Subaru Forester (up to 2005)

1263264266268269344

Comments

  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    I can't think of a single instance during normal driving when I've felt the need to downshift the XT.

    Same here. Zman, it's totally different from (for example) a WRX or XS. People who haven't lived in an XT don't realize that it drives a lot more like a V-8 than any 4-cyl out there. It's a bit weak below 1500RPMs, but at any engine speed much above that the XT will move along in any gear you wish if you're just cruising along in no hurry. That's certainly true when you're above 2K.
  • zmanzman Member Posts: 200
    That's the way I drive, just cruising along in no hurry--rarely above 70 (even on the Maine Turnpike), but I love to have get up and go when I want it--for passing the weekend antiquers here in the Hudson Valley and those big lumber trucks in Maine in the summer.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Yeah, I haven't driven an XT primarily out of fear for my wallet (seriously, I know I would want one). I'm not disputing that the XT has a lot more power at lower RPMs or that it's more driveable than the XS; we all know that regardless of whether or not we've driven one. Actually, I'm assuming the XT would behave similar to the STi. The STi's 5th and 6th gears are very similar to the XT's 4th and 5th gears, only they are a little closer together in the STi. Unless the XT does something magical that can overcome discrete gear spacing, it will still run into those ambivalent low RPM situations where you're better off popping it into 4th (just like the 6th-5th situation in the STi). It's just reality. How this translates into different driver's subjective experiences and needs is another story, which is why I still think Walker needs a test drive to really answer the question for himself. I think he made a very keen observation in test driving the XS and the real answer will come from test driving an XT.

    Craig
  • m4ethm4eth Member Posts: 101
    How easy is it to remove and replace the Oil Filter on the Forester Boxer engine? Do you need to jack the car or is it accessable without a lift?

    Do you use OEM filters...or what brand do you recommend ?

    Thanks,
    Mike
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    You can certainly do it without ramps or jacking. The filter and drain plug are easy to get to. There's a little door on the panel under the engine. Remove a couple fasteners, and it swings out of the way. Some people remove the entire panel, but I haven't needed to.

    I buy Subaru filters in bulk, usually pay about $5-6 each. Also, get new crush washers for the drain plug (50 cents to a dollar each, depending on where you buy from).

    Craig
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Yeah, I haven't driven an XT

    I'm assuming the XT would behave similar to the STi.

    That's not a good comparison. The STi uses a larger turbo (slower to spool up and not until higher in the RPM band); the XT's smaller one (with the same engine displacement) easily shows positive boost as low as 1,500 RPMs. I doubt the STi can do that, and it's part of what makes the XT unique. Also, given their entirely different roles, the STi ECU quite likely biases its AVCS somewhat more toward top end. Everything on the XT is optimized for bags of torque and flexibility in the low-midrange spectrum. You really do have to drive one to appreciate the differences; inferences drawn from experience solely with other vehicles are usually inapplicable.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Craig- Okay, I was out driving this afternoon and specifically found a stretch of road going uphill. At 40 mph the XT was turning approx 1800 rpm in 5th gear when I gave it some gas and while I wouldn't exactly characterize the acceleration as breath-taking, the XT reacted immediately and began picking up speed (with no lugging of the engine). I agree with Jack, if I didn’t know better, there’s no way I’d believe that there’s only a 4-banger under the hood.

    -Frank P.
  • zmanzman Member Posts: 200
    Jack, So I can understand this better before driving the XT, how are you defining low to midrange?

    Frank, that anectdote is encouraging. There's no way that would have happened in the XS.

    Zman
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Walker- Craig is right in that you can listen to Jack and I tout the XT all day long but the true litmus test will come when you test drive one.

    Just for reference, I was the satisfied owner of a 01 S model when the XT hit the streets. I pretty much knew I was doomed if I ever drove an XT. Well my willpower lasted 6 whole months before I caved and took a test drive and as they say "the rest is history". Seriously though, while the normally aspirated 2.5 liter engine is perfectly adequate in most situations, the turbo-charged version is in a league all of its own.

    -Frank P.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Jack, So I can understand this better before driving the XT, how are you defining low to midrange?

    For the XT, with its unique torque curve, I'd define low-to-midrange as 1500-3000 RPMs. Anything above that I'd call the upper end.

    Others will point to the XT's 3600RPM torque peak and 6500 redline and say I'm nuts. Fact remains, I almost never find any need to rev the XT above 3500, and it is completely comfortable puttering around at 1800 to 2500.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Frank sez, I agree with Jack,

    Mark this down, folks. You may never see these words again.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    going uphill...At 40 mph the XT was turning approx 1800 rpm in 5th gear when I gave it some gas...the XT reacted immediately and began picking up speed (with no lugging of the engine).

