TOYOTA TACOMA vs FORD RANGER- Part XI

1141517192068

Comments

  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    you could get a 98-99 Tacoma for that...with about 30,000-40,000 miles on the odometer. . .

    That Ranger you refered to had maybe 6-7 miles, right?

    8^)
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Just sold his Tacoma TRD. He did buy a Tundra.

    The reason he sold it was the harsh ride on the interstate. He had to go to Iowa to a funeral and the ride was so hard that he sold the truck within a week.

    In fairness, he loved the truck, hated the ride with the TRD suspension. And he used it often to take out his 4 wheeler to the moutains.

    Just thought I would share. Remember where you drive for 98-99 % of the time.

    The Rancho RS 5000's I put on stiffened up the suspension just about right. I would suggest those shocks to anyone condsidering changing Ranger stock shocks. The STX and RS9000 shocks are too stiff for such a small truck.

    Going to test out the shocks on Sunday, hopefully with rick5c and jholc.

    But seriously, it rides real nice with those shocks, nice addition. Much better than stock.
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    Now that I think of it, I wrote before I really thought. I was thinking of Arco, not Exxon. I've never had any trouble with Exxon.
  • barlitzbarlitz Member Posts: 752
    the s-10 4door is a completely different truck than the ZR2.These options come from the factory,
    Instatrac 4x4,
    reinforced wide stance chasis with bilstein gas charged monotube shocks,
    4300 vortec v6 with 190 Hp and 250 lbs tque,
    frame for wide stance,front tread 61.2" and rear 59.1" are 3.9" wider than standard,
    ground clearance is 11.4" in front and 9.1" in rear,
    strengthened front differential drive axles,
    unique rear axle with an 8.5" ring grear and larger bearings and longer,larger diameter axle shafts,
    unique rear suspension with revised multileaf springs and added rear axle track bar,
    31" x 10.5" BFG's with full size spare,
    3" increase in height over the other s-10 models,
    locking differential,
    sheild package transfer case,fuel tank,sterring linkage,skid plates,
    4 wheel anti lock brakes,
    driver side 3rd door,
    armor coated brake lines.

    I've added a k&N gen11 air kit along with a borla stainless cat back made for the ZR2,also ordered a hypertech computer programmer.
  • spoogspoog Member Posts: 1,224
    Hey gang, just got done reading the MAy issue of Four Wheeler where the Tacoma was chosen as the ultimate 4x4 over the Hummer, Land rover, and Jeep TJ!

    " The Tacoma TRD handled the desert runs better than the Hummer" - fourwheeler.com

    " The locker on the TRD easily destroyed the computer Limited slip and other "delay" devices . The locker is far superior to limited slip"
    - Fourwheeler.com

    " The Tacoma is made for people who still use their trucks as trucks"
    -Fourwheeler.com

    AMAZING!!!!

    IF you enjoy this debate, make sure you check out this MAY issue of Fourwheeler.

    There are some FANTASTIC pictures of the Tacoma hitting some dunes and other obstacles.

    ALSO- the beginning of the issue has a huge article on the Arctic LAndcruiser expedition!!!!

    It is an amazing article, with some absolutely stunning photographs of the Arctic LAndcruiser expedition! You wont beleive it.

    Man Toyota makes one heck of a rig. Absolutely fantastic!
  • kmharv6181kmharv6181 Member Posts: 5
    Does anyone else have an opinion on the TRD shocks on the highway? Those of you that do have it, is it that rough/uncomfortable/painful of a ride to want to get rid of it! I am thinking of getting the TRD on a new Tacoma even though i am on the road most of the time I would like the extra off-road capability for the weekends. In my test driving experience I just cant tell much of a difference!

