TOYOTA TACOMA vs FORD RANGER- Part XI

1363739414268

Comments

  • ebbgreatdaneebbgreatdane Member Posts: 278
    Is there any point to these on a V6? Kinda got in my head but just don't think it will sound right...?

    John
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Running this bad boy this weekend with some Explores...wanna join?

    Rally point is the Morrison exit parking lot at 8AM tomorrow, 7/21/01


    http://www.cosports.com/fwhldr/trails/webster.htm


    Do look at all the hyperlinks for the pictures of the switch backs.


    Total elevation rise, 9,120 - 12,399 in a 16 mile run. 3,279 ft rise.


    I will give you this spoog, yes, it is desirable to control as much mercury as you can from getting in the environment. I just do not fall for the traps set by whacko's.

    And no, I do not throw battries in the fire, however, they have gone in the trash when there was no effective way to recycle them.

  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    see you there maybe.
    Gonna be back by 2PM
  • ebbgreatdaneebbgreatdane Member Posts: 278
    We could meet in Tahoe but I doubt you'd keep up with my new Toy...

    heh heh
  • midnight_stangmidnight_stang Member Posts: 862
    Flowmaster's would probably be more for sound than any real noticable performance gain. Don't forget your exhaust is already TRD tuned! :) But seriously, it could be good for another 5-15 peak horsepower. Just don't get a exhaust tip big enough to stick a watermelon in.... =)
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    I got my refund for the Firestone replacement tires on my wife's Ford already. It only took about two weeks. I've got to admit that Ford has done it right in this case even though it must be costing them a bunch.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    "Light Trucks -- Most Still Score Poorly

    "Our list of the Meanest Vehicles for the Environment is again dominated by large sport utilities and pickups with 8-cylinder engines and 4-wheel drive. The three exceptions are exotic sports cars. In short, moving more metal (or moving it faster) means burning more fuel, which therefore causes more pollution unless extra steps are taken to control it. If large light trucks were used mainly for true heavy-duty hauling, fewer would be sold and their pollution would be less of a problem. But automakers have been marketing these vehicles for passenger use, pushing their sales into the millions and creating a rapidly growing source of global warming pollution.

    Many automakers are now installing improved tailpipe controls on their minivans, pickups, and SUVs, which helps with part of the problem. However, dirtier versions of these light trucks, meeting the bare minimum of pollution control requirements, are still commonplace. Overall, automakers are still lagging in their efforts to improve the fuel economy of their pickups, SUVs, and such.

    Since our Green Scores reflect both tailpipe emissions and fuel economy, the high fuel consumption alone would suffice to push down the environmental ratings of the largest light trucks. Some of the largest SUVs are so massive that they are classified as heavy duty trucks, which makes them exempt from fuel economy laws and subject to weaker tailpipe standards. Both DaimlerChrysler and General Motors are taking greater advantage of this legal flexibility, increasing the weight rating of models such as the Dodge Ram pickups and Chevrolet Suburbans so that they evade fuel economy standards. The Ford Excursion is also designed to be exempt from fuel economy standards. Recent promises by Ford and General Motors to improve the fuel economy of their light truck lines will hopefully reverse this trend that has been so detrimental to the environment.

    If you usually carry multiple passengers in your SUV or minivan, however, the environmental impact per passenger is lower than if you drive alone. Similarly, pickup trucks would be environmentally friendly if regularly used to carry the loads for which they are designed. Thus, a light truck can be "green" when its capacity is put to good use. For example, while large passenger vans like the Dodge Ram Wagon, Chevy Express, or GMC Savanna end up on our Meanest list because they score low, they may not really be "mean" since they're used primarily for carrying multiple passengers."

    Why are you driving a pickup spoog? Thought you were a true greenie? These guys want to run your lives, tell you what to drive, make what you drive something that goes about 20mph, something that can never go off-road and costs a mint to produce.

    Bit of hipocrocy I see, spoog. . .
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    And before you refer me to Rubicon for difficulty, I can point you to a site that lists at least 10-15 trails rated 9+ around here.