    Something worth emphasizing about this: People who haven't experienced an XT's remarkable ability to deliver no-strain low-midrange power don't understand when I say that in ordinary, day-to-day move-with-traffic driving, I often upshift at only 2500RPM, usually don't go above 3000, and hardly ever find any actual need to exceed 3500.

    I find it equally hard to understand why, in that same type of routine driving, others would delay their upshifts until 4000 to 4500RPM. Outside of a NASCAR track, I cannot imagine any ordinary traffic flow that would actually require the power delivered by the XT at those engine speeds just to keep up.
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Leadership has its place, but not (IMO) on public roads. I'm not wild about drivers who dart back and forth from lane to lane in a mostly-futile and sometimes dangerous attempt to get through a stream of traffic faster than the traffic is flowing. I think it's at least potentially hazardous.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Oh c'mon Jack, quit assuming the worst and lighten up! Not every driver who likes going fast dreams of auditioning for the next Fast & Furious movie. For example, there's nothing inherently unsafe about being the first away from a traffic light and reaching the speed limit and if it puts a grin on your face I say go for it.

    -Frank P.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    For example, there's nothing inherently unsafe about being the first away from a traffic light and reaching the speed limit and if it puts a grin on your face I say go for it.

    That's about the only time I can really go for it in my WRX, so I cherish those rare moments. Being first in line at a stoplight is like finding a treasure around here....

    Craig
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    nothing inherently unsafe about being the first away from a traffic light...

    Probably not, but that's not what I was referring to. I'm talking about those who try to do 50mph in a stream of traffic that's going 40. The perpetual lane-changers, darting back and forth, accelerating then braking as they wedge themselves into gaps that sane drivers leave as safe inter-car following distances. The habitual weavers aren't among my favorites.
  • 10years10years Member Posts: 48
    it seems almost always the lane changers, tail gaters, and not fast enough at any speed are "people" in their high and mighty large SUV/Trucks with their head cocked into a cell phone.

    Good Morning Jack.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Toss in the BMW and Mercedes pilots who seem to think "I OWN this road, all you lowlifes get outta my way".

    A pox on all of them. Patience is a virtue.
  • uga91uga91 Member Posts: 1,065
    I'm sure most who post here may know this, but I'd thought I'd bring it up. Doing a little research on vehicles for flat towing behind RVs, the Forester weighs less than other vehicles like Saturn VUE and Honda CR-V. You must tow a manual transmission vehicle only, though. What makes the Forester even more versatile is its towing rating in the event you need to ever use it to haul a pontoon boat or personal watercraft or anything. A Forester can tow 2400 lbs where the CR-V and VUE (both with 4 cylinder and 5 speed) are only rated for 1500 lbs. You can flat tow a V6 VUE with auto, so that may be more; but, the Forester is still lighter. Anyway, hope someone finds this useful.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Agreed - the Forester is small, light, and can go-almost-anywhere. It would make a great RV tow-behind vehicle.
  • sierratripsierratrip Member Posts: 53
    I'm trying to find an average price for 30,000 mile service on my '02 Forester. One dealer in San Diego quoted $615 and it seemed to include more service than Subaru lists in the warranty book (ie: flush the radiator instead of just a drain & fill.) Another location of the same owner quoted $440. Since I'm still under warranty I don't want to go to an independent just yet, but would like to know what a normal price should be and what I can expect to get done for that price.

    Also what is the impact, if any, on your warranty if you use non-Subaru parts? I believe that as long as the parts/filters/plugs etc. are designed for use on your vehicle you are covered but I'm not 100% sure.

    Thanks for any feedback to help me with this decision!

    Donn
  • zmanzman Member Posts: 200
    Jack,

    You and I probably drive about the same. I'm a 2400 to 3200 guy. The XT sounds like it might change that at the lower end. We'll see.

    Zman
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    I'm no fan of them either, it's why I wish we had Euro-spec highway laws. Right for slow and exiting/merging, middle for cruising, left for passing. The Speed Racers of the world (or merely those who want to go 60 instead of 55) always have a clear lane to pass with instead of weaving and creating dangerous situations.

    Doesn't change the situation in town of course, but it makes so much sense I am really surprised (or perhaps not) that Americans haven't embraced the idea.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Loosh- Haven't you ever seen those "Keep right except to pass" signs? We pretty much have the same hwy laws, the difference being that they're not enforced over here. The mindset is totally different too. Here's my theory: In Europe, the driver is more involved in the whole driving experience. While in the US, driving is viewed more as a chore to be performed while eating, talking on the cel phone, fixing one's hair, etc. Therefore the US driver wants as few actual driving distractions as possible (like having to change lanes). So it's easier to camp out in the leftmost lane and maintain a constant speed while faster traffic is forced to pass on the right.

