Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

1328329331333334478

Comments

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,328
    I probably stop.

    get rearended, hope for a new car.

    hit the bike, have to clean all the guts off the front of the car, and deal with lots of paperwork.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    edited June 2011
    I would gladly fill out any paperwork if it involved an inconsiderate cyclist. Besides, the car is an 09 (this happened last year), would like to keep it for awhile longer. On a different trip, I did see an inconsiderate cyclist get hit by a van. I'd actually leave the guts on the hood, let it serve as a warning to the next idiot on a bicycle :D

    I do understand the concept of sharing the road, however this idea needs to go BOTH ways. Unfortunately it seems that cyclists demand that motorists share the road, while they do whatever they please.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Unfortunately it seems that cyclists demand that motorists share the road, while they do whatever they please.

    Thats some generalization there. Most serious bikers do their best to share the road.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Yep, I had a great time. It's a world of its own. People from Seattle would wither up and die if they had to drive there - the northwest is so meek and incompetent in comparison. Locals freak out if you use a horn for any reason.

    I think cyclists are like cops - most are good, but there are some really jerky ones out there who don't seem to get enough castigation from their peers.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    edited June 2011
    Most serious bikers do their best to share the road.

    Don't know what "serious" means. See too many inconsiderate bicyclists on 55mph rural back roads, State highways and US highways. They do not belong there.

    We need state laws that limit bicyclists to lightly travelled city, suburb side streets where speed limits are 20, 25 or 30 mph. If bicyclists are to be allowed on higher speed roads, perhaps they should have license plate and pay same yearly fee as say a compact car (civic) for PRIVILEDGE of using public road.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Washougal Mayor Sean Guard will face a misdemeanor charge in Cowlitz County for a December incident in which he allegedly used the emergency lights on his city-owned vehicle to pass slower traffic on Interstate 5, a court official said today.

    Guard has a July 6 arraignment date for a gross misdemeanor charge of criminal impersonation in the second degree of a law-enforcement officer, said Delaura Wirkkala, a Cowlitz County court administrator.

    Gross misdemeanors carry maximum penalties of one year in jail and a $5,000 fine.

    A Washington state trooper stopped Guard Dec. 24 after allegedly witnessing him flashing emergency lights on I-5 near Kelso to urge slower-moving vehicles into the right lane. The Washington State Patrol forwarded the trooper's report to the Cowlitz County's Prosecutor's Office for further review. ;)
  • jensadjensad Member Posts: 388
    "I think cyclists are like cops - most are good, but there are some really jerky ones out there who don't seem to get enough castigation from their peers".

    Very true as most law enforcement personnel use common sense and most of us tried to be a human being and not a ticket machine. Yeh there are jerky ones but for each jerk I had towork with on the midnight shift, there were were 9 more that were professional and excellent to work with on evening/midnight shift.

    I watched a cyclist get the book thrown at him for not stopping at stop lights and also cutting off vehciles in the process. The judge assessed three points for the recklessness of the cyclist. And that is heavy stuff!!

    One big issue was that when the (law enforcement) got tenure, they were difficult to fire. Regardless of the righteousness of some, at least jmo, we did the best we could in conditions that many times were difficult. Glad to be retired.

    As I just returned with my bride of 47 years from our driving trip to Illinois and back, we got to see many beautiful places and meet many many wonderful people of this great country, the USA.

    We drove through 9 different states and meet many wonderful people. And we got to see our grandchildren play in baseball games and enjoyed the majestic Zion and the Grand Canyon. Wow what a wonderful time to be alive.

    Good luck to all and stay safe. Oh, we met very few inconsiderate drivers/people.

    jensad
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    edited June 2011
    I should have clarified by saying most bicyclists that I encounter. I have seen a small minority of those who actually follow the rules and are courteous, however for me it has been about 5-10% at most.

    I have only seen at most 3 bicyclists stop for a red light or stop sign. Drive in NYC and I guarantee you will see dozens of incompetent bicyclists, and very few that are obeying the rules. On an 8 lane road through Manhattan (4 each way) 3 of us traveling side by side through the intersection had to slam our brakes on to avoid this person who decided that cutting in front of all of us was the best option. I think what shocked me the most was the taxi driver hitting the brakes as well!

    The best cyclists I have seen were out in the country, mainly kept on the shoulder when possible, or to the right most of the lane if one wasn't available. The worst ones tend to be in the city from what I see.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Serious meaning you will never hear then use the term "long ride" for a ten mile bike ride.