    21 Road Mesa County, CO

    Battlement Mesa/Battlement Reservoir (FR847): Mesa County,

    Blanca Peak/Mt. Blanca Costilla County, CO

    Die Trying
    Montrose County, CO

    Independence Trail Fremont County, CO

    Iron Chest Chaffee County,

    Black Bear Pass: San Miguel County, CO
    just to name a few. . .
  • spoogspoog Member Posts: 1,224
    Yes, there are some awesome trails in your area Cspounser. Hopefully I will be out in the San Juans in September. Beautiful country, some of the best I have ever seen.

    It's a shame your Ranger is made more for the well maintained forest roads. Thats ok though.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    on Middle Fork of Swan trail and St. James/Glacier trail. Just tooling along at 13,000 ft, peak to peak, saddle to saddle.
    As you know me, pictures will follow. . .funny, did not see a Home Depot on any trail I was on.

    San Juan's in Sept. Hmm, it just so happens I am planning a trip to that area with a group of Rangers to run Cinnamon, Ophir, Imogene, Engineer Passes and Wheeler Gelogical area.

    Lets meet, just friendly and run the TRD against my Ranger. I can be in South Fork in 6 hours from Denver. I stay in the Comfort In just off Hwy 160, 1/4 mile away from the turnoff for CO 149.

    The offer is there and the offer stands, my word is my bond.

    So what ya say spoog? Tell me the weekend, Ill be there.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    This will finally let all people know spoog is a FAKE! He won't meet you, he doesn't have a TRD to meet you with! Can't wait for his reply....
    Lake Tahoe! LOL! Where can you offroad in that area? Its all blocked off and off limits on the CA side and is getting that way on the Nevada side. Name the trails that are open to offroad vehicles please....
    The Ranger is the best compact pickup on the market today. The Ranger has the 2nd strongest engine in its class (Chevy S10 has 250ft/lbs of torque) Ranger has 240, Toy truck has 220. I wonder why Toyota fans never want to bring up HP/Torque curves, they just like to brush them aside, along with crash test ratings, open rear diffs, shallow beds, the expensive options, the price difference between a Ranger and Toyota, the Bilstein shocks and springs they paid an arm and a leg for, .. LOL... man I can go on and on...
    Cascades are beautiful, Trillium lake was wonderful. This weekend we are talking about a trip up to the MT Jefferson area..
    See you in the Cascades...
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Not hearing anything spoog.

    I'm six hours away...my president is sending me six hundred bucks so I have the money to meet and wheel...I'm doing these 6 areas as a prerun, Ophir, Imogene, Engineer, Cinnamon, Animas Fork and Wheeler Geo. area...the loop is 66 miles long...taking 6 Ranger/Bronco's...

    Just feel lucky...Oh, you know the area, right?http://www.narrowgauge.org/4x4/html/4X4.html
  • remainedsilentremainedsilent Member Posts: 9
    Wow!! With all of those things wrong with the Tacoma and it's still rated a better truck than the Ranger by almost every major publication including Consumer Reports (V6 Tacoma 99 up - rated the best in every category, Ranger came close but not as good). If the Tacoma has all those things wrong then the Ranger must be puss!!!!! Guess that's why you cry about buying the wrong truck all the time. Ha ha!!!
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Well I never said there was anything wrong with a Tacoma. It is a nice truck, ride in my opinion, and CR's opinion is not as good as Ranger.\

    I can still outpost 2-3 to 1 of diverse publications selecting Ranger over Tacoma.

    BTW, while wheeling this weekend, I did see 2 Toyota vehicles. A Landcruiser and a RAV4. There were 4 Explorers, 2 Rangers, 2 Hummers owned by a tour company out of Summit county, 1 F150, 2 Chevy S1500's and 3 Jeeps and a whole lot of ATV's and dirt bikes.
    No Tacomas
  • remainedsilentremainedsilent Member Posts: 9
    The ranger is surely a good truck. Most of the publications I've seen pick the Ranger over the Tacoma, not because it's a better truck, but because it's considered more for your money. Doesn't Consumer Reports pick the Ranger as a best buy yet still rate the Tacoma better in every category? The Ranger is rated closer than any other truck to the Tacoma while still being cheaper and offering more options so it is a good deal. I just think vince has a hard time dealing with the Tacoma's ability and quality.
  • spoogspoog Member Posts: 1,224
    \\Lets meet, just friendly and run the TRD against my Ranger. I can be in South Fork in 6 hours from Denver. I stay in the Comfort In just off Hwy 160, 1/4 mile away from the turnoff for CO 149.\\

    Sorry Cspounser. Just like Fourwheeler says -

    " The tacoma TRD could go places the other trucks simply couldn't".

    Dontcha get it yet? The Ranger is a weak 4x4.
  • issisteelmanissisteelman Member Posts: 124
    you have to be kidding. The Ranger is certainly NOT the best compact pick-up truck. Some may argue that it is a better value, but it is certainly NOT better than a Tacoma. And many would argue (including Edmunds) that the best compact pick up is the Dodge Dakota (it has a V8!). Please, think before you write. I know you would like to believe that the Ranger is better because you purchased one, but most would agree that a Tacoma is far superior. Next time buy a Tacoma and see what a pleasure it is to own/drive a truly good quality compact pick up truck. See you in the woods................. Steelman.
  • 2k1trd2k1trd Member Posts: 301
    The only reason you don't hear people bringing up horsepower numbers is because they are not so insecure about there tacoma's like you ranger people.Just because the ranger (finally)has a little more power under the hood does'tm mean squat!,,,,the tacoma will still run with the new ranger all day long. bye bye :0)
  • bessbess Member Posts: 972
    The term 'best' is very subjective and will vary depending on what folks think is important in a truck..

    You consider the Tacoma the best pickup truck based on the criteria of build quality. It is your perception that the Tacoma quality is far superior to that of the Ranger..
    According to several publications, the Tacoma does appear to have slightly higher quality numbers than the Ranger, but not what I would call 'far superior'.. The Ranger is still a very high quality pickup as well and is rated as such in most publications (including here at Edmunds).

    For hard core off-road ability in factory trim, again I think the Tacoma has an edge here (mostly because of its manual locker).

    What if folks base 'best' compact pickup based on available options? You said that Edmunds rates the dakota the best compact pickup because of its v8. If we listen to Toyota, the Dakota is a full sized pickup. (Toytoa classifies the Tundra as a full size pickup and it's the same size as the Dakota).
    So if power is a key factor in determining the best pickup, then this would give the advantage to Chevy or Ford.

    Is the 'best' compact pickup the one that has limited access to the extended cab? The Rangers 4 doors have a definite advantage here.

    What if you prefer a more comfortable ride? Again many reviews indicate that the Ranger has a more comfortable interior and ride than that of the Tacoma.

    It is your opinion that the Tacoma is far superior to the Ranger and not 'most folks opinion' as you indicate..
  • midnight_stangmidnight_stang Member Posts: 862
    What SPOOG, no more mercury comments? No more Ford's 1994 reliability ratings are below industry average? You must be in Public Relations, because you ignore comments on your post that basically point out your mistakes. The Ranger is NOT a weak 4x4. The Tacoma may be a bit smoother at high speeds, on the sand dunes, according to Fourwheeler. So if your truck is going to be off-road 100%, get a Tacoma. If you want good road and highway manners and a seat that won't cause you pain, get a Ranger. Why don't you back up your faith in Toyota with some physical presence? At least a picture will do!

    remainedsilent--> More truck for the money, Best Selling compact truck 14 years+? What more do you need?

    tk1trd--->Tacoma's can hang with Rangers, even with the new 4.0l available, huh? Are you sure about that? With the only available V6 in a regular cab, you better hope not to meet a 4.0l Ranger.
  • eagle63eagle63 Member Posts: 599
    For all the trash talking I hear about the Tacoma's legendary off-road abilities, none of the taco people seem to put their money where their mouth is. I've seen numerous pix from CP and vince from their off-road exploits, but nothing from the toyota camp. hmmm.....
  • 1busman1busman Member Posts: 33
    Well done, couldn't have said it better. I've always said their both good trucks, and I've owned both. The toyota boys only what to may a point if they think they can put down the ranger. I don't undestand why they can't admit the ranger is a good truck. I don't know if the locker is a better choice because it has a very limited application, that's why all the other mfg's offer limited slips. For most people the limited slip is a better option. I think the toyota lovers just want to say they have a locker and you don't. I really wonder how many of them are ever going to use it. Toyota is now offering a dealer installed supercharger to equal tne ford and nissan in power. I bet somewhere down the road the supercharged engines will be breaking cranks or throwing rods. An old racing saying is you can't beat cubic inches, not that anyone is racing, but it's true.
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    I guess I was mis hearing things when the Tacoma owners were swearing to me they weren't trying to be condescending or put anyone down.

    ----------------------------------------------
    Post#1919

    you have to be kidding. The Ranger is certainly NOT the best compact pick-up truck. Some may argue that it is a better value, but it is certainly NOT better than a Tacoma. And many would argue (including Edmunds) that the best compact pick up is the Dodge Dakota (it has a V8!). Please, think before you write. I know you would like to believe that the Ranger is better because you purchased one, but most would agree that a Tacoma is far superior. Next time buy a Tacoma and see what a pleasure it is to own/drive a truly good quality compact pick up truck. See you in the woods................. Steelman.
  • rickc5rickc5 Member Posts: 378
    Cpousnr has thrown down the gauntlet and INVITED you to do some 4-wheeling.

    If you TRULY believe everything you have posted for the last two years, here's your opportunity to PROVE it.

    C'mon spoog, if you do some 4-wheeling with the chief, I'm sure he would be glad to take some photos of your Tacoma for you (since you appear to not own a camera) and even post them here, even if his Ranger "loses" to your Tacoma.

    How about that chief???

    Looks like the emperor may not have any clothes...... Hmmm.......
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    that is the offer...I'm 6 hours out and willing to travel!

    I would take and post pics of Tacomas I see, but the only ones I have seen while on a wheeling trip are:
    1. one at a Texaco in Blanca...all shiney and nice.
    2. A few at the foot of ATV trails with ATV trailers attached.
    3. In my neighbors driveway...again, all shiney and nice.
    4. On the main road in Telluride...all shiney and nice.

    Why is it I see Hummers, Rangers, Explorers, F150's etc but no Tacomas?

    Heck, i have 2 crunched rocker panels, a bent exhaust pipe and numerious off-road pinstripe modification areas...read into that scratches from brush. Been there and doing that!

    Well the offer is there. Heck, I'd even buy spoog a beer...if he is old enough!

    When I finish the rolls, next pics will be from the peaks/saddle's of the mountains between Monatzuma and Breckenridge
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    I have to admit that this doesn't look too good for spoog and he has to answer for all that Ranger trashing. Please keep in mind that, even though I personally prefer the tacoma, all of us Tacoma owner don't trash the Ranger and think that it's an incapable truck.
  • eagle63eagle63 Member Posts: 599
    sorry to lump you in with spoog, I know you're a fair and reasonable guy. (even if you are a toyota fan) :)
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    I am trying to organize a trail run that strings from California to Colorado...I lead a group up Mosquito Pass, 13,200+ ft and another group of Rangers at the same time goes to Death Valley, -292 ft as I recall.

    Top and bottom of the USA at the same time.

    If your interested in knowing when/where, I will keep you advised.

    We were thinking of doing it and submitting it to a 4X4 mag.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Manly used in the doping process of integrated circuits.

    My God man, how can you use such a device that contains such a toxic substance? Why, per pound, there is more arsenic in PC's than mercury in Rangers.

    ar·se·nic
    Pronunciation: 'ärs-nik, -s&n-ik
    1 : a trivalent and pentavalent solid poisonous element that is commonly
    metallic steel-gray, crystalline, and brittle -- see ELEMENT table
    2 : a poisonous trioxide As2O3 or As4O6 of arsenic used especially as an
    insecticide or weed killer -- called also arsenic trioxide
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    Sounds pretty cool but I admit that I'm not as diehard an off-roader as you guys. I use mine to simply get me into the more remote areas of the mountains or desert and I admit that I'm not at your level. If you do get it organized, and it's a time that I can get off work, It would be interesting to check out the Calif. part of your run and meet you guys though. However, If I bring my Toyota instead of my wife's Ford, and you guys kick my a--, then I won't be able to argue with you Ranger guys anymore.:) Keep us informed and maybe spoog will show up. By the way, if you're going to Death valley, I'm sure you know to skip the summer. It's about 105 - 115 degrees there right now.
  • modvptnlmodvptnl Member Posts: 1,352
    I was watching one of the news shows last week ( 20/20--48hours--Dateline???) And the report was the LARGEST polluter as far as mercury goes is the coal burning electrical plants!!! So much for the benefits of 0 emission electric vehicles.

    I'm sure spoog's household runs on steam power and doesn't contribute to global warming. I can picture spoog pedaling the generator while running his computer à la Gilligan's Island.

    Cp, I salute you!! You've thrown down the gauntlet and the toy boys are kinda quiet(except for ak whose finally seen the light regarding spoog!! LOL!!!)
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    By both Allknowing and spoog!! LOL! These tough Toyota boys.. LOL@@!
    I am in no way in He.. jealous of a Tacoma. I actually laugh at mostly the TRD's I see on the road. To think they paid all that money for a sticker! LOL! an OPEN rear axle! A locker that can only be engaged in 4low, I notice none of you answer my questions when I ask "What happens in the tought Toyota Tacoma TRD when you have the locker engaged and you try to take a sharp turn??" I am very confident I bought the best value 4x4 compact truck on the market today. It gets me into remote areas of the Cascade range to the deserts of Eastern Oregon for thousands less than a comparable Tacoma.
    The new SOHC 4.0 puts you Toyota boys to shame. Now that the RAnger has the upper hand in both HP and Torque, not to even mention the torque curve(something Toyota boys seem to know nothing about)
    sure do notice the comments of 0-60 times sure have vanished.. Hmm....
    Tinoda, OHHH what a feelin....!
    See you in the Cascades! Its guys like steelman, and 2k1trd I just love to run into....
  • frey44frey44 Member Posts: 230
    i have the pushrod 4.0...great torque, and i love the 5 speed auto and 4 doors. outside of that, the Taco wins the quality race, hands down. no comparison on fit and finish, dtail, and refinement. these truck, IMHO, are aimed at different customers. the typical Taco owner doesn't give a royal crap about his open differential. he is into a highway ride. period. i still, after 11 months, cannot get the vibes out of the floorboard of my Ranger. i will sell it soon, as i hate driving it for more than maybe 30 minutes on the freeway. it is NOT TIRES, as i have had these meticulously balanced on a Hunter 9700. i think it is the drivetrain, engine mounts, driveshaft, axle, who the heck knows. i have given up.
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    As you continue your foolish attacks give some thought that I've never claimed to be a big time off road guru. I was being honest that I wasn't in CP's class as he off roads for the challenge while I use mine to simply reach areas I can't in a car. I don't claim that my Tacoma can kick the Ranger's butt off road. I just personally like the Tacoma better and have had better luck with it over Ford. One thing for sure, if you're as obnoxious in person as you are here, no one will meet you for a challenge because they couldn't stand being around you. Let's just hope that you’re only this obnoxious under cover of your screen name.
  • vince8evildblvince8evildbl Member Posts: 6
    Don't worry about vince. If he's who I think he is, he's all talk and doesn't even own a 4x4. He drives this red 2x4 stepside Ranger here in Washington (LOL). The picture he posted probably wasn't even his truck. He probably doesn't know me but I think I have him pegged.
  • salamander3salamander3 Member Posts: 8
    I can't find this information anywhere and I don't know another tacoma owner personally, so anyone's help would greatly be appreciated.
    Basically, I don't have a tachometer, and I'm looking for engine RPM at these given speeds:

    20 MPH
    45 MPH
    60 MPH
    70 MPH
    80 MPH

    If anyone would be willing to take note of their tachs when they're driving around and get back to me on these, I would be greatly appreciative. Thanks.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Yeah the problem is getting someone to go to Death Valley! They want me to go to the pass in Jan.! Well there will be 10+ ft of snow on a 13,300 ft pass by then!

    Nah, I would not kick your but, but I would stay up with you. . .

    Yep the gauntlet is down, I am dead serious...and all is quiet on the Tacoma front. I am going to have to take a picture of my Ranger on Wheeler, then a shot of nothing and say: "Here is spoog!"

    Salamander:
    Well you could spend 50 bucks and get a tach from Pepboys.
    You need to find a vehicle that has the same engine, same tranny gears and same differential, otherwise the readings would be different. So you need to find out that stuff first.
  • rmacias_rmacias_ Member Posts: 37
    Vince, I will answer your locker questions.

    1- With a simple wiring mod, you can engage your locker in any gear regardless if in 4-low, 4-hi, or 2-hi.

    2- On soft sand the TRD Tacoma will turn on a dime with the locker engaged.

    3- On packed dirt your turning radius is increased but you can still turn.

    4- On dry asphalt your turning ability is greatly reduced but you don't break the rear traction and loose control.

    If you need anymore enlightenment on the capabilities of TRD Tacoma's, just ask.

    Loyal TRD Fan
  • robbirobbi Member Posts: 7
    I just read a bunch of the previous posts and I can't believe that my fellow Toyota owners were so quick to back down from the challenge.

    Cp, I know you haven't invited me, or even know me, but if you don't mind I would like to go wheelin' with you...if I can. Unfortunately I will be in FL for a while so it will all depend on when you go. I will not go to compete with your truck, I will go because I like the adventure of four wheeling. I am relatively inexperienced at it though, so I don't doubt that if we get into tricky terrain your driving skills will prevail. Do you have any mods to your vehicle or is it pretty much stock?

    Also a little note on Death Valley in the winter. It snows quite a bit there and you will see a frost layer on the sand where there isn't snow (very slippery). In the Death Valley National Park the rangers close a lot of the roads in the winter. Navigating will be a pain...and there are only two gas stations in the entire park, so watch the fuel.

    If you go to Death Valley the best time is early summer. I was there just a couple of weeks ago and there were some nice trails that I may have taken had I not been alone. It wasn't that hot either.
  • salamander3salamander3 Member Posts: 8
    As to my previous question, any non-TRD 2000 Prerunner V-6 will have the same parts, i.e., tranny, differential, rear end, etc. I'm just asking for anyone with a matching vehicle, again, a 2000 Prerunner V-6, non-TRD, for a little help.

    As a side note, Kuwait is the hottest country in the middle east and one of the hottest countries in the world (currently hovering around 121-125 degrees), and when I have to go bobbing across the desert out here I grab the nearest Toyota. We got hundreds of those--Landcruisers, pickups, vans, and so on. They don't break and barring any stupid act on behalf of the driver, they don't get stuck.

    Anyway, we don't have any 2000 Prerunners (only 4x4's out here), so if anyone will lend a hand, I'd be grateful.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    My point exactly! I go to enjoy the views, the quiet etc.!
    No real value in my mind of putting a perfectly good 20K truck in prepared mud and seeing if I can make it to the other side.
    Now if mud is in the way of the trail, I decide if I want to go thru or turn back.

    I am in colorado, would wheel with you if you came.