    -Frank P.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    difference being that they're not enforced over here.

    While I don't advocate lawbreaking, it's a fact that the speed at which traffic typically flows is often 5 to 10mph higher than the posted limit. So some busybody thinks "I'll fix all those speeders, I'll camp in the leftmost lane at exactly the speed limit." Next thing you know, even the considerate drivers are forced to pass in the righthand lanes. I wouldn't seriously expect the cops to ticket the left-lane hog when he/she isn't driving below the limit (after all, we've all seen marked cop cars intentionally doing the exact same thing), so enforcement probably isn't the major issue. The problem is thoughtless, inconsiderate drivers who think it's their g*d-given right to putt along on the left and won't move right no matter what.

    This is why all cars should be equipped with forward-firing cal.50 machine guns. And rearward-firing ones for the clods who drive around with their high beams on in traffic.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    that there seems to be a lack of 2-tone Forester XS models at dealers, or on their web site inventories? I see lots of base X models, and lots of monotone XS and XT models, but very few regular XS models.

    Bob
  • zmanzman Member Posts: 200
    Bob,

    How right you are. I waited around for over a month to test drive a 5-speed XS (ended up with my son's for a day), but they only had XS premiums w/auto either in stock or coming in. I never bothered to push the point, however, so I don't know why that is. By the way, all their X's were automatics too--I would've had to drive 65 miles to test a 5-speed.

    Speaking of test driving, GM has a 24-hour test drive program at selected dealers. Does Subaru have anything similar?

    Zman
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Thanks for the excellent summary, I learned a few things!

    Craig
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    What irritates me the most is when I'm in the passing lane, behind 3-4 other vehicles, and we're all in the process of passing a slow moving vehicle in the right lane. Every damn time, some idiot will come flying up behind me, ride my tail, and then jump in the right lane and try to pass the column of "fast moving" vehicles. If any of us passers have left reasonable space between our cars, the lunatic will jump right in. Basically, it's impossible to keep the cars spaced out; some idiot will always cut in.

    Another problem here is trucks. My main route to/from work is a two lane highway. Speed limit is 65mph. Frequently, there will be trucks in both lanes. They speed on the downhills and get down to 50-55mph on the uphills. Think they will move over and let cars pass? Nope. I used to drive a big truck for construction, and would never have the nerve to clog up the highway like that. I don't know how these other guys do it. Some of the most selfish drivers out there. And they think us "4-wheelers" are all idiots....

    Craig
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    This is why all cars should be equipped with forward-firing cal.50 machine guns. And rearward-firing ones for the clods who drive around with their high beams on in traffic.

    I'm working on that mod :D

    -Dave
  • joenhjoenh Member Posts: 11
    Hi Twofold. As I mentioned recently in a couple of messages, we have had a loud bang when running on slippery roads. Our dealer gave us the run-a-round 3 times, then admitted that the factory had a new transmission module with different shifting characteristics to lessen or eliminate the bang. They installed that under warrantee. This is on a 2002 Forester.

    I bought a Ford van in 1995 and found that it was possible to talk to a regional rep if you were having a technical problem that the dealer couldn't pinpoint. I am disappointed that Subaru doesn't have the same. The 800-SUBARU3 customer service is worthless.

    Joe
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    JB/Dave: The enormous XS/XT moonroof would be the perfect spot for a pedestal-mounted .50. Can you say "Rat Patrol"?

    Maybe not. I never could figure out how four guys in two Jeeps with a .50 each could whip the vaunted Afrika Korps. Sort of like the 1960s version of "The A Team."

    Ed
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    there is a suburban armed to the teeth.
    Don't have the site but if paisan still remembers it he could share :)

    I'm thinking more in line with paintball pistons to launch ballbearings and dropping spikes for the rear. :D

    -Dave
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Joe- Subaru does have regional reps that perform the same function. What makes you think Subaru's customer service is worthless?

    -Frank P.
  • troop2shostroop2shos Member Posts: 235
    Speed differential is the root cause of most traffic issues outside of inattentive driving. Many stops are performed by law enforcement personnel for impeding traffic flow.
  • m4ethm4eth Member Posts: 101
    Truckers should be required to Drive only on the Far Left Lane. Especially on 3 or more lanes. This would allow the lanes to the right to be free for exit and entrance of cars...also would make the truckers stay in one lane for crusing...instead of all over the roads as well as blocking the roads making driving harzadous. What do you think??
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Some states do not allow trucks in the passing (left) lane. I think all states should do this. I don't think trucks belong in the passing lane at all.

    Craig
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    Many stops are performed by law enforcement personnel for impeding traffic flow.

