By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I just did an Edmunds search on "brakes": saw problems with Tahoe, Caravan, Infiniti, etc. but no Sequoia. Saw some snippets from the truck forums, and man, do they get nasty. A few trolls in Sequoia are nothing. Those truck people get down and dirty! How fun...
My 2001 SR5 has 16k+ miles -- no brake problems; only the radio. But if I did have a problem like yours, I wouldn't camp out on this forum. I would camp out with the nearest Toyota Service Manager until the problem was resolved. Good luck!
Minuteman Obviously I'll have to run it in for an inspection, but with my latest round of postings here, I just don't have the time. Actually, my wife is the principle driver for now, and she mostly runs between taking the kids to school & running the usual overwhelming amount of errands. In fact, lately she's been eyeing the Acura. It's a CL Type-S. She says she like the power & handling more than the Sequoia's tall seat. So I ran it all last week, which is how I discovered that the brakes are pulsating (NOT antilock sensations).
It's so good to have a volunteer hall monitor at the ready. I just knew the mention of "Tahoe" would bring him running! (another wide grin)
A genuine service to Sequoia owners would be to hear details of the fix to this apparently infrequent problem. If it has a potential impact on my vehicle, then I want to know about it. That way, if some preventive maintenance is required, it will be done and I can continue enjoying the ride.
No chance of ever owning another GM product. By the way, did you see the story on MSNBC.com reporting that without incentives the Big Three would collapase under the pressure from the Japenese and Korean automakers? I'll try to find the link for you.
On that note, can we get back to the Sequoia? This isn't a "comparison" topic after all. Thanks.
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
<http://www.msnbc.com/modules/exports/ct_email.asp?/news/681218.asp>
I believe Toyota sold all of their Sequoias the first year- about 50,000+, most of them sold without huge discounts or rebates. An off topic with 7 measly postings hardly is a major problem.
http://www.wieck.com
Do a search on 'sequoia' you will discover the source of mindless' photo.
oac3: please point to a single negative word I posted about the Sequoia or Toyota in the last several posts that wasn't a quote from someone else, more specifically a Toyota owner. Equally important it wasn't some random effort to "harm" your beloved Sequoia but was in direct response to ibmindless and some of the issues and concerns he was expressing.
714cut: please take the time to read a post before you embarass yourself even more. First, minuteman proceeded to inform ibmindless that "I just did an Edmunds search on "brakes": saw problems with Tahoe, Caravan, Infiniti, etc. but no Sequoia." In fact, you didn't even need to do a search since some Sequoia owners thought it might be helpful to setup a forum to discuss their brake issues on Sequoia's with other owners that might be having the same problems. That's kinda the purpose of these forums. I didn't need to do a search since its right there on the front index of forums.
Furthermore, I never suggested it was a major problem and in fact stated "...a few Sequoia owners felt there was a big enough concern to actual form a new forum...". Take the time to read the post and you'll note that I specifically said a FEW Sequoia owners as it appears to be a recently started forum on the subject of Sequoia brakes which was exactly what ibmindless was inquiring about.
Get a grip, nobody suggested its a "major problem" least of all me. I'll let you Sequoia owners determine when and if you consider your brake performance a major problem. I was just answering the man's question.
If you did own one I could understand better you trying to inform the folks here about this vehicle. Since you own a Yukon Dinali, why don't you save your breath for people here and post to the G.M.Yukon board, since that is the vehicle that you have and you can help people over there looking for infromation regarding G.M.
I mean, if you were looking to purchase one and wanted some information on this vehicle I could understand you spending this much time and energy here at the Sequoia board, but we both know that is not the case. All you do here is point out the Sequoia's shortcomings and try to bash a fine SUV.
That is not constructive, nor does it help people that visit here trying to gather information about the Sequoia. People reading your posts know what nonsense you are all about and where your coming from---your the one that needs to get a grip! Your in the wrong place here because we don't have that "Professional Grade Truck" (whatever that means or implies)-its over there in the G.M. forum!