    Now what is being done on those 55 MPH rural roads that is inconsiderate?

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited June 2011
    Cyclists shouldn't have to come to a complete stop at stop signs or red lights, if traffic is clear. That's even the law in some places (like Idaho, except you have to stop at the light before you can run it there, assuming there's no traffic).

    Something like 57 million adults bike at least once a week; probably more since that's a 2002 number back in the days of cheap gas. (link). Changing behavior is fine, but cyclists have a right to the roads (and don't get me going on the right vs privilege to drive argument :D ). Not to mention bikers were using the roads before automobiles.

    If you want blanket assertions, take a scroll back through a few hundred posts in this board. I'm sure the percentage of idiot drivers equals those of bikers or pedestrians; likely higher since the auto idiots think they are invincible since they are surrounded by sheet metal.
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    I'm sure the percentage of idiot drivers equals those of bikers or pedestrians

    I would have to agree. When was the last time that you saw a bicyclist texting, eating a Big Mac, reading, applying makeup, or smoking? :confuse:

    (I must admit that I once saw a cyclist smoking, but I don't think that he was what S-weasel would call a "serious biker") ;)
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Pedestrians, on the other hand....

    There's a reason they are padding sign poles in parts of London.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Nobody else comes to a complete stop anyway, but maybe slow to a crawl? I see them shoot out from side streets like the stop sign isn't even there... there has to be a happy medium somewhere.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited June 2011
    Well, now you're back to my rant about taking down most signs out there. :)

    Allowing California stops would save a lot of gas.
  • ronsteveronsteve Member Posts: 1,234
    Nobody else comes to a complete stop anyway, but maybe slow to a crawl? I see them shoot out from side streets like the stop sign isn't even there... there has to be a happy medium somewhere.

    Some places are finding that happy medium for cyclists, where they are expected to regard a stop sign the same as a yield sign, and a red light the same as cars are expected to regard a stop sign. And that's what I do. The laws here don't specifically say I can or should, but I don't get in anyone's way either.

    The cyclists that get out in the rural back roads are usually the serious ones, and will ride smart and courteously. Depending on where you encounter them, you may still be delayed a few seconds. We'll ride as far to the right as it is safe to do so, and all we ask in return is 3 feet of clearance when you pass. That's sharing the road.

    A couple weekends ago I did 160+ miles on the NC back roads between Cary and Pinehurst and didn't really have any close calls with motorists.

    Oh, and you can make fun of the colorful jerseys all you want... but you can't use the excuse that you didn't see me!
    2015 Acura RDX AWD / 2021 VW TIguan SE 4Motion
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    edited June 2011
    Then why should I stop my car or wait for a usually undefendably drawn out light change when the coast is obviously clear?

    A local Seattle biker trait that bugs me - when there's a bike lane, some of these posers in funny tight unflattering gear refuse to ride in it, instead sticking to the motor vehicle lane. Maybe I should pass in the bike lane...

    And on a related note, roads were paved and made widespread for cars. If who comes first matters, then pedestrians should be able to amble down the middle of any street...
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Common sense isn't common, and a little of it goes a long way. Just wish bicyclists would use a little bit more of that which they have available.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited June 2011
    Then why should I stop my car or wait for a usually undefendably drawn out light change when the coast is obviously clear?

    Different vehicle, different rules. When you're commuting on a bike and hitting red lights, you have more visibility than someone in a car (unless you're pedaling a recumbent perhaps), and it's easy to slow and scope out the intersection without losing all your momentum. And if you screw up, you may kill a pedestrian, but you're more likely to be creamed yourself.

    In a car you don't have any personal effort at stake and no personal energy to conserve. If you get t-boned, at least you have seat belts, crumple zones and air bags on your side.

    Long lights just give you opportunity to grab the other make-up case and put some more ketchup on those McDonald's fries. :)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    If you are in a less safe vehicle, shouldn't you be stopping too? I hear different rules, but no real justification. Why should I sit in an abandoned intersection for a negligently managed traffic control to cycle through when a cyclist doesn't? How much gas is wasted and environmental harm done via this. In a car I have the brakes and gas I paid for to conserve, not to mention my time.

    Long lights increase gas tax proceeds and the overpaid "traffic engineers" who plan them likely believe they encourage people to stop and shop in their locales, as well.

