Subaru Forester (up to 2005)

1191192194196197344

Comments

  • bsvollerbsvoller Member Posts: 528
    Spock: Indeed.
  • dafracksdafracks Member Posts: 14
    To clarify, my Subaru accelerates immediately when I press on the gas pedal. There isn't a lag, just a shudder. It's all systems go as soon as I gas it.
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    I frequent the MPV boards here and another site and haven't seen any problems. Only things of note is that they slide 'heavier' than non-power doors and don't open as wide as the non-power doors.

    hmm, back on topic: I'll probably look at an XT to replace my Outback later this year or early next year. ;-)

    -Brian
  • zigzag7239zigzag7239 Member Posts: 40
    Is it possible to set the automatic climate control to complete manual control, i.e. use it just like the standard model?
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    Aside from power windows and door locks, I try and get everything manual. Power seats are useless for me because I'm the only one driving my car, so 99% of the time it'll be unused. Even with the memory feature like on other cars, I find it's too slow and it's a lot faster for me to do it manually. How lazy can people get where they need help to slide a seat forward or raise a seatback? With the exception of handicapped people, if you can't handle a seat adjustment without some help, maybe you shouldn't be driving a car. Just like the power folding seats on the expedition. How often do you need to fold the seats up and down where that becomes a really useful feature? Just amazes me how lazy some people are. At the auto show, I was looking at some of the new concept cars from some of the Big 3. One thing I noticed was everything becoming voice activated, voice activated doors, windows, etc. More useless innovation, they can't even make a reliable car, yet now they're trying to add a bunch of useless crap to try and sell it. And the funny part is, people are going to buy it.

    I can understand manufacturers wanting to make their cars easier and more convienent, but it's come to the point where they're trying to make everything idiot-proof. In my opinion, things shouldn't be idiot-proof, we need some way of weeding them out of the population. Anyway, that's my rant for the day, triggered by yet another clueless SUV driving soccermom on a cellphone.
  • rochcomrochcom Member Posts: 247
    Was it about 15 years ago that some manufacturers (Chrysler, maybe?) fitted some models with voice enunciators? "Please close the door." "Please fasten your seat belt." Those people who thought they were really cool at first, later wanted to tear apart the dash to kill the little owner of that voice under there.

    I have never owned a car with power seats, but when I have rented or borrowed one, I have always found that the controls get away from me -- always overshooting where I want the seat to go. Besides, it is one more thing to break.

    Jeff
  • bsvollerbsvoller Member Posts: 528
    Just as long as they don't go back to talking cars... It wasn't just Chrysler. I had an '82 Nissan 200SX - my first "nice" car. Best thing about it was the dashboard setup - an idiot light for every function that was binary (including light circuits, so you knew if a bulb had burned out), and a gauge for every function that wasn't. Loved it. Worst thing about it was the talking part, which you could disable except for 2 messages "The door is a jar" and "The lights are on". Nothing more gratuituous than that. Hated it.

    I once spent an hour lying half in the car working under the dash, listening to an incessant "The door is a jar" while installing aftermarket fog lamps. I finally taped the door switch shut.

    Ducktapeguy: Good point on reliability. Do that first, then add bells and whistles.

    -brianV
  • joseph50joseph50 Member Posts: 235
    I'm with ducktapeguy.
    I would pay plenty extra for manual roll-up windows.
  • gened1gened1 Member Posts: 256
    Well this lazy guy just wants to get comfortable in a power seat that offers infinite adjustments to satisfy his short legs, I do not wish to rely on some other persons idea of what might be a comfortable seating position.
    To wit the notches in a manually adjusted seat cannot compare to the exact placement of the powered seat. The height and fore and aft tilt while maybe alright manually adjusted for some, will be much more comfortably adjusted with many more incremental positions in a powered seat.
    I find your ease at name calling or labeling somewhat perplexing. Isn't use of an automobile by its very nature proof that you don't follow your own advice? Otherwise you'd be walking wherever you wished to go.
    On a lighter side , while I rail on about usefulness of a powered seat, most of your other observations are appropriate.
    Just my .03
    Gene
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    HA! I had one of those talking cars too, told me everything I didn't want to know. I also spent an hour under the dash of my car, disconnecting wires and listening to that damn "door is ajar" voice until I finally found the right wire to cut. I almost felt like throwing a party after that. I'll be laughing at the BMW 7 series driver in a few years when their Idrive goes crazy. When they go to change the station on the radio and blow a fuse, the winshield wipers are gonna go off and the ABS is gonna activate on every left turn while in reverse.
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    There's no one lazier than me! That's a fact. My point is not to turn everything into an Amish horse and carriage, but it's just that there are so many useless features on cars nowadays. Now they have power seats, automatic doors, even automatic winshield wipers and steros that automatically adjust volume. Is all that stuff a necessity? Not even a necessity, but is it even more convienent? Look at how much trouble the climate control is causing. Don't you think we're making it a little too easy to drive a car?