    Thanx!!
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    It's a bit stiff but it corners better than any truck I've ever driven. I like the ride of the TRD but some like a softer suspension. Go back to the posts about three weeks ago for more discussion on the subject.
  • stevec3201stevec3201 Member Posts: 16
    Your test drive just answered the question for you! All Tacomas with 4x4 have a stiff suspension
    already (including gas shocks). If you go for the aluminum wheels, the differences between yours and a TRD are minimal. The TRD will have 16" BF Goodrich tires, Bilstein shocks, and a rear locker. Toyota says the rear leafs are modified, when I look close I can't see the difference. Yours will have 16" Dunlaps (less noisy, less aggressive), no-name gas shocks (stiff), no locker.
    If you plan to off-road frequently, get the added insurance of the locker, if you don't, save your money. The Dunlap tires are fine, and are less noisy on the highway. I have seen after market adds for lockers for around $200-$300 if you ever need one that bad. I'm not sure if Toyota can install one at the dealer, but that is worth asking.
    As far as selling a TRD/Non-TRD because the ride was too bumpy, give me a break! My friend and his wife go everywhere with his TRD and they love it. I have made several 400 mile trips in my "01 Extracab 4x4, and not even my wife complained. As a matter of fact she likes to take my truck to work, and she commutes over 40 miles. Her normal car is a loaded Nissan, but likes the Tacoma better, go figure?
    The bottom line, trucks are not for everybody. If you want a car, buy an S-10, or Ranger.

    Cheers,
    Steve
  • eagle63eagle63 Member Posts: 599
    "The bottom line, trucks are not for everybody. If you want a car, buy an S-10, or Ranger."

    -what?
  • issisteelmanissisteelman Member Posts: 124
    It is plain and simple, if you want to be a mountain man and drive off road, then buy a Tacoma. If you want to drive on the highway (city boys), then why buy a pick up truck when you can get a car. Sure, you can buy a Ranger and it may be better for the highway, but I bought my Tacoma for going to camp (13 miles in the woods on a dirt logging road) and I haven't regretted it one bit. It handles great and is a very rugged pick up for a compact. As far as I'm concerned, a Ranger is no match for a Tacoma, except maybe on the highway and who cares about that unless you are a city slicker. Personally, I'd rather be mudding on a logging road in my Tacoma than fighting traffic on the highway in a Ranger on a commute to work :)
  • kmharv6181kmharv6181 Member Posts: 5
    Does anyone know what will be new/different on the 2002 Tacomas? If not, when will we know from Toyota?
  • cthompson21cthompson21 Member Posts: 1,102
    "If you want to drive on the highway (city boys), then why buy a pick up truck when you can get a car?"

    (1) Towing - Name a car that can tow my close to 3000lbs of sleds and gear.

    (2) Hauling - Name a car that you can throw a ton of blocks, timber, stones, dirt, etc... into the back of.

    (3) 4wd - What 4wd car can do the things mentioned above? 2wd really sucks here in the snowbelt. This past December with record snowfall would have been an absolute nightmare w/o my truck.

