Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
Really? I don't see the similarity. For example, which Ford product resembles a Mazdaspeed3, Mazdaspeed6, RX8 or Miata?
Management style, customer service, reliability...
Got $18,500 on trade, plus $500 Mazda dealer cash, so $19,000 plud I got the manual 3 at invoice. I am happy with the deal.
If you have driven a manual in the past and even remotely enjoyed it, you would love the 3 in a manual. It is a very fun car, and I have already improved by 3+ mpg in worse conditions and a less broken in vehicle. Too bad I didn't save the money in the first place.
That's every automaker, not just Ford or Mazda.
Both models were 2.3l hatches. It did end up costing me more money, but because of the special interest rate Mazda was offering, monthly payments and total amount I will pay is the same.
Not to the same degree as Mazda or Ford. Each manufacturer has their own ranking. I suspect these two are pretty much equally low.
204.0 miles on 9.803 gallons = 20.81 mpg. Not at all bad considering the conditions.
$900 does seem like a lot of money -
Have you had it fixed yet?
Did it do any good?
Did you try and get Mazda to pay for it out of warranty?
1. Press and hold down CD and AM/FM buttons
2. Start your car while still pressing down on those buttons
3. The display will read, "DIS ON" which means Driver Information System On.
4. Release the CD and AM/FM buttons
5. Turn off and restart the car
6. Now press the Set button and cycle through your avg. mpg, miles until empty, current mpg!
Now you can truly know your Real MPG numbers!
Please pass this info to others!
JC
I have 07 3i Touring & works like a charm. The only thing to add to your great instructions is to 1st make sure the radio is ON or you will NOT get the "DIS ON" message - maybe it was just me
The avg MPG (Which I assume has been tracked by the ECU for the life of the car, since it came on right away, before I moved) is 25.8. Right where I had been tracking it on an excel sheet, whenever I remember to. Looks more accurate than others I have had
I didn't get to measure the actual mileage on my first tank, but so far my average has been 21.86 over the life of the car using the actual miles / gallons calculation, so it is a little pessimistic on mine at least.
Out of curiousity - can anybody with a stick shift 3S tell me what the instant mpg is at a steady and level 60 mph indicated. Just curious about the optimum mpg at a slow speed.
Thanks
Even with cruise control on, at 60 mph on flat ground, the reading fluctuates from 20 mpg to 58 mpg. It takes its readings too often, at least on mine. The very slightest incline causes it to go to 20, inclines so slight, I've never really noticed them as an incline until the DIS dips to 20 mpg in the same place every time.
I'll try to play around with it more, but when I had it on cruise and flat ground, going maybe 65, I think it was in the high 40's. Stayed steady for a bit, but then traffic intervened
I tried a little more yesterday. Had it on cruise at 71 MPH, I had it stay steady at 35.3 for a while
Since you have both the 3S and the Civic how much difference is there in mileage and performance between the two?
Performance wise, the 3 blows the Civic away! It's like driving a sports car or a carnival ride. You just have to touch it and zoom...you're gone. Shifts are almost unnoticed also up the power band. Puts a smile on my face everytime I get into it. The Civic is surprisingly zippy for a 1.8 liter engine. Not as fast or smooth as the 3, but I drive it accordingly. I've learned to adapt my driving style to it and try to stay under 3000 rpm's when accelerating. Very satisfying to drive, but not as much fun as the 3.
We bought each car for a different reason though. The wife wanted a car that could get up and go when needed and I wanted a car with great gas mileage with great reliability, as I drive less miles per year and plan to keep the car till I retire within the next 5 to 7 years.
The Sandman
It's also interesting on what tire pressure you have. There are two thoughts, go with what is on the door jam or what the tire dealers say. In my case, I am to use 33 PSI all around, while tire dealers say that's too low. It shoud be around 35/36. While the dealer tends to put in around 34PSI all around. This too can affect the mileage.
According to the estimate, the 3 gets 22 city 30 highway with the new procedures. Sounds just about right with my experience.
Basically they could keep the new numbers, but call them city, and suburban and use the old highway number for highway driving. If you are truely driving all highway miles the old highway numbers were very easy to beat in most vehicles.
I know there is a range of numbers in fine print, but it seems nobody reads these the way they complain about mpg.
I think this depends in part on whether we are talking about the Mazda3 2.0 or the 2.3 litre. Not surprisingly, the smaller engine is more efficient (rated at 24/32) compared to the larger one which comes in at 22/30 as you say. The other part, of course, is the driver. I agree that one can beat these numbers if one drives "as if your mother were in the car" (to quote Motorweek).
If I cruise at 70 the mpg will drop to around 31.
I did a 2000 mile round trip and the numbers stayed consistent.
My averages have dropped to 29-30 mpg during the winter months.
Right now it has about 14K miles.
Month MPG
March06 31.7
April06 36.0
May06 36.2
June06 36.3
July06 35.1
Aug06 37.5
Sept06 36.8
Oct06 34.9
Nov06 33.6
Dec06 33.3
Jan07 33.1
Feb07 31.6
The MPG seems to correlate closely with temperature, which is the same pattern seen in my last 2 cars. I admit I drive with these nbrs in mind (lots cheaper than buying a hybrid!). I subscribe to the waygrabow philosphy: coasting is a good thing. Overall I am very pleased with the MPG, esp. considering this is a fun-to-drive car for this reasonable price ($16K).
Common sense (and science) tells us that driving that extra 10 miles faster will affect our mpg negatively. It's amusing hearing people complain about poor mileage numbers when they drive as if they were on an F1 track.
I recall hearing about this guy a long long time ago that heated his fuel in his Cadillac and he got spectacular gas mileage. Of course, this is dangerous as heck but does explain why we get better mileage in the summer. However, refineries add different additives during the winter months which may have an effect on fuel economy.
If you have an engine block heater, a common device here in Canada, you are in effect doing something similar. Plugging in the heater a half hour those wintry mornings makes for a smooth drive-off, improves mileage and preserves your car's engine.
TT dealer today & the intake manifold is defective - the valves are bad (I did not know the intake had valves - but I am guessing its some type of butterfly valve)- he also thinks it may be cracked - but will not know this until it is removed from the car. Service rep was sure it is the cause of the TAP TAP noise - but not 100% sure about this being the (only) reason for my low MPG.
The parts have been ordered - but no delivery date yet - he thinks that it could take "A FEW DAYS" to find the parts. I wonder why no parts are available - but at this point I am just happy that they could find something wrong - and have agreed to fix it.
I suggest for those getting low MPG, try turning airflow positioner counter-clockwise from "feet" to avoid running the compressor.
Over 2,800 miles I have averaged 30.8 MPG combined city/hwy (50/50) typical hwy speed 65-74.
Reason i'm asking is because i was wonering what does the engine turn, say on the highway around 70-80 mph in rpms?
The Sandman :confuse: