Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.
Subaru Impreza WRX
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
- Hutch
ps - I want a moonroof, and 261hp wouldn't hurt either.
"Only 265hp"? It seems that 227 is more than plenty for most people given the accident reports I've been seeing over on i-club. I don't think it will be much trouble getting that car up to the 280-300hp mark; it will be more trouble finding mature, qualified drivers who can handle that kind of power responsibly, thus keeping insurance rates down.
Ed
If they added the moonroof as a stand-alone $800 option to the WRX, it would be very tempting to give Sandy to the wifey.
-juice
-mike
-juice
I don't consider the metal slats as a good alterantive. Sorry Drew!
-Mike
Only 265hp for STI?? I can't wait to do the COBB Stage1 upgrade on my WRX. 280hp, 4.6 secs to 60 (sedan), 13.8 1/4 mile for about $2600 plus labor.
Stephen
Dennis
Patti
All our cars have some kind of open roof. The Miata is a roadster with a soft top that is down even in 40 degree temps. The Forester got an aftermarket pop up roof. The 626 has a factory moonroof.
-juice
You'd be willing to give up Sandy for this puny moonroof?
http://www.subaru.co.jp/impreza/wrx/packaging/img/photo_04.jpg
Say it isn't so!
Ken
-mike
Yup !! Automatic here, and grinning ear to ear everytime, I take her out for a spin.
Bob
Ed
Though her car is fine now, so we may just wait a year or two longer. By then, maybe a more powerful Legacy? Who knows...
-juice
The solidity issue is one sticking point... I am able to slam Passat doors shut and hear a loud thunk. I am afraid to try that with the WRX... I think the window might shatter because the door sounds so damn tinny.
The WRX upside is soooooo damn obvious, you'd have to be in a coma to not know. That crazy acceleration is just something to be experienced.
So, were any of you Rexers on the fence like I am now?
Anyway, I've spent over 4 hours of ridding around in that rex auto wagon in the twisties with a crazy driver :P Ive also been in a 2002 RS manual, as well as a WRX manual in the twisties, and even a Legacy GT sedan auto in the same twisties and a '96 L coupe modified to a 2.2l and from an auto to a manual in an Auto-x... So ya, I kinda think my personal experience has SOME merrit... Thats why I suggest that test drives/riding in someones car, or driving someones car in serious stuff is the best way to find out for YOURSELF if you dont want to believe me! :P
Cupholder: I was off the fence a looong, looong time ago on subaru's... Mostly because of what I just mentioned to rex
So if any of you are upgrading let me know.
-mike
For a stock setup, you'll be much happier from a performance stand point with the WRX. The tires are the only sore spot, but you may see the ability to break traction as a fun thing.
So, it's acceleration and handling vs. luxury and comfort. I like the former, but I'll admit the latter can be really nice when you're tired and just want to get somewhere.
-juice
Final analysis was that I wanted a bit more performance type vehicle and it had to be 4 doors not two. the Subaru name did hold a bit more appeal just from generalized info that was collected and finally it was the test drive(S) that caught me.
The details of(craftsmanship) the WRX comparo were not high prioity for me as they are you, finish ect ect. I doubt if slamming the WRX door is gonna hurt it!!!!!!;)YOU are conditioned to think sound equals quality. the doors dont have the frame..around the window.....doesnt mean its inferior its just unfamiliar to you.
I dont have an issue of family needs for space yet i wanted four doors. and leasing idea was not in equation!
I almost have 800 miles on my WRX. cant wait ! til 1000 !!!!!!!!!!
In Soobie news, saw three silver WRX wagons on a truck this morning... What a beautiful sight!
-B
Silver WRX wagon,
Stephen
-mike
Looking at a silver WRX wagon myself. Thinking the sleeper look will be a good thing with me behind the wheel, tehe.
-B
Dennis
-mike
PS: yes neons are crappolio
Buy it.
TWRX
PS, Ever owned a cult car?
Any thoughts on the above ?
Thanks in advance,
AH
I'm used to an MR2 turbo which is almost as fast as the WRX and probably handles considerably better on dry pavement. I know from my test drive of the WRX that the MR2 has nicer seats and a better sound system also, but I'd be willing to give those up for a fun car that I can drive year round.
There's also the recognition factor. I like having a car that looks like it just came off the track at LeMans. I doubt I'd get the same looks in a WRX wagon.
So the 2nd question is, has anyone replaced a real sportscar with a WRX, and what are your impressions.
AH: we queried an SoA rep and a dealer supplier I know, and both agreed there are no break-in additives in the oil Subaru uses. IIRC it was Havoline, nothing special, just SJ rated dino oil.
I'd do the first change at 3000 miles, perhaps even earlier, to get rid of any metal shavings. I wouldn't go synthetic until it's well broken in, perhaps 15k miles or so.