    But, I guess I'm just a "city boy" because I also use my truck to commute back and forth to work.
  • ranger47ranger47 Member Posts: 32
    that so many feel so compelled to defend the extra they spent on some off road package when they most likely don't use it as much as 10% of the time. My old 2wd ranger will go 75% of the places any 4wd will go and I don't have to have my eye teeth jarred loose in the process. I realize this thread has mostly became a 4wd forum, but it is highly over rated except in extreme conditions. Fact is your more likely to see a 4wd stuck than any other vehicle. Many times I have had to get out the tractor and go pull some fool out of a place they should have never been in the first place. All that 4wd does is get them a little farther in and a bit hard to to retrieve.
  • eagle63eagle63 Member Posts: 599
    "If you want to drive on the highway (city boys), then why buy a pick up truck when you can get a car."
    -hmmmm, seems to me that 99.999% of hauling and towing is done on paved roads. If you want to off-road so much, why don't you get a short wheelbase vehicle (suv) instead of a pickup which is designed to haul and tow?
  • sasquatch_2000sasquatch_2000 Member Posts: 800
    I think our '76 Dodge Monaco wagon did most of what you listed.
  • sasquatch_2000sasquatch_2000 Member Posts: 800
    Put some retread snow tires on that baby with 8 cinderblocks in the back, and that 400cu in motor will have the beast climbing trees!
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    steelman, you crack me up! I live in the Northwest and have some of the best camping, hiking, fishing, and offroading anywhere in the country. If your Tacoma is so tough, why does it finish so low on crash tests? Why doesn't Toyota offer a LSD? Why are over 80 percent of Tacoma's on the road with open rear axles? Why is the bed of the Tacoma so shallow? Why does your Tacoma rank lower a JD powers? Why does your tough truck have 15 less HP and 40 ft/lbs less of torque than a Ranger?
    I own a Ranger 4x4 and can go anywhere you can. I fish, camp, and visit the great outdoors often and my Ranger has never let me down. Your tough guy in a tough truck lecture was however amusing... Fact is over 90 percent of 4x4 vehicles never even see gravel. Fact is most of the time you drive is on asphalt bud...
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I did post the gas cap problem with my truck right here in this forum months back. An attendant (In Oregon we don't pump our own gas) broke my gas cap and my check engine light came on. Dealer fixed it, no more problems..
    Man, I did one heck of a number on you. You comment on everything I write in the other chat rooms. I have written nothing about any of the Tacoma owners having problems in the Tacoma problems room.. yet I get lectured on tact or honesty? I gave you facts about your Tacoma you obviously didn't like and deflated that "Toyota is god" bubble. I'll buy you a patch if you like?
  • cthompson21cthompson21 Member Posts: 1,102
    You're probably right! That 'ole Dodge was made the year I was born! Do you think it'll pass emissions???

    Have you noticed that wagons are making a comeback these days? It seems that people are coming to their senses and realizing that they can have a 4wd/AWD vehicle, haul all of their little soccer players, get twice the mpg of that grossly overweight SUV, pay less in initial cost, pay less insurance, be friendlier to the environment, and get rid of a 7000lb road hazard.

    I've been coaxing my wife into the possibility of owning an AWD wagon. I was thinking of a Passat 4Motion with the 1.8T and a 5-speed. With a few hundred dollars in upgrades, that little engine will churn out a reliabile 230hp with a plateau-flat torque band and still get close to 30mpg.

    I think that a A4 Avant would be nice too or maybe a Subie (iffin' they put in the 227hp blown 4cyl from the new WRX).

    Enjoy these days now, boys. This will forever be known as the muscle car era, not the 60s. Heck, even some of today's "family cars" with a 5-speed can outrun some cars that were considered serious iron back then. I've even seen a Chrysler mini-van pulling 12s at the track!!!

    Well, enough of my ramblings..........
  • spoogspoog Member Posts: 1,224
    \\own a Ranger 4x4 and can go anywhere you can. I fish, camp, and visit the great outdoors often and my Ranger has never let me down. Your tough guy in a tough truck lecture was however amusing... Fact is over 90 percent of 4x4 vehicles never even see gravel. Fact is most of the time you drive is on asphalt bud\\


    "The tacoma TRD could go places the other trucks simply couldn't"


    Fourwheeler.com


    " The Tacoma TRD is worth every penny, and is our Ultimate 4x4 over the Jeep TJ, Land Rover and Hummer"


    Fourwheeler magazine, May issue


    Sorry Vince, you CANT go everyhwere I can, like I have been saying all along. When will it sink in? lol.


    By the way, that JD powers test you mention was a phone conducted SURVEY of initial quality (first three months).


    Here is the link for the LONG term reliability test of 5 years-


    http://www.jdpa.com/studies/pressrelease.asp?StudyID=292&CatID=1


    Ford finishes well below the industry standard.

  • rickc5rickc5 Member Posts: 378
    That LONG term reliability report you posted the link for (again) is for the 1994 TOYOTA PICKUP and has NOTHING to do with the Tacoma.

    Sheeesh!
  • bgritzbgritz Member Posts: 139
    I know it's off-subject, but for Sh#ts & Giggles, check out the Audi RS4. It's only available in Europe...too bad!
  • sasquatch_2000sasquatch_2000 Member Posts: 800
    It is old enough to be exempt.
  • jianminjianmin Member Posts: 9
    I have a 98 Tacoma SR5 4x4 with ext.cab. I like it pretty much about everything except cornering and seat.
    For the cornering, I was thinking about adding font and rear AS bars but my dealer suggested to wait until after the warranty expired.
    The seat is the one I suffer most. It is way too soft. May be not only that.
    Does any one know the solution to this? Will appreciate all the input.
  • sasquatch_2000sasquatch_2000 Member Posts: 800
    How come you can't find a single wagon or SUV which has the rear window go down into the tailgate a la "station wagons" or broncos or blazers?

    I would love that feature!! It gives a nice breeze.

    If nothing else, at least put in the front vent windows and have the rear side windows "pop" open.
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    You're a funny dude Vince.
    First, thanks for the your repeat post #818, for the hundredth time, with your typical half truths included.
    Second, I was in the Ford room because I own one too, not to read your posts.
    I better go and worship my Toyota now so I'll talk to you later.
  • cthompson21cthompson21 Member Posts: 1,102
    Oh, I've seen it. Now that's the car you need when the kids are late for soccer practice! You'll get them there real FAST!
  • cthompson21cthompson21 Member Posts: 1,102
    Wasn't '74 the model year for cars that must pass emission tests? Or, am I mixing that up with something else?

    I bet they don't put the rear slider windows in wagons anymore for safety reasons. Maybe a kid flying out the back or stuff flying in during an accident?
  • issisteelmanissisteelman Member Posts: 124
    I know what you folks are saying, but fact is, I tried both a Ranger and a Tacoma before I made my Tacoma purchase and to me the Tacoma was a better buy and a better vehicle. Fact is, both vehicles are obviously good quality, but I did have my off road experiences in mind when I made my final decision and bought the Yota. I may only be off road 10 to 20% of the time, but when I am I'm glad I am in the Yota and not the Ranger. Lets face it, I see a lot more 10 year old+ Toyotas on the road than I do 10+ year old Rangers. And, if you are being honest with yourself, you would agree that for longevity the Toyotas have it while the Rangers don't (typically). You may have problems with the body of a Toyota but you'll never kill the engine. Not too many people would disagree. And, the new Yotas have a 5 year rust proof warranty. And, with the new one piece bed, I suspect that the rusting issues will disappear with the newer Tacomas. Anyway, I'll be enjoying my trips in the woods to camp to fish, hunt and snow machine while you highway riding Ranger fans can enjoy your traffic congestion. Take care........Steelman.
  • cthompson21cthompson21 Member Posts: 1,102
    Just curious, but have you ever been off-road in a Ranger?

    BTW, it's extremely rare for me to see a 10+ year old Toyota on the road. I do see a small number of old Rangers, tho. Accounting for your logic, does that make a Ranger more reliable?

    However, I would agree that the engines offered in Tacomas (and p/u) will generally last longer than the Ranger's engines. But, with proper maintainance (which doesn't seem very prevalent these days) any of these engines will outlive the rest of the truck.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    139 lb less than the bottom of the line Ranger.


    I think it, the 3.4L 4X4 Tacoma would have less towing capacity than the Ranger with the towing package option. Any way, the Tacoma 4X4 3.4L was rated at 1399 towing capacity, the Ranger has 1260 in basic configuration. The higher towing capacity for the Tacoma is restricted to the 2.7L 4 banger.


    The site was http://www.truckworld.com as I recall. You go to the truck review section and look up Tacoma.


    Interesting what you find when you search...and spoog insists he has a 3/4 ton truck. . .

  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    http://www.truckworld.com/Truck-Tests/01-toyota/01-toy-spec.html


    2.7-Liter Four-Cylinder

        

        ** Payload

      

     Total

     GVWR

     Load

    2WD

     3430

     5104

     1674


    3.4-Liter V6

        

     ** Payload

      

         Total GVW Load

    2WD 3475 5104 1629

    4WD

          3705 5104 1399


    did I read this wrong?