    True, maybe the power seats offer more adjustability, but I didn't think that a quarter of an inch would make that big of difference in driving comfort, you'd have to have a pretty sensitive bottom to notice. Even then, I'm sure they could easily figure out a way to offer infintely adjustable manual seats.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    So long as they work I'm all for em :)

    Love all the nice things in my SVX and Trooper. Both have power everything including auto-climate :)

    -mike
  • gened1gened1 Member Posts: 256
    Yes that quarter of an inch does make a difference with we vertically challenged people.
    If Subaru did make an infinitely adjustable manual seat then fine but until that day comes Subaru turn on the power!!
    I don't think all those power options you refer to make driving easier. To the contrary they distract from the true driving experience and make dealing with them harder. Look at the cell phone problems.
    A good bumper sticker... Hang up and drive!!
    Gene
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    Don't get me started on another rant about cell phones, I've just calmed down. I wish they would install cell phone jammers along the highways and streets.

    You asked, here it is.

    http://cartalk.cars.com/About/Drive-Now/bumper-sticker.html
  • shoedog27shoedog27 Member Posts: 5
    We bought a Forester XS which my wife drives most of the time. I agree the climate control on the Forester is a little quirky and hit or miss at best.

    I drive a '98 Olds Intrigue which also has climate control. I set the temperature and turn it on auto and forget about it. It keeps me warm in the winter and cool in the summer. The only time I change it is to put the defroster on if the windshield is frosted over in the morning.

    Not sure why Subaru has trouble with climate control
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    The SVX one works like your olds intrigue same with the trooper, I keep it on 72-73 degrees and the only adjustments I make are: Defrost or "econ" in winter or "auto" in summer (auto will engage the A/C, econ doesn't use the A/C)

    -mike
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    zizzag: yes, you can override the auto climate control and go to partial or full manual mode. In this respect, the system on the Forester is better than the one on the H6 Outbacks. I can also go to manual mode on the Outback, but it's harder to use.

    My biggest grips is that the system always seems to be doing something. In my WRX, I can set the fan, temp, and mode once, and drive around for days without an issue. Don't even think about it. In contrast, the auto systems always seem to be in my face, demanding some sort of correction.

    Craig
  • windy6windy6 Member Posts: 57
    Sheesh do I feel dumb! Hold the UNLOCK switch down to unlock the other 4 doors. Works like a charm, I guess every other car we've ever had or rented it was 2 pushes to open the other doors. I guess that explains why one time in 100 it would work.
    Now if you could just figure out why we can't get more than 22 MPG! And it is broken in now with 65000 miles. Other than that we love the little beast.
    windy
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    It's still green, wait til 10K to start complaining... :)

    -mike
  • jtm4jtm4 Member Posts: 60
    I wonder if Subaru changed their keyless entry system after '98. My brother's 01 Forester requires 2 hits to open the other 4 doors. Also, I've noticed the auto lock switches, on the '01, work in the opposite direction than my '98.

    Jim
  • nypaulnypaul Member Posts: 35
    joseph50 a few posts ago you said..."I would pay plenty extra for manual roll-up windows. "

    Well if you're serious just bring your check book and I'll sell you my 1971 VW bus. Oh, and the new engine istallation is almost finished! It'll be ready for camping season in a few days. :)

    Paul
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    Yes, it requires 2 hits to unlock all the doors and the gate.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Some of you may remember this shot. Here are the "before, during & after" shots.

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=33- 0184

    Bob
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    All I can think of seeing those pictures is that music you hear in movies (can't think of the actual name right now)....

    da da da daaa da, da da da daaa da.....