    Sounds like a scam to me.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    It costs a lot of money to fix traffic signals. People don't want to pay it. We don't even pay to fix potholes, much less to time the lights.

    Very inconsiderate of the taxpayers.
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    And on a related note, roads were paved and made widespread for cars. If who comes first matters, then pedestrians should be able to amble down the middle of any street...

    Well, here in the suburbs of Suwon, South Korea... the pedestrians actually *DO* that. And there are sidewalks for them to use, but the pedestrians completely ignore them, favoring the center of the road.

    It's really, REALLY annoying, to say the least.
  • ronsteveronsteve Member Posts: 1,234
    A local Seattle biker trait that bugs me - when there's a bike lane, some of these posers in funny tight unflattering gear refuse to ride in it, instead sticking to the motor vehicle lane. Maybe I should pass in the bike lane...

    I'm not in Seattle, but....

    1. The spandex, however unflattering, is functional.

    2. What you call funny is also highly visible. My neighbor may want to look like Lance (hell, he named his kid Lance) but I don't give a damn... I just want motorists to be able to see me, so they don't run me over.

    3. Sometimes I will move over into the vehicle lane (on the order of *inches* from the white line) to avoid some kind of hazard in the bike lane. If you want cyclists to stay in the bike lane all the time, stop throwing your trash there. If you want cyclists to pay license/registration fees, that money should go to regularly clearing the sand/gravel/debris out of the bike lanes.
    2015 Acura RDX AWD / 2021 VW TIguan SE 4Motion
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    I'd say several times a week I see someone on a bicycle talking on the phone.
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    edited June 2011
    I have no issues with cyclists if they ride responsibly, and will hang back behind one if I do not have the option to pass. But when they feel that their "right" to the roadway trumps everyone else's I have an issue with that. If you as a cyclist have a red light and I have a green, then you should wait like everyone else. What makes someone on a bicycle special and not subject to the rules of the road? I have not seen a cyclist waiting on the side while traffic passes by, they have always tried to force their way through the traffic as if it is their "right" to use the roadway.

    I have seen very little consideration overall. Percentage wise, I'd say cyclists are more inconsiderate than motorists. Rarely have I ever seen a cyclist using hand signals which would be nice to know that you are planning to turn in front of me, but then again, people aren't much better using signals in a car either... :(
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    I can agree with the statement regarding the serious bikers, but these are not the ones I encounter on a regular basis. These are the ones that actually know what to do and are considerate. Just wish I'd see more of them.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited June 2011
    If I stop or slow and run the light, I may be able to get through the next intersection by the time the light changes and you pass me. Car time isn't the same as bicycle time. It doesn't affect your transit time much to wait, but it does a bike.

    Different vehicle, different rules.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    It's inconsiderate to taxpayers to pay healthy salaries and insane solid platinum benefits to public sector " traffic engineers" et al who don't seem to be able to tell up from down, and in many areas don't even put on the facade of trying to fix the problems, instead providing endless excuses and maybe a red light camera here and there. Huzzah!
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Just get a cow-catcher or an easy-clean front end for your car :shades:

    After spending nearly a week in NYC, I can say I saw my share of inconsiderate pedestrians...however, they were always menaced by the vehicle they offended, and rightfully so.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    And in a car, if I can stop or slow and run an irresponsibly/negligently planned traffic control, I too can make the next light before it changes, saving time, gas, and reducing congestion.

    It's amusing how "share the road" seems to be a one way street.

    Same road, same rules.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    edited June 2011
    I don't know where you are, but I don't see bike lanes covered in trash, or often, even occupied by bikes. Sounds like a local dysfunction :P

    I'd have no problem in the world with bike fees being used to maintain said lanes - with an expectation that the riders are required to use said lanes when available, and will be penalized if they do not, just like I would be if I drove my car in that lane. What I see isn't riders avoiding hazards, but simply ignoring the existence of the bike lane altogether.

    Spandex might not be really necessary for a 2 mile jaunt from the tract house to the office, but that's what it is used for in my area :shades:
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    The same applies to a car. If a car runs a light, they might be able to get through the next intersection in less time than waiting.