  • rickc5rickc5 Member Posts: 378
    Should you decide to increase/add anti-sway bars, do this in VERY small increments. a sixteenth of an inch can make a BIG difference in handling.

    You can also try different shocks.

    For seats, you have two choices: 1) aftermarket variety (lots out there) or 2) find some sport seats from a '94 or earlier Toyota truck or 4Runner and have them re-upholstered to match your interior. Personally, I would opt for the aftermarket seats as you can pick and choose specific cushions that will meet your personal support needs.
  • rickc5rickc5 Member Posts: 378
    The Toyota Sequoia's rear window retracts into the rear door. So did all pre-'95 4Runners.

    The Ford Expedition has electric rear vent windows, controlled by the driver.
  • rickc5rickc5 Member Posts: 378
    I envy you. You must be retired or independently wealthy.

    I do most of my driving on paved roads and highways because thay are what connect my house to my job. Its not a choice.

    If I spent all my time 4-wheeling back to my favorite fishing hole, I might still have my '99 Tacoma, but I would have added new seats by now.

    FYI- Here in the Denver area, even though its the truck capital of the world, I don't see many older pickups at all. Some, but not many. They get used & abused and then disappear. Many wind up south of the border, either whole or in pieces.
  • bessbess Member Posts: 972
    on the slide down rear window. My friends forerunner rear window does that.. (Or is it a Nissan, I'm not sure)
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    Maybe I'm confused and don't understand what you're saying. Your link said that the Tacoma 3.4L had a towing capacity of 5,000 lbs with 9,000 lbs of combined weight. The payload was 1629 lbs for the 2WD and 1399 lbs for the 4x4. I'm not sure where you got the Tacoma only having a 1,399 lb towing capacity.
  • issisteelmanissisteelman Member Posts: 124
    First, my reply to cthompson21:

    Yes, I've been off road in a Ranger (it is my girlfriend's mom's truck). I did not like it, plain and simple. The engine is supposedly a V6 and it runs like a small 4 cyl. It just doesn't seem to have the output you would expect from a V6. Very disappointing. And, it just doesn't feel like it is made for off roading. Just my personal feeling, you may not agree. And around here, I know of several Tacoma's that are 8 to 11 years old with over 150,000 miles (one even has 250,000 miles on it and it is owned by a logger who is off road 75% of the time). As for Rangers, I don't know of any with that kind of track record locally. Granted, there are wooden beds in several of those old Tacomas with many miles but the engines still run like a top. Additionally, owner satisfaction on these old Yotas is sky high. People love getting many hard driving miles out of their Yotas, and all of my friends agree (even Ford owners) that Yotas kick [non-permissible content removed] when it comes to long term reliability.

    Now, for RickC5:

    No, I am not independently wealthy or retired, I am just lucky enough to have a good job in the middle of nowhere (I'm in God's country). In fact, many of you city slickers have to travel many hours (on the highway, ha, ha) to my backyard to reach your weekend playground. I'm lucky enough live here year round, and my commute to my good paying job is only 1.5 miles (and there is no traffic). Life is good and believe it or not I spend many (maybe even most) of my Tacoma miles off road. I'm glad to hear that you agree that for those of us lucky enough to be in the middle of nowhere, a Tacoma is a better choice than a Ranger. Take care..............Steelman.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    I ment stated payload capacity, 1399 for Tacoma vs 1260 for a base Rancer. Do not recall the increase in Ranger GVW and payload capacity with the option. thanks for the catch.

    The difference is about half my weight, and equal to maybe 2 chimney blocks.

