By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Rod- Unless you're planning on "off roading" the rear diff. protector isn't really necessary. Having said that, it sure can't hurt anything and if it gives you peace of mind .. go for it. I have the auto dimming mirror in the WRX (it was part of a package) and really like it. I would never have purchased it alone, because I thought it was fru-fru for really lazy people. Turns out to be a nice feature. Kinda like heated seats. I would never have considered them before but having spent several winters with them I now see them as a necessity!
- Hutch
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
On the 2nd visit for service, the dealer was able to recreate the symptoms and diagnosed it as a bad oxygen sensor. The sensor was replaced under warranty and the ecu reset. So far so good.
I'd like to do an informal survey. Anyone who has experienced this problem, please post your experience (ie. Was the problem fixed, and if so, what was done to fix it and did the repair last?).
In addition to the hesitation, I've had two other warranty issues in less than 8 months of ownership. An improperly crimped heat shield was hanging where the exhaust banged against it and the right hand mirror had to be replaced after some of the internal retaining parts went their own direction. According to the dealer, this is the third time they've seen the mirror problem and expect it to become a recall.
Other than these issues, I love my Subie. Hopefully the debugging phase is over and we'll have a long and happy life together.
Thanks,
Mike
-Frank P.
Rod: first congrats. I have the skid plate and can vouch for its sturdiness. It protects the two half shafts, the diffy, and the rear portion of the drive shaft. It also keeps that area clean and free of debris.
-juice
-Rod
Now call your mother! ;-)
-juice
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
I got the differential protector because I figured even on the highway, sometimes debris falls off trucks, etc..
Ed
Good suggestion... but I am afraid that C&D receives hundreds of complaint letters everyday anyway. The 03 review is not a sole exception. I surely do not want to devote half of my life just to correct C&Ds errors.
Juice,
I know all of your points well... but I have tested quite a few cars myself, too. Sampling errors, test variations or whatever, to me, it is clear that C&D simply did not test the car seriously. For BMW or other hot cars, they would try it again and again and again until they find one great number then log it. This is how they got the 5.8s number for S2000.
Also, it is the S which got the 4th ranking in the comparison test, not L. It is the same comparison test I mentioned earlier.
-bear
-Brian
-Brian
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
No engine oil cooler on the manual tranny, so we still cannot explain the 2400 lb towing, vs 2000 on the auto.
Also, he said no shiftronic, that would be saved for the performance line. Forester turbo, maybe?
-juice
Ed
Ken
Ed
XS = Crossover Sport, he said.
Mike Whelan used to sell Ferraris, interesting.
-juice
-Brian (still wishing for a b4)
-juice
Mike has been trained well in the dungeon!
Ken
Bob
-juice
Bob
Thanks, capybara
Have the dealer check the output voltage of the front O2 sensor. When you goose the gas, it should change state immediately. After the repair, the output values fluctuated very quickly in response to reving the engine at different speeds. If it lags, it may be on the edge of failing. Not enough to throw a light, but enough to make the car run rich. Most of that gets cleaned up by the converter, so the rear O2 sensor doesn't see a problem. Hesitation and/or backfire could both be caused by too much fuel in the system.
Subaru's rep was able to see the problem right away, and show me what he was refering to on the Subaru diagnostic device that plugs into the ODBII port under the dash. It was pretty impressive the amount of detail he could call up.
Hope this helps.
I was hoping to find out more about the manual transmission dipstick. What is the advantage of it? Other than being able to monitor the level of fluids... Why do most cars NOT have it? Can you increase performance / life of your tranny by pouring aftermarket products??
Thanks in advance...
For those that have noticed my previous posts, Subaru's regional district manager had a look at the car and found a faulty front O2 sensor. Not very faulty, but enough to make the car run rich. Very knowledgeable and courteous; took the time to show me what he'd found and why he thought it was the problem. They replaced the sensor and plugs and performed an ECU reset.
I'm on my second tank of gas since the fix (last Monday) and I'm starting to get smell again. I'm supposed to drive this tank of gas out and see if gas purchased elsewhere gives up the same smell. Although I'm not thrilled with the mileage, I have to concede that's it's better than two months ago (as low as 10 mpg).
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
-Frank P.
Bob
-Frank P.
I still think we will see a turbo Forester for '04. There are just too many good sources reporting that news. Remember, Mike "can't" talk about future products, no matter how much he may have wanted to. So, if it hasn't been "officially" announced by SOA—it doesn't exist...
Bob
Entropy5527- Good question. Only time will tell for sure but in general, cars today are built better and last far longer than those manufactured back in the 80s when turbos were last popular.
-Frank P.
Ross
Bob
My guess is that the 2.0T Forester would be the next easiest thing for Subaru to bring to the US from a logistics standpoint (again, ignoring emissions). One, it already exists and two, it shares a lot of common parts with the WRX.
Ken
Have a good weekend everybody.
Paul
Ross
John
1. They give the higher power only when needed, so that they do not increase fuel consumption as much as an engine that gets the additional power from increased displacement, or a constantly driven supercharger.
2. They produce a quieter exhaust stream, and thus can profit from a less restrictive exhaust system without violating noise regulations. That gives even more power.
3. They are fun, making cool whining sounds like a jet engine and giving loads of power when needed, not to mention the joy of seeing the boost gauge jump (Subaru seems to have gotten this last part only as an afterthought).
4. If properly designed, there is little or no turbo power lag.
5. They can be cleaner than conventional engines. When Saab introduced its newer turbo engine control system in the early 1990's, they tested one of their cars in London, known for its bad air. The exhaust air was actually cleaner in several of the emissions test parameters than the air going in to the engine!