I'm loathe to admit it, but I owned a '92 Explosion (explorer). Worst piece of defective metal I've ever owned. Dead starter, dead battery; leaking tranny, pwr strng, & valve covers; and much more. I actually replaced 3 starters --- then the world discovers that it wasn't the starters after all - it was a poorly designed ignition module, for which there is now a class action suit. If WE discover (through exchanging information) that the "nit" we've decided to live with is actually being experienced on a broader scale, we might be more inclined to seek corrective remedies. That's all.
Meanwhile, I have MANY NICE THINGS to say about the Sequoia. Despite some concerns of late, it still seems to ooze good design & general build quality. My wife was stopped at a light when an 18-wheeler was slowing to stop behind her. The driver's foot slipped off the brake and he rammed her - right out into the intersection. The driver & my wife agreed that it was a hard hit. They exchanged info, but couldn't detect any damage to the Sequoia. [since then I had it inspected and found that it whacked the tailgate / bumper / fender out of alignment]. The good news is, it served its purpose & protected my family.
Rats! Second one this week!
While helping others or providing a complete story may not be of interest to you, it is to me:) If a poster asks for some assistance I see no reason in avoiding his inquiry just so you can feel better about the vehicle your drive. People asking for guidance when they have a problem is not at all a negative reflection on the Sequoia. All vehicles, let me repeat ....all vehicles including the Sequoia have problems that people are looking for help on.
As I read the Edmund's Guidelines, that's the point of this forum.
If you really wish to engage him, may I suggest a visit to I don't like SUVs, why do you?
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Although I do like the idea of a whole bunch of suv fans, like I know those on this forum to be, coming over to the Anti-suvers forum to straighten out some of those characters about how great suvs are, particularly the Sequoia:)
Now, anyone got a response for Jbarm?
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
"Aside from the Sequoia, are there any large SUVs with shoulder belts in the center seats of both the middle and rear benchs?"
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
I think if you did a little fact-based (your favourite saying)poll you would find the general concensus would be that you are the one who has embarassed yourself with your posts.
Seems to me I'm not the one getting the "hate mail". You may be good at marketing, but you need help with your public relations.
http://www.detnews.com/2002/autosinsider/keepup/b07-383940.htm
The thing is, these are all known issues for sometime now, so for heatwave and his pals to come here and argue the superiority of their Denali or Tahoe against the Seq is not only unfounded but unsupported with facts as they are on the ground (so to speak)....
Let's see how heatwave wiggles out of this one, as he would certainly like to put his spin on it...
I have pointed out that after my shopping, the Denali XL met MY needs better than other vehicles I was shopping for including the Sequoia. I have pointed out many times (although I guess I have to repeat it again) that the Sequoia may very well be a better choice for some people.
I have shared facts regarding the greater sales of the GM f/s suvs. I have shared the facts regarding performance and vehicle specifications that may be helpful to some consumers when deciding which vehicle best meets their needs.
I have shared my opinion that the 10:1 ratio of GM F/S SUV sales to Sequoias is reflective of a preference by consumer's to the GM models. You're welcome to disagree with my opinion, however its hard to come to a different conclusion regarding the sales data (although I'm sure you will).
Regarding the site you posted it repesents all vehicle sales. Recent reports will also show that GM for the first time in many years did NOT lose market share in 2001. More importantly and more relevant for this forum is that GM is the SUV sales leader and their growth rate in suv sales exceeded that of the imports on a base that is already many times that of all the imports combined.
The imports and the Japanese manufacturers particularly continue to gain market share in passenger cars which is why in TOTAL, Toyota shows the marketshare gains posted in the article you cited. SUVs are an entirely different story that clearly shows GM and Ford as the dominant forces in the marketplace with GM enjoying leadership sales growth in suvs.
714cut: stop being so sensitive. The only "hate" mail are the ones sent from you and oac3. I never expected any "fan" mail from either of you:)
for all the facts on the new 2003 Ford Expedition.
For "autobroker" -- it has seat-integrated restraints in both the 2nd and 3rd rows...as well as 2nd and 3rd row fold-flat seats that never have to be removed. Industry-first power-fold feature too. Have a look!