    I would have expected a bit more given an extra spring leaf and the thicker lowere spring leaf.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    As I have been harped on, lectured to over the last few weeks. "The Tacoma is the better choice" in YOUR OPINION. Its ok you spent and extra 2-4K for your truck. I notice this "YOTA" thing is usually with the younger crowd. And stats show younger crowd usually favors Toyota for is image as a tough 4x4 truck. Its obvious you have not driven a SOHC 4.0, or even the old push rod 4.0. I surely hope you don't own a 2.7, because then I would have to question your logic of engine choices to 4x4 with. its no secret the 2.7 is gutless for the Tacoma 4x4.
    I am about 30-45 mintues from MT Hood, and about 2 hours to the coast range, and about 2 hours to the deserts of Eastern Oregon. I have posted pics in the past of my Ranger out on the trail. Rangers can 4x4, and can go anywhere a Tacoma can. Image, it all boils down to image.
  • navy4navy4 Member Posts: 44
    Maybe my math is off, but...

    The Tacoma came out in 1995, seven model years ago. I would like to see the 10 year old Tacoma with any miles on it...
  • eagle63eagle63 Member Posts: 599
    I do envy your situation. I'd love to be able to spend the bulk of my time driving offroad. Don't forget, however, that you are in the minority. The vast majority of trucks spend their time on asphalt. And not just "city slickers" either; it's pretty tough to find areas without roads - even in small rural towns. Also, there's plenty of tacomas and tundras stuck in rush hour traffic too.
  • issisteelmanissisteelman Member Posts: 124
    I guess you misunderstood my comment. I've said before that both Tacomas and Rangers are good quality trucks. However, in my opinion (we are all entitled to them) my preference is a Tacoma. I never said that a Ranger is crap, I simply said that a Yota cannot be beat for long term engine reliability. Do I have stats to back that up, no. I only have the experience of many long term Yota owners who told me that I won't be disappointed with the toughness of a Yota motor. Furthermore, I bought my Tacoma at a Ford dealership and (due to a $2,300 factory rebate/incentive package) paid less than if I had opted for a Ranger. I guess that shoots down your 2K - 4K more statement. In the final analysis, we all pay too much for vehicles, but who really cares as long as you enjoy what you have. You enjoy your Ranger and I enjoy my Tacoma and we are both happy and the world goes round. Take care..............Steelman.
  • lariat1lariat1 Member Posts: 461
    If it will make you feel any better I had a 92 toy p/u and I think I replaced the timing chain with every oil change,I had it for 2 years and it refused to idle smooth for more than a month at a time. I traded the truck in for a ranger in 94 and in my opinion the ranger was 10x the truck the toy was on the good hand though I bought the toy for $13,000 new and traded it in 2 years later for $12,500 and all I did was put new wheels on it.
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    Fair enough CP. I actually thought that the 4x4 Tacoma had a greater payload than 1,399 lbs. I thought that I had read 1,700 or 1,800 lbs somewhere but maybe I'm wrong. I've really never had trouble with with either truck, in my limited experience, as they both seem to handle a good load. The Ranger also has a deeper bed which can be an advantage too I suppose.
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    Hey vince, you almost sounded human in your last post!!! Not quite, but almost. Most of your post was pretty good describing your opinion without the extra rambling. Keep it up.
  • jianminjianmin Member Posts: 9
    Thanks for your input. I searched a couple after market places and couldn't find any seat for 98 Tacoma. Most of them are for American trucks. Do you have any place to recommand?
  • spoogspoog Member Posts: 1,224
    Excellet post. Up in the Upper Peninsula of Michgan where it is pretty much nothing but logging rodas, the truck of choice is the Toyota.

    I envy that you live in such a nice place. What part of the country do you live in? I would love to have no traffic, a short commute and great fishing.
  • ranger47ranger47 Member Posts: 32
    magauto.com has parts for toyota and other brands. You do have to enter some info about your wehicle and yourself. Maybe they will have the seats your after.
  • spoogspoog Member Posts: 1,224
    Excellet post. Up in the Upper Peninsula of Michgan where it is pretty much nothing but logging rodas, the truck of choice is the Toyota.

    I envy that you live in such a nice place. What part of the country do you live in? I would love to have no traffic, a short commute and great fishing.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.