    -Brian
  • gened1gened1 Member Posts: 256
    Good thing you have a day job!!!
    LOL
    Gene
  • subaru2004subaru2004 Member Posts: 9
    I am considering the purchase of my first Subaru. I would appreciate opinions on which vehicle you would want on a cross country trip with som offroading to scenic sites.
    The choices would be:
    Impezza WRX wagon,
    outback wagon,
    forester xs or xt.

    What is the 0-60 time for 165 hp 5sp Forester?

    Are their any Subaru Clubs iin Southern California?
    Does any club do caravanning trips?

    Thanks for any input.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    << I am considering the purchase of my first Subaru. I would appreciate opinions on which vehicle you would want on a cross country trip with some offroading to scenic sites. >>

    Forester 2.5XT.

    << What is the 0-60 time for 165 hp 5sp Forester? >>

    9&#150;10 second range.

    << Are their any Subaru Clubs iin Southern California? >>

    Check www.nasioc.com or www.i-club.com. They both have chapters across the USA. You can post questions on their web sites.

    << Does any club do caravanning trips? >>

    Possibly, but I don't know for sure. Again, check with nasioc or the I-Club.

    Bob
  • subaru2004subaru2004 Member Posts: 9
    Thanks for the info Bob.
    Have you taken a Forester on a long trip?
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    But I've driven our '01 Forester ~ 450 miles in one day, a number of times. It was fine. The new 2.5XT should be great.

    My guess an Outback H-6 would be even more comfortable, but not as good off-road as the Forester (worse angle of approach and departure).

    Bob
  • windy6windy6 Member Posts: 57
    We have, 3 trips from Austin Texas to Cincinnati OH, in our '97 L model. Different times of year, varying weather. I'm 6'1" 195 lbs. We're in our 50s and have been comfortable on long drives. No aching backs or cramped feelings. It's not as comfortable as our Grand Marquis was or our Maxima is but our 55 lb dog doesn't get to ride in those and she does get to go in the Subie.
    The car is a great hauler, I buy and rehab houses and I can put lots of stuff in the back and on the roof and it's actually better at this than our Jeep Cherokees were.
    Good luck on your search.
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    A couple of long trips for my Forester: to/from suburban Philadelphia to outside of Myrtle Beach, SC; and to/from the same point to Asheville, NC via Skyline Drive, the Blue Ridge Parkway, and I-81. For the SC trip it was all one shot one way, one stop in VA the other; the Blue Ridge trip averaged about 200 mi/day but lots of sightseeing involved.

    Everything went well and the car was comfortable enough for long drives. The heated seats were nice for the cool Appalachian mornings and evenings as well.

    Ed
  • leo2633leo2633 Member Posts: 589
    We own a 2001 Forester S and a 2002 Outback wagon. Even though the OB is larger overall, with a smoother, quieter ride, I'd prefer taking the Forester on a long trip. I find the driver's seat area a little less cramped in the Forester. Perhaps it's the more upright seating position. I'm 6'1" and around 200 lbs. Hope this helps.

    Len
  • subaru2004subaru2004 Member Posts: 9
    Thanks to all of you, for taking the time to reply to my message.

    Do any of you find the 165 hp model to have sufficient power for hills, passing merging etc?

    Ron
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Ron,

    I own a 98 Forester S (5-speed) and I find it has sufficient power for everything you've listed. One of the reasons why I purchased the Forester was that it was really the only mini-ute that had decent power at the time. Even at altitude (5000-6000 ft) the Forester does well with cargo and passengers.

    Remember that it's really torque that matters for acceleration and the Forester has very good low-mid range torque of 166 ft-lbs.

    I've taken my Forester on 500-1000 mile road trips and I find it very pleasurable to drive. I find the seats comfortable and the ride nicely soaks up any expansion joints. It's really a great all-around vehicle.

    Ken
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    nothing more. I wish it had more power. That's why I'm looking forward to the new turbo XT model.

    Bob
  • kajkokajko Member Posts: 70
    Bob, congratz on the 10000th message!

    Ron, my wife and i recently (nov02) purchased the Forester X. so far, we took it on a week-long trip through NM and AZ, and plenty of weekend and 3-day drives around northern NM. next month we are doing a 10 day trip through southern AZ, San Diego and then back to NM through Grand Canyon. it´s nimble and plenty of power at high altitudes (most of northern NM is above 6000ft). as far as cargo hauling, on the week-long trip we used a Yakima 11 cu ft box for all the camping gear. no reason it wouldn´t fit inside but we liked the convenience of having room to sleep in the back.

    as to your other choices, my boss has a WRX and loves it, but would like to have more room in the back for stuff on trips, also he is limited to very "nice" gravel roads. another professor i know likes his Outback because of more room to sleep in the back, but it does suffer on rough roads because of overhang and larger wheelbase. also keep in mind that the H4 is the same engine as the Forester but the car is much heavier.

    don´t know about caravanning clubs in so CA, but ducktapeguy should know. we´ll try exploring parts of Anza Borrego State Park on our trip. That is a great place!

    cheers, tom
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    Go to the Forester section on nasioc.com. There are a few of use Socal subarus there, and we do meet up sometimes. It's usually at the WRX/impreza meets, but they don't seem to mind us being there. And the 165 hp is decent, it's enough to get me in trouble. But overall, I think its a good balance between hp and fuel efficiency. As for trips, I average 100+ miles a day, longest trip was 1500 miles. No problems
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Duck: that rant had me ROTFLMAO.

    I agree that the folks at Dodge keep adding gadgetry instead of improving a transmission that fails more often than not at about 80k. Funny how the warranty is 70k now, it's like they plan it that way!

    My dad had a talking car, a 1986 Mercury Cougar. It was amusing the first time, then annoying after that.

    I feel the opposite way that Len does. The Forester is a better city car, easier to manuever in tight spots, easier to park, and more fun to point-and-squirt.

    But IMO our Legacy is a better highway car for trips. Longer wheelbase, smoother ride, and bigger gas tank means more range. The back seat is roomier if they're not kids back there.

    But still, we've taken the Forester up to CT a couple of times, about 7 hours driving each way, and it was fine.

    -juice
  • ken_from_njken_from_nj Member Posts: 105
    have no problems with the auto climate control on our 03 xs prem. seems to work just fine with me. just wanted to say not all are unhappy with it. what i don't like is fact the map lights don't light up when opening the front doors - at nite this is my pet peeve as it makes visibility in the front of the cabin difficult after dark.
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    have the overhead light in the middle position? It is a bit rearward of the map lights, but it works fine for me at night.

    John
  • leo2633leo2633 Member Posts: 589
    I agree that the two map lights should come on with the dome light when you open the doors. My '01 Forester and my wife's '02 Outback are the same as your '03, not bright enough in front at night. (Of course, my 45 year old eyes have nothing to do with that!)

    Len (also from NJ)
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Just catching up...

    Power seats: go in the nice-to-have category (but if you have one, make it one with memory).

    Mileage: I've always gotten better than the EPA estimates but then I drive pretty conservatively most of the time.

    Life expectancy of the clutch: Too many variables to predict how long a clutch will last but the number one reason for failure is driver abuse. With a used car, there's no telling how it was driven so when the clutch will fail is a big unknown.

    Speed-sensitive stereo: Personally, I think it's a great invention. I always notice and appreciate it when I drive a GM vehicle (that and the radio automatically going off when you take the key out of the ignition are virtually the only things I appreciate about GM though).

    Which Subaru to get: First off, you do realize that you're asking in a somewhat biased forum? In any case, I think it depends on what you value the most. The Outback offers the most people/cargo hauling capacity and is quieter and comes across as slightly more refined. The WRX has the least cargo space but the most oomph and the best handling. The Forester really is a compromise between the two extremes offering decent cargo hauling while retaining fairly sporty handling characteristics. (Hey, sounds like Goldilocks and the three bears!) And has been pointed out, the Forester is best suited of the three for venturing off-road. While the engine and acceleration really are adequate, I do at times, find myself having to downshift to maintain speed on steep mountain climbs but now, with the addition of a turbo, the XT should be approaching perfection as far as I'm concerned.

    -Frank P.
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    kajko,
    How are the springs, did you finish installing them? I wanna see some pictures! When are you gonna be going to AB? I might be there sometime next month also. If I see your car, I'll stick a piece of ducktape on the winshield so you'll know it's me. And if you see my car, leave a $20 under the wiper so I know you saw me.

