Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Is there data that you could share to show the difference in reliability between Mazda3 and Rabbit?
Anecdotal experience is entertaining at best.
I told you, I have seen NO data recommending the Golf/Rabbit. I am going on the history of it's predecessor. I have stated that many times. Because cannot find data on the new to US Rabbit.
What is your source for the Rabbit/Golf reliability?
What are the differences in expected reliability or differences in past reliability of German VW Golfs and Mazda3?
Ok, every respected periodical not only calls the Mazda3 a class leader, but, also has reliability that is at least above average to excellent. The history of the Golf that has been sold here in the U.S. has been repeatedly below average to poor. I have said many times in this thread, that it is too early to say the the VW is poor, however, look at the history of them, and history does not paint a good picture.
Both vehicles have been on the market for several years so there is data for both past and current (initial) reliability.
Where have you seen accurate reliability assessments for the Golf/Rabbit?
Don't get me wrong, I am not trying to bash the vehicle. I have driven it. It does drive nice, and has good fit and finnish. I just question VW reliability.
Problems per vehicle
2.43 Mazda
2.99 Volkswagen
2.27 Industry Average problems per vehicle
1.94 Honda
The difference is less than 1 problem per vehicle difference between Volkswagen and the industry average.
The difference between VW and Mazda is 0.56 problems per vehicle.
And this is for 2003 vehicles, it is reasonable to conclude that 2006/2007 vehicles will be more reliable for both manufacturers based on improving initial quality/reliability data.
Honda is popularly regarded as a gold standard of reliability and 1.05 problems per vehicle is the reliability advantage compared to VW.
Based on data, I have to disagree with your opinion Steven.
The purpose of my data is to provide data of manufacturer long term reliability. This must be done by reviewing past performance from the manufacturers.
The results are relevant to the current 2006/2007 Mazda3 and VW Rabbit, though it will be another 3 years before we can look back at actual results from the current vehicles being sold.
No where in my post did I state that Mazda3 production started in 2003, although the first car rolled off the assembly line on 8 December 2003.
a supposidly rock solid dependable car.they are haveing tranny problems and engine problems.an obvious flawed design with the engine and tranny.
Can you elaborate on this? I just purchased a 07 Camry Hybrid. Thanks!
Good luck with your purchase!
link title
Tried the mazda 3 and did like it alot but preferred the rabbit.
And after driving around through the blizzard/ice storm in the northeast this week I love it even more. Great little (heavy/ well balanced) bad weather car.
I would bet that the Passat is responsible for pulling VW down on the list. I have heard horror stories here from friends with previous Gen Jettas and Golfs, far more that I have ever heard in Europe. The EUR Golf and even the Bora have usually been a pretty decent/average cars in terms of reliabilty. The Passat however has always been known for its problems. There's no question that the Mazda3 is a much more reliable car.
There have been numerous complaints around EUR that the new car feels less remarkable than the previous one and frankly I agree. The doors don't close with that old VW feel anymore, it feels more like the [non-permissible content removed]. It's quite obvious that a lot of cost cutting went on. I haven't driven the US market Rabbit yet, but the Golf--besides it's long list of features, some of which are not even available on the Rabbit here--is not impressive. It's also significantly more expensive. I'd say Mazda has caught on big time and I can't wait to see the next Gen 3.
Not impressive? If anyone has anything bad to say about the us spec rabbit, they usually admit that it has a pretty ballin' list of features. I feel bad for the euro golf! :sick:
So who is going to be the first to tell this guy that the Mazda 3 is more of a European car (Volvo S40) than it is a Japanese car?
I consider it more a japanese though.
And he was referring specifically to 'german' cars not all european cars. I'm pretty sure that a renault or fiat feels different than a vw or bimmer.
Maybe so, but, it's a great platform. It really is only the base to build a vehicle off of. The Mazda3, Volvo S40 and Focus are all totally different vehicles.
The Mazda3 has a European drive (great handling, responsive steering, top knotch breaking) and offers Japanese reliability.
got that rabbit for $16.4k ($300 below MSRP) vs $19.4k that the guy wanted for Mazda3 5-dr hatchback, touring S...
no braier, and , lol... i heard a lot about horrible VW dealership experiences, mine was totally awesome actually...i was awaiting that "extended warranty/undercoating/acid rain" crap filled with dread...but...surprise surprise, visit to the "finance office" took all of 3 minutes and ended with an honest handshake. thanks Walker VW/Mazda in Barre, VT ))
Speaking of European, the British weekly, Autocar, rates (using 5 stars) the Ford Focus superior to the Mazda3 and Volvo S40.
- Focus hatch: 4.5 stars, "UK's favourite car returns bigger and better than ever"
- Volvo S40: 3 stars, "strangely less than the sum of its parts"
- Mazda3 hatch: 3 stars, "a good car, but not quite what it should have been"
Moral of the story: sometimes you have to leave home to feel appreciated.
If I wen to the UK, I would be driving a far superior Focus then we get here.....I guess I would appreciate that much more then what Ford provides for their own people!
I checked Autocar again and noticed that the Mazda3 hatchbacks in the UK differ from those being sold in North America. The UK Mazda3 hatch uses a 2.0 L with 148 hp instead of our 2.3 L with 164 hp. Hooray for us!
http://www.autozeitung.de/online/render.php?render=47159
p.s. Being a German site, I am not surprised that the VW Rabbit won.
I thought it was only 156hp. :confuse:
Oops. You're right! I don't know from where I got that.
Well, in the case of comparing a Mazda5 to a Mazda3, yes, taller DOES mean a higher center of gravity.
The 5 also handled quite nicely. I actually found it quite tossable. I didn't expect it to handle as nicely as the lighter, lower 3, but what I found surprising was that the steering lacked the precise road feel in the 3.
And, IMO, Mazda has to put in traction control in the 5. It wasn't difficult to spin the inside front tire at all when turning on wet pavement.
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3444
I have Two Honda's that are "J" cars and now the Mazda which is a "J" car and love them all. Rabbits can compete especially with the price of the Mazda's.
And its your opinion.
Rabbits can compete especially with the price of the Mazda's
you are right...they SURE can!
If you don't want to upset anyone, don't post comments like '_____ sucks.' or, 'i HATE _____'.
I like my bunny better than the 3, but i still like the 3 and realize what both cars stregnths and weaknesses are.
You post has a very heavy air of someone who didn't REALLY own one, and is just saying that to hate on the car.
For example, why not elaborate to why it sucked? And why you traded it in so early? was it a 2 door? Four door? Did you make a profit off of it or do you know have negative equity since the earliest you could have had one was back in 2006, and that means you would have had to have been waiting in line for one...
It's OK to disagree about the cars. That's the purpose of a comparison discussion like this. But we're not here to talk about the motivations of each other. Let's stick to the cars please.
Every car on the market has their weaknesses. Nothing in life is perfect, not even a $100,000 car.
I traded in the car because I was putting over $2,500 a year to maintain it and the warranty was out already.
2 completley different cars...if you hate the golf, post it in the golf forum.
....and if you are talking about the rabbit...what made you want one after your previous experience? the mazda 3 did exist when the rabbit/mkV came to our shores... :confuse:
Thats about the cars is it not? If i hate something, i state why, i don't just post and wait for someone to call me out on it to explain myself.