    I agree with your comment about the hazards of speed differentials, but not the line above. In the 43 years since I began driving, I have seen more speeders cited than I could count. I've also come upon thousands of left-lane hogs who refused to yield the passing lane to faster-moving traffic, compelling people to pass in the right lanes. Other than one or two semitruckers, I have never - not even once - seen a left-lane bandit driving at the speed limit get pulled over for obstructing traffic that desired to move faster than the limit. With the possible exception of California, I am highly skeptical that this happens anywhere with anything approaching regularity.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    I don't think trucks belong in the passing lane at all.

    This means that no truck would ever be able to move faster than the slowest one in an ever-lengthening column, because (unless there were at least 3 lanes in the same direction) the trucks behind would never be able to pass the slowpoke in front.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Jack- Hopefully Craig was referring to 3 or more lanes in each direction.

    Around here truckers are pretty good about staying in the 2nd to the rightmost lane. This allows traffic to merge and exit using the right lane while keeping the left lanes free for passenger vehicles.

    -Frank P.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    I think you're on drugs! ;-)

    No no no, look, I've been across the pond, driven there, seen the light, and it is good. Lemme say this again: the RIGHT lane is for merging, exiting, and the infrequent special vehicle that's going quite slow: special loads, Real big RV, whatever. Middle lane is for cruising: at or about the legal limit. Left lane is for PASSING. Pass the slower car in front, then return to the middle. That way there is always on elane moving faster than the other and there is no need for aggresive lane hopping.
  • ballisticballistic Member Posts: 1,687
    referring to 3 or more lanes in each direction.

    We have some of those, but not as many as more densely populated regions. Around here, two lanes each way is a very common scenario.
  • troop2shostroop2shos Member Posts: 235
    Professional experience.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I meant three lanes. The righmost lane should be used for slow moving traffic (trucks on hills), center for normal travel, and left lane for passing. Some states only allow trucks in the center and right lanes.

    Craig
  • uga91uga91 Member Posts: 1,065
    #13679 of 13695 Clay by c_hunter Jan 19, 2004 (6:08 pm)
    Thanks for the excellent summary, I learned a few things!

    Craig

    Craig, you're welcome. I thought there might be someone who could bebefit from what I found.
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    I am looking for an off road type (to be put in my new cab tractor!) radio/cd that has good vibration characteristics, with Weather Band. I like my Forester 6 CD changer. Do any of you have recommendations for a single CD unit?

    Also, I would like one with a headset plug. Seems to me that this was illegal for on-road radios, but I thought it might be available for some off-road units.

    John
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    Donn,
    Expect to pay at least a few hundred for the 30K at the dealer. Not that they do anything really important, but they'll charge you at least an hour's worth of labor to just look at the car. You can go to an independent service center for maintenance, or you can do it yourself, without worrying about the warranty. The dealers can NOT deny you your warranty if you didn't have all the service done by them. It's the law. Same thing goes for non-subaru parts. As long as it meets the criteria listed in the owners manual (specific weight of oil, certain standards for the fluids, etc.) it's okay to use it and they are 100% covered. So I'd shop around for a cheaper price.

    30K should include
    oil change ($10-30 depending on oil, 10 minutes)
    air filter change ($5-10, 2 minutes)
    spark plug change ($4, 1/2 - 1 hour)
    coolant change ($5, 1/2 hour or less)
    fuel filter change ($20, 5 minutes, not really necessary)
    brake fluid change ($7-8, 1/2 hour)
    other minor stuff not really that important

    Those are the prices of the material cost and how long it took me, a competent shop could do them all in a hour if they really rushed, but probably figure 2-3 hours.

    Aside from the oil change, there really is nothing that important here that couldn't wait for another 30K. Most of the filter stuff is minor, takes a couple of minutes to change. Brake fluid and coolant is cheap, but messy to do yourself. Only problem with taking it to an independent is that they might not have some of the parts in hand, so you might have to supply them.
  • sierratripsierratrip Member Posts: 53
    Thanks for the feedback on the 30k service! The dealer I talked to included things like a tune-up, flushing the radiator and brake lines before replacing new fluids. But still $500 plus dollars has given me a severe case of "service sticker shock"! One thing this dealer has over the other two in San Diego County is that they actually have some Subaru Certified Master Techs working for them. The other two dealers sell and service several other brands as well as Subie and always give me that "oh that's right, we do service Subaru" look when I come in. Not exactly what I'm looking for in car care if you know what I mean?!

    Thanks again,
    Donn
  • ezshift5ezshift5 Member Posts: 858
    ..the 30k on my standard shift V-6 Solara bottom-lined at 160...oil/filter/air filter/rotation/new coolant.

    Perhaps my Forester purchase should be deferred until my next Naval Reserve raise...
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.