Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Here are those same results, but instead of alphabetical by make, I have sorted them with the "most reliable" brands on top:
HYUNDAI 14.87%
MITSUBISHI 16.80%
KIA 17.39%
DAEWOO 19.18%
MAZDA 21.20%
ISUZU 21.73%
SUBARU 21.83%
SUZUKI 22.35%
LAND ROVER 22.89%
PLYMOUTH 22.99%
EAGLE 23.06%
TOYOTA 24.05%
VOLKSWAGEN 24.29%
HONDA 25.07%
CHEVROLET 25.34%
FORD 26.11%
MERCURY 26.11%
OLDSMOBILE 26.20%
DODGE 26.47%
BUICK 26.89%
PONTIAC 27.45%
JEEP 27.74%
CHRYSLER 28.28%
GMC 28.69%
NISSAN 29.37%
AUDI 30.78%
SATURN 31.11%
LINCOLN 32.59%
ACURA 33.29%
MERCEDES BENZ 36.23%
BMW 36.79%
INFINITI 36.93%
SAAB 37.23%
LEXUS 39.25%
CADILLAC 40.20%
PORSCHE 41.48%
VOLVO 42.76%
JAGUAR 57.84%
I have a lot of problems with that site. For one, it is sponsored by a company which sells aftermarket warranties! Conflict of interests, anyone? Further, it doesn't even give ANY information as to how those results were obtained. Lexus, Acura and Infiniti near the bottom? Land Rover and Volkswagen above average? And when was the last time anyone saw a an Eagle???
Does anyone have a ranking of reliability that is actually a good source of info? By this, I mean a source that is willing to share how they collected their data and show that the principles of market research are adhered to, so that the info is statistically valid and projectable? PLUS, where the data can realistically be used to estimate problems down the road? (see below)
Consumer Reports... Besides the inadequacy of their methodology (only people with strong opinions one way or the other are likely to respond to their surveys), they treat all reported problems equally, whether it is a radio button falling off or a transmission falling out. I could stand the weird noises and minor flaws in my last Ford (a 2004 model), but not the tranny issues and the occasional struggling to start.
JD Power... They look at "Initial Quality" - I want to know about 5-7 years down the road, and beyond. I don't think it is accurate to project long-term reliability off of initial quality rankings, as people often do.
So far, the only reliability info I have seen which I tend to agree with (that I can think of right now) is the MSN Autos reliabilty ratings; see how MSN Autos' Reliability Ratings are determined. In my opinion, they have good methods of data collection, and the data is analyzed well, plus the "problem areas" are specified if you look up a particular model. This is useful if you want to look at the reliability history of a specific make and model. From my past experience with several cars, the results are quite accurate. UNFORTUNATELY, I can't find where they have done a current ranking of car manufacturers overall...
Its a fine car, build quality was above average (although 6 trips to the dealer couldn't fix the rear door handle so it worked correctly, the AC smelled, and the paint didn't last very long), dealer service is terrible and it had some interesting designs that made its services more costly than other vehicles (namely the front brakes, oh and the rubber band holding the engine together).
Its a car. Its been fine. I just haven't found it to be made from holiness or anything.
I quickly checked the site myself, and found 5 that pertained to the Altima:
NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID Number : 06V242000
03V084000
03V251000
06E023000
06E064000
Yes, her car has the 2.5L.
I have to check on the other repairs that were done, since I don't remember offhand what exactly they were.
So far it's been OK, it had to go right back to the dealer after purchase for an issue with the brake-shift interlock on the Auto tranny... I think she has around 15 or 20k on it now. We'll see how it holds up.
Of course it does, its a DOHC design and Hondas always have good specific output. My point was the 4 speed in the Aura doesnt hinder its mileage when compared to the much lighter Accord V6 with its smaller displacement engine. I'm not sure how your statement disproves my point.
b) The Accord is ONE car brand when I was talking about GM's overall retention rate. Sure the Accord may be higher, but GM has good retention overall.
c) It's difficult to argue that overall GM's vehicles are unreliable and more problematic than imports when they lead the industry in return customers.
d)the survey I was talking about was based on much more recent sales data than the link you provided.
