2004 Odyssey vs 2004 Sienna vs 2006 G Caravan SXT
For the first time in my life, I am considering buying a used vehicle. My current lease is about to expire and I was wondering why do I need to return a perfectly running vehicles at the end of every lease I have experienced through?
Choices (from Canada):
- 2004 Odyssey EX, 100,000km at $19k CA
- 2005 G Caravan SXT, 50,000km at $14k CA
- 2004 Sienna LE, 100,000km at $20k CA
What are the (relatively trouble free) life expectancy of the above vans? If I want to keep them for the next 4 years, which would end up with lower ownership cost?
Which would you choose?
Choices (from Canada):
- 2004 Odyssey EX, 100,000km at $19k CA
- 2005 G Caravan SXT, 50,000km at $14k CA
- 2004 Sienna LE, 100,000km at $20k CA
What are the (relatively trouble free) life expectancy of the above vans? If I want to keep them for the next 4 years, which would end up with lower ownership cost?
Which would you choose?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I would get the 2006 GC SXT with less miles, lower mileage, and lower cost. The separately controlled temperature for the driver and front passenger of the GC SXT is a VERY important feature which NEITHER the 2004 Ody EX or 2004 Sienna have.
The 2004 Ody EX has the most comfortable seats BUT the Ody EX 3rd row fold into the floor seat is only one piece while the Sienna LE and GC SXT have 60/40 split fold into the floor 3rd row seats. :shades:
Most of the time, it's better to buy the Honda/Toyota/Lexus/Acura cars new, and the Chryslers, Fords, and Chevys used, unless you can get a screaming deal.
Our two Chrysler's never made it to the end of their warranty when we had them - we got rid of them before they ran out because it would have been so expensive to keep them up at that rate should the warranty expire.
I hope this car won't cause any problems... (crossing my fingers!)