By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Thanks for your input. They wanted $500 to replace both O2 sensors. That caused the engine light to come on-4 trouble codes. It wasn't oil in the tailpipe, it was unburned fuel. The O2 sensors were making the engine run lean. You were right about the clunking noises-struts and bearing plates to the tune of $560. $356 to do the timing belt. Now, I'm just trying to decide what tree to find all this money on. Maybe I'll just wait for an '30 Mazda 6!
If your car is a 1995 you don't have to use factory O2 sensors. I just purchased one for mine at $99.00. You can go to the buyoxygensensors.com site and order them even cheaper -- about $65.00 for OEM types, or order them from Autozone (I got a Bosch) then have them install it while you're doing the other repairs. I would not get the Universal O2 Sensor. Some type of soldering has to be done. Avoid the chance for extra labor.
Do the valve cover and timing belt at the same time. At the price they quoted, I would make sure that included the Cam and crankshaft seals and new spark plugs when the timing belt is changed. Sorry, but you might also want to consider a water pump at the same time for about another $100.00 plus labor (much less since most of the labor involves the removal of the timing belt). Saves a lot of money in the long run.
I'd let the struts and mounts go a while longer until the other repairs have been paid for.
I've done everything you needed, plus a CV Axle. but the car is sure fun to drive. I feel confident with the manual transmission, that it will last a long time.
In my view the OEM has more solid connections, and is so much easier to install, it's worth the extra $15--$25. Since mine had never been changed I felt it better to shift labor responsibity to someone who would have to fix it if they broke it. (i.e. not me.) Mine only cost another $25.00
I also put in a bosch and loved it.
PS I'm lucky to get about 300 miles out of a tankfull....
I think the secret to getting better mileage out of this car is to quit thinking about improving MPG and just drive the heck out of it. By the standards of people steeped in the culture of Consumer Reports, my driving is self-absorbed and utterly unconcerned with the Greater Good; on the other hand, I routinely beat the EPA sticker on both 626s I have owned (the current example of which is, yes, a 2000 four-cylinder with said autobox). Middle of last summer, in fact, I got nearly 33 mpg running down the Pennsylvania Turnpike, a road which is not in the least bit conducive to steady speeds. With the A/C cranked up to just short of the Glacier setting, yet. Around town, 22-23 mpg, unless I'm slogging through snow or other winter-inflicted miseries.
Mazda, for some reason, thinks you should be really, really impressed by the low-fuel light, and that you should fill up the moment it bathes you in its hideous orange glow. There are, of course, good and sensible reasons why you should never let a fuel-injected vehicle run out of fuel, but unless you routinely commute across the Mojave, three gallons left is way too early for an alarm, if you ask me. (300 miles divided by the 13.9 gallons of fuel you used up to get down to this point is 21.6 mpg.)
That said, yes, this car would probably get 1 or 2 mpg better if it had 150 hp instead of 125-130; the engine wouldn't be working so hard so often. Fortunately, it doesn't seem to mind being flogged.
Cheap things to increase power are replace PCV valve, and get a new air filter. Too new yet to replace sparkplugs, or time the engine. I was amazed recently about the influence of a PCV valve on engine power when I replaced it. My gas mileage is similar to windowphoebe.
pretty poor calibration on Mazdas' part
zoom/zoomin' along with no problems.Our 130 ponies
can "Keep up with the big boys" no problem and
I'm wondering if I should pay for the EW at least
for the final 3yrs of payments? She hasn't given
us a lick of grief.Those workers in FlatRock MI
sure put together a fine automobile and I'm not
sure if that money would be better spent elsewhere.
Exactly one year old (yesterday).
Started shifting funny this morning on the way to work. When I got to work, (25 mile trip) I put the transmission into park and the O/D light started flashing. Now I have no reverse, it "slips" like crazy in all forward grears and the O/D flashes. I had hoped all the Ford transmission problems had been worked out by now, guess not. Hope I can make it home today!
Power steering quirky, so I started checking out
the boards for any maintenance issues with this
vehicle. ( Consumer reports likes the maintenance history of this model ). Imagine my sinking feeling when I read post after post of tranny problems with the 4 cyl. Car has only 27,500 miles on it at this time, should I sell ASAP?
I don't mind paying for regular maintenance, even beyond the suggested items, but the thought of a $2K tranny on a vehicle this new makes me queasy.
I bought import for her with expectations of trouble-free driving with the normal maintenance performed.
Would welcome any imput/hand-holding.
After that a drain and fill with Lubegard should be done every 15,000 miles after that. If you wish to use synthentic that interval can be extended to 25-30k.
At 67K My son's 626 was starting to have difficulty shifting between first and second gears. We did the above treatment and everything worked fine a few days after the fluid was completely replaced.
Another good thing to do is install a good transmission cooler. My mechanic does that as a routine if a replacement transmission needs to be installed.
Newer vehicles don't have the same problems that cars built in the early to mid 1990s.
Having said this, I must also say that on day 1096 of ownership, I will probably tack on that auxiliary cooler.
Tony