By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
First, a warning: I didn't test-drive a Ram, nor have I done any real homework on them, so I don't know any of this for sure. That said, I believe the 5.2L engines in both the Ram and Dakota both use the NV3500 manual tranny, so that much should be the same. As far as shift lever/clutch travel, perhaps I should explain - I've been driving subcompact cars and mini-trucks since I got a driver's license so to me a "real truck" drivetrain will feel different. On most vehicles I've driven, the clutch will start to engage about 1/3 of the way through the travel (say, 1 1/2 inches off of the floor) and fully engage at about 2/3 of the clutch travel (maybe 3 inches up). The Dakota clutch starts to "grab" at about 4 inches off the floor, and fully engages just about when the pedal is all the way up. All the Daks I've tested (5) do this, and it appears to be a function of the hydraulic clutch's ability to self-adjust. Just feels odd to me, is all.
As far as shift lever throw, most of the vehicles I've driven have shifters no more than 6 inches long or so - in the Dakota, the thing's about a foot long! Knob movement is further (1-2 shift may take 4 inches of movement to complete, others similarly long) so blasting through the gears just ain't gonna happen.
As far as how this applies to the Ram - I would expect the differences to be even bigger. Clutch travel might be about the same, but the shifting I would expect even more movement with the bigger truck (think the seats are further off of the floor).
As far as driving a bigger vehicle, only advice I can give is to just remember that your vehicle is now between 4 and 6 feet longer than what you're probably used to - it'll take you more room to do things. Cut your corners a little wider and take the new truck into a deserted parking lot to practice parking, parallel parking, cornering, etc. when you first get it. Worked for me!
Hope this helps,
DMS1
DP
Yes the 5.9l will be available for 2000 in the dakota, other then the R/T. Go to www.4adodge.com
It states this there.
P.S. The tapping won't hurt anything in your engine, it just happens to knock at the right frequency to make the steering column vibrate...annoyingly.
Two weeks ago, I took delivery of a 99 5-speed SLT 4x4 club cab, V6, Tire & Handling Group, etc., (basically power everything) in lieu of waiting for the 2k quadcab.
Without a doubt, this is the finest vehicle I have owned in my 43 years. Quiet, Smooth...and Awesome!
My dealer also offered an alarm/remote start option which I elected to take. Only to find out later, (after the alarm was installed) that the installer refused to install the remote start, supposedly due to safety/liability concerns (which I fully understand). Couple questions:
1. Is it technically possible to equip a 5-speed with the remote start? While I acknowledge the concerns, I would really like to add this option.
2. Are there any service bulletins I should know about on this vehicle and address now?
3. Does the tire cupping problem occur with the 31 inch tires?
4. Seen this question posted with no response yet: does Dodge plan to discontinue the club in favor of the quad?
5. The infinity speakers/200 watt amp has turned me on to good sound and i'm considering adding an additional aftermarket power amp and sub. Any thoughts or advice? Can I do this myself -easily- a 'la Crutchfield or is a professional installer the best bet?
My intention has been to keep this truck until the 2k quad model comes out. Now, reading the previous posts on the reduced bed lengths makes me think I won't --really depends on the styling but who would want a 4.9" bed? (I just think it would look -silly- never mind what your intended use of the vehicle is.)
Thanks for a terrific open forum, and any feedback on my several questions!
As for the powered subwoofer, I'd go with a JL Stealthbox and an external amplifier. I've never had anyone not love the stealthbox line, and its certainly powerful and clear enough to enjoy.
Your best bet is to find a good audio shop in your area that carries JL and talk to them about it. To find a dealer, check the Dealer Find script. Of course, if you're looking to do a low-budget install, get some MDF and buy a cheap sub -- the stealthboxes are a little pricy, but deliver fantastic sound and good value for money.
I'm going to testdrive the '99 Dakota tomorrow - 4x4, x-cab, small V8 etc. If I like then I will devide between that and a Y2k Jeep Grand Cherokee (don't ask). But I have no desire to wait around for the Y2K Dakota if that's what it's really going to look like. Maybe the Toyota Tundra might worth taking a peek at...is that out yet???
Thanks, You answered questions asked in post #269. I've ordered a 99 club cab 4x4 SLT, w\3.9 5sp. I was concerned if the 3.9 was sufficient. Are your mpg's with the 5sp or auto. Did you opt for the 235's or 31in tires. Does the anti slip diff affect gas mileage. Glad to hear your a happy camper.
Matt D
http://members.xoom.com/99overNvoice/Index.htm
I'd have to defer to others on whether the V-6 is adequate for a 4x4, but I personally wouldn't be too concerned. From what I've heard, 4x4's require a fair amount of low-end torque, which the V-6 has a pretty good supply of. Won't be winning too many races with it, but it won't leave you stranded either.
Just over 5,000 miles, and still a happy camper!
Dmat:
Thanks for the help on the limited-slip diff. I wouldn't have known whether it adversely affects MPG or not - wasn't specifically looking for a truck that had it, just sorta worked out that way.
DMS1
Nice to get responses. My current 2wd dakota is giving me 24mpg( v6, 5sp and 3:21 rear axle) can't expect this with my new truck. 20mpg would be nice on highway. I'm also a long range commuter.
If you keep up on your air filter, get split pulgs, and check the air in the tires, you can get very close to the 20 mpg.
