GM - Lemon Law in Wisconsin - Civil Suit

cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
edited March 2014 in Chevrolet
Sorry this is so long, just trying to be thorough.

We have a 2000 K2500 crew cab...it's a lemon. The truck will be 2 years old in April (w/ approx. 34000 miles on it) and we are finally pushing lemon law. Went through BBB - started paperwork, Chevy was on the phone within 2 days. Their "legal" department promised to call back during certain times (generally 2-3 hour increments during the day) and never did, we ended up calling them each time and getting put off each time. It has now been 3-4 weeks. We were told we would be getting a new truck - the only one close to what we have was a diesel, so we figured we'd have to put some $ into the deal for an upgrade. Chevy's legal dept. told us they estimated $2,000, which was fine, and that they wanted our truck off the road as soon as possible (one of the problems is the brakes don't always work). Chevy told my hubby the deal would be done by the end of this week. Chevy never contacted the dealer with the new truck, so I contacted Chevy before work on Monday...still no exact figure, and was told the paperwork would take 3 weeks. Yesterday, Thursday, I called Chevy and said the brakes are working less and less frequently and now squeal and clunk, and that if I get in an accident, Chevy will have a lawsuit since they know the problem and are delaying getting us into the new truck. By noon there was a message on our answering machine, it would be $12,000 to get into the new diesel. WRONG!

I told Chevy I did my homework and a new truck Exactly like ours would cost $38,398 (which would be what a replacement vehicle would be under lemon law) - the truck we were getting was $42,400, the most we're paying is $4000 - the difference. Chevy says no - you're upgrading 2 model years. I said no, if the truck would have been taken back in 2000 when it had all the problems it wouldn't be an upgrade, and it doesn't matter because lemon law says "a replacement vehicle will be a NEW comparable vehicle". I ended up telling Chevy we will sue them in civil court under lemon law, because that's what they want, and hung up. Today I will be doing up paper work to sue.

Chevy wants the best of both worlds, they want us to take a new truck, at sticker price, and only allow us our sticker price, minus mileage, against the new price. I told her the mileage only applies to buybacks under lemon law, and then there are a bunch of things in our favor, including collateral and pecuinary damages. She basically told me that they can do and will do what they want; oh, but she was overstepping her boundaries to help us - yeah, don't forget who signs her paycheck.

You can't get anywhere with GM. Before all this came about, we had the truck in 7 or 8 documented times in the first year, and at least 20 undocumented. The truck has a lack of power, an engine knock, tick, and miss, brakes that don't work part of the time, a problem with the rear axel, oil leaks, the 4wd lever doesn't pull sometimes, etc. They actually fixed one problem, the interior that was falling apart. The ZONE MANAGER looked at the truck and said "there's nothing wrong with it" (he didn't even acknowledge the interior problem) and gave me a bunch of other excuses, ending it with "you have a beautiful truck, I don't see what your problem is". Even when shown the 4wd lever, he said well, it's normal and it finally pulls on the 5th or 6th try, so you'll just have to live with it.

I had been in contact with Chevy's service line numerous times to no avail. Anytime the dealer noted a problem and called Chevy, they were told there's nothing wrong and everything is normal.

Finally at 14000 the dealer replaced valves, lifters, cylanders, gaskets, etc. - that made it work for about 14000 miles more, now same problem is back, prompting this whole deal.

This has been an unbelieveable experience and once we go for money under lemon law, we won't be buying a GM vehicle for a long time.

Has anyone gone through civil, circuit court, with lemon law here in Wisconsin?
«1

Comments

  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    You used the truck for 2 years and 34,000 miles. I think you are being unreasonable.
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    We were trying to get Chevy to take the truck back and/or fix it for the 1-1/2 years we've had it.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    I mean...if your truck had been flawless, and you were trading for an upgraded 2 year newer model HD with diesel, and only gave 12K more in trade for a used truck with 34,000 miles, that would seem fair, and the about the most they could owe you. During the time your truck was being repaired, you were entitled to be provided with alternative transportation.