Well that more or less sums up your position on Fords. You arent going to consider one regardless of reliability data. I understand you got burned and I can understand not wanting anything but Toyotas but as others have said the data indicates Fords are pretty reliable, as are most cars these days. Do you remove all domestics from consideration or just all Ford products? Also, would you drive a Volvo?
The Honda V6 in the Accord is a SOHC design. Honda efficiency at extracting the most out of an engine.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Actually I find Toyota rather boring - too "soft". The Lexus IS is a nice car though, and the entire Lexus line is looking really good with the L-Finesse designs. Honda/Acura is for good overall reliability/value/etc, though Acura is getting to be a bit pricey these days.
I would buy a domestic in a heartbeat if I had cash to blow - a Corvette Z06 in Lemans Blue! :shades:
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
and then later,
So far it's been OK, it had to go right back to the dealer after purchase for an issue with the brake-shift interlock on the Auto tranny... I think she has around 15 or 20k on it now. We'll see how it holds up.
now you really got me confused, at first you talk about your Altima with 6 recalls (which I can't find), and $800 spent on something in 32k, and then you talk about a shift interlock and 'so far it's been OK'.
Which is it?
The Altima, BTW, is anything but an import.
MSN data is useful too, but as you indicate they do not give you any sort of summary.
I do wonder if the warranty direct data is only counting problems that are not covered by manufacturer's warranty...because the top three all have longer warranty than is typical.
I wasn't the one talking about the 6 recalls, that was someone else.
Re-read my post. The top part (in quotes, and bold) was a quote from the poster I was replying to. The lower quote was part of my response.
The original poster was relating the problems with his Mother's Altima to me, and I was stating that so far, my Mother-in-law's Altima has been OK with that one exception.
-Loren
How did they obtain this "data"? And when? In my opinion, a credible research study should cite their sources and methodolgies. Also, it is misleading to state that one brand is more reliable than another when all problems are treated equally.
Example:
Midsize sedan "A" has been in the shop twice; once for a door lock that malfunctioned, and once when the radio stopped picking up FM channels.
Midsize sedan "B" has been in the shop only once, after the transmission suddenly self-destructed.
Which car has been more "reliable"? According to most of the studies which are being cited in this forum, it would be car "B" because it is less likely to develop a "problem." But which car would you rather buy? Which one would you consider reliable?
Seems like most of these studies don't use common sense...
And why are they all so scared to let you know EXACTLY how they came up with their results? I mean specifics; if they are using surveys, how many surveys were taken, how long ago, among what population or group of respondents, and how were they compared with one another? Were all "problems" treated as equal, were repair costs taken into account, etc?
-Loren
From what I read on their site, based on their claims, they are doing good market research. However, I still have questions... It says "These scores come from owners who have rated their vehicle on dependability after four-to-five years of ownership."
What owners? Has anyone ever been asked by J.D. Power to rate their own car after 4-5 years? How do we know that their sample is representative of the total population?
It was always the Grand Prix replacement. You obviously heard wrong.
Rocky
I guess you wouldn't see them on the left coast. Is that really surprising.
Rocky
but, I would guess your MIL will have the same sort of luck I've had with Nissans overall - a total of four of them, over 15 years, a total of about 500,000 miles, and never had one in the shop - although I did lose the 92 Maxima to a blown tranny at 250k (my fault). They are great cars, and that 3.5 VQ is perhaps the best V6 out there (apologies and a tip of the hat to Toyota and Honda).
Not the same cars (although mostly the same mfgrs.) - got to be careful about the silly Internet, you can find info on all kinds of things that don't really apply.
Reliability data is relevant, as far as the highest rated cars, will probably be more reliable than the lowest rated. The rest is a wash, IMO. You can pick a lemon, in ANY brand.
GM has too many brands... Chevy is mainstream. Cadillac is the luxury. Pontiac is sorta sporty/younger/value??? (sort of like a Scion?). And then you have Buick and Saturn. So it confuses buyers a great deal. The Aura is not upscale enough to be a Lexus/Acura equal to the Malibu. The CTS is more like competition for an Acura TL. The Malibu is the Accord/Camry direct competition. So the Aura is lost.
