. Higher cars give a better view of the road, which is nice, and can be easier to enter and exit than cars that sit low to the ground.

    My only point: smaller *can* be better. Lower *can* be better.

    Subie-less Steve
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Let your needs decide. If you can use the extra space, get the Forester. You get a lot more head room, and about double the useful cargo space.

    The OBS has more features than a Forester X. Those alloys are nice, for instance. It's light and sporty, and if you drive alone most of the time and don't need the space, go for it.

    On the gears, reverse and 1st and actually right next to each other, physically, on the tranny. A while back Colin went as far as to show us a photo of the tranny insides. So if you go to 1st, then reverse, it has a shorter path to travel and engages quite easily. Though I'll admit I'm lazy by nature and never do this, and it's still fine.

    Lou: get comfy first. A comfortable driver's seat is so important that I would recommend you buy something else if you can't sort it out. The new seats ratchet up like VWs, so try the full length of adjustments.

    CEL right after 60k service? Could be a coincidence, or the dealer goofed doing something. There are tools you can buy that hook up to a Palm, if you know any gear heads they might have one. They can usually read and reset codes.

    Did my tire rotation last night. 48k miles total, 20k so far on these tires. They look great, in fact they'll last another 40k miles at least, it seems. Nitto NT460, very good overall, just not in snow.

    Also sprayed some lithium grease on the sway bar bushings. Yes, it's quiet, but better safe than sorry. There were dry.

    My brake pads look good, too, in fact they seem like they'll last more than 100k miles. All this and quiet operation, I'm in heaven.

    Lovin' my Subie.

    -juice
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    Per Edmunds, here are the interior stats for 2003 Forester and OBS (presumably also other imprezzas). First number is Forester (inches):

    Front headroom: 39/39.7
    Front hip room: 51.6/53.3
    Front Shoulder room 53.5/52.7
    Front legroom 43.7/42.9
    Rear headroom 37/37.3
    Rear hip 51.6/51.7
    Rear shoulder 53.6/52.9
    Rear leg 33.7/33.7

    It's unclear to me whether headroom #s factor in a sunroof on the Forester. For me, differences of less than an inch are essentially insignificant. I'd have to stick by my earlier comment that, room wise, the cargo area is where the difference is-a difference of 15%.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Numbers don't tell the whole story, though.

    I have hauled an oversized clothes washer home, still in the box. Hatch closed.

    The Forester is square-backed and can fit very large boxes that an Impreza couldn't hope to haul.

    In fact, the entire greenhouse is very tall and boxy, and creates an open and airy feeling, so it *feels* twice as big, even though it's not.

    Personally, I feel a little claustrophobic in the back seat of a WRX wagon, so does my wife. I couldn't talk her into one for that reason.

    -juice
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    One of the reasons you're able to get that washer in the Forester is the 32 cu ft. of "luggage" room. That's a significant difference to the 27.9 in the Imprezza, maybe (depending on one's needs) THE significant difference other than exterior appearance b/w the cars. My point was that I have to doubt that there are meaningful differences space-wise elsewhere in the vehicles.
  • jtm4jtm4 Member Posts: 60
    Went down to Auto Zone so they could hook up their diagnostic computer. The only reading was "misfire cylinder 4". The engine runs smooth, though. It's not missing. It wasn't last week when they checked it at the 60k service and it isn't today. The Auto Zone tech even said it sounded fine. He cleared the light and the dealer said if it comes on again to bring it in. Maybe I should replace the gas cap. I guess I'll wait and see.

    I do have a question. I wanted to pick up a few of those Tabs that hold on the skid plate, right inside the front fender wells. Since I don't have any in there I don't know what size to get. Do those Tabs have the phillips head or the rivet top? Also, what size diameter are they? There were many fasteners in the store and I wasn't sure which ones to get. Thanks.

    98 Forester L
  • mlp1mlp1 Member Posts: 6
    Hi guys! I'm still reading the threads and trying to make up my mind. I finally test drove the Subaru Forester and the Baja. Also drove the Honda CRV. Decisions, decisions.....there are things I like and don't like about all 3 of them! I'm a little leary of the Forester only because there are no local dealers for me. I'm fine as long as any work I have done is when I'm at work (since I commute). A friend who owns a '99 Forester tells me not to worry because I won't be in the shop that often....hmmmm...he doesn't know about my luck! My son sat in the back of both the Forester and the CRV and liked the roominess of the CRV (but he's 13 and sits up front anyhow). I liked the rear vision better in the Forester, not the CRV. One thing about the Forester is that it seemed to me to shift kind of hard (I drove an automatic). I didn't notice that in the CRV but it was a manual. Anyhow, I really do have a question! If I were to get the Forester and had no plans to take it off-road, is it necessary to buy the rear differential protector?
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    You're absolutely right, smaller and lower can be better. I wasn't talking about buying an Excursion, but between a forester and outback sport, the exterior dimension and other specs are so close as to be almost identical. The get about the same gas milage, fit into the same parking spaces, and handling, well, neither of them is a sports car but they both have decent handling. But to really tell the difference you can't go by the numbers, because both cars have a totally different feel. As everyone else already stated, the outback sport feels like a compact car, while the forester seems much larger than it really is.

    mlp1,
    I'd get the rear diff protector just because it's cheap insurance, but if you really want to save the $50, then it's not an absolute necessity. However, even if you never take it off-road, eventually you'll run over something that will make it worthwhile. After one hard knock you'll be glad you got it. Besides, when you're 13 year old son starts driving, you'll want all the extra protection.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    There is also ease of ingress/egress. The Forester's seats are at your hip point, so you slide right in. The doors are also squared off so you don't have to duck to get in.

    Little things like that add up. I think that if you're hauling 3-4 people regularly, than those benefits would justify spending more on the Forester.

    Those tabs are push-type, no phillips or flat top. To remove them, use a small, flat screwdriver, and pull the middle portion out. Then you can just pull the whole thing out with your fingers.

    I couldn't tell you their size, though.

    Murphy's Law - I have 7 Subaru dealers very close by and have only had to pay a visit once in 4+ years. :-)

    You could skip the rear diffy protector. It's more than 10 inches off the ground anyway. Look underneath - the Forester has a very clean underside, nothing to get caught up off road. It's not very high off the ground, but the lowest part is the front cross member - and that's a sturdy metal piece.

    Drive a 5 speed Forester (and sample that Hill Holder feature), and an automatic CR-V, so you have the complete picture.

    Both are good values. The Forester may cost a little more, but it offers more features and a longer warranty. Both are reliable, both are IIHS Best Picks for safety, both hold their value well, it's hard to go wrong.

    -juice
  • crowpluscrowplus Member Posts: 3
    2001 Forester S 20k miles. Extremely pleased with vehicle.

    Noticed a burning oil smell for a few days.

    Crawled underneath and noticed a bit of grease-like material which had dripped down from where right front driveline goes into engine/transmission? case. Taking car into dealer on Wed. Wondering what questions I should ask dealer to make sure I get proper service versus quick fix/future problems.

    Car has been driven normally, no off road.
    Thanks.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.