The Japanese and import manufacturers are not just gaining market share in the U.S in passenger cars. They are also gaining a sizeable market share with thier trucks and SUV's as well. Sequoia, Highlander, Tundra, are all relatively newer vehicles in Toyota's arsenal and G.M. should take notes on the progress of these vehicles as they will surely put pressure on them by forcing them to continue to lure customers into their showrooms with baited come ons like 0% finincing and large factory rebates. That is what they must do to continue to comptete in this high stakes market.
A couple statements come to the fore:
"They just never take their eye off the ball," said Jay Woodworth, a New Jersey-based auto industry analyst. "They don't go off on wild tangents or money-losing ventures. They concentrate on superb quality with extremely competitive pricing."
Does this not make you cring at the thoughts of GM's "adventurism" in the concept vehicles - The Pontiac Aztek and Chevy Avalanche ??? These vehicles are by no means sales chart busters !!! They were supposed to go against the norm, challenge our views and expectations of what SUV's and trucks should/could be, and maybe provide a peek into the future... But, despite GM's best efforts, these attempts have been unmitigated sales disasters. The main reason being aestethics (the look). Will GM ever learn the lesson from these ? Hopefully, a big YES !
Yes to Innovation
No to adventurism, esp when your competitors are these formidable in an increasingly competitive environment
The eye-opening closer is instructive too:
"You have to stop thinking of them as Japanese companies," said Saul Rubin, an analyst with UBS Warburg. "Honda has twice as much revenue in the U.S. as it does in Japan. It's basically a U.S. company. They take it very seriously. It's simply easier to run a growth business."
The Japanese-3 are as American as the Big-3. It can even be argued that they are more American than the Big-3, with the latter situating parts and assembly lines in countries other than the US to contain costs and improve margins.....
There has to be a silver lining in all of these for the domestic competition - make better quality vehicles, that inspire confidence and reliability, otherwise face very difficult and challenging times ahead !!
To end: how about this ?
"Price is not the only factor, it's the value you give customers," said Jed Connelly, Nissan's head of North American operations.
touche
The Cross Terrains are not cheap, but so far seem worth the price.
The Sequoia does have impressive rear tail lights though..
As a long time lurker, I am still in the market for some type of SUV to replace my 95 Explorer. No vehicle has yet to totally hit the mark on my requirements. I really like the Sequoia but I can't say as though I need a vehicle that size, and I'm not sure I can justify $35K+ for a vehicle. Any scoop on a new 4Runner? I would like a 3rd row for occasional use and stability control is a key feature for me. Any feature/timeframe info available?
Thanks for any insight.
The 2001 November sales for the Chevy Avalanche were 8661 units. The combination sales for the Pontiac Aztek and its twin the Buick Rendezvous were 6803 units in Nov. The total sales for the Toyota Sequoia in Nov. were 6248.
If the GM model sales were unmitigated sales disasters, how would you describe the Sequoia sales numbers?
I would love to know how far off the mark the 3 vehicles are that you mentioned.
http://www.toyota.com/html/about/news/archive/press_release/product/docs/2002/20020106a_gx470.jsp
I'll hit 2000 miles w/in several days on an '02 Seq and am planning on towing a camper on vacation.
1) Do I need to change the new "break-in" oil prior to the trip - 0r wait for 5,000 per owners manual?
2) When I change, do I need synthetic?
3) While towing, should I turn off overdrive and drive for 1000 miles without overdrive - OR - leave the transmission in Drive w/OD.
All help and advice is greatly appreciated.
( had it's best year ever in 2001..without "0" percent financing).
My dealer suggested and oil and filter change at the first 1000 mi. Synthetic engine oil is best after the engine breaks in, I usually wait until 10,000 miles.
Towing is hardest on the differential, it will get very hot very quickly until it wears in under the increased load. Take it slow, under 60mph and stop every 20 miles during the first 60 miles of towing and let it cool off. I think it should be changed at the first oil change as well. Synthetic Hypoid Gear Lube is an excellent choice for the differential.
While the forecasts were not probably met on the Aztec and its twin, I do have to say I was surprised to see the Avalanche and the Aztec/Rendezvous with higher sales, since the Sequoia is a far better looking vehicle and compared to the Avalanche would have been expected to meet more consumer's needs. Anyway's I thought the sales data was interesting compared to the Sequoia.