I think GM is failing to realize that people are confused by their many offerings and a simplified lineup would make things much easier.
The 3.6L is a good competitor to the Camry, Accord, and Altima V6s. The 3.5L is good if you don't care about mileage and want V6 torque but don't care about being particularly fast or advanced.
You have your vinyl seats: You get Chevy
You have your cloth seats: You get Saturn
You have your leather seats: You get Cadillac
-Loren
Now that Saturn is losing its uniqueness (no more plastic panels, no real unique models except the Opel-based hatch coming soon), it seems redundant with Pontiac, since both have a sporting flair. Or maybe Saturn is the reincarnation of Oldsmobile??
-Loren
The same practices of the good old days are still at work in Detroit with badge engineering. Why not just make one solid mainstream and luxury model in each class segment and sell it like crazy (witness the Accord/TL and Camry/ES success)? :confuse:
And if vinyl is Chevy, cloth is Saturn and leather is Cadillac... what exactly are Buick and Pontiac? Suede and plastic? :confuse:
That's true for the Milan but not the MKZ. The MKZ is significantly different and upgraded from the Fusion and Milan starting with the 3.5L V6.
I just had a friend who did that exact thing. He had a 99 Outback that had about 90K miles. Don't recall the details, but at 60K, he had a problem that cost over a thousand dollars. Then his AC went, as well as another problem that combined was going to cost two thousand dollars. The final straw was his engine started overheating a few weeks ago (in the middle of winter!). He spent a couple hundred replacing his thermostat, but when it continued to overheat, the mechanic said it was probably a blown head gasket. He traded it in to Carmax for $3500.
He then went out and bought a new 2007 Outback last week.
And the last couple of years they have been pretty reliable.
Why do they keep throwing that aweful grill on Lincolns? I think its a nice car otherwise.
A comment like that sure is broad-based and accusatory for one-person with limited communication with the millions of import car owners. (And yes I know you 'exshoman' aren't the original poster who said that)
And, for the record my great aunt who now is on her third Honda once sold her old, suspension-troubled Buick Regal (I say old I think it was 6 years old at the time) on a Buick Century. This was around 1990 though. She didn't make the same mistake again though. Her Century was more trouble free than the 80s Regal she had but she eventually left GM for Honda and hasn't looked back.
Why do they keep throwing that aweful grill on Lincolns? I think its a nice car otherwise.
Well, it's their design language. Too bad more people don't speak it!
I could be completely nuts, but I disagree on the Milan being the same as the Fusion. I think the ride and handling differs from the Fusion. Ride seemed a little softer and steering was lighter. I also think the mercury was a bit quieter and the seats were slightly different...not as deep as the Ford.
Finally there is nothing wrong with having a choice of cars that differ in styling. I like the styling of the Milan much more than the Fusion. If Honda did this, without sticking me with a premium equipment level, that I don't want, I might have considered one of their vehicles. I could not get past the unattractive (to me) styling of the Accord (and then they want a premium price for it too). I know it is not based on the US Accord, but had TSX been available equipped at about the Accord SE level, I might have considered that, depending on price.
If you own a Subaru, you must follow the recommended service intervals exactly, or you may see some rather expensive repairs. This is anecdotal evidence from my aunt and uncle's experience with a Legacy and Outback.
That makes no sense, EPA ratings are off for ALL vehicles, not just certain brands. To say that the Aura would do substantially worse than its EPA ratings but the Accord wouldn't is illogical. Most V6 family sedans get 20-22mpg in mixed driving per magazine tests. The Accord four cylinder in a recent C&D test averaged 24mpg and the Aura averaged 20mpg.
I agree. The Accord's a fantastic car mechanically but the 06 restyle is lame. I think the 08 Accord will revive the Accord's appeal from a design angle.
The TSX (and the TL) is a thing of beauty - much better looking than the Accord and worth the extra money.