    In any case, they won't owe you more than the value of an equivalent 2 yr old, but flawless K2500 Crew Cab with 34,000 miles.

    Can't tell you what to do, but if they offered me the deal you describe, I'd call 'em back and take it. No getting around it, vehicle ownership is expensive, and 5,6,7k depreciation per year is not unreasonable.
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    and lemon law (WI) says they will replace the truck with a Comparable New vehicle (no mileage deduction) plus collateral costs, or refund purchase price (less mileage of first complaint), plus collateral costs, interest paid, tax, title, & license, etc.

    We are not "trading" the truck, we are pursuing lemon law.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    If what you say is true, then wouldn't they use the formula (((66,000/100,000) x purchase price)+ interest,fees, tax, title, & liscense) equaling what they would pay you under the lemon law. Essentially based on mileage, you've used up approximately 1/3 of the life of the truck.

    Doesn't WI have a time or mileage limitation as to whether you can file a lemon law case against the manufacturer? I believe, course your attorney will verify, that GM has stalled you out of the option to file under the lemon law.
  • txyank1txyank1 Member Posts: 1,010
    7, 6 or even 5k dollars a year IS unreasonable for a truck to depreciate!
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    Hi again...our truck is now at 34,000 miles, not 66000 - also, under lemon law, they have to go by the mileage the defect was reported - we have it documented at 10,000, so it would be purchase price + all the extras - 1/10 of purchase price.

    The mileage only comes off if you are taking a cash settlement, the other option is to replace the truck with a new one (no mileage allowance deducted).

    I believe it has to be filed within the warranty period 3/36000, with at least 4 repair attempts in the first year (we have 7 documented in the first year). That's probably why they're stalling again now.
  • losangelesemtlosangelesemt Member Posts: 279
    I for one don't believe you're being unreasonable. Sounds like you have a classic case of good ole GM lemon. I actually thought they were gaining ground in quality within last few years, but your experience reaffirms my initial GM junk concept. To have a 2000 model of any kind undergo a short block overhaul at 14,000 doesn't seem acceptable to me at all. Not to mention that the attention GM has shown you in the matter seems to be quite sub par. I think you have a fair case should you continue with litigation, good luck.
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    Thanks for the understanding. I believe any company can have a lemon, but to not stand behind the vehicle is a joke, it's just gotten to be a big run around. My attorney will enjoy making money on this one. - Thanks again.
  • sebring95sebring95 Member Posts: 3,241
    I've seen some pretty open & shut cases go right down the tubes for the consumer with lemon laws. Not sure what makes the difference, but you are far from a sure-thing on thie one regardless of what the laws say. Good luck though.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    Going strictly by the numbers, my original calculation was correct in that
    100k-34k= 66k/100k x original value +fees,etc.= current value of truck.

    If there is an option, I'm sure GM will take the repurchase route rather than replace with an "as like" truck. Comes out cheaper for them.

    This may all be a moot point as your attorney knows the laws of your state better than I or anyone on this board.