    And if that argument doesn't hold water for a car, it doesn't hold water for anything on the road. Period.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited June 2011
    Yes I would agree. Many motorcycle drivers ROUTINELY split lanes with cars ALL the time. For some reason, they get real hostile when cars split lanes with them ????? Keep in mind in CA, lane splitting is NOT against the law for either.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Keep in mind lane splitting is NOT against the law

    It is here.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    I will be a bit more direct with this question.

    Are you saying "screw the cross traffic", I'm going through regardless and they must stop/swerve to avoid hitting you?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited June 2011
    And they still do it (where) ?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited June 2011
    Well yes, that would be one consequence. T boning of cars is probably one of the deadliest accidents. I would hate to imagine with a bike. It would probably be the bikes fault, but ruled the cars fault, as goofy as our laws are becoming.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    It's really simple - if traffic is clear, you proceed. Cross-traffic implies that it's not safe to proceed.

    Here's how Idaho does it.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The problem is the bikers who don't understand that principle. I almost hit a biker the other day who went full speed through a stop sign. I was close enough, also on his right in the intersection with stop signs on all corners, that he should have yielded right of way. When we encourage bikers to not follow the same traffic laws that all other road traffic must follow, these kinds of things will happen.

    Now, I don't think a bike should have to come to a complete stop at every stop sign and stop light. But they'd better slow down, look VERY carefully in all directions, and be prepared to stop, and yield right of way to other traffic. Given that a bike is at a disadvantage in any collision, that is only prudent.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited June 2011
    That's pretty much what the Idaho law says in a nutshell. Slow down and yield.
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    edited June 2011
    Thanks for the clarification. Based on personal experience, I usually see a cyclist ride through with no respect for the cross traffic. Rarely (if ever) do I see them stop when traffic is coming.

    Thinking back, I really can't recall sitting at a light without cross traffic at all in the recent past, so I'm under the impression that they should stop and wait their turn with the rest of us. I guess I need to travel out further in the country where you may sit at a light with nothing coming for miles from either direction :) Where I am, there is always traffic.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    edited June 2011
    Spend some time in metro Seattle...you'll see lights sitting on red for nothing. Happened to me just this morning around 0545...I slowed down but didn't stop. No traffic, no (revenue based) cameras, no real reason to stop.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I don't see many doing it.

    And I am in IL.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Drove 40 miles from my house yesterday before I hit my first traffic light. And I hit the green. :)

    Did a 30 mile RT jaunt this morning with just one flashing caution to go through. That light is probably unnecessary; more of a beacon to get people to realize there's shopping just off the main road.

    In another couple of years I won't be fit to drive in Seattle.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Many people who have lived in Seattle for years aren't fit to drive in Seattle :P
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    I still say I need to fit an air horn of hockey arena magnitude under the hood of the Subaru. Perfect for don't stop bicyclists, airhead cell phoners, and anyone else who needs a little wake up call :surprise:
  • ronsteveronsteve Member Posts: 1,234
    The same applies to a car. If a car runs a light, they might be able to get through the next intersection in less time than waiting.

    And if that argument doesn't hold water for a car, it doesn't hold water for anything on the road. Period.


    But if a light is on a demand sensor, and a cyclist is the only cross traffic, it's not going to change. That's when I just look for a break in traffic that is big enough for me to cross without getting in anyone's way.
    2015 Acura RDX AWD / 2021 VW TIguan SE 4Motion
  • ronsteveronsteve Member Posts: 1,234
    The trash in the bike lanes isn't the biggest problem; sand and gravel are a larger issue.

    Long story short, there are things that cyclists have to avoid that motorists wouldn't even think about. If I stray over the line, I have a good reason. And that's a good reason for the 3-foot rule.

    The only place I truly play fast and loose with a bike lane is a lightly traveled 25 mph residential thoroughfare in a nearby beach town... because if the wind is favorable I can easily pull 25-30mph.
    2015 Acura RDX AWD / 2021 VW TIguan SE 4Motion
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I don't miss the goatheads. :)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    You likely have a good reason, but I doubt all of the passive-aggressive weekend racers I see riding in the middle of the vehicle lane when the system has been generous enough to give them their own special lane have similar reasons. No huge issues with sand and gravel in these parts either. I think it's just general douchiness.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    OMG the phone yappers, must have seen a dozen of them in as many minutes this afternoon, most worryingly several members of the fairer side of the fence in largeish SUVs dawdling around with a phone to their ear. When are LEOs going to enforce this law they spent so much to advertise?
Sign In or Register to comment.