    Sall:
    Sorry misunderstood your post.

    There may be different parts considering the tranny engine etc.
    If you could find if you have the 4:56, 4:10 or 2:90 rear end, that would help.

    For example, a Ranger 5 speed, 3:73 runs at 2,500 rpm at 60mph and a Ranger 5 sp, 4:10 runs at 2,800 rpm at 60.

    So if you can get the tranny type, differential ratio and engine, that my help.
  • robbirobbi Member Posts: 7
    It is good to see that we agree the reason to go is to enjoy the views, animals, excitment, etc. not to see what our respective man made piles of metal and polymers can do!

    I may actually be in Col. soon. I have to travel from Calif. to Wash., then from Wash. to Fl. I have over two weeks to do the trip so I am looking for adventure. I am not sure about the route I will take. The only problem is I am doing this with my friend who owns a Z3. We would have to drop that off somewhere and he is paranoid about leaving it without 800 or so bodyguards. I will post later when my plans are more definitive.

    The only reason why I posted last time was because I had read all these people whining about whose truck is better. Then spoog said you couldn't handle his off road prowess and you responded with a challenge. It was put up or shut up and all my fellow Toyota owners wussed out. The only response was a quote from Fourwheeler. So I decided to step up to the challenge, but I doubt anything will come of it.

    rickc5: The emperor has clothes, only they are invisible!
  • midnight_stangmidnight_stang Member Posts: 862
    Why would you want to engage a locker on asphalt? You may be turning well with it engaged, in any gear setting (2hi, 4lo, etc), by clipping a control wire, but still why? I can understand when great Dane says he engaged it while pulling a boat out of the water. I have a '67 mustang bracket race car which has welded rear gears. Essentially it's a hand made spool, or full time locker. It's great for traction, but that's for a straight quarter mile. Getting her turned on the way back to the pits is harsh to say the least. You may have OK ability on dirt or sand surfaces, but you do realize your dragging half your rear end, right? I'm not a 4x4 guy, but I know it has to be practically pointless to engage it unless you're climbing rocks, or going up a muddy incline.
  • lariat1lariat1 Member Posts: 461
    Thats why they make automatic traction control devices,they only work when you need them,when there is sufficient traction available they operate as an open differential.Automatic traction control is nice when you drive on icy roads for 8 months a year like I do up here in Alaska.
  • rmacias_rmacias_ Member Posts: 37
    The point is not "why" but to simply answer Vince's questions. I agree that not all road conditions require the use of a locker, just simply that it can be done.

    Also, wheelin' in heavy sand with the locker engaged allows you to better control your vehicle through obstacles. Unlike just "flooring" it so you can get through and not sink.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    allknowing appears as the victim. Anyone who scrolls back will see just what kind of person you are. You keep claiming the Tacoma is sooooo much better than a Ranger in offroad, onroad, parked, whichever, yet, you won't take a challenge from a Ranger owner? And spoog, he has finally been revealed as a fake.
    Frey, sorry about your vibration problems. I'm sure you have had the drive line checked? alignment by a 4x4 shop?
    rmacias, I'm sure Toyota will honor your warranty when they find you have made this mod.. LOL@! I have a friend who owns a TRD and his DOES NOT turn as easy as you portray when the locker is engaged. Lockers are for straight away traction. I'm sure you will be rebuilding your locker soon.. $$$ CHA CHING.. Look in your owners manual at all the restrictions and warnings Toyota has printed to cover their butts. The TRD package is such a marketing gimmick for 90% of owners. Most don't even know when to engage a locker in an offroad situation.
    vince8evildbl!!! lOL! thats good. I do own a 1998 4x4 Ranger SC 4.0 5spd Offroad pkg, towpkg, 3.73 Limited slip diff, with a stepside bed in light blue. I have P265x75R16 All terrains, nerfs, LineX, rock guards in front, K&N air charger kit, AC, PS, PB, loaded truck and lovin it. However, the kids are getting too big now. I'm seriously considering a Jeep Liberty.....
    Toyota owners hate me because I reveal all the faults with their "perfect trucks". POP! There goes the "Toyota is god" bubble!
    MT Jefferson here I come!
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    http://www.powertrax.com/truck.htm


    $400 plus install. Good time to convert to synthetic fluid. . .