    Either way...good luck with your case.
  • guy21guy21 Member Posts: 129
    I tend to agree with obyone in that GM has probably "timed you out". As I read it, the WI Lemon Law does state at least four repair attempts within the first year, but also says that any claim must be filed within the first two years or 24,000 miles of ownership, whichever comes first. Additionally, one of the first things your attorney would need to do is notify the court that you have unsuccessfully tried to negotiate a lemon law settlement on your own. Again, good luck.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I have no idea if you have a case but I will agree that GM has a reputation for not standing behind thier products and increasingly the reputation for putting out products of poor build quality.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    I had a 1986 Cavalier 2.8L that developed an expensive problem in the fuel injection system well after the warranty had expired. GM covered 50%.
  • kg11kg11 Member Posts: 530
    but in CA it's based on mileage at the time the problem it's being bought back for was first reported.The max here is 18 months or 18,000 mi.Mine had 7126 when I finally took it in and complained so they owe me for 120,000 minus 7,126 plus 100% of sales tax and first year's registration.I have 17,500+ on it now so I'm out of time to file.I gave them all the time I could cuz I really wanted it to work out.I don't want another GM becuase they couldn't fix this one.
    kip
  • amoralesamorales Member Posts: 196
    Have a 2000 C2500 reg cab. Built Jan 2000 in Arlington, Texas at 1230pm. This was purchased in Aug 2000 as an exchange for a LEMON 2000 S10 Xtreme 2.2L that at 20,000 mi and 8 mos. was returned to dealer for severe engine stalling 7 times. They could not duplicate stalling, however the engine computer confirmed a problem. After I threatened legal action, the dealer told me to pick-out another truck and deducted the value of S10. That was 4+ hours of intense negotiation over the value of the S10 truck. My current truck has 48,000 almost trouble free miles. Only problem was a premature right disc pad replacement at 38,000. I did that myself in less that an hour. There was a recall for the POPPET valves in injectors. That one is good for 100,000 miles and covers '97 - 2000. It seems the gasolenes formulated in California affect the very sensitive injectors on Vortec engines. GM just advises to use fuel injection clearner. Theirs is $19.95. Same as Techrolene which is available at most discount auto centers for about $3.95 and works great. GM is suppose to replace poppet valves if the cleaner does not work. Mine is ok.

    Regards,

    Andy
  • rayt2rayt2 Member Posts: 1,208
    My 86 Chevy Pickup had 19450 on it and was 1 1/2 years old when I finally settled my New York Lemon Law case. I got back full cost less $500 because of the 1450 over 18,000 mile limit for NY Lemon Law. NY's lemon law is 18 months or 18000 miles. I filed my case after going back 6 times for the same 3 problems which were all driveability related and first reported it at 450 miles. I didn't hold it against the dealer for GM's obvious defects and went right back and ordered the first year run of the extended cab in 1988, that truck had a few quirks that were taken care of under warranty and I kept it for 12 years till I got my Y2K Knockorado. I am getting the extended component warranty for engine from GM on this but am also working on pursuing this w/Attorney Generals office for them to go after GM for the knock issue. It's to late for lemon law but this is a nationwide problem that GM will get burned on eventually. They screwed up and will be brought to bear for it by all the states I think, it's just gonna take time and a few News Channnels to pursue it before they wake up.

    Bottom line ....DON'T GIVE UP YOU WILL PREVAIL
    my 2 cents

    Ray T.
  • guy21guy21 Member Posts: 129
    My last GM vehicle resulted in a lemon law claim during 2001. During the first nine months I owned the vehicle there were seven unsuccessful transmission repair attempts and eight unsuccessful steering repair attempts. I got fed up and filed a claim. GM fought relentlessly. After the judge ruled in my favor with a cash settlement, the area GM rep began sending me threatening emails thru the GM server. My local sheriff intervened to stop the threats. I bought a Ford.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    like offering you another GM? j/k
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I like that one.
  • ricschricsch Member Posts: 540
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you getting a lawyer involved? I went through the Wisconsin Lemon Law with my '00 Silverado working with the BBB (Better Business Bureau)w/0 any lawyer=no cost involved. Figured if I wasn't successful, I could seek an attorney. I am told Wisconsin has one of the most strict Lemon Laws. When you go to arbitration, be fully prepared, and hopefully you have documented each time you had ( or tried to) have contact with the dealer, and General Motors. From what it sounds like they have given you the run-around as usual. Show them you've had it. I did, and they had to give me a new '01 Silverado-no expense to me, besides my time.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    How many miles and how old was your truck at time of lemon law?
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    Guess we hit a good topic. We have turned it over to an attorney to handle. Will let you know when it's resolved.
  • ricschricsch Member Posts: 540
    When I actually swapped trucks, the Lemon '00 for the '01,the '00 had 5000 miles and was 10 months old. The first documented trip to the dealer for the vibration problem was at 700 miles.
  • maccarty1maccarty1 Member Posts: 5
    I agree, GM will eventually be forced to own up to their products. I bought a brand new 2001 Chevy 2500HD with the 8.1L and had many problems with it. I've had it since October 15 and had the 4wd unit replace (ring & pinion) let loose, heater motor, passenger side seatbelt, and the latest "OIL CONSUMPTION", not to mention the engine noise that I hear. What are my options?