Matt D
http://members.xoom.com/99overNvoice/Index.htm
Mabye the 2000 dakota isn't for you, but it is going suit a lot of people's needs. Take for instance a family of four. The husband wants a a vehicle to carry his gear around, or just wants to have the pickup truck image, or whatever other reason. But with a wife and kids, he can't do that with a club cab, quad cab (mabye), so he's stuck with buying a car or minivan. This vehicle gives a person the best of both worlds. You got room for 6, can haul your trailers with ease, can carry most of your cargo in the bed, and isn't to big to fit in your garage or parking spaces. Plus with the choice of a v6, or an all new v8 tranny combo, yuo got the performance as well. If you dont want the four doors, I'm sure there still will be the club cab for at least a year, to see how things go with the four door.
did you know caps means you're yelling on the internet. if you meant it, we got the point, but i don't think you did. i owned a 97 dodge dakota sport, 4x4, 3.9 liter engine with the towing package. great truck but after only 25k miles, i found a SLOW leak between the trans and the clutch. is this normal? also, there was a ticking sound whenever it was cold. i thought it was in the belts and sprayed belt dressing on it, but it persisted. does anyone else have this problem?
http://media.daimlerchrysler.com/index_e.htm
there's lots of Dakota info there.
HTH,
DMS1
Almost all of the Dodge engines will pull more outside the vehicle (especially the Cummins). The limiting factors are the trans. and the break system. Transmissions usually handle less than the max output potential from the engine. However as a safeguard, this is computer controlled to protect the trans.
Matt D
http://members.xoom.com/99overNvoice/Index.htm
I am about to put in ano order for Dakota 4X4 with the v6 manual. I was wondering if the anti-spin axle was worth the extra cash. Got any thoughts?
DP
The reason I got mine with limited-slip was basically just because it happened to be there - all I wanted was a V-6 powered tow vehicle with a stick shift. In retrospect I can see how it might help on a boat ramp with slick patches of algae, but it's not likely to be a cure-all for putting a vehicle in a situation that it shouldn't have been put in in the first place.
DMS1
EXT cab/OvrHd Pwr Conv Grp/Htd Mirrors/AMFM CD CAss/Deep amethyst pearl coat...Cali/NY emmisions
Few questions though:
1. How negotiable are DLr Add-ons?
2. Would after mrkt optns decrease value and or resale if it were to become a classic? {I don't want to get ahead of myself, but the truck is pretty unique 5.9 et all}
would appreciate any input 'bout the R/T, this site was very helpful in research and decision making.
Tomguiness
the 5.9l replacement engine out soon, so if they put that in the dakota, the R/T name will live on, and might be quicker too. But owning one with the 5.9l probably will make it to the classic hall of fame, since they've only been out a couple of years.
What did you think of my $ quote?
Many times you don't know you're on ice (black ice)until your rear is spinning. Also it prevent that rear end clunk when spinning wheel hits dry pavement again.
If none of these suggestions work, call up the dealer where you bought the truck and ask to speak top a service writer to set up an appointment.
Matt D
http://members.xoom.com/99overNvoice/Index.htm
I have a 1998 dakota ext cab with the infinity sound system. Added a 100watt amplifier to the stock cd player, sound great, but the speakers can't handle the bass with out distortion (only 6 1/2 in. speakers) I've since added a subwoofer (10inch) and a third amp with built in bass expander. Turning the bass down to a minimum on the cd player allows the stock speakers to play highs and mid ranges without distortion. The bass can then be turned up using the bass controls on the amplifier. Sounds great! I removed the padded flip down seat behind the drivers bucket seat, gave me room for the speaker box and still room for three. Four people was way to uncomfortable anyway.
As for the fog lights, probably a bad relay. But that's what warranties are for, make the dealer fix it.
i have a '99 extended cab 4 x 4 v8. as far as gas mileage... i have the overhead computer which tells me that i am getting a whopping 13.9 mpg mixed city/hwy.
billman
I have the Dura-liner in my Ram, and it also has the built-in tie downs and slots for placing boards to section it off. I assume most of the drop-in bedliners have these now.
I have the Dodge under-the-rail liner. The holes near the cab are cut the exact size as the hole in the actual bed sheet metal. this allows those rubber plugs to be inserted in the bed liner. My only complaint is that there are holes near the gate for the rear tie-downs. These are uncovered and could allow water and debris to get under the liner and cause damage to the sheet metal. There really isn't anyway to get around this since the tie downs protrude through the cut out. At least these rear tie downs aren't on the floor, but mounted on the side of the bed.
1. If I let the tank get to 1/4 tank left, the truck gets the shakes, and stutters like mad. Happens at exactly 1/4 tank, never any other time. Air filter is fine, plugs are fine. Anyone else have this problem?
2. This truck isn't exactly wonderful for passing. I have the automatic, so downshifting is out. Would stepping up to 93 octane gas be worthwhile, or should I just live with it, and get the V8 next time around?
Thanks for any thoughts.
I was seriously considering the ranger after my excellent experience up in the cascades, but after going to the auto show here in LA and sitting in the dakota, checking out the engine, etc. I would opt for the dakota. Either one is a good small truck - but you can't beat a V8 if you wanna tow. On the other hand I've heard the dakota MPG is just terrible (in the V8) like 13/15 or something. What's everybody else's take between these 2 trucks?