    You would ONLY engage a locker on hard pavement if you were in a straight line. Reslut otherwise as a minimum, screwed up tires, as a maximum, torn up differentials/drive line.


    robbi:

    Yep sort of figured that. You and I must be alike in some ways. I see no need to try to put my stock truck against 1/4 mile of mud just to see if I can make it. And as far as rock climbing, well on my last trip I had myself rocking side to side, suspension articulated, 500 ft drop off to the left. Thats enough thank you. Don't need my truck and main vehicle on it's side to prove a point.


    I had a co-worker, you may have read about him, it was in the national 4X4 and Jeep rags 6 months ago. He was up out of Breckenridge, quite frankly very close to the trail I was on last weekend, Middle Fork of the Swan, went off-trail very steep area. Flipped it and it tumbled 1,000 ft. He however departed the vehicle in mid flip about 100 ft into the ordeal. Snapped neck and other assorted things. Never, NEVER traverse a hill sideways and then try to straighten out on wet rocks.


    It was a built jeep, almost 40 inch tires, special tranny/transfer case/, lockers had a 5 point restraint that he, for some reason, choose not to use that day.


    What got him? Light rain on rocks and being off-road where he should not have been.


    When things strike close to home, the reality is very cold and chilling. You learn.


    Give me the beauty to see, the thrill of getting to it and a Ranger which gets me there.


    I could care less if a TRD could engage a locker and go where I, and it, should not be. Mine gets me where I want to go.

  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    You're right vince. My Tacoma will kick your Ranger's [non-permissible content removed] PARKED any day. The tacoma parks off road way better than your Ranger in particular because your Ranger was designed to be parked on the street. I'll challange you to park next to me any day but you don't have the guts.
  • indacurl2kindacurl2k Member Posts: 54
    I believe Vince just loves thinking that he's pissing off the Toyota owners. He's really just trolling the Tacoma owners, looking for a flame war so he can do his slam dunk. He knows the Tacoma is a good truck and has admitted it too. I don't have the TRD option, didn't feel it was necessary for me. I go off road a few times a year in my 98 Tacoma 4x4 X-cab V6. I also use the 4wd when it snows here in NJ. I paid a little more for it but got a good reliable off road vehicle that I feel is a little better than the Ranger. That's my opinion though and I don't try to push my opinion as fact.

    It cost SLIGHTLY more than a Ranger, but then again it's SLIGHTLY more reliable; right Vince? (He never seems to respond to my posts)

    I have never claimed the Ranger isn't a good truck, it most certainly is. Vince wants so desperately to believe that his Ranger is miles ahead in performance and quality when in fact it isn't. Anyone with any logic can see that both trucks are very close to one another. Both trucks are pretty much capable of going any place that the other can. I don't think either is miles ahead or behind the other. Just so you understand Vince, they're both good trucks. You make a great case for the Ranger, but it gets obfuscated with all of your anti-Toyota owner comments.

    It's too bad you have to get rid of your Ranger Vince. I'm sure we'll all miss you, since there will be no real reason for you to come to this forum anymore. Enjoy the Jeep, I hope you get a fair resale price for your Ranger, I know I will when I get rid of my Tacoma.

    Chief, I'd love to do that run but I just don't have that kind of time man. It's a lame excuse I know but hey if I am ever out in your neck of the woods I'd definitely do some trails with ya'.
  • sonjaabsonjaab Member Posts: 1,057
    Frey can't hear you. He is over in the
    Avalanche thread bashing away.
    Maybe its his ATTITUDE to the dealer and
    they won't go that extra inch to help him out.
    Not to say my GM cars were always trouble
    free either....................... Geo
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.