    Bill
  • kg11kg11 Member Posts: 530
    "what are my options"
    The things that broke and were fixed are not an issue,but the engine knock and oil consumption are.Call GM's customer service hotline(in your owner's manuel) and they'll give you an extended warranty on the engine(only).If,like me ,you don't find this acceptable then call the BBB AUTO LINE at 1 800 955 5100.The more people that file claims the faster we'll all get satisfaction.
    kip
  • rayt2rayt2 Member Posts: 1,208
    Is that a National number for complaints or for California?

    Ray T
  • kg11kg11 Member Posts: 530
    "BBB AUTO LINE IS THE BBB system's national program for the resolution of automotive disputes"

    The rules for resolution are different from one state to another.Call the number and they'll send you a pamphlet with the specifics for your state.
    kip
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    If, like us, you've complained from day one (basically), you'll probably receive a call from Chevy to do "everything" to keep you as a customer. Beware and be careful. Hopefully someday we'll get it taken care of. (oh, our horn went off again two nights ago at 12:30 a.m. - just blares - maybe it's possessed?)
    lots of luck
    Chris
  • maccarty1maccarty1 Member Posts: 5
    I feel like the test dummy for GM! We all have to pay for their Research/Development and testing. I did not believe my marketing teacher told the class that there are approximately 25 known defects with new cars. I did not believe him then but, maybe it is true. I'm up to 7 defects already.

    Bill
  • txyank1txyank1 Member Posts: 1,010
    before most people knew what one was. Every problem I had was the first time the Dealer had seen it because no other owners (both of them) put as many miles on as I did. Talk about a "test dummy"!
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    Our 2000 went back to the shop today (had to walk the mile to work, at least it's not below 0, like a few days ago). This time they actually were shown what the 4wd does, or doesn't do. They're going to look at that today too, along with the horn. I told them I left the truck running so I could show them the 4wd; the guy that came out said "that ain't right" - I told him, according to the Zone Manager it is...he got a chuckle out of that, too bad I don't appreciate it when we get a foot of snow and my 4wd doesn't work.
    Chris
  • rayt2rayt2 Member Posts: 1,208
    Got my Extended Component Warranty for the engine knock in mail yesterday from GM, 5year/100,000 mile for engine only. Guess I won't be keeping this truck for 10 years after all.

    Ray T.
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    my 4wd has had a miraculous recovery, now being told it's fine; the mechanic was mistaken because his is a manual and mine's an automatic. Too bad all the other automatics I've had haven't done this, nor does my dads.
  • mentor34mentor34 Member Posts: 60
    I just purchased a new 2002 2500HD 6.0L, quiet so far, what is the best approach to obtain an extended engine warranty???
  • kg11kg11 Member Posts: 530
    I called GM cust service(number in your owner's manual)and told them my engine is knocking.They offered me a 5/100 over the phone without an inspection.
    kip
  • rayt2rayt2 Member Posts: 1,208
    If what KG says is true then piece of cake, most dealers must document the problem. I documented the "engine knock/lifter tap" when I brought truck in for warranty service work @ 17000 miles, dealer noted it on service ticket and confirmed what I heard. I followed up with a call to customer service about my longevity concerns and the fact that they were issuing ext. component warranties to those w/knock, they then came up with the offer. Be aware that they are now stating that this knock is NOT an issue and causes no long term effects on engine. Print out a few of these statements from this board and tell GM CS that you have proof to dispute their opinions. If you need a copy of my letter just e-mail me your fax number & I'll send you a copy.

    Ray T.
  • cspauldingcspaulding Member Posts: 159
    When I got to the dealer, I was told the truck had to be in motion - I told him it doesn't matter if the truck is moving or not, the 4wd does the same thing; so I took the tech. out for a ride and showed him, then he sent the Service Manager out and I showed him. They want to wait a few weeks to see if Chevy gets on the ball, because they'd have to take the whole 4wd system and axels apart to see what's wrong.