-juice
I guess I will do the first change as soon as my "break-in" is over. I plan to "break-in" my car for 1500 miles, even though the manual only suggests that we do it for 1000 miles. That should hopefully ensure the longevity of the car. Personally, in my estimation, the car is not truly broken-in until about 10,000 miles of "smooth" driving is over (including smoothly and progressively raising the car's RPM to redline, every now and then, after the initial 1500 miles).
Later...AH
PLEASE HELP ANYONE
-Nick
The WRX does NOT replace my summer car, a Miata. The Miata runs circles around the WRX when it comes to fun and limits in the twisties, but the WRX does quite well thank you and does it almost as well with much less drama (assuming better tires). That's the beauty of AWD and the balanced design of the car. It's got a decent dose of thrill in everything it does any day...rain/sun/snow. Sometimes you want the drama, and that's why MR2's and Miatas exist, but sometimes you just want to get there quickly with a decent sense of fun and security...that's what the WRX is about.
However, I think most people know that the WRX cannot replace a true sportscar (like my Miata, or S2000, or any of the other raw feeling sports cars), but then again, most people buy the WRX because it just feels capable without demanding the world out of the driver. With AWD and a fairly tuned suspension, it can hang with and even beat some more dedicated cars measurement wise. As far as the looks, some people like sleepers, there's something to be said about a car that hangs with more exotic stuff with a baby seat in back and a non-cop attracting package.
For those who want the pinnacle of sportscar handling/performance, the Impreza can get them there too thanks to STi parts and the fact there are ultra hot Imprezas called P1's and 22B which don't apologize to ANY sportscars. The fact that the Impreza is a race proven package (see N-group rally cars) adds to its desirability.
Accord is a reliable workhorse family sedan.
Jetta is a comparatively unreliable, expensive (to buy and upkeep) compact sedan that feels posh and well detailed.
WRX is reliable sedan that sacrifices luxury features for performance and has AWD for traction in any conditions.
No doubt, at least in this forum, the WRX is the best choice!
Too many college students own Jettas around here. It is good looking, but I heard horrific problems with them. Not to mention their warranty sucks (until next year that is.)
WRX is good all around, I can't wait until it snows. I couldn't move a thing last year here in jersey.
-mike
the WRX has theraputic value it will put a
smile on your face. Im not real familiar with'
a Jetta as far as knowing anybody close who has owned one but I sure have read more than 30 remarks about the "iffy" general reliability of these cars. Accord is like Velveeta cheese
its soo plain ......does the job...established reputable long shelf life.....cost is nice.....nobody complains..
The Jetta has a nice solid interior. Very comfortable and feels upscale inside. As people have mentioned, reliability is more suspect. For a couple of grand more, you can get a Passat -- same engine, but the car is bigger and made in Germany, while the Jetta is made in Mexico. The truly fun VW is the GTI, but it is on the small side. Like the Jetta, the GTI seems like a kid's car.
The WRX... what is there to say about the WRX? Drive one, and you'll see. When I first test drove one, I was smiling ear to ear and ready to buy it on the spot... but the dealer didn't have the color I wanted in stock... and I have been tire kicking ever since. My main reservations about the WRX: 1. Less than smooth shifter that could be a pain to drive in the city, 2. Cheesey interior, 3. Feel very vulnerable in the car. Car feels like a tin can, and half the cars on the road these days are being driven by 5 foot tall women in 5000 lb SUVs that are putting on makeup while driving. 4. Poor gas mileage, and requires premium. I am told that "sprited driving" will lead to a sub-20 mpg average. 5. Insurance rates.. they're already high, and I am not optimistic about the rates in the future. Go read i-club.com. People are wrecking these WRXes left and right (dumb kids driving out of control, thinking AWD will save them).
So, if you use your head, you probably won't get a WRX. If you follow your heart, say "hell, I only live once", and just want a big sh-- eating grin on your face when you drive, you know what to do...
Thats all I have to say about it
1. Less than smooth shifter that could be a pain to drive in the city - It smooths out considerably after some mileage.
2. Cheesey interior - Ahhh .. that one is subjective but I kinda like it.
3. Feel very vulnerable in the car. - Again subjective but there is no reason to feel vulnerable. The frequently touted frame rigidity is in large part due to the "Ring Shaped Reinforcement Frames" which disperse energy around the passenger compartment. Also, the boxer engine is designed to go down and under in a front end collision. "Feeling" is very subjective but your "feeling" is just that. The car is extremely safe in comparison to other cars in the price range.
4. Poor gas mileage, and requires premium. I am told that "sprited driving" will lead to a sub-20 mpg average - I've been averaging 26+. Do you call that bad? Sure if you wanna keep your foot on the floor there is a price to pay but who drives like that all the time. Not even Paisian!
5. Insurance rates.. they're already high - Well, I might have to give you this one. GEICO raised my premium 30% with a "performance surcharge". I've changed to Progressive and was able to beat my old GEICO rate. So, if you shop around rates are acceptable.
- Hutch
Also, do the rear seats on the sedan fold down, or is there only a pass-through? I guess there's always the wagon option.
Thanks.