    Just so I'm not misunderstood, I'm not against progress. I like gadgets as much as the next guy, but when I see some of the useless crap coming from Ford or GM, I just wonder what the hell the engineers are thinking. They can spend all this time and money in making power running boards (like regular running boards on those SUV's weren't useless enough, now they're motorized), automatic fold down rear seats, and voice activated doors. But they still can't make a car that won't be recalled in the first year or one that last beyond warranty. I think the point of my rant (if it had a point) was to concentrate on the important items first, and then add all the useless gadgets. If it were Toyota, they've already proved they can make a decent car, so I'd say if they want to start making everything automated, then good for them.
  • subaru2004subaru2004 Member Posts: 9
    Tom:
    Thanks for the info.
    Is their enough room in the Forester for a 6 footer to sleep with the second row folded?
  • windy6windy6 Member Posts: 57
    Thanks again to everyone for the help with the door remote problem.
    Now 3 other questions. It's time for the General tires to go! Any recommendations for a tire that's good in rain, we see 1 snow day every other year but lots of "frog drowning rains", we don't off-road, just use it as an around town car. If we take the dog we make road trips so something quiet running is good.

    What mileage are most of you replacing timing belts? We're at 62,000 now and my experience most TBs last 90K or more. Is the Subie a non-interference motor like my Miata? or should I just suck it up pay the ?? hundred dollars and do it soon?

    Gas consumption has been the only weak point of our Subie. We got rid of a 93 Jeep Chickoree with a 4.0L High Output and it got as good mileage as the Forester! About 20 in town, but only 21-22 Highway. It doesn't matter which of us drive, it stays the same. I cruise at 80 MPH, she cruises at 70 and it might make 1/2 MPG if one of us drives then entire tank. You would think that the RPM dropping from 3000-3100 @80 to 25-2600 at 70 might make some difference.

    I appreciate all the help I've gotten on this site.
    windy6
  • ken_from_njken_from_nj Member Posts: 105
    tks leo&john,
    my dome light is set in the middle position &
    does come on when the doors are open but it is
    behind that massive hole in the roof thus set back
    to far to provide adequate lighting in the front, not to mention that a baby seat is presently located in the rear seat center position facing backwards (i know - that's my problem) which also limits the light waves from reaching the front of the vechicle to my satisfaction. just a personal gripe.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Sleeping: I could fit a 6' step ladder in my Forester with about 2' to spare with the front seat down. I think you should be able to sleep in it.

    Tires: Most all season tires will do well for what you're looking for. Look for tires with a traction A or AA rating. Some tires that would fit your needs would be:
    Dunlop SP Sport A2
    Dunlop SP5000 (that's what I currently use)
    Yokohama Avid H4

    Timing belt: Recommended replacement is at 105K miles. I'd suggest doing it at 90K. Have the dealer do the accessory belts at the same time since they'll have the front cover off anyway. Also, inspect the water pump while they're in there too.

    Gas: That does sound a bit on the low side, but not completely unusual. What tire pressures do you run?

    Ken
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Cool ad, they should add a bike rack to that roof on the Forester!

    Hey guys, check this out:

    http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4291908527&p=4235998858- - &idx=18

    Need to haul lumber home? No problem. I had 4 plywood/OSB sheets on the roof, 4'x8', 3/8" thick each. Had another one cut up inside. The guy at Home Depot wrapped it with plastic wrap, but I'm sure tying it down would have worked just as well.

    To be honest I didn't even feel the weight, although there was a lot of noise from the flapping of the plastic.

    2004: try this, remove all the head rests. Fold the rear seats flat, then move the front seats forward and fold them back, flush with the 2nd row. Now put an inflatable bed over the whole area. You should be able to sleep there, easily. I fit four pieces of plywood, 12"x8' each, inside, hatch closed, with room to spare. So unless you're 9' tall you should fit. :-)

    windy6: was that Cherokee a 4WD model? That's pretty good mileage for a 4.0l.

    The timing belt is supposed to be inspected at 90k. I say just change it then while you have the labor paid for, even though it's designed to last 105k.

    -juice
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Windy6- I'm at a loss to explain your mileage. My previous car was a 92 Cherokee 4.0L with 4WD and I usually averaged around 20 mpg on my mostly highway commute. My Forester gets 27.5 mpg on the same commute.

    -Frank P.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.