    Just an update. Chris
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    I'm not sure what kind of 4x4 problem you're having, but the astute technician/owner will get all four wheels off the ground on jackstands, hydraulic lift etc., engage the 4x4 system, run it up to the speed you're having the problem at, and look/listen for something shaking/vibrating, making unusual noise etc.

    Being told to wait weeks for Chevy to get on the ball, or that they would have to take the whole 4x4 system apart just reinforces my opinion that perhaps the biggest issue you have with your truck is an inept dealer service group.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    I don't know if I'd wait another couple of weeks. If Chevy hasn't been on the ball so far, a couple of weeks isn't making much of a difference.

    Another dealer might. This is the first I've heard of such a thing as waiting for them to do anything near what you're talking about. Except of course, stalling hoping maybe their problem will go away.
  • hunter48hunter48 Member Posts: 30
    It sounds like the 4x4 problem your having is your actuator on the front axle is intermittent if so you would experience a clicking or grinding, even though it is a new truck they can be bad good luck.
  • zr2randozr2rando Member Posts: 391
    Could you describe the problem again? You have a manual shifter right? auto hubs? Problem is that the lever does not move for several tries and then finally engages, do I have that right? thanks
    does it work better if transmission is in neutral, while rolling or stopped?
    Rando
  • ak4x4ak4x4 Member Posts: 126
    In my profession, we always take lack of proper maintence. into account. If you read your contract you will see that GM has the right to inspect your records for proper OEM replacement parts. This can range from an simple oil filter to spark plugs to etc.... Just saying that if you have anything but AC/Delco parts under that hood, there may be a problem down the line. FRAM is not OEM so if you have say a FRAM oil filter they will void the warranty because you did not use a Ac/Delco. Also with the 4x4 system I assume you have an autotrac?? Did you leave it engaged in auto year round?? This could have caused the problem in the 4x4 system. But then again the product does say you can leave it in auto all the time. And you say auto. Have you tried switching to the 4WH button??

    Also how much wear is actually on the truck?? 34K and two years ild is used in my opinion and you should be offered the full private party sell amount, that's it. Considering the body design has changed to 4 doors and not 3 you think of reasons why. Also how much did you stress the 4x4 system?? Have you gone 4buying alot?? In all due respect I could leave mine in 4wd all year and need a new system in 30k miles!

    All in all, a court of law will want proof from you that you used OEM parts on the truck at all times. That includes any work not performed by GM. If You got you oil changed and they put a NAPA gold on it, there goes your case. Just telling ya.

    I can scan a copy of my ext warranty and highlight the part where it says OEM parts.
  • ak4x4ak4x4 Member Posts: 126
    Autotrac has a button not a lever to push. I have a maunal lever on mine. Seems like the story is messed up. I am confused.
  • ryanbabryanbab Member Posts: 7,240
    ak i believe csp has the push button insta trac (4wd system before autotrac)
  • zr2randozr2rando Member Posts: 391
    from post #1:
    "the 4wd lever doesn't pull sometimes, etc"

    AK4X4, just having a non-OEM filter on the vehicle does not exempt the vehicle from a warranty claim or a lemon law case unless it is proven that the non-OEM filter individually caused the problem that requires repair.
    Gm/Ford/whoever can not force you to use OEM parts for routine maintenance unless they give them to you for free.
  • rayt2rayt2 Member Posts: 1,208
    It's called the Magnuson/Fergusen Act or something along that line about not being forced to use OEM parts. This was discussed wayyyyyyyyyyyy back in another posting.

    Ray T.
  • zr2randozr2rando Member Posts: 391
    Knew I could count on you to remember that for me!
    see ya
    Rando
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    Try Magnuson-Moss Act.


    http://www.autopedia.com/Lemon/LemonMM3.html


    This one is even more interesting:


    http://www.autopedia.com/lemon/

  • rayt2rayt2 Member Posts: 1,208
    All I remember was that I printed that damn thing out all 20 frickin pages and stored it someplace for future reference..........

    Maybe I was thinking of the tractor Massey Ferguson and got confused.........LOL

    Ray T.
This discussion has been closed.